This study examined all Medicare beneficiary complaints about quality of care submitted to the California Peer Review Organization (PRO) over 18 months. The complaint rate was low, and a medical record review by the PRO only confirmed 13% of the complaints. Managed Care Organization (MCO) members filed significantly more complaints about denial and/or delays in receiving services and the failure to refer to specialists. Fee-for-service complaints focused on inpatient hospital services, particularly premature discharge, discharge planning, admission necessity, and unnecessary tests. The PRO review process took over 7 months, and the findings were generally not released to the complainants.
DavisARWareJE. Involving consumers in quality of care assessment. Health Aff (Millwood). 1988;7:33–48.
2.
GoldMWooldridgeJ. Surveying consumer satisfaction to assess managed-care quality: current practices. Health Care Financing Rev. 1995;16:155–173.
3.
FeldmanSERundallTG. PROs and the health care quality improvement initiative: insights from 50 cases of serious medical mistakes. Med Care Rev. 1993;50:123–151.
4.
LevitKCowanCBradenBNational health expenditures in 1997: more slow growth. Health Aff (Millwood). 1998;17:99–110.
5.
RoperWLHackbarthGM. HCFA's agenda for promoting high-quality care. Health Aff (Millwood). 1998;7:91–106.
6.
ChassinMR, Galvin RW, and the National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. (1998). The urgent need to improve health care quality. JAMA. 1998;280:1000–1005.
7.
BrookRH. Managed care is not the problem, quality is. JAMA. 1997;1278:1612–1614.
8.
LeapeLL. Error in medicine. JAMA. 1994;272:1851–1857.
9.
LeapeLLBrennanTALairdNThe nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:377–384.
10.
BlumenthalD. Quality of health care. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:891–893; 966–969; 1060–1063; 1146–1149; 1227–1230.
11.
SchusterMAMcGlynnEABrookRH. How good is the quality of health care in the United States?. Milbank Q. 1998;76:517–563.
12.
ChassinMR. Assessing strategies for quality improvement. Health Aff (Millwood). 1997;16:151–161.
13.
ChassinMR. Is health care ready for six sigma quality. Milbank Q. 1998;76:565–591.
14.
AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Ethical issues in managed care. JAMA. 1995;273:330–335.
15.
FriedmanE. Capitation, integration, and managed care: lessons from early experiments. JAMA. 1996;275:957–993.
16.
The President's Advisory Commission on Health Consumer Protection and Quality in the Health Care Industry. Quality First: Better Health Care for All Americans. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1998.
GonzalesRSteinerJFSandeMA. Antibiotic prescribing for adults with colds, upper respiratory track infections, and bronchitis by ambulatory care physicians. JAMA. 1997;278:901–904.
19.
ChassinMRKosecoffJParkREDoes inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health services? A study of three procedures. JAMA. 1987;253:2533–2537.
20.
BatesDWSpellNCullenDJThe costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. JAMA. 1997;277:307–311.
21.
BrennanTALeapeLLLairdNMIncidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:370–376.
22.
Grievances, organization determinations and appeals, 63Federal Register560–664 (1998) (codified at 42 CFR §422).
23.
Social Security Act, 42 USC §1154(a)14.
24.
Qualified health maintenance organizations: organization and operation. 61Federal Register69366 (codified at 42 CFR 417.124 et seq).
25.
Grijalva v Shalala, F Supp WL 627497 (D Ariz 1996), 65 USLW 2320, Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 44, 734 (D Ariz 1996).
26.
Social Security Act, 42 USC §1320 (1974).
27.
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986 (Pub L No 99-509).
28.
42 CFR §464–466.
29.
US Health Care Financing Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare Peer Review Organization Manual. Rockville, Md: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1997. HCFA Transmittal 64.
30.
Office of Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services. The Beneficiary Complaint Process of the Medicare Peer Review Organizations. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1995. OEI-01-93-00250.
31.
RodwinMC. Consumer protection and managed care: the need for organized consumers. Health Aff (Millwood). 1996;15:110–123.
32.
DallekGHarperAJimenexCMedicare Risk-Contract HMOs in California: A Study of Marketing, Quality, and Due Process Rights. Los Angeles: Medicare Advocacy Project; 1993.
33.
RubensteinLVKahnKLReinischEJChanges in quality of care for five diseases measured by implicit review, 1981 to 1986. JAMA. 1990;264:1974–1978.
