Abramson, Rudy
. 1992. High Court backs compensation for loss of land rights, property: Justices rule that a state must prove it is blocking development to prevent public harm or pay the owner for his sacrifice. Los Angeles Times (June 30): A15-A15. (Copyright, 1992, Los Angeles Times. Reprinted with permission.)
2.
Allen, J. Linn
. 1992. Court boosts property rights vs. regulations. Chicago Trbune (June 30): 1-1(business section). (All quotations from the Chicago Tribune are reprinted here with permission)
3.
Allen, J. Linn
. And opens up property rights. 1992. Boston Globe (June 30): 14-14. (All quotations from the Boston Globe are reprinted here with permission)
4.
Ausburn, Deborah A.1992. Court decides property rights are civil rights, too. Atlanta Journal and Constitution (July 21): 13-13.
5.
Avictory for property rights
. 1993. Phoenix Gazette (July 22): A14-A14. (All quotations from the Phoenix Gazette are reprinted here with permission)
6.
Beach decision worrisome
. 1992. Atlanta Journal and Constitution (july 6): 14-14. (All quotations from the Atlanta Journal and Constitution are reprinted here with permission)
7.
Beachfront landowners suffer setback
. 1991. Atlanta Journal and Constitution (February 12): 2-2 (national news section).
8.
Berger, Michael M.1994. Column right Property owners have rights, too; the Supreme Court reaffirms that their public entities cannot cavalierly toss out their interests in favor of the community's. Los Angeles Times (July 3): 5-5 (opinion section).
9.
Berlin, Kenneth
. 1993. Just compensation doctrine and the workings of government: The threat from the Supreme Court and possible responses. Harvard Environmental Law Review17,1: 97-150.
10.
Biskupic, Joan
. 1994a. Justices broaden property rights; land use requirements may be "takings."Washington Post (June 25): Al-A1. (All quotations from the Washington Post are reprinted here with permission)
11.
Biskupic, Joan
. 1994b. Justices to hear test of land-use concessions forced by government. Washington Post (March 20): A4-A4.
12.
Bruss, Robert
. 1987a. High Court gives owners more muscle in land use cases. St. Petersburg Times (October 11): H5-H5.
13.
Bruss, Robert
. 1987b. 2 U.S. Supreme Court rulings protect private property. Chicago Tibune (October 17): 1-1 (home section).
14.
Can regulation become confiscation?1992. Chicago Tribune (July 7): 12-12.
15.
Campbell, Linda P.1992. Justices deny ban to "indecent broadcasts."Chicago Tribune (March 3): 4-4.
16.
Campbell, Linda P.1991. Court may widen rights of private land owners. Chicago Tribune (November 19): 5-5.
17.
Carlson, Wayne E.1995. "To take or not to take": What exactly is the Lucas question?Journal of Planning Literature10, 1: 92-103.
18.
Changing the coastal rules
. 1987. Los Angeles Times (June 29): 4-4 (metro section).
19.
Compton, Lynn D.1987. Restoring rights to property owners: Supreme Court curbs abuses by planners, zoners, regulators. Los Angeles Times (July 7): 5-5 (metro section).
20.
Court limits abortion rights; divided justices refuse to overturn Roe vs. Wade
. 1992. Houston Chronicle (June 29): Al-A1. (All quotations from the Houston Chronicle are reprinted with permission)
21.
Court limits public access to private beach
. 1987. Los Angeles Times (June 26): 1-1 (Associated Press article). (All quotations from the Associated Press are reprinted with permission)
22.
Court to review landowners' rights; justices will decide whether laws go too far in protecting the environment at the expense of property owners' rights
. 1991. Orlando Sentinel Tribune (November 19): A3-A3.
23.
Courtwill review access tobeaches
. 1986. New York Times (October 21): A20-A20.
24.
Dart, Bob
. 1992. Justices hear debate on S.C.'s curbs on developing beachfront property. Atlanta Journal and Constitution (March 3): 7-7 (national news).
25.
Deibel, Mary
. 1994. Property rights go to High Court; Oregon businesswoman fights city for expansion. Dallas Morning News (March 20): Al-A1.
26.
Downey, Kirstin
. 1992. A conservative Supreme Court addressed property rights; environmentalists worry about the outcome of three test cases, while landowners are heartened by justices now on the bench. Washington Post (February 16): H1-H1.
27.
Elsasser, Glen
. 1994. Supreme Court sides with property owners; seizure of land for bike path violated constitution. Chicago Tribune (June 25): 1-1.
28.
Epstein, Aaron
. 1994. Property-rights case could rewrite rules. Chicago Tribune (March 26): 20-20 (home section).
29.
Epstein, Richard A.1993. Lucas v. South Carolina Council: A tangled web of expectations. Stanford Law Review45, 5: 1369-1392.
30.
Epstein, Richard A.1985. Takings: Private property and the power of eminent domain. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
31.
Freivogel, Wlliam H.1994. Property owners win case; governments lose High Court ruling. St. Louis Post-Dispatch (June 25): Al-A1. (Al quotations reprinted with permission from the St. Louis Post Dispatch, copyright 1995)
32.
Freivogel, Wlliam H.1991. Court's view of basic liberties has changed with the times. St. Louis Post-Dispatch (December 15): G1-G1.
33.
Geewax, Marylin
. 1992. Property rights must be limited in scope. Atlanta Journal and Constitution (March 6): 11-11.
Greenhouse, Linda
. 1994c. The Supreme Court: High Court, in a 5-4 Split, limits public power on private property. New York Times (June 25): 1-1. (Copyright 01994 by The New York Times Company. Reprinted by permission)
37.
Greenhouse, Linda
. 1992. The Supreme Court: Justices ease way to challenge land-use rules that prevent development. New York Times (June 30): A18-A18. (Copyright @ 1992 by The New York Times Company. Reprinted by permission)
Half a loaf: Court should have further affirmed property rights
. 1992. Houston Chronicle (July 7): A16-A16.
41.
Hamey, Kenneth
. 1991. U.S. Supreme Court rulings on property rights likely in 1992. Star Thbune (December 14): R3-R3 (shelter section; nation's housing). (Copyright C 1991, Washington Post Writers Group, reprinted with permission)
42.
Herson, Albert T.1992. Letters to the editor. San Francisco Chronicle (July 14): A16-A16.
43.
Inman, Bradley
. 1994. High Court to consider developers' rights. San Diego Union-Tribune (March 13): H8-H8. (All quotations from this article used by permission of the author)
44.
Jackson, James P.1992. An unwise use of resources... wise-use movement seeks to exploit the environment. St. Louis Post-Dispatch (February 25): C3-C3. (All quotations from this article are used by permission from the author)
45.
Jones, Robert A.
, and Judy Pasternak. 1987. Decision may force changes in access rules. Los Angeles Times (June 27): 1-1.
46.
Kelly, Eric Damian
. 1989. The quiet evolution continues. Journal of Planning Literature4, 2: 121-138.
47.
Kenworthy, Tom
, and Kirstin Downey. 1992. South Carolina may have to pay compensation in property case. Washington Post (June 30): 10-10.
Kmiec, Douglas W.1992. Private property rights under siege. Chicago Tribune (March 4): 15-15 (perspective section).
51.
Lazarus, Richard J.1993. Puffing the correct "spin" on Lucas. Stanford Law Review45, 5: 1411-1432.
52.
Lehman, H. Jane
. 1993. Settlement supports private landowner's right to build; beach-front ban proves costly to South Carolina. San Diego Union-Tribune (August 15): H27-H27. (All quotations from H. Jane Lehman are reprinted with the permission of Real Estate News Service)
53.
Lehman, H. Jane
. 1992a. Caught in transition of changing values. San Diego Union-Tribune (February 16): F2-F2.
54.
Lehman, H. Jane
. 1992b. Court gives few clues in property-rights case. Chicago Tribune (March 15): L2-L2.
55.
Lehman, H. Jane
. 1992c. Lucas case fallout up in the air. Chicago Tribune (July 12): D2-D2.
56.
Lehman, H. Jane
.1992d. This land is my land: Rebellingagainst regulation (part 1). Washington Post (January 4): E1-E1.
57.
Lemon, Steven J.
, Sandy R. Feinland, and Colin C. Deihl. 1989. The first application of the Nollan nexus test Observations and comments. Harvard Environmental Law Review13, 2: 585-606.
58.
Marcus, Ruth
. 1991. High Court to consider owners' claim to compensation for regulated land. Washington Post (November 19): 5-5.
59.
Marshall, Jonathan
. 1992. Big victory for property owners; states may have to pay if they ban development. San Francisco Chronicle (June 30): A1-A1. (All quotations from the San Francisco Chronicle, reprinted by permission)
60.
Marshall, Jonathan
. 1991. Big test for government regulations; Thomas may shift Supreme Court on economic rights. San Francisco Chronicle (November 25): B1-B1.
61.
Mauro, Tony
. 1994. Oregon case pits "property rights" against environmental "strings."USA Today (March 24): A2-A2. (Copyright 1994, USA TODAY, reprinted with permission)
62.
Mauro, Tony
. 1992. Court to decide on land's end; owner says rights lost to zone law. USA Today (March 2): A3-A3. (Copyright 1992, USA TODAY, reprinted with permission)
63.
Mauro, Tony
. 1991. Private property vs. public interest. USA Today (December 26): A9-A9. (Copyright 1991, USATODAY, reprinted with permission)
64.
Michelman, Frank
. 1988. Takings, 1987. Columbia Law Review88, 8: 1600-1629.
65.
Myers, David W.1988. High Courts leave mark on industry; 1987 decisions bring new rules for real estate-related matters. Los Angeles Times (January 10): 1-1 (real estate section).
66.
Myers, David W.1986. Court to decide state's beach access issue. Los Angeles Times (December 14): 1-1 (real estate section).
67.
No beach, no building
. 1987. Washington Post (July 4): A18-A18.
Nolon, John R.1992. Footprints in the shifting sands of the Isle of Palms: A practical analysis of regulatory takings cases. Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law8, 1: 1-51.
70.
Paul, Jeremy
. 1991. The hidden structures of takings law. Southern California Law Review64, 6: 1395-1548.
Phelps, Timothy M.1994. Property owners win; court, in Oregon ruling, elevates land rights. Newsday (June 25): A7-A7.
73.
Private rights, public benefit
. 1992. Boston Globe (March 4): 12-12.
74.
Property rights are limited
. 1991. Atlanta Journal and Constitution (November 21): A18-A18.
75.
Property rights first
. 1992. USA Today (March 6): A8-A8. (Copyright 1991, USA TODAY, reprinted with permission)
76.
Property rights, public rights
. 1991. St. Petersburg Times (November 20): A16-A16. (Al quotations reprinted here with permission from the St. Petersburg Times)
77.
Rapp, David
. 1992. Thomas seen as key in rights case. Chicago Tribune (March 1): G2-G2.
78.
Regulating land use: Court tells government to do its homework
. 1992. Seattle Times (July 1): A12-A12. (All quotations reprinted here with permission from the Seattle Times)
79.
Riddle, Lyn
. 1991. National Notebook: Charleston, S.C.: Court sinks a choice lot. New York Times (March 31): 1-1 (section 8).
Ruling gives boost to property rights; Court says city must justify conditions it set on private development
. 1994. Rocky Mountain News (June 25): A40-A40. (All quotations reprinted here with permission from the Rocky Mountain News)
82.
Savage, David G.1994. Supreme Court strengthens rights of property owners, development: Ruling limits government power for building permits. Los Angeles Times (June 25): A1-A1. (Copyright, 1994, Los Angeles Times. Reprinted with permission.)
83.
Savage, David G.1992. Property rights, limits on use collide before court. Los Angeles Times (February 25): A5-A5. (Copyright, 1992, Los Angeles Times. Reprinted with permission.)
84.
Savage, David G.1991. Justices take up issue of development curbs: Environment: Court to decide if government must pay compensation when it forbids construction on coast. Los Angeles Times (November 19): A20-A20. (Copyright, 1991, Los Angeles Times. Reprinted with permission.)
85.
Savage, David G.1987a. Court rejects state rule onbeach access; says officials can't force homeowner to open shore to public. Los Angeles Times (June 27): 1-1. (Copyright, 1987, Los Angeles Times. Reprinted with permission.)
86.
Savage, David G.1987b. High Court to decide beach access question; Ventura homeowner challenging coast panel's rule keeping private frontage open to public. Los Angele Times (March 29): 1-1. (Copyright, 1987, Los Angeles Times. Reprinted with permission.)
87.
Savage, David G.1986. High Court to rule in coast access case. Los Angelas Tmes (October 21): 1-1. (Copyright, 1986, Los Angeles Times. Reprinted with permission.)
88.
Schneider, Keith
. 1992. Environment laws face a stiff test from land owners. New York Times (January 20): A1-A1. (Copyright C 1992 by The New York Times Company. Reprinted by permission)
89.
Siemon, Charles L.1990. Who owns Cross Creek?Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law5, 2: 323-377.
90.
Snyder, Jack
. 1992. Landowners grapple with regulations. Orlando Sentinel Toibune (May 12): C1-C1. (All quotations reprinted here with permission from the Orlando Sentinel Tribune)
91.
Swallow, Wendy
. 1987. Court again rules for developers; justices limit extraction of concessions for building permits. Washington Post (June 27): A12-A12.
92.
Testing the 5th Amendment1994.Rocky Mountain News (March31): A54-A54.
93.
Times writer wins 2 realty writing awards
. 1987. Los Angeles Times (November 22): 9-9 (real estate section).
94.
Top court curbs public-access rights
. 1987. Chicago Tune (June 27): 3-3(Associated Pre article).
95.
Vick, Karl
. 1992. States could pay for land value loss. St. Petersburg Times (June 30): A1-A1.
Will, George F.
. 1992. The link between property and freedom. Newsday (July 6): 31-31 (viewpoints section). (0 1992, Washington Post Writers Group, reprited with permission)
98.
Willmann, John Betz
. 1987. The Washington scene: Rulings strengthen landowner rights. Los Angeles Times (August 16): 14-14 (real estate section).