Planners and urban designers have long sought to encourage the creation of livable streets. Despite these professions’ best efforts, the creation of such streets has proven difficult to implement due to the design practices employed by traffic engineers. This article details how engineering practices modify the design of urban streets and provides a thematic review of recent innovations to engineering guidance. It concludes by presenting four general strategies for ensuring that walkable streets emerge from the engineering phases of the project planning and design process.
AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2011a. A Policy on the Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 6th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
2.
AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2011b. Roadside Design Guide, 4th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AppleyardD.GersonM. S.LintellM.1981. Livable Streets. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
BernB.MarshallW. E.2013. “Capacity Analysis of Pedestrian Treatments at Large Arterial Intersections and Comparison with a Lane-equivalent, Small Intersection Gridded Network.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development139 (4): 241–49.
6.
BiswasS.ChandraS.GhoshI.2017. “Effects of On-street Parking in Urban Context: A Critical Review.” Transportation in Developing Economies3 (10). doi:10.1007/s40890-017-0040-2.
7.
City of Boston. 2013. Boston Complete Streets Design Guidelines. Boston, MA: Boston Transportation Department.
8.
City of Chicago DOT (Department of Transportation). 2013. Complete Streets Chicago. Chicago, IL: City of Chicago DOT.
9.
CNU Project for Transportation Reform. 2012. Sustainable Street Network Principles. Chicago, IL: Congress for the New Urbanism
10.
DixonK.LieblerM.ZhuH.HunterM. P.MattoxB.2008. NCHRP Report 612: Safe and Aesthetic Design of Urban Roadside Treatments. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies of Science.
11.
DuanyA.Plater-ZyberkE.SpeckJ.2000. Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream. New York: North Point Press.
12.
DumbaughE.2005. “Safe Streets, Livable Streets.” Journal of the American Planning Association71 (3): 283–98.
13.
DumbaughE.2006. “The Design of Safe Urban Roadsides: An Empirical Analysis” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 196174–82.
14.
DumbaughE.2013. “A Positive Approach to Urban Road Safety.” In Safety, Sustainability, and Future Urban Transport, 141–61. New Delhi, India: Eicher Goodearth.
15.
DumbaughE.LiW.2011. “Designing for the Safety of Pedestrians, Cyclists, and Motorists in Urban Environments.” Journal of the American Planning Association77 (1): 69–88.
EwingR.1994. “Residential Street Design: Do the British and Australians Know Something That Americans Do Not?” Transportation Research Record1455:42–49.
18.
EwingR.BrownS. J.2009. U.S. Traffic Calming Manual. New York: Routledge.
19.
EwingR.CerveroR.2010. “Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of the American Planning Association76 (3): 265–94.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 1997. Flexibility in Highway Design. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.
22.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2009. Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.
23.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2014. Handbook for Designing Roadways for an Aging Population. Washington DC: US Department of Transportation.
24.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2015. Delivering Safe, Comfortable, and Connected Pedestrian and Bicycle Networks: A Review of International Practices. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.
25.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2016. Achieving Multimodal Networks: Applying Design Flexibility and Reducing Conflicts. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.
26.
Fire Apparatus Manufacturers Association. 2011. Emergency Vehicle Size and Weight Regulation Guidance. Ocala, FL: Fire Apparatus Manufacturers’ Association.
27.
FitzpatrickK.CarlsonP.BrewerM.WooldridgeM.2001. “Design Factors That Affect Driver Speed on Suburban Streets.” Transportation Research Record1751:18–25.
28.
GarderP. E.2004. “The Impact of Speed and Other Variables on Pedestrian Safety in Maine.” Accident Analysis and Prevention36 (4): 533–42.
29.
HallmarkS. L.MuellerK.2004. Impact of Left-turn Phasing on Older and Younger Drivers at High-speed Intersections. Ames: Iowa Department of Transportation.
30.
HarwoodD.TorbicD. J.RichardK. R.GlauzW. D.ElefteriadouL.2003. NCHRP Report 505: Review of Truck Characteristics as Factors in Roadway Design. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
31.
International Code Council. 2015. International Fire Code. Country Club Hills, IL: International Code Council.
32.
ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers). 2010. Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context Sensitive Approach. Washington, DC: ITE.
ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers). 2015. Recommended Design Guidelines to Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicycles at Interchanges. Washington, DC: ITE.
IvanJ.GarrickN. W.HansonG.2009. “Designing Roads that Guide Drivers to Choose Safety Speeds.” Report No. JHR 09-321, Connecticut Transportation Institute, Storrs.
37.
JacobsA. B.1995. Great Streets. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
38.
JacobsA. B.MacDonaldE.RofeY.2003. The Boulevard Book: History, Evolution, Design of Multiway Boulevards. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
39.
JacobsJ.2004. Dark Age Ahead. New York: Random House.
40.
KanellaidisG.GoliasJ.ZarifopoulosK.1995. “A Survey of Drivers’ Attitudes toward Speed Limit Violations.” Journal of Safety Research26 (1): 31–40.
41.
Kittelson and Associates, Inc., Parsons Bricnkerhod, KFH Group, Texas A&M Research Institute, and Arup. 2017. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
42.
KnappK.ChandlerB.AtkinsonJ.WelchT.RigdonH.RettingR.MeekinsS.WidstrandE.PorterR. J.2014. Road Diet Informational Guide. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.
LA County DOT (Los Angeles County Department of Transportation). 2011. Model Design Manual for Living Streets. Los Angeles, CA: LA County DOT.
45.
LammR.PsarianosB.MailaenderT.1999. Highway Design and Traffic Engineering Handbook. New York: McGraw Hill.
46.
MuellerB.2014. “25 MPH Speed Limit Takes Effect in New York.” New York Times, November 7.
47.
NACTO (National Association of City Transportation Officials). 2011. Urban Bikeway Design Guide, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Island Press.
48.
NACTO (National Association of City Transportation Officials). 2013. Urban Street Design Guide. Washington, DC: Island Press.
49.
NACTO (National Association of City Transportation Officials). 2016. Transit Street Design Guide. Washington, DC: Island Press.
50.
NeumanT. R.SchwartzM.ClarkL.BednarJ.2002. NCHRP Report 480: A Guide to Best Practices to Achieving Context-sensitive Solutions. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
51.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2016. Zero Road Deaths and Serious Injuries: Leading a Paradigm Shift to a Safe System. Paris, France: OECD.
52.
ParsonsonP.2002.
“The Design Driver in Crash Litigation.”
ITE Annual Meeting CD-ROM
. Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers.
53.
PottsI. B.HarwoodD. W.RichardK. R.2007. “Relationship of Lane Width to Safety on Urban and Suburban Arterials.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2023: 63–82.
54.
RosenE.SanderU.2009. “Pedestrian Fatality Risk as a Function of Car Impact Speed.” Accident Analysis and Prevention41 (3): 536–42.
55.
ShawT.2003. NCHRP 311: Performance Measures of Operational Effectiveness for Highway Segments and Systems. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
56.
SkeneM.1999. “Traffic Calming on Arterial Roadways?” In Institute of Transportation Engineers Compendium of Technical Papers. Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers.
57.
SnyderRyanSiegmanPatrickHuffHerbieMcCormickCullen. 2013. Best Practices for Emergency Access in Healthy Streets. Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles County Department of Public Health.
UlfarssonG. F.KimS.LentzE. T.2006. “Factors Affecting Common Vehicle-to-vehicle Collision Types: Road Safety Priorities in an Aging Society.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1980:70–78.
61.
UrbanikT.TanakaA.LoznerB.LindstromE.LeemK.QuayleS.BeairdS.2015. NCHRP Report 812: Signal Timing Manual, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
62.
WarnerH. W.AbergL.2008. “Drivers’ Beliefs about Exceeding the Speed Limits.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour11 (5): 379–89.
63.
WelleB.LiW.AdriazolaC.KingR.ObelheiroM.SarmientoC.LiuQ.2015. Cities Safer by Design: Urban Design Recommendations for Healthier Cities, Fewer Traffic Fatalities. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
YannisG.LoucaG.VardakiS.2013. “Why Do Drivers Exceed Posted Speed Limits?” European Transportation Research Review5 (3): 165–77.
67.
ZegeerC. V.SeidermanC.LagerweyP.CyneckiM.RonkinM.SchniederR.2002. “Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide—Providing Safety and Mobility.” Report No. FHWA-RD-102-01, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
68.
ZegeerC. V.StewartJ. R.HuangH. H.LagerweyP. A.FeaganesJ.CampbellB. J.2005. Safety Effects of Marked Versus Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations: Final Report and Recommended Guidelines. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
