Electrification and Justice for All? A Systematic Review of Equity and Justice Concerns in the Literature on Transportation Electrification

Abstract

The transition to an electrified transportation system is underway, with implications for justice and equity, particularly among under-resourced and underrepresented communities. The potential exists for policymakers and planners to alleviate current and historic injustices or to further embed them within emerging transportation paradigms. To avoid this latter scenario, decision-makers must understand how the deployment and use of electrified transportation technologies impact equity and justice. To this end, I synthesize recent academic literature on the electrification of U.S. land transportation systems. I assess the state of knowledge surrounding the intersection of these principles with transportation electrification technologies and discuss emergent themes.

Keywords

Transportation electrification equity & justice electric vehicles environmental justice transportation equity just transition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agyeman

Schlosberg

Craven

Matthews

. 2016. “Trends and Directions in Environmental Justice: From Inequity to Everyday Life, Community, and Just Sustainabilities.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41 (1): 321–40. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090052.

Allan

M. S.

2022, August 6. “E-bikes are Gaining Popularity in the US. Here’s Why.” Abc10.Com. https://www.abc10.com/article/news/local/e-bikes-are-gaining-popularity/103-b261a3af-091e-4fe8-912a-4dedd0f44788

Ambrose

Pappas

Kendall

. 2017. Exploring the Costs of Electrification for California’s Transit Agencies. Davis, CA: University of California Institute of Transportation Studies. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0fn8s2jh .

Babar

Burtch

. 2020. “Examining the Heterogeneous Impact of Ride-Hailing Services on Public Transit Use.” Information Systems Research 31 (3): 820–34. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0917.

Barrett

Bivens

. 2021. The Stakes for Workers in How Policymakers Manage the Coming Shift to All-Electric Vehicles. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

Bauer

Hsu

C.-W.

Lutsey

. 2021. When Might Lower-Income Drivers Benefit from Electric Vehicles? Quantifying the Economic Equity Implications of Electric Vehicle Adoption. Washington, DC: International Council on Clean Transportation.

Been

1992. “What’s Fairness Got to Do with It? Environmental Justice and the Siting of Locally Undesirable Land Uses.” Cornell Law Review 78 (6): 1001–85.

Biber

Kelsey

Meckling

. 2017. “The Political Economy of Decarbonization.” Brooklyn Law Review 82 (2): 605–643.

Birkmann

Jamshed

McMillan

J. M.

Feldmeyer

Totin

Solecki

Ibrahim

Z. Z.

, et al. 2022. “Understanding Human Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Global Perspective on index Validation for Adaptation Planning.” Science of the Total Environment 803: 150065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150065.

10.

Blazanin

Mondal

Asmussen

K. E.

Bhat

C. R.

. 2022. “E-scooter Sharing and Bikesharing Systems: An Individual-Level Analysis of Factors Affecting First-use and use Frequency.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 135: 103515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103515.

11.

Blynn

Attanucci

. 2019. “Accelerating Bus Electrification: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Barriers and Drivers to Scaling Transit Fleet Electrification.” Transportation Research Record 2673 (8): 577–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119842117.

12.

Borenstein

Davis

L. W.

. 2016. “The Distributional Effects of US Clean Energy Tax Credits.” Tax Policy and the Economy 30 (1): 191–234. https://doi.org/10.1086/685597.

13.

Bozeman

J. F.

Nobler

Nock

. 2022. “A Path Toward Systemic Equity in Life Cycle Assessment and Decision-Making: Standardizing Sociodemographic Data Practices.” Environmental Engineering Science 39 (9): 759–69. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2021.0375.

14.

Brand

A. L.

2015. “The Politics of Defining and Building Equity in the Twenty-First Century.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 35 (3): 249–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X15585001.

15.

Bretones

Marquet

. 2022. “Sociopsychological Factors Associated with the Adoption and Usage of Electric Micromobility. A Literature Review.” Transport Policy 127: 230–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.008.

16.

Brockway

A. M.

Conde

Callaway

. 2021. “Inequitable Access to Distributed Energy Resources due to Grid Infrastructure Limits in California.” Nature Energy 6 (9): 892–903. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00887-6.

17.

Brown

Howell

, University of Oregon, Creger

, The Greenlining Institute , and University of Oregon . 2022. Mobility for the People: Evaluating Equity Requirements in Shared Micromobility Programs. Portland, OR: Transportation Research and Education Center (TREC). https://doi.org/10.15760/trec.277 .

18.

Bullard

R. D.

1990. Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class and Environmental Quality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

19.

Business & Human Rights Resource Center. n.d. “Transition Minerals Tracker.” Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. Retrieved September 26, 2023, from https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/from-us/transition-minerals-tracker/

20.

Camilleri

S. F.

Montgomery

Visa

M. A.

Schnell

J. L.

Adelman

Z. E.

Janssen

Grubert

E. A.

Anenberg

S. C.

Horton

D. E.

. 2023. “Air Quality, Health and Equity Implications of Electrifying Heavy-Duty Vehicles.” Nature Sustainability 6: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01219-0 .

21.

CARB. 2016. Diesel Exhaust and Health. Sacramento, CA: California Air Resources Board. www.arb.ca.gov/research/diesel/diesel-health.htm .

22.

Carley

Konisky

D. M.

. 2020. “The Justice and Equity Implications of the Clean Energy Transition.” Nature Energy 5(8), Article 8. 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0641-6.

23.

Carlton

Sultana

. 2022. “Transport Equity Considerations in Electric Vehicle Charging Research: A Scoping Review.” Transport Reviews 43 (3): 330–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2022.2109775.

24.

Caspi

2022. “Equity Implications of Electric Bikesharing in Philadelphia.” GeoJournal 88 (2): 1559–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10698-1.

25.

Chandler

Espino

O’Dea

. 2017. Delivering Opportunity: How Electric Buses and Trucks Can Create Jobs and Improve Public Health in California. Berkeley, CA: Union of Concerned Scientists; Greenlining Institute. https://progov21.org/Download/Document/K66J32 .

26.

Choma

E. F.

Evans

J. S.

Hammitt

J. K.

Gómez-Ibáñez

J. A.

Spengler

J. D.

. 2020. “Assessing the Health Impacts of Electric Vehicles Through air Pollution in the United States.” Environment International 144: 106015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106015.

27.

Cotterman

Fuchs

E. R. H.

Whitefoot

K. S.

Combemale

. 2024. “The Transition to Electrified Vehicles: Evaluating the Labor Demand of Manufacturing Conventional Versus Battery Electric Vehicle Powertrains.” Energy Policy 188: 114064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114064.

28.

Davis

S. C.

Boundy

R. G.

. 2022, December 22. Freight Analysis Framework Version 5. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. https://faf.ornl.gov/faf5/ .

29.

De Bartolomeo

Caggiani

Ottomanelli

. 2023. “An Equity Indicator for Free-Floating Electric Vehicle-Sharing Systems.” Transportation Research Procedia 69: 115–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.152.

30.

De Blas

Mediavilla

Capellán-Pérez

Duce

. 2020. “The Limits of Transport Decarbonization Under the Current Growth Paradigm.” Energy Strategy Reviews 32: 100543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100543.

31.

DeShazo

J. R.

Sheldon

T. L.

Carson

R. T.

. 2017. “Designing Policy Incentives for Cleaner Technologies: Lessons from California’s Plug-in Electric Vehicle Rebate Program.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 84: 18–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.01.002.

32.

Dill

McNeil

. 2021. “Are Shared Vehicles Shared by All? A Review of Equity and Vehicle Sharing.” Journal of Planning Literature 36 (1): 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220966732.

33.

Erhardt

G. D.

Mucci

R. A.

Cooper

Sana

Chen

Castiglione

. 2022. “Do Transportation Network Companies Increase or Decrease Transit Ridership? Empirical Evidence from San Francisco.” Transportation 49 (2): 313–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10178-4.

34.

Esteves

A. M.

Franks

Vanclay

. 2012. “Social Impact Assessment: The State of the Art.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 30 (1): 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.660356.

35.

Farrell

2012. “A Just Transition: Lessons Learned from the Environmental Justice Movement.” Duke Forum for Law & Social Change 4 (45): 45–63.

36.

Ferreira

2023, May 8. How Does the Environmental Impact of Mining for Clean Energy Metals Compare to Mining for Coal, Oil and Gas?. Cambridge, MA: MIT Climate Portal. https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/how-does-environmental-impact-mining-clean-energy-metals-compare-mining-coal-oil-and-gas .

37.

Fleming

K. L.

2018. “Social Equity Considerations in the New Age of Transportation: Electric, Automated, and Shared Mobility.” Journal of Science Policy & Governance 13 (1): 1–20.

38.

Forkenbrock

D. J.

Schweitzer

L. A.

. 1999. “Environmental Justice in Transportation Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (1): 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976036.

39.

Friedman

R. S.

Law

E. A.

Bennett

N. J.

Ives

C. D.

Thorn

J. P. R.

Wilson

K. A.

. 2018. “How Just and Just How? A Systematic Review of Social Equity in Conservation Research.” Environmental Research Letters 13 (5): 053001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabcde.

40.

Fuller

C. H.

Brugge

. 2020. “Environmental Justice.” In Traffic-Related Air Pollution, 495–510. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818122-5.00020-X .

41.

Gallagher

K. S.

Muehlegger

. 2011. “Giving Green to Get Green? Incentives and Consumer Adoption of Hybrid Vehicle Technology.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 61 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.05.004.

42.

Simeone

Duvall

Wood

. 2021. “There’s No Place Like Home: Residential Parking, Electrical Access, and Implications for the Future of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure” (No. NREL/TP-5400-81065, 1825510, MainId: 79841; p. NREL/TP-5400-81065, 1825510, MainId:79841). https://doi.org/10.2172/1825510

43.

Girardi

Gargiulo

Brambilla

P. C.

. 2015. “A Comparative LCA of an Electric Vehicle and an Internal Combustion Engine Vehicle Using the Appropriate Power mix: The Italian Case Study.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 20 (8): 1127–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0903-x.

44.

Guo

Chen

Stuart

Zhang

. 2020. “A Systematic Overview of Transportation Equity in Terms of Accessibility, Traffic Emissions, and Safety Outcomes: From Conventional to Emerging Technologies.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 4: 100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100091.

45.

Guo

Kontou

. 2021. “Disparities and Equity Issues in Electric Vehicles Rebate Allocation.” Energy Policy 154: 112291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112291.

46.

Hardman

Chandan

Tal

Turrentine

. 2017. “The Effectiveness of Financial Purchase Incentives for Battery Electric Vehicles—A Review of the Evidence.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 80: 1100–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.255.

47.

Hardman

Fleming

Kare

Ramadan

. 2021. “A Perspective on Equity in the Transition to Electric Vehicle.” MIT Science Policy Review 2: 46–54. https://doi.org/10.38105/spr.e10rdoaoup .

48.

Hawkins

T. R.

Gausen

O. M.

Strømman

A. H.

. 2012. “Environmental Impacts of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles—A Review.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 17 (8): 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0440-9.

49.

Heffron

R. J.

McCauley

. 2017. “The Concept of Energy Justice Across the Disciplines.” Energy Policy 105: 658–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.018.

50.

Henderson

2020. “EVs Are Not the Answer: A Mobility Justice Critique of Electric Vehicle Transitions.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (6): 1993–2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1744422.

51.

Holland

S. P.

Mansur

E. T.

Muller

N. Z.

Yates

A. J.

. 2019. “Distributional Effects of Air Pollution from Electric Vehicle Adoption.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 6 (S1): S65–94. https://doi.org/10.1086/701188.

52.

Hopkins

Potoglou

Orford

Cipcigan

. 2023. “Can the Equitable Roll out of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure be Achieved?” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 182: 113398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113398.

53.

Hsu

C.-W.

Fingerman

. 2021. “Public Electric Vehicle Charger Access Disparities Across Race and Income in California.” Transport Policy 100: 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.10.003.

54.

Huether

2021. Siting Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) with Equity in Mind. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.

55.

Ikeme

2003. “Equity, Environmental Justice and Sustainability: Incomplete Approaches in Climate Change Politics.” Global Environmental Change 13 (3): 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(03)00047-5.

56.

Jenkins

2018. “Setting Energy Justice Apart from the Crowd: Lessons from Environmental and Climate Justice.” Energy Research & Social Science 39: 117–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.015.

57.

Jenkins

J. D.

Thernstrom

. 2017. “Deep Decarbonization of the Electric Power Sector: Insights from Recent Literature.” 1–10. Fairfax, VA: Energy Innovation Reform Project.

58.

Jenn

2019. “Emissions Benefits of Electric Vehicles in Uber and Lyft Services.” National Center for Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.7922/G23R0R38

59.

Jenn

Lee

J. H.

Hardman

Tal

. 2020. “An In-Depth Examination of Electric Vehicle Incentives: Consumer Heterogeneity and Changing Response Over Time.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 132: 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.004.

60.

Cushing

L. J.

Morello-Frosch

. 2020. “An Equity Analysis of Clean Vehicle Rebate Programs in California.” Climatic Change 162 (4): 2087–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02836-w.

61.

Karner

Levine

. 2021. “Equity-Advancing Practices at Public Transit Agencies in the United States.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2675 (10): 1431–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211016861.

62.

Mintz

Zhou

. 2022. “Estimating Potential Employment Impact of the Charging Infrastructure Used to Support Transportation Electrification in the United States.” Transportation Research Record 2676 (12): 436–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221095750.

63.

Kerby

Bharati

A. K.

Tarekegne

. 2022. “Assessing the Energy Equity Benefits of mobile Energy Storage Solutions.” 6th E-Mobility Power System Integration Symposium (EMOB 2022), 100–6. https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2022.2722

64.

Khan

H. A. U.

Price

Avraam

Dvorkin

. 2022. “Inequitable Access to EV Charging Infrastructure.” The Electricity Journal 35 (3): 107096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2022.107096.

65.

Khisty

C. J.

1996. “Operationalizing Concepts of Equity for Public Project Investments.” Transportation Research Record 1559 (1): 94–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196155900112.

66.

Lazer

Wachche

Sclar

Cassius

. 2021. “Electrifying Ride-Hailing in the United States, Europe, and Canada: How to Enable Ridehailing Drivers to Switch to Electric Vehicles (World Resources Institute Working Paper).”

67.

Levandowski

2024, January 10. “BLOG | A growing number of states are taking steps to align transportation planning decisions with climate targets.” Georgetown Climate Center. https://www.georgetownclimate.org/blog/a-growing-number-of-states-are-taking-steps-to-align-transportation-planning-decisions-with-climate-targets-eo.html

68.

Fitzgerald

. 2018, March 29. “Ride-Hailing Drivers Are Ideal Candidates for Electric Vehicles.” RMI. https://rmi.org/ride-hailing-drivers-ideal-candidates-electric-vehicles/

69.

Liao

Correia

. 2022. “Electric Carsharing and Micromobility: A Literature Review on Their Usage Pattern, Demand, and Potential Impacts.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 16 (3): 269–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1861394.

70.

Linn

2022. “Balancing Equity and Effectiveness for Electric Vehicle Subsidies.” Resources for the Future 22 (7): 1–51.

71.

Liu

Dai

Rodgers

M. O.

Guensler

. 2022. “Equity Issues Associated with U.S. Plug-in Electric Vehicle Income Tax Credits.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 102: 103159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103159.

72.

Liu

X. C.

Zhou

Wei

Golub

Macarthur

. 2021. Bi-objective Optimization for Battery Electric Bus Deployment Considering Cost and Environmental Equity. Portland, OR: National Institute for Transportation and Communities.

73.

Martin

Iles

. 2021. “The Ethics of Rare Earth Elements Over Time and Space.” In Ethics of Chemistry, edited by Schummer

Børsen

, 317–46. Hackensack, NJ: WORLD SCIENTIFIC. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811233548_0012 .

74.

Mayfield

Jenkins

. 2021. “Influence of High Road Labor Policies and Practices on Renewable Energy Costs, Decarbonization Pathways, and Labor Outcomes.” Environmental Research Letters 16 (12): 124012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac34ba.

75.

McCauley

Heffron

. 2018. “Just Transition: Integrating Climate, Energy and Environmental Justice.” Energy Policy 119: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.014.

76.

Milken Institute School of Public Health, E. 2020, November 5. “Equity vs. Equality: What’s the Difference?” GW Online Public Health. https://onlinepublichealth.gwu.edu/resources/equity-vs-equality/

77.

Min

Lee

H. W.

. 2020. “Social Equity of Clean Energy Policies in Electric-Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Systems.” Construction Research Congress 2020: 221–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482858.025.

78.

Miner

Smith

B. M.

Jani

McNeill

Gathorne-Hardy

. 2024. “Car Harm: A Global Review of Automobility’s Harm to People and the Environment.” Journal of Transport Geography 115: 103817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103817.

79.

Ministry of the Economy and Finance. 2021, June 18. “The support fund for employees in the automotive sector officially established.” https://www.economie.gouv.fr/fonds-accompagnement-salaries-filiere-automobile-etabli

80.

Moellendorf

2018. Cosmopolitan Justice. New York, NY: Routledge.

81.

Moses

2023, January 27. “Electric School Buses Can Fight—or Further—Inequity in the US.” World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/insights/electric-school-buses-equity-us

82.

Motairek

Chen

Makhlouf

M. H. E.

Rajagopalan

Al-Kindi

. 2023. “Historical Neighbourhood Redlining and Contemporary Environmental Racism.” Local Environment 28 (4): 518–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2022.2155942.

83.

Muehlegger

Rapson

. 2018. Understanding the Distributional Impacts of Vehicle Policy: Who Buys New and Used Alternative Vehicles?. 130–373. Davis, CA: National Center for Sustainable Transportation & UC Davis Institute of Transportation Studies. https://escholarship.org/content/qt0tn4m2tx/qt0tn4m2tx_noSplash_36244609f162444f3e55c550dfc22cad.pdf .

84.

Nazari-Heris

Loni

Asadi

Mohammadi-ivatloo

. 2022. “Toward Social Equity Access and Mobile Charging Stations for Electric Vehicles: A Case Study in Los Angeles.” Applied Energy 311: 118704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118704.

85.

Oswald Beiler

Mohammed

. 2016. “Exploring Transportation Equity: Development and Application of a Transportation Justice Framework.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 47: 285–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.06.007.

86.

Palm

Farber

Shalaby

Young

. 2021. “Equity Analysis and New Mobility Technologies: Toward Meaningful Interventions.” Journal of Planning Literature 36 (1), 1–15. https://journals-sagepub-com.libproxy.berkeley.edu/doi/full/10.1177/0885412220955197.

87.

Pollin

2023. Fossil Fuel Industry Phase-Out and Just Transition: Designing Policies to Protect Workers’ Living Standards. Amherst, MA: University of Massachussetts, Amherst; Political Economy Research Institute. https://peri.umass.edu/images/WP570.pdf .

88.

Qian

Jaller

. 2021. “Bikeshare Destination Choices and Accessibility among Disadvantaged Communities.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 91: 102686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102686.

89.

Qian

Niemeier

. 2019. “High Impact Prioritization of Bikeshare Program Investment to Improve Disadvantaged Communities’ Access to Jobs and Essential Services.” Journal of Transport Geography 76: 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.02.008.

90.

Reckien

Lwasa

Satterthwaite

McEvoy

Creutzig

Montgomery

Schensul

, , et al. 2018. “Equity, Environmental Justice, and Urban Climate Change.” In Climate Change and Cities: Second Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network, 1st ed., edited by Rosenzweig

Solecki

W. D.

Romero-Lankao

Mehrotra

Dhakal

Ali Ibrahim

, 173–224. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316563878.013

91.

Riofrancos

Kendall

Dayemo

K. K.

Haugen

McDonald

Hassan

Slattery

Lillehei

. 2023. “Achieving Zero Emissions with More Mobility and Less Mining.” Climate and Community Project; UC Davis. https://www.climateandcommunity.org/_files/ugd/d6378b_b03de6e6b0e14eb0a2f6b608abe9f93d.pdf

92.

Rodier

Randall

Garcia Sanchez

J. C.

Harrison

Francisco

Tovar

. 2022. “Challenges and Opportunities for Publicly Funded Electric Vehicle Carsharing.” https://doi.org/10.7922/G29C6VRC

93.

Romero-Lankao

Nobler

. 2021. Energy Justice: Key Concepts and Metrics Relevant to EERE Transportation Projects.” National Renewable Energy Laboratory: 1–12.

94.

Rowangould

G. M.

2013. “A Census of the US Near-Roadway Population: Public Health and Environmental Justice Considerations.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 25: 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.08.003.

95.

Schlosberg

2013. “Theorising Environmental Justice: The Expanding Sphere of a Discourse.” Environmental Politics 22 (1): 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.755387.

96.

Sheldon

T. L.

2022. “Evaluating Electric Vehicle Policy Effectiveness and Equity.” Annual Review of Resource Economics 14 (1): 669–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-111820-022834.

97.

Sovacool

B. K.

2021. “Who are the Victims of low-Carbon Transitions? Towards a Political Ecology of Climate Change Mitigation.” Energy Research & Social Science 73: 101916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101916.

98.

Sovacool

B. K.

Hook

Martiskainen

Brock

Turnheim

. 2020. “The Decarbonisation Divide: Contextualizing Landscapes of Low-Carbon Exploitation and Toxicity in Africa.” Global Environmental Change 60: 102028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102028.

99.

Timmers

V. R. J. H.

Achten

P. A. J.

. 2016. “Non-exhaust PM Emissions from Electric Vehicles.” Atmospheric Environment 134: 10–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.017.

100.

Tong

Jenn

Wolfson

Scown

C. D.

Auffhammer

. 2021. “Health and Climate Impacts from Long-Haul Truck Electrification.” Environmental Science & Technology 55 (13): 8514–23. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01273.

101.

Transport and Environment. 2017, September. “Briefing—How Will Electric Vehicle Transition Impact EU Jobs.” Transport and Environment. https://www.transportenvironment.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Briefing%20-%20How%20will%20electric%20vehicle%20transition%20impact%20EU%20jobs.pdf

102.

Turrentine

Tal

Rapson

. 2018. The Dynamics of Plug-in Electric Vehicles in the Secondary Market and Their Implications for Vehicle Demand, Durability, and Emissions. National Center for Sustainable Transportation; UC Davis Institute of Transportation Studies. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8wj5b0hn

103.

van Uffelen

2022. “Revisiting Recognition in Energy Justice | Elsevier Enhanced Reader.” Energy Research & Social Science 92, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102764.

104.

Van Wee

Roeser

. 2013. “Ethical Theories and the Cost–Benefit Analysis-Based Ex Ante Evaluation of Transport Policies and Plans.” Transport Reviews 33 (6): 743–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.854281.

105.

Vega-Perkins

Newell

J. P.

Keoleian

. 2023. “Mapping Electric Vehicle Impacts: Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Fuel Costs, and Energy Justice in the United States.” Environmental Research Letters 18 (1): 014027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca4e6.

106.

Viscelli

France

Zabin

. 2020. “Chapter 7: Sustainable Transportation.” In Putting California on the High Road: A Jobs and Climate Action Plan for 2030, 267–327. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley Labor Center, California Workforce Development Board, Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Chapter-7-Sustainable-Transportation-Putting-California-on-the-High-Road.pdf .

107.

Vithanage

A. C.

2020. “EV for EV: Equity and Viability in Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Law and Policy.” Natural Resources & Environment 34(4): 11–15.

108.

Walsh

2021. “A Just Transition for US Workers is Within Reach.” Bulletin of the Atomic Sciences 77 (10): 86–9.

109.

Welch

T. F.

Mishra

. 2013. “A Measure of Equity for Public Transit Connectivity.” Journal of Transport Geography 33: 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.007.

110.

Wells

2012. “Converging Transport Policy, Industrial Policy and Environmental Policy: The Implications for Localities and Social Equity.” Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit 27 (7): 749–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094212455018.

111.

Yusuf

Brozen

Blumenberg

. 2022. “Electric Carsharing Models for Low-Income Households in California (UCLA Policy Briefs).” https://escholarship.org/uc/item/21h5862d

112.

Zhu

2021, August 24. “The Inconvenient Truth: How TNCs Like Uber Provide Rides So Cheap.” The Startup. https://medium.com/swlh/how-uber-makes-its-ride-cheap-its-business-model-explained-5242c6d30e04

113.

Zou

Khaloei

MacKenzie

. 2020. “Effects of Charging Infrastructure Characteristics on Electric Vehicle Preferences of New and Used Car Buyers in the United States.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2674 (12): 165–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120952792.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB