Impact Fees: A New Funding Source for Local Growth

Alterman, Rachelle . 1988. Exactions American style: The context of evaluation. In Private supply of public services: Evaluation of real estate exactions, linkages and alternative land policies, Rachelle Alterman , ed. New York: New York University Press.

Barneby, Mark P. , Tom MacRostie , Arthur C. Nelson , et al. 1988. Paying for growth: Community approaches to development impact fees. In Development impacifees,Arthur C. Nelson , ed. Chicago: Planners Press.

Bauman, Gus , and William H. Ethier . 1987. Development exactions and impact fees: A survey of American practices. Land Use Law and Zoning Digest 39, 7: 3-S1-3-S1.

Beatley, Timothy . 1988. Development exactions and social justice. In Private suppl ofpublic services: Evaluation of real estate exactions, linkages and alternative land policies, Rachelle Alterman , ed. New York: New York University Press.

Billings, Katherine . 1989. Impact fees and affordability: Who really pays? Freddie Mac Newsletter, March.

Cervero, Robert . 1988. Paying for off-site road improvements through fees, assessments and negotiations: Lessons from California. Public Administration Review 48, 1: 534-541.

Cervero, Robert . 1986. Suburban gridlock. New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Economic Research, Rutgers University.

Connors, Donald L. , and Michael Ettigh . 1987. The expanding circle of exactions: From dedications to linkage. Law and Contemporary Problems 50, 1: 69-83.

Delaney, Charles J. 1987. Impact fees, housing costs, and housing affordability: Who bears the impact of impact fees? University of Flrida Journal of Law and Public Policy 1, 1: 87-101.

Frank,James E. , and Paul E. Downing . 1988. Patterns of impact fee use. In Development impactfees, Arthur C. Nelson , ed. Chicago: Planners Press.

Fulton, William . 1987. Exactions put to the test. Planning 53, 12: 6-10.

Grogan John . 1989. Palm Beach (FLA) reining in growth. City and State 3,9:3-3, 40-41.

Jurgensmeyer, Julian Conrad . 1988. The development of regulatory impact fees. In Development impactfees, Arthur C. Nelson , ed. Chicago: Planners Press.

Kaiser, Edward J. , Raymond J. Burby , and David H. Moreau . 1988. Local governments' use ofwater and sewer impact fees and related policies: Current practice in the Southeast. In Development impactfees, Arthur C. Nelson , ed. Chicago: Planners Press.

Knack, Ruth . 1984. How road impact fees are working in Broward County. Planning 50, 6: 24-25.

Larsen, Wendy U. , and Michelle J. Zimet . 1988. Impact fees: Et tu, Illinois? John Marshall Law Review 21, 3: 489-511.

Lemov, Penelope . 1989. Raleigh: Keeping up with growth. Governing 2, 7: 30-31.

Lillydahl, Jane H. , Arthur C. Nelson , Timothy V. Ramis , Amtero Rivasplata , and Stephen Schell . 1988. The need for a standard state impact fee enabling act. Journal of the American Planning Association 54, 1: 7-17.

McKay, Patricia , Jerome Milliman , and Anne H. Shoemyer . 1988. Undestanding impact fees. Gainesville, Fl.: Bureau of Economics and Business Research, College of Business Administration, University of Florida.

Nelson, Arthur C. 1988. Development impact fees.Journal of the American Planning Association 54, 1: 3-6.

Nicholas,James C. 1988. Impact exactions: Economic theory, practice and incidence. Law and Contemporary Pwroblems 50, 1: 84-100.

Porter, Douglas R. 1988. Will developers pay to play? In Development impactfees, Arthur C. Nelson , ed. Chicago: Planners Press.

Porter, Douglas R. 1986. The rights and wrongs of impact fees. Urban Land 45, 7: 16-19.

Rose,Jerome G. 1988. Development fees: To what extent may municipalities shift the cost of public improvement to new developments? Current Municpal Problems 15: 211-220.

Siemon, Charles . 1988. Who bears the cost? Law and Contemporary Problems 50, 1: 115-126.

Smith, R. Marlin . 1988. From subdivision improvement requirements to community benefit assessments and linkages payment A brief history of land development exactions. Law and Contemporary Problems 50, 1: 5-30.

Snyder, Thomas P. , and Michael A. Stegman . 1986. Payingfor growth. Usingdevelopment impactfees tofinanceinfrastructure. Washington, D.C.: Urban Land Institute.

Stroud, Nancy . 1988. Legal consideration of development impact fees. In Development impact fees, Arthur C. Nelson , ed. Chicago: Planners Press.

U.S. Department of Commerce . Advisory Committee on Zoning . 1926. A standard state zoning enablingact under which municipalities may adopt zoning regulations. Rev. ed. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Valente, Maureen G. , and Clayton Carlisle . 1988. Developer financing: Impact fees and negotiated exactions. MIS Report 20: 4-4.