By integrating literature on transportation planning, megaprojects, and public choice theory, this article identifies the following eight factors that can cause delays in planning transportation megaprojects in the United States: impacts to neighborhoods and the environment, laws and regulations relating to the environment and planning, insufficient funding, changes in scope and design of a project, government bureaucracies and conflict between agencies, overly optimistic expectations, uncertainty involved in identifying the best alternative, and the absence of an effective public sector champion.
AckermanFrank. 2008. “Critique of Cost-benefit Analysis, and Alternative Approaches to Decision-making. A Report to Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland.” Accessed December 16, 2014, http://www.ase.tufts.edu/gdae/Pubs/rp/Ack_UK_CBAcritique.pdf.
2.
AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2007. Transportation - Invest in Our Future: Accelerating Project Delivery. Washington, DC. Accessed December 16, 2014, http://downloads.transportation.org/TIF7-1.pdf.
3.
AlesinaAlbertoGlaeserEdwardSacerdoteBruce. 2001. Why Doesn’t the US Have a European-style Welfare System?Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
4.
AltshulerAlanLuberoffDavid. 2003. Mega-projects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
5.
Benjamin-BothwellSharon. 2003. “An Intervention Addressing a Wicked Problem: Leadership Tension between Executives and Boards in National Nonprofit Organizations.” PhD in Interdisciplinary Studies, Union Institute and University Graduate College.
6.
BerechmanJoseph. 2009. The Evaluation of Transportation Investment Projects. New York: Routledge.
7.
BesleyTimothy. 2011. “Pathologies of the State.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization80 (2): 339–50.
8.
BruijnHans deLeijtenMartijn. 2008. “Mega-projects and Contested Information.” In Decision-making on Mega-projects: Cost-benefit Analysis, Planning, and Innovation, edited by PriemusHugoFlyvbjergBentWeeBert Van, 84–104. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
BuchananJames M.TullockGordon. 1962. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11.
BuchholzT. G.2007. New Ideas from Dead Economists: An Introduction to Modern Economic Thought. New York: Penguin Group.
12.
BuehlerRogerGriffinDaleRossMichael. 1994. “Exploring the “Planning Fallacy”: Why People Underestimate their Task Completion Times.” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology67 (3): 366–81.
13.
CapkaJ. R.2004. “Megaprojects: They Are a Different Breed.” Public Roads68, no. 1 (2004): 2–9.
14.
ChurchGardner. 1996. “The North American Failure: The Governance of Regional Cities.” In Local Places in the Age of the Global City, edited by KeilRogerWekerleGerda R.BellDavid V. J., 99–106. Montréal, Canada: Black Rose Books.
15.
CromptonJ. L.2006. “Economic Impact Studies: Instruments for Political Shenanigans?” Journal of Travel Research45 (1): 67–82.
16.
CrossettJoeSecrestCraig. 2006. Costs Related to Compliance with Federal Environmental Laws: Case Studies in the Federal-aid Highway Program. Washington, DC: Prepared by TransTech Management Inc. for the Federal Highway Administration’s Office of Planning, Environment and Realty.
17.
Deloitte and Federal Transit Administration. 2007. New Starts Program Assessment (Final Report). Washington, DC: Federal Transit Administration.
18.
DewarJames A.WachsMartin. 2006. Transportation Planning, Climate Change, and Decisionmaking Under Uncertainty. Washington, DC: Proceedings of the Workshop Conference on Climate Change and U.S. Transportation, National Academies of Sciences and Engineering.
19.
DillJennifer. 2006. What Influences the Length of Time to Complete NEPA Reviews?: An Examination of Highway Projects in Oregon and the Potential for Streamlining. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting.
20.
DownsAnthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
FlemingS. A.2009. Public Transportation: Better Data Needed to Assess Length of New Starts Process, and Options Exist to Expedite Project Development: United States Government Accountability Office. Accessed December 16, 2014, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-784.
27.
FlyvbjergBent. 2005. “Policy and Planning for Large Infrastructure Projects: Problems, Causes, Cures.” Policy Research Working Paper 3781, World Bank, Washington, DC.
28.
FlyvbjergBent. 2008. “Curbing Optimism Bias and Strategic Misrepresentation in Planning: Reference Class Forecasting in Practice.” European Planning Studies16 (1): 3–21.
29.
FlyvbjergBentBruzeliusNilsRothengatterWerner. 2003. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
FrickKaren Trapenberg. 2008. “The Cost of the Technological Sublime: Daring Ingenuity and the New San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.” In Decision-making on Mega-projects: Cost-benefit Analysis, Planning and Innovation, edited by PriemusH.FlyvbjergB.WeeBert Van, 239–62. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
31.
GoetzA. R.SzyliowiczJ. S.. 1997. “Revisiting Transportation Planning and Decision Making Theory: The Case of Denver International Airport.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice31 (4): 263–80.
32.
HansenRogerWolffTheodoreMelcherAlbert. 2007. “Commentary: NEPA and Environmental Streamlining: Benefits and Risks.” Environmental Practice9 (2): 83–95.
33.
HowlettMichaelRameshM.PerlAnthony. 2009. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles & Policy Subsystems. Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press.
34.
InnesJudith E.GruberJudith. 2005. “Planning Styles in Conflict.” Journal of the American Planning Association71 (2): 177–88.
35.
KaarboJulietGruenfeldDeborah. 1998. “The Social Psychology of Inter-and Intragroup Conflict in Governmental Politics.” Mershon International Studies Review42 (2): 226–33.
36.
KeckDennisPatelHinaScolaroAnthonyBlochArnoldRyanChristopher. 2010. “Accelerating Transportation Project and Program Delivery: Conception to Completion.” Transportation Research Board. Accessed December 16, 2014, http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_662.pdf.
37.
KhistyC. J.2005. “Possibilities of Steering the Transportation Planning Process in the Face of Bounded Rationality and Unbounded Uncertainty.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies13 (2): 77–92.
38.
LeightJessica. 2010. “Public Choice: A Critical Reassessment.” In Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of Regulation, edited by BalleisenEdwardMossDavid A., 213–55. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
LitmanTodd. 2009. Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis: Techniques, Estimates and Implications. Victoria, Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
40.
LohmannSusanne. 1996. “The Poverty of Green and Shapiro.” In The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered, edited by FriedmanJeffrey127–54. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
MallettW. J.LutherL.. 2011. Accelerating Highway and Transit Project Delivery: Issues and Options for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
MoeTerry M.1989. “The Politics of Bureaucratic Structure.” In Can the Government Govern? edited by ChubbJohn E.PetersonPaul E., 267–329. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
44.
MolotchH.1976. “The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place.” American Journal of Sociology82 (2): 309–32.
45.
MungerMichael C.2011. “Persuasion, Psychology and Public Choice.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization80 (2): 290–300.
46.
OstromElinor. 2011. “Honoring James Buchanan.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization80 (2): 370–73.
47.
PaganoMichael. 1997. Cityscapes and Capital: The Politics of Urban Development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
48.
PiersonPaul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review94 (2): 251–67.
RasouliS.TimmermansH.. 2012. “Uncertainty in Travel Demand Forecasting Models: Literature Review and Research Agenda.” Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research4 (1): 55–73.
51.
RittelH. W. J.WebberM. M.. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences4 (2): 155–69.
52.
SchillerP. L.BruunE. C.KenworthyJ. R.. 2010. An Introduction to Sustainable Transportation: Policy, Planning and Implementation. Washington, DC: Earthscan.
53.
SchroederChristopher. 2009. “Public Choice and Environmental Policy: A Review of the Literature.” In Handbook on Public Law and Public Choice, edited by FarberDanElgarAnne Joseph O’ Connell.. Accessed December 16, 2014, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1401375.
54.
ShortJ.KoppA.. 2005. “Transport Infrastructure: Investment and Planning. Policy and Research Aspects.” Transport Policy12 (4): 360–67.
55.
SmithAngela M.WoodWilliam C.. 2010. “Public Choice and Behavioral Economics.” In Teaching Economics in Troubled Times: Theory and Practice for Secondary Social Studies, edited by SchugMarkWoodWilliam, 61–78. New York: Routledge.
56.
SteinRobertBickersKenneth. 1994. “Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel.” The Journal of Politics56 (2): 377.
57.
SweetMatthias. 2011. “Does Traffic Congestion Slow the Economy?” Journal of Planning Literature26 (4): 391–404.
TolstoyLeo. 2000. Anna Karenina, trans. PevearR.VolokhonskyL.. New York: Penguin Books.
60.
TransTech Management Inc. 2003. Causes and Extent of Environmental Delays in Transportation Projects. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board.
61.
TullockGordonSeldonArthurBradyGordon L.. 2002. Government Failure: A Primer in Public Choice. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
US DOT (U.S. Department of Transportation John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center). 2008. Meeting Environmental Requirements after a Bridge Collapse. Accessed December 16, 2014, http://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/projdev/bridge_casestudy.asp.
64.
US General Accounting Office. 2003. Highway Infrastructure: Stakeholders’ Views on Time to Conduct Environmental Reviews of Highway Projects (Report to the Chairman, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives). Accessed December 16, 2014, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-03-534.
Van WeeBertTavasszyLorant A.. 2008. “Ex-ante Evaluation of Mega-projects: Methodological Issues and Cost-benefit Analysis.” In Decision-Making on Mega-Projects: Cost-Benefit Analysis, Planning and Innovation, edited by PriemusH.FlyvbjergB.WeeBert Van, 40–65. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
67.
VickermanRoger W.2008. “Cost-benefit Analysis and the Wider Economic Benefits from Mega-projects.” In Decision-Making on Mega-Projects: Cost-Benefit Analysis, Planning and Innovation, edited by PriemusH.FlyvbjergB.WeeBert Van, 66–83. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
68.
WachsMartin. 1990. “Ethics and Advocacy in Forecasting for Public Policy.” Business & Professional Ethics Journal9 (1): 141.
69.
WintrobeRonald. 1997. “Modern Bureaucratic Theory.” In Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, edited by DennisMueller C.429–54. New York: Cambridge University Press.
