This study examines the trend of health care spending, availability and use of medical services, and aggregate health outcome of the 24 industrialized member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Major differences between the United States and other OECD countries are highlighted and discussed. The results of the study demonstrate that, over the past four decades, the United States has been spending more and accomplishing less when compared with other industrialized nations. The United States needs to learn from the successful experience of other nations. Redesigning the system of health care delivery in the United States may be the only viable option to improve the quality of health care.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Roemer M. NationalStrategies for Health Care Organization: A World Overview. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1985.
2.
Hagland MMLooking abroad for changes to the U.S. health care system. Hospitals1991;20:30-31.
3.
Iglehart JKHealth policy report: Canada's health care system. Part 1. N Engl J Med1986;315:202-208.
4.
Iglehart JKHealth policy report: Canada's health care system. Part 2. N Engl J Med1986;315:778-784.
5.
Iglehart JKHealth policy report: Canada's health care system. Part 3. N Engl J Med1986;315:1623-1628.
6.
Rakich JSThe Canadian and U.S. health care systems: Profiles and policies. Hosp Health Serv Admin1991;36:25-41.
7.
Weil TPThe German health care system: A model for hospital reform in the United States ? Hosp Health Serv Admin1992;37:533-547.
8.
Hagland MMGermany: universal coverage leads to efficiency, praise. Hospitals1991;20:31-32.
9.
Johnsson J.Health care "down under": Success, with reservations. Hospitals1991;20:32-33.
10.
Anderson, HJTwo systems in change: Japan and the Netherlands . Hospitals1991;20:4-35.
11.
Saltman RBEmerging trends in the Swedish health system. Int J Health Serv1991;21:615-623.
12.
Blendon RJ, Donelan K., Jovell AJ, et al. Spain's citizens assess their health care system. Health Affairs1991, Fall, pp. 217-228.
13.
Day P., Klein R.Britain's health care experiment. Health Affairs1991, Fall, pp. 39-59.
14.
Altman S., Jackson T.Health care in Australia: lessons from down under. Health Affairs1991, Fall, pp.129—146.
15.
Ikegami N.Japanese health care: Low cost through regulated fees. Health Affairs1991, Fall, pp. 87-109.
16.
Grumbach K. , Fry J.Managing primary care in the United States and the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med1993;328:940-945.
17.
Fielding JE , and Lancry PJLessons from France: Vive la difference. JAMA1993;270:748-756.
18.
Elling, RHTheory and method for the cross-national study of health systems. Int J Health Serv1994;24:285-309.
19.
Harrison S.The dynamics of health care organization in Britain. J Public Health Policy1994, Autumn, pp. 283—297.
20.
Schieber GJ, Pollier JPInternational health spending: issues and trends. Health Affairs1991, Spring, 106—116.
21.
Schieber GJ, Pollier JP, Greenwald LMHealth care systems in twenty-four countries. Health Affairs1991, Fall, pp. 22-38.
22.
Hurst JWReforming health care in seven European nations. Health Affairs1991, Fall, pp. 7—21.
23.
Department of Health and Human Services.Health United States. U.S. DHHS Pub. No. ( PHS) 93-1232, Hyattsville, MD, August 1993.
24.
Levit KR, Lazenby HC, Cowan CA, et al. Health spending by state: new estimates for policy making. Health Affairs1993, Fall, pp. 7—26.
25.
Shi L.The relationship between primary care and life chances. J Health Care Poor Underserved1992;3:321-335.
26.
Shi L.Primary care, specialty care, and life chances. Int JHealth Serv1994;24:431-458.
27.
Shi L.Public health, medical care, and mortality rates. J Health Care Poor Underserved1995;6:307-321.
28.
Shi L.Balancing primary versus specialty care. J R Soc Med1995;88:428-432.
29.
Donabedian, A.Exploration in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. Vol. I: The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1980.
30.
Donabedian, A.Twenty years of research on the quality of medical care, 1964-1984. Eval Health Professions1985;3:243-265.
31.
Donabedian, A.The quality of health care: How can it be assessed. JAMA1988;260:1743-1748.
32.
Guadagnoli E., McNeil BJOutcome research: Hope for the future or the latest rage. Inquiry1994;31:14—24.
33.
Parkerson GR , Broadhead WE, Tse CJHealth status and severity of illness as predictors of outcomes in primary care. Med Care1995 ;33:53-66.
34.
Bailit H., Federico J., McGivney W.Use of outcomes studies by a managed care organization: Valuing measured treatment effects. Medical Care1995;33:AS216—AS225.
35.
Kitzhaber JAPrioritizing health services in an era of limits: The Oregon experience. BMJ1993;307-373.
36.
Ahcpr.Rural health care research: impacting vulnerable populations. NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, February 8, 20(6), 1991.
37.
Ahcpr.National Medical Expenditure Survey: Questionnaires and Data Collection Methods for the Medical Provider Survey. (AHCPR Pub. No. 92-0042)Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1992.
38.
Ahcpr.Health services research on rural health. NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts , 21(16), May 1992.
39.
Ahcpr.Medical treatment effectiveness research: Part II. NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, May 13, 23(18), 1994.
40.
Ahcpr.Medical treatment effectiveness research: Summary. NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, June 10, 23(22), 1994.
41.
Greenfield S., Nelson ECRecent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. Med Care1992;30(suppl):MS23-MS41.
42.
Schieber GJ , Pollier JP, Greenwald LMU.S. health expenditure performance: An international comparison and data update. Health Care Finan Rev1992;13:1—87.
43.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: OECD Health Systems: Facts and Trends. Paris, 1992.
44.
Schieber GJ , Pollier JPAdvancing the debate on international spending comparisons. Health Affairs1991, Fall, pp. 199-200.
45.
Barer ML, Welch WP, Antioch L.Canadian-U.S. health care: Reflections on the HIAA's analysis. Health Affairs1991;10:229—236.
46.
Parkin D., McGuire A., Yule B.Aggregate health care expenditures and national income. J Health Econ1987;6:109-127.
47.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: National Accounts, 1992. Vol. I, Part VIII. Paris, 1992.
48.
Levy E.The search for health indicators. Int Social Sci J1977;29:433-463.
49.
Larson JSPredictors of international health status. Eval Health Professions1992; 15:299-312.
50.
Leigh JPInternational comparisons of physicians' salaries. Int J Health Serv1992;22:217-220.
51.
Bergner M.Measurement of health status. Med Care1985 ;23:696-704.
52.
Rice DPHealth Status and national health priorities. West JMed1991;154:294-302.
53.
Centers for Disease Control.Health status indicators: definitions and national data. Statistical Notes1992;1:1—8.
54.
Miller DCHandbook of Research Design and Social Measurement, 5th Ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications , 1991.
55.
Smeeding TMCross-national comparisons of inequality and poverty position. In: Osberg, L., ed. Economic Inequality and Poverty: International Perspective. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1991.
56.
Mishel L., Frankel DMThe State of Working America, 1990-1991. Armonk, NY: Economic Policy Institute, ME Sharpe Inc., 1991.
57.
Schroeder SA , Sandy LGSpecialty distribution of U.S. physicians: The invisible driver of health care costs. N Engl J Med1993;328:961-963.
58.
Schroeder SAThe troubled profession: is medicine's glass half full or half empty? Ann Intern Med1992 ;116:583-592.
59.
American Medical Association.Physician marketplace statistics 1992. Chicago: American Medical Association, 1992;71.
60.
Navarro V.The public private mix in the funding and delivery of health services: an international survey. Am J Public Health1985 ;75:1318-1320.
61.
Abel-Smith B.Cost containment and new priorities in the European community. Milbank Q1992;70:393-415.
62.
Aday LA, Andersen, R.A framework for the study of access to medical care. Health Serv Res1974;9:208-220.
63.
Brown REAccess to health insurance in the United States. Med Care Rev1989;46:349—385.
64.
Newhouse J. , Friedlander L.The relationship between medical resources and measures of health: some additional evidence. J Hum Resources1980;15:200-218.
65.
Lena HF, London B.The political and economic determinants of health outcomes: a cross-national analysis. Int J Health Serv1993;23:585-602.
66.
Ware, JEThe assessment of health status. In:LH Aiken LH, Mechanic D, eds. Applications of Social Science to Clinical Medicine and Health Policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1986; 204-228.
67.
Steinwachs DMApplication of health status assessment measures in policy research. Med Care1989;27(suppl):S12-S26.
