Despite the wealth of academic research on large-scale urban developments, a comprehensive meta-analysis of the literature is yet to exist. On the one hand, theories on urban change and development have offered useful frameworks for explaining the processes and outcomes of large-scale developments. On the other hand, in-depth case studies have provided profound insights into specific examples. Nevertheless, how the case studies relate to the theoretical debates is unclear. In response, this article undertakes a systematic review of the theories and case studies on large-scale developments and identifies the multitude of ways in which case studies relate to theories.
AltshulerAlan A.LuberoffDavid. 2003. Mega-Projects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment. Washington, D.C.: Cambridge, Mass: Brookings Institution Press; Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
3.
AmmonFrancesca Russello. 2015. “Postindustrialization and the City of Consumption: Attempted Revitalization in Asbury Park, New Jersey.” Journal of Urban History41 (2): 158–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144214563510.
4.
AndersonMartin. 1964. The Federal Bulldozer. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
5.
AtkinsonDavid. 2007. “Kitsch Geographies and the Everyday Spaces of Social Memory.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space39 (3): 521–40. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3866.
6.
AtkinsonRobTallonAndrewWilliamsDavid. 2019. “Governing Urban Regeneration in the UK: A Case of ‘Variegated Neoliberalism’ in Action?” European Planning Studies27 (6): 1083–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1598020.
7.
AugustMartine. 2016. “Revitalisation Gone Wrong: Mixed-Income Public Housing Redevelopment in Toronto’s Don Mount Court.” Urban Studies53 (16): 3405–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015613207.
8.
AvniNufarFischlerRaphaël. 2020. “Social and Environmental Justice in Waterfront Redevelopment: The Anacostia River, Washington, D.C.” Urban Affairs Review56 (6): 1779–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419835968.
9.
AvniNufarTeschnerNa’ama. 2019. “Urban Waterfronts: Contemporary Streams of Planning Conflicts.” Journal of Planning Literature34 (4): 408–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412219850891.
10.
BanfieldEdward C.1961. Political Influence: A New Theory of Urban Politics. New York: Free Press.
11.
BassettKeithGriffithsRonSmithIan. 2002. “Testing Governance: Partnerships, Planning and Conflict in Waterfront Regeneration.” Urban Studies39 (10): 1757–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098022000002948.
12.
BaurothNicholas. 2011. “The Reluctant Rise of an Urban Regime: The Exercise of Power in Fargo, North Dakota.” Journal of Urban History37 (4): 519–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144211403084.
13.
BlockThomasSteyversKristofOosterlynckStijnReynaertHerwigDe RynckFilip. 2012. “When Strategic Plans Fail to Lead. A Complexity Acknowledging Perspective on Decision-Making in Urban Development Projects—The Case of Kortrijk (Belgium).” European Planning Studies20 (6): 981–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.673561.
14.
BolandPhilipBronteJohnMuirJenny. 2017. “On the Waterfront: Neoliberal Urbanism and the Politics of Public Benefit.” Cities (London, England)61 (January): 117–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.08.012.
15.
BrailShaunaKumarNishi. 2017. “Community Leadership and Engagement After the Mix: The Transformation of Toronto’s Regent Park.” Urban Studies54 (16): 3772–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016683122.
16.
BrennerNeil. 2004. New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
CainColleen. 2014. “Negotiating With the Growth Machine: Community Benefits Agreements and Value-Conscious Growth.” Sociological Forum29 (4): 937–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12127.
18.
ChanayilAjay. 2002. “The Manhattan Yankees? Planning Objectives, City Policy, and Sports Stadium Location in New York City.” European Planning Studies10 (7): 875–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431022000013275.
19.
ChapinTim. 2002. “Beyond the Entrepreneurial City: Municipal Capitalism in San Diego.” Journal of Urban Affairs24 (5): 565–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9906.00144.
20.
ChapinTimothy S. 2004. “Sports Facilities as Urban Redevelopment Catalysts: Baltimore’s Camden Yards and Cleveland’s Gateway.” Journal of the American Planning Association70 (2): 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976370.
21.
CollinsTimothy W. 2008. “Unevenness in Urban Governance: Stadium Building and Downtown Redevelopment in Phoenix, Arizona.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26 (6): 1177–96. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0829g.
22.
DaamenTom A.LouwErik. 2016. “The Challenge of the Dutch Port-City Interface.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie107 (5): 642–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12219.
23.
DahlRobert Alan. 1961. Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in and American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.
24.
DebrieJeanRaimbaultNicolas. 2016. “The Port-City Relationships in Two European Inland Ports: A Geographical Perspective on Urban Governance.” Cities50: 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.004.
Del Saz-SalazarSalvadorGarcia-MenendezLeandro. 2003. “The Nonmarket Benefits of Redeveloping Dockland Areas for Recreational Purposes: The Case of Castellón, Spain.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space35 (12): 2115–29. https://doi.org/10.1068/a364.
27.
DoucetBrian. 2013. “Variations of the Entrepreneurial City: Goals, Roles and Visions in Rotterdam’s Kop van Zuid and the Glasgow Harbour Megaprojects.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37 (6): 2035–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01182.x.
28.
EidelmanGabriel. 2018. “Failure When Fragmented: Public Land Ownership and Waterfront Redevelopment in Chicago, Vancouver, and Toronto.” Urban Affairs Review54 (4): 697–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416671429.
29.
ElkinStephen L.1987. City and Regime in the American Republic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
ErieSteven P.KoganVladimirMacKenzieScott A.. 2010. “Redevelopment, San Diego Style: The Limits of Public—Private Partnerships.” Urban Affairs Review45 (5): 644–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087409359760.
31.
FainsteinSusan S.2001. The City Builders: Property Development in New York and London, 1980-2000. 2nd ed., Rev. Studies in Government and Public Policy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
FisherBonnieBensonBeth. 2004. Remaking the Urban Waterfront. Washington, D.C.: Urban Land Institute.
36.
FraserNancy. 2003. “Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics.” In Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, edited by FraserNancyHonnethAxel, 7–109. London; New York: Verso.
37.
FriedenBernard J.SagalynLynne B.. 1989. Downtown, Inc: How America Rebuilds Cities. Fifth printing. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
38.
FriedmanStephen. 2016. Successful Public/Private Partnerships: From Principles to Practices. Washington, D.C.: Urban Land Institute.
39.
GallandDanielHansenCarsten J.. 2012. “The Roles of Planning in Waterfront Redevelopment: From Plan-Led and Market-Driven Styles to Hybrid Planning?” Planning Practice & Research27 (2): 203–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661669.
40.
GardesseCamille. 2015. “The Fraught ‘Menage à Trois’ of Public Actors, Private Players and Inhabitants: Problems of Participation in French Urban Development Projects.” Urban Studies52 (16): 3035–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014555631.
41.
GoldsteinBrett T.MeleChristopher. 2016. “Governance Within Public–Private Partnerships and the Politics of Urban Development.” Space and Polity20 (2): 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2016.1157968.
42.
GordonDavid L. A.1997a. Battery Park City: Politics and Planning on the New York Waterfront. Cities and Regions, v. 1. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.
43.
GordonDavid L. A. 1997b. “Managing the Changing Political Environment in Urban Waterfront Redevelopment.” Urban Studies34 (1): 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098976276.
44.
GothamKevin Fox. 2006. “The Secondary Circuit of Capital Reconsidered: Globalization and the U.S. Real Estate Sector.” American Journal of Sociology112 (1): 231–75. https://doi.org/10.1086/502695.
45.
GualiniEnricoMajoorStan. 2007. “Innovative Practices in Large Urban Development Projects: Conflicting Frames in the Quest for ‘New Urbanity.’” Planning Theory & Practice8 (3): 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350701514637.
46.
GuinandSandra. 2020. “Re-Arranging Public-Private Partnerships: The Case of South Street Seaport New York.” Journal of Urban Affairs0 (0): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1697182.
47.
GuironnetAntoine. 2019. “Cities on the Global Real Estate Marketplace: Urban Development Policy and the Circulation of Financial Standards in Two French Localities.” Urban Geography40 (10): 1527–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1627807.
48.
GuironnetAntoineAttuyerKatiaHalbertLudovic. 2016. “Building Cities on Financial Assets: The Financialisation of Property Markets and Its Implications for City Governments in the Paris City-Region.” Urban Studies53 (7): 1442–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015576474.
49.
HagermanChris. 2007. “Shaping Neighborhoods and Nature: Urban Political Ecologies of Urban Waterfront Transformations in Portland, Oregon.” Cities (London, England), Political Ecologies of Urban Waterfront Transformations, 24 (4): 285–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2006.12.003.
50.
HailaAnne. 2008. “From Annankatu to Antinkatu: Contracts, Development Rights and Partnerships in Kamppi, Helsinki.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32 (4): 804–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00824.x.
51.
HarnerJohnKinderFrank. 2011. “Placelessness in a Deregulated City: University Village in Colorado Springs.” Urban Geography32 (5): 730–55. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.32.5.730.
52.
HarveyDavid. 1973. Social Justice and the City. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
HarveyDavid. 1982. The Limits of Capital. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
55.
HarveyDavid. 1989. “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism.” Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography71 (1): 3. https://doi.org/10.2307/490503.
56.
HoldenMegScerriAndyEsfahaniAzadeh Hadizadeh. 2015. “Justifying Redevelopment ‘Failures’ Within Urban ‘Success Stories’: Dispute, Compromise, and a New Test of Urbanity.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39 (3): 451–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12182.
57.
HunterFloyd. 1953. Community Power Structure. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
58.
HunterMarcus AnthonyLoughranKevinFineGary Alan. 2018. “Memory Politics: Growth Coalitions, Urban Pasts, and the Creation of ‘Historic’ Philadelphia.” City & Community17 (2): 330–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12299.
59.
HyraDerek S. 2012. “Conceptualizing the New Urban Renewal: Comparing the Past to the Present.” Urban Affairs Review48 (4): 498–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087411434905.
60.
JacobsKeith. 2004. “Waterfront Redevelopment: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Policy-Making Process Within the Chatham Maritime Project.” Urban Studies41 (4): 817–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000194124.
61.
Janssen-JansenLeonie Bvan der VeenMenno. 2017. “Contracting Communities: Conceptualizing Community Benefits Agreements to Improve Citizen Involvement in Urban Development Projects.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space49 (1): 205–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16664730.
62.
JessopBob. 2002. “Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State-Theoretical Perspective.” Antipode34 (3): 452–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00250.
63.
JonesCalvin. 2001. “A Level Playing Field? Sports Stadium Infrastructure and Urban Development in the United Kingdom.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space33 (5): 845–61. https://doi.org/10.1068/a33158.
64.
JonesCalvin. 2002. “The Stadium and Economic Development: Cardiff and the Millennium Stadium.” European Planning Studies10 (7): 819–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431022000013239.
65.
KlemekChristopher. 2012. The Transatlantic Collapse of Urban Renewal: Postwar Urbanism from New York to Berlin. Paperback ed. Historical Studies of Urban America. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
66.
LeePhillip. 2002. “The Economic and Social Justification for Publicly Financed Stadia: The Case of Vancouver’s BC Place Stadium.” European Planning Studies10 (7): 861–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431022000013266.
67.
LehrerUteLaidleyJennefer. 2008. “Old Mega-Projects Newly Packaged? Waterfront Redevelopment in Toronto.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32 (4): 786–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00830.x.
68.
LevineMarc v. 1987. “Downtown Redevelopment as an Urban Growth Strategy: A Critical Appraisal of the Baltimore Renaissance.” Journal of Urban Affairs9 (2): 103–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.1987.tb00468.x.
69.
LippertRandy K.2019. Condo Conquest: Urban Governance, Law, and Condoization in New York City and Toronto. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.
70.
LoganJohn R.MolotchHarvey Luskin. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
71.
LoganJohn R.SwanstromTodd. 1990. Beyond the City Limits: Urban Policy and Economic Restructuring in Comparative Perspective. Philadelphia [Penn.: Temple Univ. Press. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10292352.
72.
MacLeodGordon. 2002. “From Urban Entrepreneurialism to a ‘Revanchist City’? On the Spatial Injustices of Glasgow’s Renaissance.” Antipode34 (3): 602–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00256.
73.
MadureiraAna Mafalda. 2014. “Physical Planning in Entrepreneurial Urban Governance—Experiences from the Bo01 and Brunnshög Projects, Sweden.” European Planning Studies22 (11): 2369–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.843650.
74.
MadureiraAna MafaldaBaetenGuy. 2016. “By Invitation Only: Uses and Users of the ‘Entrepreneurial City.’” International Planning Studies21 (4): 362–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2016.1157015.
75.
MajoorStan. 2008. “Progressive Planning Ideals in a Neo-Liberal Context, the Case of Ørestad Copenhagen.” International Planning Studies13 (2): 101–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470802291978.
76.
MajoorStan. 2011. “Framing Large-Scale Projects: Barcelona Forum and the Challenge of Balancing Local and Global Needs.” Journal of Planning Education and Research31 (2): 143–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X11402694.
77.
MarantzNicholas J. 2015. “What Do Community Benefits Agreements Deliver? Evidence From Los Angeles.” Journal of the American Planning Association81 (4): 251–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2015.1092093.
78.
MazarAlissa. 2018. “Growth Coalitions in Declining Cities: Casinos, Redevelopment, and Inter-Urban Competition.” Urban Geography39 (6): 822–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1405686.
79.
McGovernStephen J. 2008. “Evolving Visions of Waterfront Development in Postindustrial Philadelphia: The Formative Role of Elite Ideologies.” Journal of Planning History7 (4): 295–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538513208315756.
80.
MoulaertFrankSalinElodieWerquinThomas. 2001. “Euralille: Large-Scale Urban Development and Social Polarization.” European Urban and Regional Studies8 (2): 145–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977640100800205.
81.
MoulaertFrankSwyngedouwErikRodriguezArantxa. 2001. “Large Scale Urban Development Projects and Local Governance: From Democratic Urban Planning to Besieged Local Governance.” Geographische Zeitschrift89 (2/3): 71–84. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27818901 .
82.
NiitamoAnnaliina. 2020. “Planning in No One’s Backyard: Municipal Planners’ Discourses of Participation in Brownfield Projects in Helsinki, Amsterdam and Copenhagen.” European Planning Studies0 (0): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1792842.
83.
NijkampPetervan der BurchMarcVindigniGabriella. 2002. “A Comparative Institutional Evaluation of Public-Private Partnerships in Dutch Urban Land-Use and Revitalisation Projects.” Urban Studies39 (10): 1865–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098022000002993.
84.
NoringLuiseOhlerLaura PriscaStruthersDavid. 2021. “City Government Capacity and Patterns in Urban Development Project Governance.” Urban Affairs Review. 57 (5): 1343–1371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419897808.
85.
NorrisMichelleHearneRory. 2016. “Privatizing Public Housing Redevelopment: Grassroots Resistance, Co-Operation and Devastation in Three Dublin Neighbourhoods.” Cities (London, England), Resistance to Social Housing Transformation, 57 (September): 40–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.12.006.
86.
OakleySusan. 2005. “Working Port or Lifestyle Port? A Preliminary Analysis of the Port Adelaide Waterfront Redevelopment.” Geographical Research43 (3): 319–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2005.00331.x.
87.
OakleySusan. 2009. “Governing Urban Waterfront Renewal: The Politics, Opportunities and Challenges for the Inner Harbour of Port Adelaide, Australia.” Australian Geographer40 (3): 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180903127747.
88.
OakleySusan. 2011. “Re-Imagining City Waterfronts: A Comparative Analysis of Governing Renewal in Adelaide, Darwin and Melbourne.” Urban Policy and Research29 (3): 221–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2011.592133.
89.
OcejoRichard E. 2021. “The Precarious Project and the Wasted Opportunity: The Social and Cultural Dynamics of Conflict Over Urban Development.” Urban Affairs Review57 (4): 952–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087420908943.
90.
OppioAlessandraDell’OvoMartaTorrieriFrancescaMiebsGrzegorzKadzińskiMiłosz. 2020. “Understanding the Drivers of Urban Development Agreements with the Rough Set Approach and Robust Decision Rules.” Land Use Policy96 (July): 104678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104678.
91.
OruetaFernando DiazFainsteinSusan S.. 2008. “The New Mega-Projects: Genesis and Impacts.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32 (4): 759–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00829.x.
92.
PagliarinSofiaHerspergerAnna M.RihouxBenoît. 2020. “Implementation Pathways of Large-Scale Urban Development Projects (LsUDPs) in Western Europe: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA).” European Planning Studies28 (6): 1242–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1681942.
PolsbyNelson W.1980. Community Power and Political Theory: A Further Look at Problems of Evidence and Inference. New Haven: Yale University Press.
95.
RacoMikeHendersonSteven. 2009. “Flagship Regeneration in a Global City: The Re-Making of Paddington Basin.” Urban Policy and Research27 (3): 301–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140902968737.
RosentraubMark S.2009. Major League Winners: Using Sports and Cultural Centers as Tools for Economic Development. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. http://www.crcnetbase.com/isbn/9781439801628.
SagalynLynne B. 1997. “Negotiating for Public Benefits: The Bargaining Calculus of Public-Private Development.” Urban Studies34 (12): 1955–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098975169.
SagalynLynne B.2016. Power at Ground Zero: Politics, Money, and the Remaking of Lower Manhattan. New York: Oxford University Press.
103.
SaitoLeland T. 2012. “How Low-Income Residents Can Benefit from Urban Development: The LA Live Community Benefits Agreement.” City & Community11 (2): 129–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2012.01399.x.
104.
SaitoLeland. 2019. “Urban Development and the Growth with Equity Framework: The National Football League Stadium in Downtown Los Angeles.” Urban Affairs Review55 (5): 1370–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087417751216.
105.
SaitoLelandTruongJonathan. 2015. “The L.A. Live Community Benefits Agreement: Evaluating the Agreement Results and Shifting Political Power in the City.” Urban Affairs Review51 (2): 263–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414527064.
SandercockLeonieDoveyKim. 2002. “Pleasure, Politics, and the ‘Public Interest’: Melbourne’s Riverscape Revitalization.” Journal of the American Planning Association68 (2): 151–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208976262.
108.
SaviniFederico. 2013. “The Governability of National Spatial Planning: Light Instruments and Logics of Governmental Action in Strategic Urban Development.” Urban Studies50 (8): 1592–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012465131.
109.
SawickiDavid S. 1989. “The Festival Marketplace as Public Policy: Guidelines for Future Policy Decisions.” Journal of the American Planning Association55 (3): 347–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368908975422.
110.
SchererJay. 2011. “Olympic Villages and Large-Scale Urban Development: Crises of Capitalism, Deficits of Democracy?” Sociology45 (5): 782–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511413433.
111.
SchererJay. 2016. “Resisting the World-Class City: Community Opposition and the Politics of a Local Arena Development.” Sociology of Sport Journal33 (1): 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2015-0054.
112.
SchererJaySamMichael P.. 2008. “Public Consultation and Stadium Developments: Coercion and the Polarization of Debate.” Sociology of Sport Journal25 (4): 443–61. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.25.4.443.
113.
SchlichtingKara Murphy. 2017. “Rethinking the Bronx’s ‘Soundview Slums’: The Intersecting Histories of Large-Scale Waterfront Redevelopment and Community-Scaled Planning in an Era of Urban Renewal.” Journal of Planning History16 (2): 112–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538513216661206.
114.
SchwarzerMitchell. 2015. “Oakland City Center: The Plan to Reposition Downtown Within the Bay Region.” Journal of Planning History14 (2): 88–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538513214543985.
SmithNeil. 1979. “Toward a Theory of Gentrification A Back to the City Movement by Capital, Not People.” Journal of the American Planning Association45 (4): 538–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367908977002.
117.
SmithNeil. 1984. Uneven Development. New York, NY: Blackwell.
SrokaRobert. 2020. “Getting STIF[Ed]: Louisville’s Yum! Center, Sales-Tax Increment Financing, and Megaproject Underperformance.” Urban Affairs Review56 (5): 1553–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419830527.
120.
StoneClarence N.1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Studies in Government and Public Policy. Lawrence, Kan: University Press of Kansas.
SwyngedouwErikMoulaertFrankRodriguezArantxa. 2002. “Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large–Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy.” Antipode34 (3): 542–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00254.
Taşan-KokTuna. 2010. “Entrepreneurial Governance: Challenges of Large-Scale Property-Led Urban Regeneration Projects.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie101 (2): 126–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00521.x.
125.
TaylorBruce MHarmanBen P. 2016. “Governing Urban Development for Climate Risk: What Role for Public-Private Partnerships?.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy34 (5): 927–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15614692.
126.
van der VeenMennoKorthals AltesWillem K.. 2012. “Contracts and Learning in Complex Urban Projects: Contracts and Learning in Complex Urban Projects.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research36 (5): 1053–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01053.x.
127.
van den HurkMartijnTasan-KokTuna. 2020. “Contractual Arrangements and Entrepreneurial Governance: Flexibility and Leeway in Urban Regeneration Projects.” Urban Studies57 (16): 3217–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019894277.
128.
van der VeenMennoKorthals AltesWillem K.. 2011. “Urban Development Agreements: Do They Meet Guiding Principles for a Better Deal?” Cities (London, England)28 (4): 310–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.03.001.
WeberRachel. 2010. “Selling City Futures: The Financialization of Urban Redevelopment Policy: ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY.” Economic Geography86 (3): 251–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01077.x.
131.
WeberRachel. 2015. From Boom to Bubble: How Finance Built the New Chicago. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
132.
Wolf-PowersLaura. 2010. “Community Benefits Agreements and Local Government.” Journal of the American Planning Association76 (2): 141–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360903490923.
133.
zogulSaraTasan-KokTuna. 2020. “One and the Same? A Systematic Literature Review of Residential Property Investor Types.” Journal of Planning Literature35 (4): 475–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220944919.
