Alterman, Rachelle
. 1988. Exactions American style: The context of evaluation. In Private supply of public services: Evaluation of real estate exactions, linkages and alternative land policies, Rachelle Alterman, ed. New York: New York University Press.
2.
Barneby, Mark P.
, Tom MacRostie, Arthur C. Nelson, et al. 1988. Paying for growth: Community approaches to development impact fees. In Development impacifees,ArthurC. Nelson, ed. Chicago: Planners Press.
3.
Bauman, Gus
, and William H. Ethier. 1987. Development exactions and impact fees: A survey of American practices. Land Use Law and Zoning Digest39, 7: 3-S1-3-S1.
4.
Beatley, Timothy
. 1988. Development exactions and social justice. In Private suppl ofpublic services: Evaluation of real estate exactions, linkages and alternative land policies, Rachelle Alterman, ed. New York: New York University Press.
5.
Billings, Katherine
. 1989. Impact fees and affordability: Who really pays?Freddie Mac Newsletter, March.
6.
Cervero, Robert
. 1988. Paying for off-site road improvements through fees, assessments and negotiations: Lessons from California. Public Administration Review48, 1: 534-541.
7.
Cervero, Robert
. 1986. Suburban gridlock. New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Economic Research, Rutgers University.
8.
Connors, Donald L.
, and Michael Ettigh. 1987. The expanding circle of exactions: From dedications to linkage. Law and Contemporary Problems50, 1: 69-83.
9.
Delaney, Charles J.1987. Impact fees, housing costs, and housing affordability: Who bears the impact of impact fees?University of Flrida Journal of Law and Public Policy1, 1: 87-101.
10.
Frank,James E.
, and Paul E. Downing. 1988. Patterns of impact fee use. In Development impactfees, Arthur C. Nelson, ed. Chicago: Planners Press.
11.
Fulton, William
. 1987. Exactions put to the test. Planning53, 12: 6-10.
12.
Grogan John
. 1989. Palm Beach (FLA) reining in growth. City and State3,9:3-3, 40-41.
13.
Jurgensmeyer, Julian Conrad
. 1988. The development of regulatory impact fees. In Development impactfees, Arthur C. Nelson, ed. Chicago: Planners Press.
14.
Kaiser, Edward J.
, Raymond J. Burby, and David H. Moreau. 1988. Local governments' use ofwater and sewer impact fees and related policies: Current practice in the Southeast. In Development impactfees, Arthur C. Nelson, ed. Chicago: Planners Press.
15.
Knack, Ruth
. 1984. How road impact fees are working in Broward County. Planning50, 6: 24-25.
16.
Larsen, Wendy U.
, and Michelle J. Zimet. 1988. Impact fees: Et tu, Illinois?John Marshall Law Review21, 3: 489-511.
17.
Lemov, Penelope
. 1989. Raleigh: Keeping up with growth. Governing2, 7: 30-31.
18.
Lillydahl, Jane H.
, Arthur C. Nelson, Timothy V. Ramis, Amtero Rivasplata, and Stephen Schell. 1988. The need for a standard state impact fee enabling act. Journal of the American Planning Association54, 1: 7-17.
19.
McKay, Patricia
, Jerome Milliman, and Anne H. Shoemyer. 1988. Undestanding impact fees. Gainesville, Fl.: Bureau of Economics and Business Research, College of Business Administration, University of Florida.
20.
Nelson, Arthur C.1988. Development impact fees.Journal of the American Planning Association54, 1: 3-6.
21.
Nicholas,James C.1988. Impact exactions: Economic theory, practice and incidence. Law and Contemporary Pwroblems50, 1: 84-100.
22.
Porter, Douglas R.1988. Will developers pay to play? In Development impactfees, Arthur C. Nelson, ed. Chicago: Planners Press.
23.
Porter, Douglas R.1986. The rights and wrongs of impact fees. Urban Land45, 7: 16-19.
24.
Rose,Jerome G.1988. Development fees: To what extent may municipalities shift the cost of public improvement to new developments?Current Municpal Problems15: 211-220.
25.
Siemon, Charles
. 1988. Who bears the cost?Law and Contemporary Problems50, 1: 115-126.
26.
Smith, R. Marlin
. 1988. From subdivision improvement requirements to community benefit assessments and linkages payment A brief history of land development exactions. Law and Contemporary Problems50, 1: 5-30.
27.
Snyder, Thomas P.
, and Michael A. Stegman. 1986. Payingfor growth. Usingdevelopment impactfees tofinanceinfrastructure. Washington, D.C.: Urban Land Institute.
28.
Stroud, Nancy
. 1988. Legal consideration of development impact fees. In Development impact fees, Arthur C. Nelson, ed. Chicago: Planners Press.
29.
U.S. Department of Commerce
. Advisory Committee on Zoning. 1926. A standard state zoning enablingact under which municipalities may adopt zoning regulations. Rev. ed.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.
30.
Valente, Maureen G.
, and Clayton Carlisle. 1988. Developer financing: Impact fees and negotiated exactions. MIS Report20: 4-4.
