In this article, we have examined evidence that supports inferences regarding the critical role of pri mary care in determining the ultimate quality and success of our health care system as a whole. It seems clear that this nation has a critical need to correct the rapidly eroding structure and impact of our primary care system. We have suggested several strategies necessary to improve the United States primary care system. We need to correct the numeric imbalance of generalists to specialists by enhancing motivation to enter this career field. To enhance primary care as a career choice, we must increase the status, contribu tion, and rewards of primary practitioners. Finally, to facilitate future growth and success, we must en hance the scholarly base of knowledge in this field, particularly as related to quality improvement tech nology and managed health care.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Fuchs VRThe sector's share of the gross national product. Science1990;247:534-538.
2.
Levit KR, Lazenby HC, Cowan CA et al. National health expenditures. Health Care Financing Rev1990;13:29-54.
3.
Blendon RJ, Leitman R., Morrison, I. et al. Satisfaction with health systems in ten nations. Health Aff1990;185-192.
4.
Starfield B.Primary care and health: a cross-national comparison . JAMA1991;266:2268-2271.
5.
Brennan TA, Russell JL, Laird NLReliability and validity of judgments concerning adverse events suffered by hospitalized patients. Med Care1989;27:1148-1158.
6.
Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med1991 ;324:370-376.
7.
Brennan TA, Localio AR, Leape LL et al. Identification of adverse events occurring during hospitalization: a cross sectional study of litigation, quality assurance, and medical records at two teaching hospitals. Ann Intern Med1990;112:221-226.
8.
Rhee S-O.Relative Influence of Specialty Status on Quality of Medical Care. (Multivariate analysis of Payne & Lyons data.) Doctoral Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 1975.
9.
Elstein AS, Shulman, LS, Sprafka. Medical problem solving: a ten year retrospective . Eval Health Prof1990;13:5-36.
10.
Schmidt HG, Norman, GR, Boshuizen, Hpa.A cognitive perspective on medical expertise. Acad Med1990;65:611-621.
11.
Ingbar ML, Williamson JWDetermining societal importance of health problems, in Williamson JW (ed): Teaching Quality Assurance . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982 , p 91.
12.
White KLLife and death and medicine. Sci Am1973 ;229:23-33.
13.
Brook RH, Kamberg CJ, Mayer-Oakes A. et al. Appropriateness of Acute Medical Care for the Elderly: An Analysis of the Literature. Santa Monica, CA, Rand Corp., 1989.
14.
Williamson JW, Fehlauer, CS, Gaiennie , MA et al. Assessing quality of ambulatory care . Qual Assurance Utilization Rev1991;6:8-15.
15.
Wu AW, Folkman S., McPhee, SJ et al. Do house officers learn from their mistakes? JAMA1991;265:2089-2094.
16.
Colwill JMWhere have all the primary care applicants gone?N Engl J Med1992;326:387-409.
17.
Davis K.Implications of an expanding supply of physicians: evidence from a cross-sectional analysis. Johns Hopkins Med J1982;150:55-64.
18.
Berenson R., Holahan J.Sources of growth in Medicare physician expenditures. JAMA1992;267:687.
19.
Budetti PPAchieving a uniform federal primary care policy: opportunities presented by national health reform. JAMA1993;269:498-501.
20.
Peterson MC, Holbrook JH, Hales, DV et al. Contributions of the history, physical examination, and laboratory investigation in making medical diagnoses. West J Med1992;156:163-165.
21.
Williamson JWAssessing and Improving Health Care Outcomes: The Health Accounting Approach to Quality Assurance. Cambridge, MA, Ballinger Publishing Co., 1978.
22.
Ellwood PMShattuck lecture: outcomes management: a technology of patient experience . N Engl J Med1988 ;318:1549-1556.
