Despite the centrality of comprehensive plans to the profession of city and regional planning, there is a gap in knowledge about the quality of plans as they are not routinely evaluated against best practice standards. We discuss plan quality evaluation, an emerging methodology for assessing the quality of plans. We review the evolution of the concept, the dimensions covered, and the principles and criteria used. We then provide a comparative meta-analytic analysis of the findings from published plan quality evaluations, ranging from research studies in the United States to national planning policy applications in Holland and New Zealand, and offer recommendations about future directions in improving content analysis of plan documents and research design in plan quality evaluation.
Baer, W.C.1997. General plan evaluation criteria: An approach to making better plans. Journal of the American Planning Association63 (3): 329-45.
2.
Ballon, H., and K. T. Jackson , eds. 2007. Robert Moses and the modern city: The transformation of New York. New York: Norton.
3.
Bartholomew, K.2007. Land use transportation scenario planning in an era of global climate change. Transportation34 (4): 397-412.
4.
Beatley, T.1999. Green urbanism: Learning from European cities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
5.
---. 2005. Native to nowhere: Sustaining home and community in a global age. Washington, DC: Island Press.
6.
Berke, P.R., M. Backhurst, L. Laurian, J. Crawford, and J. Dixon.2006. What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design33 (4): 581-600.
7.
Berke, P.R., J. Crawford, J. Dixon, and N. Ericksen.1999. Do cooperative environmental planning mandates produce good plans? Empirical results from the New Zealand experience . Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26: 643-64.
8.
Berke, P.R., J. Dixon, and N. Ericksen.1997. Coercive and cooperative intergovernmental mandates: A comparative analysis of Florida and New Zealand environmental plans. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design24: 451-68.
9.
Berke, P.R., N. Ericksen, J. Crawford, and J. Dixon.2002. Planning for indigenous people: Human rights and environmental protection in New Zealand. Journal of Planning Education and Research22: 115-34.
10.
Berke, P.R., D.R. Godschalk, and E.J. Kaiser, with D.A. Rodriguez .2006. Urban land use planning. 5th ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
11.
Berke, P.R., and M. Manta-Conroy .2000. Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning Association66 (1): 21-33.
12.
Berke, P.R., D. Roenigk, E. Kaiser, and R. Burby.1996. Enhancing plan quality: Evaluating the role of state planning mandates for natural hazard mitigation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management39 (1): 79-96.
13.
Brody, S.2003a. Are we learning to make better plans? A longitudinal analysis of plan quality associated with natural hazards. Journal of Planning Education and Research23 (2): 191-201.
14.
---. 2003b. Implementing the principles of ecosystem management through local land use planning. Population and Environment29 (6): 511-40.
15.
Brody, S., V. Carrasco, and W. Highfield.2006. Measuring the adoption of local sprawl reduction planning policies in Florida. Journal of Planning Education and Research25: 294-310.
16.
Brody, S., W. Highfield, and V. Carrasco.2004. Measuring the collective planning capabilities of local jurisdictions to manage ecological systems in southern Florida. Landscape and Urban Planning69: 32-50.
17.
Bullard, R., ed. 2007. Growing smarter: Achieving livable communities, environmental justice, and regional equity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
18.
Burby, R.J., P.R. Berke, R.E. Doyle, S.F. French, D.R. Godschalk, E.J. Kaiser, J.D. Kartez, P.J. May, R. Olshansky, R.G. Paterson, and R.H. Platt.1999. Unleashing the power of planning to create disaster-resistant communities. Journal of the American Planning Association65 (3): 247-58.
19.
Burby, R.J., and L.C. Dalton.1994. Plans can matter! The role of land use plans and state planning mandates in limiting the development of hazardous areas. Public Administration Review54 (3): 230-38.
20.
Burby, R.J., and P.J. May, with Philip R. Berke , Linda C. Dalton, Steven P. French, and Edward J. Kaiser.1997. Making Governments Plan: State Experiments in Managing Land Use. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
Caro, R.A.1974. The power broker: Robert Moses and the fall of New York . New York: Knopf.
22.
Deyle, R.E., and R.A. Smith.1998. Local government compliance with state plan mandates: The effects of state implementation in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association64 (4): 457-69.
23.
Edwards, M.M., and A. Haines.2007. Evaluating smart growth: Implications for small communities. Journal of Planning Education and Research27 (1): 49-64.
24.
Ericksen, N., P. Berke, and J. Crawford.2004. Plan-making for sustainability: The New Zealand experience. London: Ashgate.
25.
Esnard, A., P. Berke, D. Godschalk, and E. Kaiser.2006. Hypothetical city workbook III: Exercises in GIS data to accompany urban land use planning. 5th ed. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
26.
Glass, G.1977. Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education5: 351-79.
27.
Godschalk, D.R.2004. Land use planning challenges: Coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable development and livable communities. Journal of the American Planning Association70 (1): 1-9.
28.
Godschalk, D.R., T. Beatley, P. Berke, D. Brower, and E. Kaiser.1999. Natural hazard mitigation: Recasting disaster policy and planning, 327-91. Washington, DC: Island Press.
---. 2007. How plan mandates work: Affordable housing in Illinois . Journal of the American planning Association73 (1): 86-99.
31.
Hopkins, L.D.2001. Urban development: The logic of making plans. Washington, DC: Island Press.
32.
Kaiser, E.J., and J. Davies.1999. What a good plan should contain: A proposed model. Carolina Planning24 (2): 29-41.
33.
Kaiser, E.J., and D.R. Godschalk.1995. Twentieth century land use planning: A stalwart family tree. Journal of the American Planning Association61 (3): 365-85.
34.
Kaiser, E.J., D.R. Godschalk, and S. Chapin Jr.1995. Urban land use planning. 4th ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
35.
Kalkhoff, W., and S. Thye.2006. Expectation states theory and research: New observations from meta-analysis. Sociological Methods and Research35 (2): 219-49.
36.
Knaap, G.J., C. Ding, and L.D. Hopkins.2001. Do plans matter? The effects of light rail plans on land values in station areas. Journal of Planning Education and Research21: 32-39.
37.
Krippendorff, K.2004. Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communications Research30 (3): 411-33.
38.
Lombard, M., J. Snyder-Duch, and C. Bracken.2002. Content analysis in mass communication research: An assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research28: 587-604.
39.
Meck, S., ed. 2002. Growing smart legislative guidebook: Model statutes for planning and management of change. 2 vols. Chicago: American Planning Association.
40.
Nelson, A., and S. French.2002. Plan quality and mitigating damage from natural disasters: A case study of the Northridge Earthquake with planning considerations. Journal of the American Planning Association68 (2): 194-207.
41.
Norton, R.2005. More and better local planning: State-mandated local planning in coastal North Carolina. Journal of the American Planning Association71 (1): 55-72.
42.
Schon, D.A.1983. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
43.
Smith, C.2006. The Plan of Chicago: Daniel Burnham and the remaking of the American city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Talen, E.1996. After the plans: Methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research16 (2): 79-91.
45.
Termorshuizen, J., P. Opdam, and A. van den Brink .2007. Incorporating ecological sustainability into landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning79: 374-84.
46.
Tomalty, R., and D. Alexander.2005. Smart growth in Canada: A report card . Ottawa: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
47.
Wolf, F.1986. Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis . London: Sage.
