Abstract
In recent years, local governments have taken a more active role in the development and implementation of housing programs. This article reviews changes in local housing plans during the 1970s and 1980s; looks at what guidelines were developed for preparing effective local plans; and critically examines seven efforts (Chattanooga, Dallas, Detroit, Hartford, King County (Washington), Minneapolis-St. Paul, and New York City). An "insider's" view of the preparation of Cincinnati's recently completed Housing Blueprint is also provided. The eight plans exhibit a high degree of diversity with respect to both mission (whether the planfocused on both market-rate and below market-rate housing) and organizational auspices (whether it was produced by a city agency or an independent taskforce). The article highlights three issues involved in the preparation of local housing plans. First, needs assessment is a more complicated and value-laden process than most planners realize. Second, local governments lack the financial resources to address the problem of affordability in addition to the problems of unhealthy and overcrowded housing conditions. Third, there is a need for improved coordination between housing and ancillary programs (income transfers, education, and social services).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
