The planning community has shown a curious lack of interest in developing methods to evaluate how successfully plans are implemented. Evaluation in planning has centered primarily on methods of comparing the impacts of alternative proposed plans. The methodological problems with evaluating implementation success are many, but they are not insurmountable. A typology of planning evaluation is offered here. The need to establish a separate, distinctive form of planning evaluation focused exclusively on evaluating the implementation success of plans is discussed. This call to develop and refine methods to evaluate plan implementation success coincides with the call by many theorists to develop better theories of planning based on a keener understanding of the realities of planning practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, Ernest R.1985. From idea to action: Notes for a contingent theory of the policy-implementation process. Administration & Society16,4:403-426.
2.
Alexander, Ernest R.
, and Andreas Faludi. 1989. Planning and plan implementation: Notes on evaluation criteria. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design16, 2: 127-140.
3.
Alterman, Rachelle
, and Morris Hill. 1978. Implementation of urban land use plans. Journal of the American Institute of Planners33, 3: 274-285.
4.
Babcock, R. F.1980. The spatial impact of land use and environmental controls. In The prospective city. See Solomon 1980.
5.
Barnekov, Timothy
, and Douglas Hart. 1993. The changing nature of U.S. urban policy evaluation: The case of the urban development action grant. Urban Studies30, 9: 1469-1483.
6.
Batty, Michael
, and Paul Longley. 1994. Fractal cities. London: Academic Press.
7.
Baum, Howell S.1988. Planning theory as political practice. Society26, 1: 35-42.
8.
Beauregard, Robert A.1990. Bringing the city back in. Journal of the American Planning Association56, 2: 210-215.
9.
Beauregard, Robert A.1987. The object of planning. Urban Geography8, 4: 367-373.
10.
Berke, Philip R.
, and Steven P. French. 1994. The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research13, 4: 237-250.
11.
Berry, Brian J. L.1971. Monitoring trends, forecasting change and evaluating goal-achievement in the urban environment: The ghetto expansion vs. desegregation issue in Chicago as a case study. In Regional forecasting, M. Chisoim, ed. London: Butterworths.
12.
Bertuglia, C. S.
, and G. A. Rabino. 1990. The use of mathematical models in the evaluation of actions in urban planning: Conceptual premises and operative problems. Sistemi Urbani2, 2: 121-132.
13.
Birch, Eugenie Ladner
. 1987. Design, process, and institutions: Planning in urban history. In American urbanism, Howard Gillette, Jr., and Zane L. Miller, ed. New York: Greenwood.
14.
Booth, P.1989. How effective is zoning in the control of development. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design16, 4: 401-415.
15.
Bourne, Larry S.1976. Monitoring change and evaluating the impact of planning policy on urban structure: AMarkov chain experimentPlan Canada16,1: 5-14.
16.
Boyce, David E.1970. Toward a framework for defining and applying urban indicators in plan-making. Urban Affairs Quarterly6,2: 145-171.
17.
Breheny, Michael J.
, and Alan J. Hooper. 1985. Rationality in planning. London: Pion.
18.
Briassoulis, Helen
. 1991. Letter to the editor. Journal of Planning Education and Research10, 3: 175-177.
19.
Bryson, John M.1991. There is no substitute for an empirical defense of planning and planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research10,2: 164-165.
20.
Bryson, John M.
, and Paul Bromiley. 1993. Critical factors affecting the planning and implementation of major projects. Strategic Management Journal14, 5: 319-337.
21.
Bryson, John M.
, Paul Bromiley, and Y. Soo Jung. 1990. Influences of context and process on project planning success. Journal of Planning Education and Research9, 3: 183-195.
22.
Burby, R. J.
, and S. F. Weiss. 1976. New communities U.S.A. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
23.
Calkins, Hugh W.1979. The planning monitor: An accountability theory of plan evaluation. Environment and Planning A11, 7: 745-758.
24.
Cartwright, T. J.1991. Planning and chaos theory. Journal of the American Planning Association57, 1: 44-56.
25.
Connerly, Charles E.
, and Nancy A. Muller. 1993. Evaluating housing elements in growth management comprehensive plans. In Growth management: The planning challenge of the 1990s, Jay M. Stein, ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Couclelis, Helen
. 1991. There is nothing as theoretical as good practice. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design18, 4: 379-384.
27.
Dalton, Linda C.1990. Emerging knowledge about planning practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research9, 1: 29-44.
28.
Dalton, Linda C.1989. The limits of regulation: Evidence from local plan implementation in California. Journal of the American Planning Association55, 2: 151-168.
29.
Dalton, Linda C.
, and Raymond J. Burby1994. Mandates, plans, and planners: Building local commitment to development management. Journal of the American Planning Association60,4: 444-461.
30.
Dear, Michael J.1986. Postmodernism and planning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space4, 3: 367-384.
31.
DeSanctis, G.1990. "Research reports of the Group Decision Support Systems Project."Department of Management Science, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
32.
Dowall, David E.1984. The suburban squeeze. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
Fishman, Richard P.
, ed. 1978. Housing for all under the law. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
34.
Foglesong, Richard E.1986. Planning the capitalist city. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Foley, Paul
. 1992. Local economic policy and job creation: A review of evaluation studies. Urban Studies29, 3/4: 557-598.
36.
Forester, John
. 1987. Planning in the face of conflict Negotiation and mediation strategies in local land use regulation. Journal of the American Planning Association53, 3: 303-314.
37.
Forester, John
. 1982. Understanding planning practice: An empirical, practical and normative account. Journal of Planning Education and Research1, 1: 59-71.
38.
Fox, C. J.1990. Implementation research: Why and how to transcend positivist methodologies. In Implementation and the policy process. See Palumbo and Calista 1990.
39.
Fudge, C.
, Healey, C., Lambert, C., and Underwood, J.1983. "Speed, economy and effectiveness in local plan preparation and adoption."OP 11, School for Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol, UK.
40.
Goggin, Malcolm L.
, Ann O. Bowman, James P. Lester, and Laurence J. O'Toole, Jr.1990. Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
41.
Hall, Peter
. 1988. Cities of tomorrow. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
42.
Hamilton, Calvin S.1986. What can we learn from Los Angeles?Journal of the American Planning Association52, 4: 500-507.
43.
Hartshorn, Truman A.1992. Interpreting the city: An urban geography. New York: Wiley.
44.
Harvey, David
. 1989. The urban experience. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
45.
Healey, P.1986. Emerging directions for research on local land-use planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design13, 1: 103-120.
46.
Healey, P.1982. Understanding land use planning. In Planning theory, prospects for the 1980s, P. Healey, G. McDougal, and M. J. Thomas, eds. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
47.
Heilbrun, James
. 1987. Urban economics and public policy. New York: St. Martin's.
48.
Hickson, David J.
, Richard J. Butler, David Cray, Geoffrey R. Mallory, and David C. Wilson. 1986. Top decisions: Strategic decision-making in organizations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
49.
Hill, Morris
. 1968. Agoals-achievement matrix for evaluating alternative plans. Journal of the American Institute of Planners34, 1: 19-29.
50.
Hogwood, Brian W.
, and Lewis A. Gunn. 1984. Policy analysis for the real world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51.
Innes, Judith E.1992. Group processes and the social construction of growth management. Journal of the American Planning Association58, 4:440-453.
52.
Kartez, Jack D.
, and Michael K. Lindell. 1987. Planning for uncertainty: The case of local disaster planning. Journal of the American Planning Association53, 4: 487-498.
53.
Keating, W. Dennis
, and Norman Krumholz. 1991. Downtown plans of the 1980s: The case for more equity in the 1990s. Journal of the American Planning Association57, 2: 136-152.
54.
Keogh, Geoffrey
, and Alan W. Evans. 1992. The private and social cost of planning delay. Urban Studies29, 5: 687-699.
55.
Knapp, Gerrit
, Kieran Donaghy, Lewis Hopkins, and Jaideep Mukherjee. 1994. "Infrastructure provision by a local agency behaving as a Stac Kelberg leader: Simulation results from a differential game model." Paper presented at the thirty-sixth annual conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Phoenix, AZ, November 3-6.
56.
Knaap, Gerrit
, and Lewis Hopkins. 1994. "Managing urban growth for efficiency in infrastructure services: Insights from a differential game simulation." Paper presented at the thirty-sixth annual conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Phoenix, AZ, November 3-6.
57.
Kostof, Spiro
. 1991. The city shaped. London: Little, Brown.
58.
Landis, John D.1992. Do growth controls work? A new assessment. Journal of the American Planning Association58,4:489-508.
59.
Lichfield, NathanielPeter Kettle
, and Michael Whitehead. 1975. Evaluation in the planning process. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
60.
Madsen, RoJean
. 1983. Use of evaluation research methods in planning and policy contexts. Journal of Planning Education and Research2,2: 113-121.
61.
Mansfield, Howard
. 1990. Cosmopolis: Yesterday's cities of the future. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
Mazmanian, Daniel
, and Paul Sabatier. 1983. Implementation and public policy. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
64.
Mazmanian, Daniel
, and Paul Sabatier. eds. 1981. Effective policy implementation. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
65.
McMillen, Daniel P.
, and John F. McDonald. 1990. A two-limit to bit model of suburban land-use zoning. Land Economics66, 3: 272-282.
66.
Meyerson, Martin
, and Edward Banfield. 1955. Politics, planning and the public interest: The case of public housing in Chicago. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
67.
Moore Milroy, B.1989. Constructing and deconstructing plausibility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space7, 3: 313-326.
68.
Natoli Salvatore J.1971. Zoning and the development of urban land use patterns. Economic Geography47, 2: 171-184.
69.
Neuburger, Henry
, and Joan Wilcox. 1976. The economic appraisal of land-use plans. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy10: 227-236.
70.
Nutt, PauL1989. Making tough decisions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
71.
Palumbo, Dennis J.
, and Donald J. Calista. 1990. Implementation and the policy process: Opening up the black box. New York: Greenwood.
72.
Pearman, A. D.1985. Uncertainty in planning: Characterisation, evaluation, and feedback. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design12, 3:313-320.
73.
Peiser, Richard B.1984. Does it pay to plan suburban growth?Journal of the American Planning Association50, 4: 419-433.
74.
Pogodzinski, J. M.
, and Tim R. Sass. 1991. Measuring the effects of municipal zoning regulations: A survey. Urban Studies28,4: 597-621.
75.
Posavac, Emil J.
, and Raymond G. Carey. 1980. Program evaluation: Methods and case studies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
76.
Pressman, Jeffrey L.
, and Aaron B. Wildavsky. 1973. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
77.
Reps, John
. 1965. The making of urban America: A history of city planning in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
78.
Roeseler, W. G.1982. Successful American urban plans. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
79.
Rudel, Thomas K.1989. Situations and strategies in American land-use planning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
80.
Sabatier, Paul A.1986. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy6, 1: 21-48.
81.
Schlesinger, Arthur M., Jr.1986. The cycles of American history. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
82.
Simmie, James
. 1993. Planning at the crossroads. London: University College London Press.
Soja, Edward W.1989. Postmodern geographies. London: Verso.
85.
Solomon, Arthur P.
, ed. 1980. The prospective city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
86.
Struening, Elmer L.
, and Marcia Guttentag. 1979. Handbook of evaluation research. London: Sage.
87.
Talen, Emily
. 1994. "A methodology for evaluating the implementation success of plans." Research Paper 9431, Regional Research Institute, West Vnrinia University.
88.
Taylor, NigeL1980. Planning theory and the philosophy of planning. Urban Studies17, 2: 159-172.
89.
Tett, Alison
, and Jeanne M. Wolfe. 1991. Discourse analysis and city plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research10, 3: 195-200.
90.
Vande Ven Andrew H.
, Harold L. Angel, and Marshall Scott Poole. 1989. Research on the management of innovation. New York: Harper & Row.
91.
Webber, Melvin M.
, and Carolyn C. Webber. 1987. Will the planner's hour strike again?Journal of the American Planning Association53, 3: 394-396.
92.
Wegener, MichaeL1994. Operational urban models: State of the art. Journal of the American Planning Association60, 1: 17-29.
93.
Weiss, Marc A.1987. The rise of the community builders: The American real estate industry and urban land planning. New York. Columbia University Press.
94.
Weitz, S.1980. Metropolitan development patterns: What difference do they make?Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
95.
Whelan, Jim
. 1994. Assessing urban planning schemes by means of multi-criteria evaluation techniques: The case of pedestrianisation. Urban Studies31, 2: 309-328.
96.
Wholey, Joseph S.
, Harry P. Hatry, and Kathryn E. Newcomer, eds. 1994. Handbook of practical program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
97.
Wildavsky, Aaron
. 1973. If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing. Policy Sciences4, 2: 127-153.
98.
Wolkoff, Michael J.1992. Is economic development decision making rational?Urban Affairs Quarterly27, 3: 340-355.
99.
Wolman, Harold L.
, Coit C Ford, and Edward Hill. 1994. Evaluating the success of urban success stories. Urban Studies31, 6: 835-850.
100.
Young, R. C.1966. Goals and goal-setting. Journal of the American Institute of Planners32, 2: 76-85.
101.
Younis, Talib
, ed. 1990. Implementation in public policy. Brookfield, VT: Gower.
