Epstein AMThe outcomes movement—will it get us where we want to go? N Engl J Med1990;323:266-270
2.
Roper WL, Winkenwerder W., Hackbarth GM, Krakauer H.Effectiveness in health care. An initiative to evaluate and improve medical practice. New Engl J Med1988;319:1197-1202.
3.
Guadagnoli E. , McNeil BJOutcomes research. Hope for the future or the latest rage?Inquiry1994;31:14-24.
4.
Iezzoni LI ed. Risk Adjustment for Measuring Health Care Outcomes. Ann Arbor, Health Administration Press, 1994.
5.
Iezzoni LI, Shwartz M., Restuccia J.The role of severity information in health policy debates: a survey of state and region concerns. Inquiry1991;28:117-128.
6.
Iezzoni LI, Shwartz M., Ash AS, Mackiernan Y., Hotchkin EKRisk adjustment methods can affect perceptions of outcomes. Am J Med Quality1994;9:43-48.
7.
Iezzoni LI, Restuccia JD, Shwartz M., Schaumburg D., Coffman GA, Kreger BE, Butterly JR, Selker HPThe utility of severity of illness information in assessing the quality of hospital care. Med Care1992;30:428-444.
8.
Shapiro MF, Park RE, Keesey J., Brook RHThe effect of alternative case-mix adjustments on mortality differences between municipal and voluntary hospitals in New York City. Health Serv Res1994;29:95-112.
9.
Quality Measurement and Management Project.The Hospital Administrator's Guide to Severity Measurement Systems. Chicago, IL: The Hospital Research and Education Trust of the American Hospital Association, 1989.
10.
Aronow DBSeverity-of-illness measurement: applications in quality assurance and utilization review. Med Care Rev1988;45:339-366.
11.
Iezzoni LISeverity standardization and hospital quality assessment. In: Couch, JB, ed. Health Care Quality Management for the 21st Century. Tampa, FL, The American College of Physician Executives, Hillsboro Printing Company, 1994:177-234.
12.
Iezzoni LI 'Black box' medical information systems: a technology needing assessment . JAMA1991;265:3006-3007.