We wished to determine if a claims-based method for severity adjustment would predict mortality or survival in pneumonia based on age, gender, and secondary diag noses. We used a discriminant analysis model of severity of illness developed from Medicare Part A claims data. Our data base was taken from a hospitalized population age 65 years or older coded as DRG 89 (pneumonia with complications/comorbidities). There were 35,677 cases with a mortality = 11.2% in the derivation cohort from 1989 to 1990, and 19,915 cases with a mortality = 9.8% in the validation cohort from 1991. In the derivation cohort, 98% of patients predicted to live, lived, whereas 18% of patients predicted to die, died. Of the three vari ables, secondary diagnoses had greatest explanatory power. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the model performed best at 40% survival. Results were confirmed with the 1991 validation cohort. The model could be applied to hospitals with as few as 172 discharges. This simple, claims-based method can pre dict survival in pneumonia. It may be useful in selecting medical records for intensified review of medical quality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Wyszewianski L.The emphasis on measurement in quality assurance: reasons and implications. Inquiry1988;25:424-436.
2.
Berwick DMContinuous improvement as an ideal in health care. N Engl J Med1989;320:53-56.
3.
Goldman RLThe reliability of peer assessments of quality of care. JAMA1992;267:958-960.
4.
Lohr KN, Schroeder SAA strategy for quality assurance in Medicare. N Engl J Med1990;322:707-712.
5.
McMahon FM, Billi JEMeasurement of severity of illness and the Medicare prospective payment system: state of the art and future directions. J Gen Int Med1988;3:482-490.
6.
DesHarnais SI , Chesney JD, Wroblewski RT, et al. The risk-adjusted mortality index: a new measure of hospital performance. Med Care1988;26:1129-1148.
7.
American Hospital Association.The Hospital Administrator's Guide to Severity Measurement Systems. Chicago, American Hospital Association Research and Educational Trust, 1989.
8.
Thomas JW, Ashcraft Mlf.Measuring severity of illness: a comparison of interrater reliability among severity methodologies. Inquiry1989 ;26:483-492.
9.
Fink A., Yano EM, Brook RHThe condition of the literature on differences in hospital mortality . Med Care1989;27:315-336.
10.
Welch CE, Grover PLAn overview of quality assurance. Med Care1991;29:(suppl):AS8-AS28.
11.
McDonald CJ , Hui SLThe analysis of humongous databases: problems and promises. Stat Med1991;10:511-518.
12.
Jencks SF, Dobson A.Refining case-mix adjustment: the research evidence. N Engl J Med1987;317:679-686.
13.
Rubin HR, Wu AWThe risk of adjustment. Med Care1992 ; 30:973-975.
14.
Iezzoni LI, Ash AS, Coffman GA, et al. Predicting in-hospital mortality: a comparison of severity measurement approaches. Med Care1992;30:347-359.
15.
DesHarnais SI, McMahon LF, Wroblewski RT, et al. Measuring hospital performance: the development and validation of risk-adjusted indexes of mortality, readmissions and complications. Med Care1990 ;28:1127-1139.
16.
Fisher ES, Baron JA, Malenka DJ, et al. Overcoming potential pitfalls in the use of Medicare data for epidemiologic research. Am J Public Health1990;80:1487-1490.
17.
Steinberg EP , Whittle J., Anderson GFImpact of claims data research on clinical practice. Int J Technol Assess Health Care1990;6:282-287.
18.
Safran C.Using routinely collected data for clinical research. Stat Med1991;10:559-564.
19.
Connell FA, Diehr P., Hart LGThe use of large data bases in health care studies. Annu Rev Public Health1987;8:51-74.
20.
Iezzoni LIUsing administrative diagnostic data to assess the quality of hospital care: pitfalls and potential of ICD-9 CM. Int J Technol Assess Health Care1990;6:272-281.
21.
DesHarnais SICurrent uses of large data sets to assess the quality of providers: construction of risk-adjusted indexes of hospital performance. Int J Technol Assess Health Care1990;6:229-238.
22.
Concato J., Feinstein AR, Holford TRThe risk of determining risk with multivariable models. Ann Intern Med1993;118:201-210.
23.
Lemeshow S. , Hosmer DWA review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol1989;115:92.
24.
DesHarnais S., Chesney JD, Wroblewski RT, et al. The risk-adjusted mortality index: a new measure of hospital performance. Med Care1988;26:1129-1148.
25.
Daley J., Jencks S., Draper D., et al. Predicting hospital-associated mortality for Medicare patients: a method of patients with stroke, pneumonia, acute myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure. JAMA1988;260:3617-3624.
26.
Durocher A. , Saulnier F., Beuscart R., et al. A comparison of three severity score indexes in an evaluation of serious bacterial pneumonia . Intensive Care Med1988;14:39-43.
27.
Keeler EB, Kahn KL, Draper D., et al. Changes in sickness at at admission following the introduction of the prospective payment system. JAMA1990 ;264:1962-1968.
28.
Zweig S., Lawhorne L., Post R.Factors predicting mortality in rural elderly hospitalized for pneumonia. J Fam Pract1990;30:153-159.
29.
Smith DW, Pine M., Bailey RC, et al. Using clinical variables to estimate the risk of patient mortality . Med Care1991; 29: 1108-1129.
30.
Bradbury RC , Steams FE, Steen PMInterhospital variations in admission severity-adjusted hospital mortality and morbidity. Health Serv Res1991;26:407-424.
31.
Bums LR, Wholey DRThe effects of patient, hospital and physician characteristics on length of stay and mortality. Med Care1991 ;29:251-271.
32.
Weingarten SR, Riedinger MS, Varis G., et al. Identification of low-risk patients with pneumonia: Implications for early conversion to oral therapy. Chest1994;105:1109-1115.
33.
Fine MJ, Singer DE, Hanusa BH, et al. Validation of a pneumonia prognostic index using the MedisGroups comparative hospital data base. Am J Med1993 ;94:153-159.
