As design review and multicultural constituencies become more and more prevalent, planners will have increasing needs to make aesthetic decisions that may be contingent on social or cultural factors. Accordingly, it would be useful for planners to have access to the body of empirical literature that has been published on the demographic effects in environmental aesthetics. A literature review found 107 relevant references. These references covered more than 19,000 respondents and 3,281 environmental scenes. Overall, the correlation of preferences between different demographic groups was r = .82. Correlations are also reported for the following factors: multiculturalism, designers and other people, students and other people, children and adults, gender, and special interest groups. Correlations were very high except for children, designers and others for avant-garde architecture, and special interest groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramowitz, S. I.
, and B. Gomes. 1975. Publish or politic: Referee bias in manuscript review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology5, 3: 187-200.
2.
Anderson, Thomas W.
, Ervin H. Zube, and William P. MacConnell. 1976. Predicting scenic resource values. In Studies in landscape perception, E. H. Zube, ed., R-76-1: 6-69. Amherst: Institute of Man-Environment Relations, University of Massachusetts.
3.
Arthur, Louise M.
, and Ron S. Boster. 1976. Measuring scenic beauty: A selected annotated bibliography, RM-25. Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountains Forest and Range Experiment Station.
4.
Bacon, Francis.
[1605] 1952. Advancement of learning. Reprint, New York: Collier.
5.
Balling, John D.
, and John H. Faulk. 1982. Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior14, 1: 5-28.
6.
Beer, Ann R.1983. Development control and design quality: Part 2: Attitudes to design. Town Planning Review54, 4: 383-404.
7.
Brush, Robert O.1979. The attractiveness of woodlands: Perceptions of forest landowners in Massachusetts. Forest Science25, 3: 495-506.
8.
Buhyoff, Gregory J.
, and William A. Leuschner. 1978. Estimating psychological disutility from damaged forest stands. Forest Science24, 3: 424-432.
9.
Buhyoff, Gregory J.
, and Douglas Wellman. 1983. Landscape preference metrics: An international comparison. Journal of Environmental Management16: 181-190.
10.
Buhyoff, Gregory J.
, Douglas Wellman, H. Harvey, and R. A. Fraser. 1978. Landscape architect’s interpretations of people’s landscape preferences. Journal of Environmental Management6: 255-262.
11.
Calderon, Enrique1994. Design control in the Spanish planning system. Built Environment20, 2: 157-168.
12.
Cochran, William G.1937. Problems arising in analysis of a series of similar experiments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society4: 102-118.
13.
Cohen, Jacob
. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Cohen, Jacob
, and Patricia Cohen. 1993. Applied regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Cook, Thomas D.
, Harris Cooper, David S. Cordray, Heidi Hartman, Larry V. Hedges, Richard J. Light, Thomas A. Louis, and Frederick Mosteller, eds. 1994. Meta-analysis for explanation. New York: Russell Sage.
16.
Cooper, Harris M.1989. Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Cooper, Harris
, and Larry V. Hedges, eds. 1994. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage.
18.
Craik, Kenneth H.1973. Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology24: 403-422.
19.
Craik, Kenneth H.
, and Nickolaus R. Feimer. 1987. Environmental assessment. In Handbook of environmental psychology, D. Stokols and I. Altman, eds. New York: John Wiley.
20.
Cullingworth, Barry
. 1997. Planning in the USA: Policies, issues and processes. London: Routledge.
21.
Daniel, Terry C.
, and Ron S. Boster. 1976. Measuring landscape aesthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method. RM 167. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service.
22.
Daniel, Terry C.
, L. Wheeler, Ron S. Boster, and P. R. Best. 1973. Quantitative evaluation of landscapes: An application of signal detection analysis to forest management alternatives. Man-Environment Systems3: 330-344.
23.
Davidoff, Paul1965. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association31: 331-338.
24.
Dearinger, John A.1979. Measuring preferences for natural landscapes. Journal of the Urban Planning and Development Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers105, UP1: 63-80.
25.
Devlin, Ann S.1994. Children’s housing style preferences: Regional, socioeconomic, sex and adult comparisons. Environment and Behavior26, 4: 527-559.
26.
Devlin, Kimberly
, and Jack L. Nasar. 1989. The beauty and the beast: Some preliminary comparisons of “high” versus “popular” residential architecture and public versus architect judgments of same. Journal of Environmental Psychology9: 333-344.
27.
Dickersin, Kay.1990. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. Journal of the American Medical Association263, 10: 1385-1389.
28.
Dunn, M. C.1976. Landscape with photographs: Testing the preference approach to landscape evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management4: 15-26.
29.
Ellul, Jacques
. 1964. The technological society. New York: Knopf.
30.
Fisher, Ronald A.1932. Statistical methods for research workers. 4th ed.London: Oliver & Boyd.
31.
Gans, Herbert
. 1974. Popular culture and high culture. New York: Basic Books.
32.
Gilplin, Alan
. 1995. Environmental impact assessment: Cutting edge for the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
33.
Glass, G. V.1976. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher5: 3-8.
34.
Groat, Linda N.1989. Contextual compatibility in architecture: An issue of personal taste? In Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and applications, Jack L. Nasar, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
35.
Groves, Mark
, and Ross Thorne. 1988. Aspects of housing preferences: Revisiting a cross-cultural study with the hindsight of improved data analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology8: 45-55.
36.
Habe, Reiko
. 1989. Public design control in American communities. Town Planning Review60, 2: 195-219.
37.
Hedges, Larry V.
, and Ingram Olkin. 1985. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
38.
Hochberg, Yosef
, and Ajit C. Tamhane. 1987. Multiple comparison procedures. New York: John Wiley.
39.
Holahan, Charles J.1986. Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology37: 381-407.
40.
Hubbard, Philip
. 1994. Professional vs lay tastes in design control—An empirical investigation. Planning Practice and Research93: 271-287.
41.
Hunter, John E.
, and Frank L. Schmidt. 1990. Methods of meta-analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
Hutchenson, John D.1984. Citizen participation in neighborhood planning. American Planning Association Journal50, 2: 183-193.
43.
Jackson, John S.
, and William L. Shade. 1973. Citizen participation, demographic representation, and survey research. Urban Affairs Quarterly9: 57-89.
44.
Kaplan, Rachel
, and Eugene J. Herbert. 1989. Familiarity and preference: A cross-cultural analysis. In Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research and applications, Jack L. Nasar ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
45.
Kaplan, Rachel
, and Eugene J. Herbert. 1987. Cultural and sub-cultural comparisons in preferences for natural settings. Landscape and Urban Planning14: 281-293.
46.
Kellomaki, Seppo
, and Risto Savolainen. 1984. The scenic value of the forest-landscape as assessed in the field and the laboratory. Landscape Planning11: 97-107.
47.
Kocher, Sara
. 1988. Reliability and validity of assessment scales for scenic highways. In EDRA19 Peoples’ needs/planet management/paths to co-existence, Denise Lawrence, Rupert Habe, Art Hacker, and Drury Sherrod, eds. Norman, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.
48.
Light, Richard
, and David B. Pillemer. 1984. Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
49.
Lightner, Brenda C.1993. Survey of design review practices. Planning Advisory Service Memo. Chicago: American Planning Association.
50.
Loew, Sebastian
. 1994. Design control in France. Built Environment20, 2: 88-103.
51.
Lyons, Elizabeth
. 1983. Demographic correlates of landscape preference. Environment and Behavior15, 4: 487-511.
52.
Mahoney, M. J.1977. Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research1, 2: 161-175.
53.
Mann, Charles
. 1990. Meta-analysis in the breech. Science249: 476-480.
54.
Medina, Augusto Q.1983. Avisual assessment of children’s and environmental educator’s urban residential preference patterns. In The experience of nature: A psychological perspective, Rachel Kaplan and Stephen Kaplan, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
55.
Mehrabian, Albert
, and James Russell. 1974. An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge: MIT.
56.
Meng, Xiao-li
, and Robert Rosenthal. 1992. Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin111, 1: 172-175.
57.
Milbrath, Lester W.1981. Citizen surveys as citizen participation mechanisms. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science17, 4: 478-496.
58.
Miller, Rupert G.1980. Simultaneous statistical inference. New York: Springer-Verlag.
59.
Moore, Gary T.1987. Environment and behavior research in North America: History, developments, and unresolved issues. In Handbook of environmental psychology, Daniel Stokols and Irwin Altman, eds. New York: John Wiley.
60.
Mosteller, Frederick M.
, and Robert R. Bush. 1954. Selected quantitative techniques. In Handbook of social psychology: Vol. 1. Theory and method, G. Lindzey, ed. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
61.
Nasar, Jack L.1998. The evaluative image of the city. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
Nasar, Jack L.1989. Symbolic meaning of house styles. Environment and Behavior21, 3: 235-257.
63.
Nasar, Jack L.1984. Visual preferences in urban street scenes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology15, 1: 79-93.
64.
Nasar, Jack L.
, and Junmo Kang. 1989. A post-jury evaluation: The Ohio State University design competition for a center for the visual arts. Environment and Behavior21, 4: 464-484.
65.
Nelissen, Nico
, and C. L. de Vocht. 1994. Design control in the Netherlands. Built Environment20, 2: 142-156.
66.
Nystrom, Louise
. 1994. Design control in planning: The Swedish case. Built Environment20, 2: 113-126.
67.
Osgood, Charles
, George Suci, and Percy Tannenbaum. 1957. The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois.
68.
Palmer, James F.
, and Richard C. Smardon. 1989. Measuring human values associated with wetlands. In Intractable conflicts and their transformation, Louis Kriesberg, Terrell A. Northrup, and Stuart J. Thorson, eds. Ithaca, NY: Syracuse University.
69.
Pantel, Gunmar
. 1994. Design control in German planning. Built Environment20, 2: 104-112.
70.
Pearson, Karl
. 1904. Report on certain enteric fever inoculations. British Medical Journal2: 1243-1246.
71.
Pennartz, Paul J.
, and Marja Elsinga. 1990. Adults, adolescents, and architects: Differences in perception of the urban environment. Environment and Behavior22, 5: 675-714.
72.
Peron, E.
, Alan T. Purcell, Henk Staats, S. Falchero, and R. J. Lamb. 1998. Models of preference for outdoor scenes: Some experimental evidence. Environment and Behavior30, 3: 282-305.
73.
Pitt, David G.
, and Ervin H. Zube. 1987. Management of natural environments. In Handbook of environmental psychology, D. Stokols and I. Altman, eds. New York: John Wiley.
74.
Pountney, Melville T.
, and Peter W. Kingsbury. 1983. Aspects of development control: Part 2: The applicant’s view. Town Planning Review54, 3: 285-303.
75.
Purcell, Alan T.
, R. J. Lamb, E. M. Peron, and S. Falchero. 1994. Preference or preferences for landscape?Journal of Environmental Psychology14: 195-209.
76.
Redburn, Steve
, Terry F. Buss, Stephen K. Koster, and William C. Binning. 1980. How representative are mandated citizen participation processes?Urban Affairs Quarterly15: 345-352.
77.
Rodriguez, Gabriel
. 1995. Architects, non-architects and the image of the detached single-family house: Evaluation and preferences. Paper presented at the EDRA26 twenty-sixth annual conference of the Environmental Design Research Association, March 1-5, Boston.
78.
Rosenthal, Robert
, and Ralph L. Rosnow. 1991. Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
79.
Rosenthal, Robert
, and Donald B. Rubin. 1986. Meta-analytic procedures for combining studies with multiple effect sizes. Psychological Bulletin99, 3: 400-406.
80.
Saegert, Susan
, and Gary H. Winkel. 1990. Environmental PsychologyAnnual Review of Psychology41: 441-477.
81.
Scheer, Brenda C.
, and Wolfgang F. E. Preiser. 1994. Design review: Challenging urban aesthetic control. New York: Chapman & Hall.
82.
Schiffman, Irving
. 1989. Alternate techniques for managing growth. Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
83.
Schuster, J. Mark
. 1997. The role of design review in affecting the quality of urban design: The architect’s point of view. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research14, 3: 209-225.
84.
Seaton, R. W.
, and J. B. Collins. 1972. Validity and reliability of ratings of simulated buildings. In Environmental design: Research and practice, W. S. Mitchell, ed. Los Angeles: University of California.
85.
Shafer, Elwood L.
, and Thomas A. Richards. 1974. A comparison of viewer reactions to outdoor scenes and photographs of those scenes. US Forest Service Research Paper NE: 302.
86.
Shelby, Bo
, and Richard Harris. 1985. Comparing methods for determining visitor evaluations of ecological impacts: Site visits, photographs, and written descriptions. Journal of Leisure Research17, 1: 57-67.
87.
Smardon, Richard C.
, and James P. Karp. 1993. The legal landscape: Guidelines for regulating environmental and aesthetic quality. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
88.
Snedecor, G. W.1946. Statistical methods. 4th ed.Ames: Iowa State University.
89.
Stamps, Arthur E.1999. Sex, complexity, and preferences for residential facades. Perceptual and Motor Skills88: 1301-1312.
90.
Stamps, Arthur E.
1997. Meta-analysis in environmental research. In Space design and management for place making: Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Environmental Design Research Association, Maurice S. Amiel and Jacquiline C. Vischer, eds. Montreal, Canada and Edmond, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.
91.
Stamps, Arthur E.1996. People and places: Variance components of environmental preferences. Perceptual and Motor Skills82: 323-334.
92.
Stamps, Arthur E.1992. Pre-and postconstruction environmental evaluations. Perceptual and Motor Skills75: 481-482.
93.
Stamps, Arthur E.1991. Public preferences for high rise buildings: Stylistic and demographic effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills72: 839-844.
94.
Stamps, Arthur E.1990. Use of photographs to simulate environments: A meta-analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills71: 907-913.
95.
Stamps, Arthur E.
, and Sandra D. Miller. 1993. Advocacy membership, design guidelines, and predicting preferences for residential infill designs. Environment and Behavior25, 3: 367-409.
96.
Stamps, Arthur E.
, and Jack L. Nasar. 1997. Design review and public preferences: Effects of geographical location, public consensus, sensation seeking, and architectural styles. Journal of Environmental Psychology17: 11-32.
97.
State of California
. 1991. Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act as amended January 1, 1991. Administrative Code Title 14, chap. 2, s. 15000-15387.
98.
Stokols, Daniel
. 1978. Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology29: 253-295.
99.
Strumse, Elnar
. 1996. Demographic differences in the visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway. Journal of Environmental Psychology16: 17-31.
100.
Sudman, Seymour
. 1976. Applied sampling. New York: Academic Press.
101.
Sundstrom, E.1996. Environmental psychology 1989-1996. Annual Review of Psychology47: 485-512.
102.
Tips, Walter E.
, and Tongchai Savasdisara. 1986. Landscape preference evaluation and sociocultural background: A comparison among Asian countries. Journal of Environmental Management22: 113-124.
103.
Tognoli, Jerome
. 1987. Residential environments. In Handbook of environmental psychology, Vol. 1, Daniel Stokols and Irwin Altman, eds. New York: John Wiley.
104.
Ulrich, Roger
. 1977. Visual landscape preferences: A model and application. Man-environment systems7, 5: 279-293.
105.
Uzzell, David L.
, and Ellen M. Jones. 1996. Incorporating the visual impact of buildings into BREEAM: A study for the Building Research Establishment. Guilford, UK: University of Surrey.
106.
Verba, Sidney
, and Norman H. Nie.1972. Participation in America. New York: Harper & Row.
107.
Vignozzi, Allessandro
. 1994. Design control in Italian planning. Built Environment20, 2: 127-141.
108.
Weller, A.1991. Potential bias in editorial peer review: A study of U.S. medical journals. The Serials Librarian19, 3/4: 95-103.
109.
Wilson, Margaret A.1996. The socialization of architectural preference. Journal of Environmental Management16: 33-44.
110.
Winer, B. J.
, Donald R. Brown, and Kenneth M. Michels. 1991. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
111.
Wonnacott, Thomas H.
, and Ronald J. Wonnacott. 1969. Introductory statistics. New York: John Wiley.
112.
Yang, Byoung E.
, and Terry J. Brown. 1992. A cross-cultural comparison of preferences for landscape styles and landscape elements. Environment and Behavior24, 4: 471-507.
113.
Yates, F.
, and W. G. Cochran. 1938. The analysis of groups of experiments. Journal of Agricultural Science28: 556-580.
114.
Zube, Erwin H.1974. Cross-disciplinary and intermode agreement on the description and evaluation of landscape resources. Environment and Behavior6, 1: 69-89.
115.
Zube, Erwin H.1973. Rating everyday rural landscapes of the Northeastern U.S.Landscape Architecture63, 4: 371-375.
116.
Zube, Erwin H.
, and Louis V. Mills. 1976. Cross-cultural explorations in landscape perception. In Studies in landscape perception, Erwin H. Zube, ed. Amherst: Institute for Man and Environment, University of Massachusetts.
117.
Zube, Erwin H.
, and David G. Pitt. 1981. Cross-cultural perceptions of scenic and heritage landscapes. Landscape Planning8: 69-87.
118.
Zube, Erwin H.
, David G. Pitt, and Thomas W. Anderson. 1975. Perception and prediction of scenic resource values in the North-East. In Landscape assessment: Values, perceptions and resources, R.O. Brush and J. Fabros, eds. Stroudsbury, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
119.
Zube, Erwin H.
, David G. Pitt, and Gary W. Evans. 1983. A lifespan developmental study of landscape assessment. Journal of Environmental Psychology3: 115-128.
120.
Zube, Erwin H.
, James L. Sell, and Jonathan G. Taylor. 1982. Landscape perception: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning9: 1-33.
121.
Zube, Erwin H.
, David E. Simcox, and Charles S. Law.1987. Perceptual landscape simulations: History and prospect. Landscape Journal6, 1: 62-79.
122.
Alp, Ahmet V.1984. Aesthetic response to geometric organization of architectural space. In EDRA15: The challenge of diversity, Donna Duerk andDavid Cambell, eds. Norman, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.
123.
Altman, Irwin
, and Martin M. Chemers. 1980. Cultural aspects of environment-behavior relationships. In Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Social psychology, H. C. Triandis and Richard W. Brislin, eds. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
124.
Altman, Irwin
, and Arza Churchman, eds. 1994. Women and the environment. New York: Plenum.
125.
Anderson, Eddie
. [1978] 1989. Visual resource assessment: local perceptions of familiar natural environments. In The experience of nature: A psychological perspective, Rachel Kaplan and Stephen Kaplan, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
126.
Baird, John C.1982. Aesthetic factors in adult and child evaluation of visual space. In Mind child architecture, John C. Baird and Anthony D. Lutkus, eds. Hanover and London: University Press of New England.
127.
Banerjee, Tridib
. 1977. Who values what? Audience reactions to coastal scenery. Landscape Architecture240-243.
128.
Berlyne, D. E.1980. Psychological aesthetics. In Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Basic processes, Harry C. Triandis and Walter Lonner, eds. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
129.
Bernaldez, Fernando G.
, and Rosa P. Abello. 1989. Environmental challenge and environmental preference: Age and sex effects. Journal of Environmental Management28: 53-70.
130.
Bernaldez, Fernando
, Dolores Gallardo, and Rosa P. Abello. 1987. Children’s landscape preferences: From rejection to attraction. Journal of Environmental Psychology7: 169-176.
131.
Bromley, Peter
. 1981. The role of the public in landscape decisions: A case study in the Peak District National Park. Landscape Research6, 1: 2-6.
132.
Carp, Francis
, and Abraham Carp. 1982. Perceived environmental quality of neighborhoods: Development of assessment scales and their relation to age and gender. Journal of Environmental Psychology2: 295-312.
133.
Craik, Kenneth H.1972. Psychological factors in landscape appraisal. Environment and Behavior4: 255-266.
134.
Dearden, P.1981. Public participation and scenic quality analysis. Landscape Planning8: 3-19.
135.
Dearinger, John A.1979. Measuring preferences for natural landscapes. Journal of the Urban Planning and Development Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers105, UPI: 63-80.
136.
Devlin, Kimberly
. 1990. An examination of architectural interpretation: Architects versus non-architects. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research7, 3: 235-244.
137.
Espe, Hartmut
. 1981. Differences in the perception of national socialist and classicist architecture. Journal of Environmental Psychology1: 33-42.
138.
Feimer, Nickolaus R.1984. Environmental perception: The effects of media, evaluative context, and observer sample. Journal of Environmental Psychology4: 61-80.
139.
Feimer, Nickolaus
, Richard C. Smardon, and Kenneth H. Craik. 1981. Evaluating the effectiveness of observer based visual resource and impact assessment methods. Landscape Research6, 1: 12-16.
140.
Fines, K. D.1968. Landscape evaluation: A research project in East Sussex. Regional Studies2: 41-55.
141.
Gallagher, Thomas J.[1977] 1989. Visual preference for alternative natural landscapes. In The experience of nature: A psychological perspective, Rachel Kaplan and Stephen Kaplan, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
142.
Garcia-Mira, Ricardo
, Constantino Arce, and Jose M. Sabucedo. 1997. Perceived quality of neighborhoods in a city in Northwest Spain: An individual differences scaling approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology17: 243-252.
143.
Groat, Linda N.1982. Meaning in post-modern architecture: An examination using the multiple sorting task. Journal of Environmental Psychology2: 3-22.
144.
Hasell, Mary Joyce
, Frieda Dell Peatross, and Christine A. Bono. 1993. Gender choice and domestic space: Preferences for kitchens in married households. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research10, 1: 1-22.
145.
Hendee, John C.
, and Robert W. Haris. 1970. Foresters’ perception of wilderness-user attitudes and preferences. Journal of Forestry68, 12: 759-762.
146.
Herbert, Eugene J.[1981] 1989. Visual resource analysis: Prediction and preferences in Oakland County, Michigan. In The experience of nature: A psychological perspective, Rachel Kaplan and Stephen Kaplan, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
147.
Hershberger, Robert G.
, and Robert C. Cass. 1974. Predicting user responses to buildings. In EDRA5: Man-environment interactions, Daniel H. Carson, ed. Norman, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.
148.
Hudspeth, Thomas R.1982. Visual perception as a tool for citizen participation: A case study of urban waterfront revitalization in Burlington, Vermont. In The experience of nature: A psychological perspective, Rachel Kaplan and Stephen Kaplan, 246-248. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
149.
Ittelson, William H.
, Massaaki Asai, and Mary Ker, eds. 1986. Cross cultural research in environment and behavior. Tucson: University of Arizona.
150.
Kaplan, Rachel
. 1987. Simulation models and participation: Designers and “clients.” In EDRA18: Public environments, Joan Harvey and Don Henning, eds. Norman, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.
151.
Kaplan, Rachel
. 1973. Predictors of environmental preference: Designers and clients. In EDRA4: Environmental design research, Wolfgang Preiser, ed. Norman, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.
Lansing, John B.
, and Robert W. Marans. 1969. Evaluation of neighborhood quality. American Institute of Planners Journal35, 3: 195-199.
154.
Little, Brian
. 1976. Specialization and the varieties of environmental experience. In Experiencing the environment, Seymour Wapner, Saul B. Cohen, and Bernard Kaplan, eds. New York: Plenum.
155.
Lowenthal, David
, and Marquita Riel. 1972. Milieu and observer differences in environmental associations. In Publications in environmental perception, Vol. 7. New York: American Geographical Society.
156.
Macia, A.
1979. Visual perception of landscapes: Sex and personality differences. Our national landscape: A conference on applied techniques for analysis and management of the visual resource, General Technical Report PSW-35: 279-285.
157.
Malinowski, Jon C.
, and Christopher A. Thurber. 1996. Developmental shifts in the place preferences of boys aged 8-16 years. Journal of Environmental Psychology16: 45-54.
158.
Mann, Dennis Alan
. 1980. Architecture, aesthetics and pluralism: Theories of taste as a determinant of architectural standards. Journal of Popular Culture13, 4: 701-719.
159.
Michelson, William
. 1966. An empirical analysis of urban environmental preferences. American Institute of Planners Journal32, 6: 355-360.
160.
Miller, Patrick A.[1984] 1989. Visual preference and implications for coastal management: A perceptual study of the British Columbia shoreline. In The experience of nature: A psychological perspective, Rachel Kaplan and Stephen Kaplan, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
161.
Nasar, Jack L.1986. The shaping of design values: Case studies on the trade magazine. In EDRA 17: The costs of not knowing, Jean D. Wineman, Richard D. Barnes, and Craig M. Zimring, eds. Norman, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.
162.
Nasar, Jack L.1983. Adult viewers’ preferences in residential scenes: A study of the relationship of environmental attributes to preference. Environment and Behavior15, 5: 589-614.
163.
Nasar, Jack L.
, and Chalay Kunawong. 1987. Architect and lay judgments of architecture: Do they really differ? In EDRA18: Public environments, Joan Harvey and Don Henning, eds. Norman, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.
164.
Newell, Patricia
. 1997. A cross-cultural examination of favorite places. Environment and Behavior29, 4: 495-514.
165.
O’Riordan, Timothy
. 1971. Public opinion and environmental quality: A reappraisal. Environment and Behavior3, 2: 191-214.
166.
Penning-Rowsell, Edmund C.1982. A public preference evaluation of landscape quality. Regional Studies16, 2: 97-12.
167.
Peterson, George L.1974. A comparison of the sentiments and perceptions of wilderness managers and canoeists in the Boundary Waters canoe area. Journal of Leisure Research6, 3: 194-206.
168.
Purcell, Alan T.
, and Jack L. Nasar. 1992. Experiencing other people’s houses: A model of similarities and differences in environmental experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology12: 199-211.
169.
Purcell, Alan T.
, E. Peron, and C. Sanchez. 1998. Subcultural and cross-cultural effects on the experience of detached houses: An examination of two models of affective experience of the environment. Environment and Behavior30, 3: 348-377.
170.
Purcell, Terry
. 1995. Experiencing American and Australian high- and popular-style houses. Environment and Behavior27, 6: 771-800.
171.
Schermer, Brian
. 1987. User involvement in aesthetic design decisions. In EDRA18: Public environments, Joan Harvey and Don Henning, eds. Norman, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.
172.
Schroeder, Herbert W.1991. Preference and meaning of arboretum landscapes: Combining quantitative and qualitative data. Journal of Environmental Psychology11: 231-248.
173.
Sewell, Derrick
, and Brian Little. 1973. Specialists, laymen and the process of environmental appraisal. Regional Studies7: 161-171.
174.
Shuttleworth, Steven
. 1984. Consensus and the perception of landscape quality. Landscape Research9, 1: 17-22.
175.
Stamps, Arthur E.1995. Stimulus and respondent factors in environmental preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills80: 668-670.
176.
Stino, Laila
. [1983] 1989. A visual preference study of urban outdoor spaces in Egypt. In The experience of nature: A psychological perspective, Rachel Kaplan and Stephen Kaplan, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
177.
Ulrich, Roger S.1983. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Behavior and the natural environment, Irwin Altman and Joachim F. Wohlwill, eds. New York: Plenum.
178.
Ulrich, Roger S.1981. Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior13, 5: 523-556.
179.
Valdez, Joseph J.1984. Diverging meanings of development among architects and three other professional groups. Journal of Environmental Psychology4: 223-228.
180.
Verderber, Stephen
, and Gary T. Moore. 1977. Building imagery: A comparative study of environmental cognition. Man-Environment Systems7, 6: 332-341.
181.
Vining, Joanne
. 1992. Environmental emotions and decisions: A comparison of the responses and expectations of forest managers, and environmental group, and the public. Environment and Behavior24, 1: 3-34.
182.
Wilhite, Robert G.
, and William R. Sise. 1974. Measurement of reaction to forest practices. Journal of Forestry72, 9: 567-571.
183.
Winkel, Gary H.
, Roger Malek, and Philip Thiel. 1969. The role of personality differences in judgments of roadside quality. Environment and Behavior1, 6: 18-223.
184.
Woodcock, David
. [1982] 1989. A functionalist approach to environmental preference. In The experience of nature: A psychological perspective, Rachel Kaplan and Stephen Kaplan, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
185.
Yeiser, Jimmie L.
, and Charles L. Shilling. 1978. Student responses to selected terms and scenes in natural resource management. Journal of Forestry76, 7: 497-498.
186.
Yi, Young Kyoung
. 1992. Affect and cognition interface in aesthetic experiences of landscapes. College Station: Texas A&M University.
187.
Zube, Ervin H.
, and Marsha McLaughlin. 1978. Assessing perceived values of the coastal zone. Paper presented at the Coastal Zone 78: symposium on technical, environmental, socioecoonomic, and regulatory aspects of coastal zone management, March 14-16, San Francisco.
188.
Zube, Ervin H.
, Joanne Vining, Charles Law, and Robert B. Bechtel. 1985. Perceived urban residential quality. Environment and Behavior17, 3: 327-350.
