Chess, Caron
. 1992. Attacking a problem with the facts. EPA Journal18,2:46-48.
2.
Chess, Caron
, and Billie Jo Hance. 1989. Opening doors: Making risk communication agency reality. Environment31, 5: 11-15.
3.
Chess, Caron
, and Kandice L. Salomone. 1992. Rhetoric and reality: Risk communication in government agencies. Journal of Environmental Education23, 1: 28-33.
4.
Chess, C.
, P. M. Sandman, and M. R. Greenberg. 1990. Empowering agencies to communicate about environmental risk: Suggestionsfor overcoming organizational barriers. New Brunswick, N.J.: Environmental Communications Research Program.
5.
The Conservation Foundation
. 1984. State of the environment: An assessment at mid-decade. Washington, D.C.: The Conservation Foundation.
6.
Crouch, Edmund A. C.
, and Richard Wilson. 1982. Risk1benefit analysis. Cambridge, Ma.: Ballinger.
7.
Derby, Stephen L.
, and Ralph L. Keeney. 1981. Risk analysis: Understanding 'How safe is safe enough?"In Readings in Risk. See Glickman and Gough 1990.
8.
Dunster, H. J.1980. The approach of a regulatory authority to the concept of risk. IAEA Bulletin22, 5/6: 123-128.
9.
Emergency Planningand Community Right-to-Know Act. U.S. Code. 1986. Vol. 42, secs. 11001 et seq. In Managing Environmental Risk, Machlin and Young, eds. New York: Clark Boardman.
10.
Fischoff, Baruch
. 1977. Cost benefit analysis and the art of motorcycle maintenance. Policy Sciences8, 2: 177-177. In Risk/Benefit Analysis. See Crouch and Wilson 1982.
11.
Fischoff, Baruch
, Stephen R. Watson, and Chris Hope. 1984. Defining risk. In Readings in Risk. See Glickman and Gough 1990.
12.
Glickman, Theodore S.
, and Michael Gough, eds. 1990. Readings in risk. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
13.
Hall, Stephen K.
, and Cathleen M. Crawford. 1992. Risk analysis and risk communication. Pollution Engineering24, 19: 78-83.
14.
Kasper, Raphael G.1980. Perceptions of risk and their effects on decision making. In Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough? See Schwing and Albers 1980.
15.
Madia, William J.
1993. Risk assessment and environmental ethics. Invited lecture, Forum on Ecology, Ethics and the Human Condition, sponsored by the Battelle Endowment for Technology and Human Affairs and The Ohio State University. March 11, Columbus, Ohio.
16.
Miller, Thomas A. W.
, and Edward B. Keller. 1991. What the public thinks. EPA Journal17, 2: 40-43.
17.
National Research Council
. 1989. Improving risk communication. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
18.
Okrent, David
. 1980. Comment on societal risk. Science208, 4442: 372-375.
19.
Otway, Harry J.
, and Detlof von Wmterfeldt. 1982. Beyond acceptable risk: On the social acceptability of technologies. Policy Sciences14, 3:247-256.
20.
Plough, Alonzo
, and Sheldon Kimsky. 1987. The emergence of risk communication studies: Social and political context. In Risk. See Glickman and Gough 1990.
21.
Reissland, John
, and Vaughan Harries. 1979. A scale for measuring risks. New Scientist83,1172:809-811.
22.
Slovic, Paul1987. Perception of risk. Science236, 4799: 280-285.
23.
Slovic, Paul
, Banich Fischoff, and Sarah Lichtentein. 1980. Facts and fears Understanding perceived risk In Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough?Schwing and Albers, eds. New York: Plenum.
24.
Slovic, Paul
, Banich Fischoff, and Sarah Lichtentein. 1979. Rating the risks. In Readings in Risk. See Glickman and Gough 1990.
25.
Starr, Chauncey
. 1969. Social benefit versus tehnological risk. In Readings in Readings mi Risk. See Glickman and Gough 1990.
26.
Thompson, Paul B.1986. Uncertainty arguments in environmental issues. Envinmmental Ethics8, 2: 59-75.
27.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
. 1987. Unfinished business: A comparatime assesment of environmental problems. Washington D.C:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Policy Analysis.
28.
Vlek, Charles
, and Pieter-Jan Stallen. 1981. Judging risks and benefits in the small and in the large. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance28, 2: 235-271.
29.
Widavsky, Aaron
, and Karl Dake. 1990. Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why?Daedalus119, 4: 41-60.