This article analyzes the debate concerning the problems, approaches, and intent of industrial policy as it relates to the working planner. It begins with a search for a definition. From there the authors set forth a rationale for such a policy and lay out the key characteristics typically proposed by its advocates. The critical dimensions in the debate are then reviewed. Finally, the potential impacts of various policy options upon local planners are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abernathy, W.
, K. Clark, and A. Kantrow. 1981. The new international competition. Harvard Business Review59, 5: 68-81.
2.
Aldrich, N.1986. The temple of analysis. New England Monthly3, 2: 32-38.
3.
Allen, D.
, and V. Levine. 1984. Nurturing advanced technology enterprises. New York: Praeger.
4.
Anton, T.
, J. Cawley, and K. Kramer. 1981. Federal spending in states and regions: Patterns of stability and change. In Cities under stress: The fiscal crisis of urban America, R. Burchell and D. Listokin, eds. New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Urban Policy Research.
5.
Badaracco,J.
, and D. Yaffie. 1983. Industrial policy: It can't happen here. Harvard Business Review61, 6: 96-105.
6.
Barfield, C.
, and W. Schambra, eds. 1986. The politics of industrial policy. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
7.
Barker, M.1984. Rebuilding America's infrastructure: An agenda for the 1980's. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
8.
Beauregard, R.1983. National industrial policy: A review of recent literature, I. Journal of the American Planning Association49, 1: 89-91.
9.
Bendick, M.
, and L. Ledebur. 1982. National industrial policy. In Public policies for distressed communities, F. Redburn and T. Buss, eds. Lexington, Ma: D.C. Heath.
10.
Bergman, E.
, and H. Goldstein. 1983. Corporatist policy and planning models. Paper presented at the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, San Francisco, October 1983.
Birch, D.1981. Who creates jobs?Public Interest65: 10-12.
13.
Birch, D.1979. The job generation process. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change.
14.
Bluestone, B.
, and B. Harrison. 1982. The reindustrialization of America. New York: Basic Books.
15.
Bluestone, B.
, B. Harrison, and L. Baker. 1981. Corporateflight: The causes and consequences of economic dislocation. Washington, D.C.: Progressive Alliance.
16.
Blume, M.
, J. Crockett, and I. Friend. 1981. Stimulation of capital formation: Ends and means. In Toward a new U.S. industrial policy, M. Wachter and S. Wachter, eds. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
17.
Bower, J.1983. Managing for efficiency, managing for equity. Harvard Business Review61, 4: 83-90.
18.
Bowles, S.
, D. Gordon, and T. Weisskopf. 1984. Beyond the wasteland. New York: Anchor.
19.
Business Week Team
. 1982. The reindustrialization of America. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
A cautious nod to industrial policy. March 19, 1984. Business Week, p. 15-15.
21.
Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission
. 1982. Blackstone Valley industrially zoned land survey and analysis. Worcester, Ma: Blackstone Valley Regional Economic Development Committee.
22.
Choate, P.
, and S. Walter. 1981. America in ruins. Washington, D.C.: Council of State Planning Agencies.
23.
Clark, E.March 3, 1986. America can beat anyone in high technology. Business Week, pp. 57-59.
24.
Cohen, S.1977. Modern capitalist planning: The French model. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
Committee for Economic Development
. 1984. Strategy for U.S. industrial competitiveness. Washington, D.C.: Committee for Economic Development.
26.
Dotson, B.1983. Plant closing and the situation of cities-A review essay. Journal of the American Planning Association49, 3: 358-362.
27.
Dropping the other shoe
. September 9, 1985. Time, p. 42-42.
28.
Eckstein, O.
, and R. Tannenwald. 1981. Productivity and capital formation. In Toward a new U.S. industrial policy, M. Wachter and S. Wachter, eds. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
29.
Feldstein, M.
, and K. Feldstein. September 3, 1985. Shoe imports: Reagan shows courage and wisdom. International Herald Tribune, p. 4-4.
30.
Fielecke, N.1985. The foreign trade deficit and American industry. New England Economic Review, July/ August: 52-53.
31.
Fisher, P.1982. Economics and the education of planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research1, 2: 72-77.
32.
Friedman, B.1981. Financing capital formation in the 1980's. In Toward a new U.S. industrial policy, M. Wachter and S. Wachter, eds. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
33.
Gappert, G.
, and R. Knight. 1982. City development in advanced industrial societies. Beverly Hills: Sage.
34.
Goldsmith, W.
, and H. Jacobs. 1982. The improbability of urban policy: The case of the United States. Journal of the American Planning Association48, 1: 53-66.
35.
Goldstein, H.
, and E. Bergman. 1986. Institutional arrangement for state and local industrial policy. Journal of the American Planning Association52, 3: 265-276.
36.
Goodman, R.1979. The last entrepreneurs. New York: Simon and Schuster.
37.
Governor's Commission on the Future of Mature Industries
. 1984. Final report. Boston: Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
38.
Graham, O.1976. Toward a planned society: From Roosevelt to Nixon. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
Halberstam, D.1986. The reckoning. New York: William Morrow.
40.
Harrison, B.1982. Rationalization, restructuring and industrial reorganization of older regions: The economic transformation of New England since World War II. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Working Paper #72.
41.
Hekman, J.
, and J. Strong. 1980. Is there a case for plant closings?New England Economic Review, July/ August: 34-35.
42.
Hodges, A.1985. Career advancement in spite of a planning education. Journal of the American Planning Association51, 1: 4-5.
43.
The hollow corporation-A special report
. March 3, 1986. Business Week, pp. 56-59.
44.
Howell, J.1985. The New England economic revitalization and future research priorities. New England Journal of Public Policy, Winter/Spring: 6-8.
45.
Industrial policy: Is it the answer?July 4, 1983. Business Week, p. 47-47.
46.
International City Management Association
. 1984. Baseline data report16, 11/12: 1-23.
47.
James, F.
, and J. Blair. 1983. The role of labor mobility in a national urban policy. Journal of the American Planning Association49, 3: 307-315.
48.
Johnson, C.
, ed. 1984. The industrial policy debate. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
49.
Jonas, W.March 3, 1986. A strategy for revitalizing industry. Business Week, p. 84-84.
50.
Kantrow, A.
, ed. 1983. The political realities of industrial policy. Harvard Business Review61, 5: 76-86.
Kilborn, P.September 3, 1985. Considering a global shock to end protectionism. International Herald Tribune, p. 15-15.
53.
Lawrence, R.1984. Can America compete?Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
54.
Leone R.
, and S. Bradley. 1981. Toward an effective industrial policy. Harvard Business Review59, 6: 91-106.
55.
Levitan, S.
, and C. Johnson. 1983-84. The contradictions of industrial policy. Journal of the Institute for Socioeconomic Studies7, 4: 48-63.
56.
Lodge, G.
, and W. Glass. 1984. U.S. trade policy needs one voice. Harvard Business Review61, 3: 75-83.
57.
Lugar, M.1984. Federal tax incentives as industrial and urban policy. In Sunbelt, snowbelt: Urban development and regional restructuring, L. Sawyers and W. Tabb, eds. New York: Oxford University Press.
58.
McKenzie, R.1984. Fugitive industry: The economics and politics of deindustrialization. Cambridge, Ma: Ballinger.
59.
Magaziner, I.
, and R. Reich. 1983. Minding America's business. New York: Vintage Books.
60.
Mansfield, E.1981. How economists see R and D. Harvard Business Review59, 6: 98-106.
61.
Markusen, A.1984a. Defense spending: A successful in- dustrialpolicy?Berkeley: University of California Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Working Paper #424.
62.
Markusen, A.1984b. Defense spending and the geography of high technology industries. Berkeley: University of California Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Working Paper #423.
63.
Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation
. 1984. Concrete realities: The capital needs of Massachusetts cities and towns and the state's assistance strategy. Boston: Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation.
64.
Mier, R.1983. High technology based development: A review of recent literature. Journal of the American Planning Association49, 3: 363-365.
65.
National Council for Urban Economic Development
. 1984. Competitive advantage: Framing a strategy to support high growth firms. Washington, D.C.: National Council for Urban Economic Development.
66.
National League of Cities
. 1986. National municipal policy. Washington, D.C.: National League of Cities.
67.
National League of Cities and United States Conference of Mayors
. 1983. Capital budgeting and infrastructure in American cities, an initial assessment. Washington, D.C.: National League of Cities and United States Conference of Mayors.
68.
National Science Board
. 1978. Science indicators. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
69.
Northeast-Midwest Institute
. 1982. Shutdown: A guide for communities facing plant closings. Washington, D.C.: Northeast-Midwest Institute.
70.
Okun, A.1975. Equality and efficiency: The big tradeoff. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
71.
Phillips, K.1984. Staying on top: The business case for a national industrial strategy. New York: Random House.
72.
Phillips, R.
, and A. Vidal. 1983. The growth and restructuring of metropolitan economies. Journal of the American Planning Association49, 3: 291-306.
73.
President's Commission for a National Agenda for the 1980's
. 1980. A national agenda for the 1980's. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
74.
Reich, R.1983. The next American frontier. New York: Times Books.
75.
Reich, R.1982. Why the United States needs an industrial policy. Harvard Business Review60, 1: 74-81.
76.
Rhode Island Strategic Development Commission
. 1983. The greenhouse compact. Providence: State of Rhode Island.
77.
Rohatyn, F.1983. The twenty year century: Essays on economics andpublicfinance. New York: Random House.
78.
Schultze, C.1984. Industrial policy: A dissent. In National industrial policy: Solution or illusion, T. Petri, W. Clinger, N. Johnson, et al., eds. Boulder, Co.: Westview.
79.
Schumpeter,J.1966. Business cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York: Anchor Books.
80.
Scott, B.1982. Can industry survive the welfare state?Harvard Business Review60, 5: 70-84.
81.
Simon, J.September 17, 1984. Greenhouse compact ideas and concepts survive its defeat. New England Business, pp. 70-72.
82.
Thurow, L.July 29, 1986. Training the dropout. Boston Globe, p. 40-40.
83.
Thurow, L.1985. The zero-sum solution: Building a world class American economy. New York: Simon and Schuster.
84.
Thurow, L.1980. The zero-sum society. New York: Basic Books.
85.
Tucker, J.August 1985. Managing the industrial miracle. High Technology, p. 25-25.
86.
Wachter, M.
, and S. Wachter, eds. 1981. Toward a new industrial policy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
87.
Watkins, A.1981. Felix Rohatyn's biggest deal. Working Papers6, 5: 40-51.
88.
Windsor, D.1986. Why planners need economics. Journal of the American Planning Association52, 3: 260-261.
89.
Wolff, G.1984. Reindustrialization: A debate among capitalists. In Sunbelt, snowbelt: Urban development and regional restructuring, L. Sawyers and W. Tabb, eds. New York: Oxford University Press.
90.
Zysman, J.
, and L. Tyson, eds. 1983. American industry in international competition: Government policies and corporate strategies. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
