To fabricate electroactive fibrous membranes and provide simulated bioelectric micro-environment for bone regeneration mimicking nature periosteum, a series of electroactive polyurethanes (PUAT) were synthesized using amino-capped aniline trimers (AT) and lysine derivatives as chain extenders. These PUAT were fabricated into fibrous membranes as guided bone tissue regeneration membranes (GBRMs) via electrospinning. The ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry (CV) of PUAT copolymers showed that the electroactive PUAT fibrous membranes had good electroactivity. Besides, the introduction of AT significantly improved the hydrophobicity and thermal stability of PUAT fibrous membranes and decreased the degradation rate of PUAT fibers in vitro. With the increasing content of AT incorporated into copolymers, the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of PUAT fibrous membranes increased from 4 MPa (PUAT0) to 15 MPa (PUAT10) and from 2.1 MPa (PUAT0) to 18 MPa (PUAT10), respectively. The cell morphology and proliferation of rat mesenchymal stem cells (rMSCs) on PUAT fibers indicated that the incorporation of AT enhanced the cell attachment and proliferation. Moreover, the expression levels of OCN, CD31, and VEGF secreted by rMSCs on PUAT fibers increased with the increasing content of AT. In conclusion, an electroactive polyurethane fibrous membrane mimicking natural periosteum was prepared via electrospinning and showed good potential application in guiding bone tissue regeneration.
LinZFatehASalemDM, et al.Periosteum: biology and applications in craniofacial bone regeneration. J Dent Res2013; 93(2): 109–116.
2.
BuserDDulaKBelserU, et al.Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. II. Surgical procedure in the mandible. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent1995; 15(1): 10–29.
3.
TrumboreDCHeidegerWJBeachKW. Electrical potential difference across bone membrane. Calcif Tissue Int1980; 32(2): 159–168.
4.
BassettCABeckerRO. Generation of electric potentials by bone in response to mechanical stress. Science1962; 137(3535): 1063–1064.
5.
BassettCAPawlukRJBeckerRO. Effects of electric currents on bone in vivo. Nature1964; 204: 652–654.
6.
WeaverJCAstumianRD. The response of living cells to very weak electric fields: the thermal noise limit. Science1990; 247(4941): 459–462.
7.
Wound healing with electric potential.
8.
GriffinMBayatA. Electrical stimulation in bone healing: critical analysis by evaluating levels of evidence. Eplasty2011; 11: e34.
9.
ZhangYZhangXShiB, et al. Membranes for guided tissue and bone regeneration. Ann Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 1(1): 10.
10.
CaiYZWangLLCaiHX, et al.Electrospun nanofibrous matrix improves the regeneration of dense cortical bone. J Biomed Mater Res A2010; 95(1): 49–57.
11.
PuwanunSByeFIrelandM, et al. Production and characterization of a novel, electrospun, tri-layer polycaprolactone membrane for the segregated Co-culture of bone and soft tissue. Polymers. 2016; 8(6): 221–229.
12.
SuWTWuPSHuangTY. Osteogenic differentiation of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth on poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofibers containing strontium phosphate. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2015; 46: 427–434.
13.
Masoudi RadMNouri KhorasaniSGhasemi-MobarakehL, et al.Fabrication and characterization of two-layered nanofibrous membrane for guided bone and tissue regeneration application. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2017; 80: 75–87.
14.
AtoufiZZarrintajPMotlaghGH, et al.A novel bio electro active alginate-aniline tetramer/agarose scaffold for tissue engineering: synthesis, characterization, drug release and cell culture study. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed2017; 28(15): 1617–1638.
15.
GuoBQuJZhaoX, et al.Degradable conductive self-healing hydrogels based on dextran-graft-tetraaniline and N-carboxyethyl chitosan as injectable carriers for myoblast cell therapy and muscle regeneration. Acta Biomater2019; 84: 180–193.
16.
KalantariKAfifiAMJahangirianH, et al.Biomedical applications of chitosan electrospun nanofibers as a green polymer - review. Carbohydr Polym2019; 207: 588–600.
17.
TaemehMAShiravandiAKorayemMA, et al.Fabrication challenges and trends in biomedical applications of alginate electrospun nanofibers. Carbohydr Polym2020; 228: 115419.
18.
ChenJDongRGeJ, et al.Biocompatible, biodegradable, and electroactive polyurethane-urea elastomers with tunable hydrophilicity for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2015; 7(51): 28273–28285.
19.
AngeloniVContessiNDe MarcoC, et al.Polyurethane foam scaffold as in vitro model for breast cancer bone metastasis. Acta Biomater2017; 63: 306–316.
20.
MarzecMKucinska-LipkaJKalaszczynskaI, et al.Development of polyurethanes for bone repair. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2017; 80: 736–747.
21.
ErgeneEYagciBSGokyerS, et al.A novel polyurethane-based biodegradable elastomer as a promising material for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Biomed Mater2019; 14(2): 025014.
22.
BagherZAtoufiZAlizadehR, et al.Conductive hydrogel based on chitosan-aniline pentamer/gelatin/agarose significantly promoted motor neuron-like cells differentiation of human olfactory ecto-mesenchymal stem cells. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2019; 101: 243–253.
23.
JingWHuangYWeiP, et al.Roles of electrical stimulation in promoting osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs on conductive fibers. J Biomed Mater Res A2019; 107(7): 1443–1454.
24.
ZarrintajPBakhshandehBSaebMR, et al.Oligoaniline-based conductive biomaterials for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater2018; 72: 16–34.
25.
KenryLiuB. Recent advances in biodegradable conducting polymers and their biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules2018; 19(6): 1783–1803.
26.
da SilvaACSemeanoATSDouradoAHB, et al.Novel conducting and biodegradable copolymers with noncytotoxic properties toward embryonic stem cells. ACS Omega2018; 3(5): 5593–5604.
27.
JeonJ-WZhouJGeldmeierJA, et al.Dual-responsive reversible plasmonic behavior of core–shell nanostructures with pH-sensitive and electroactive polymer shells. Chem Mater2016; 28(20): 7551–7563.
28.
SalvatierraRVCavaCERomanLS, et al.ITO-free and flexible organic photovoltaic device based on high transparent and conductive polyaniline/carbon nanotube thin films. Adv Funct Mater2013; 23(12): 1490–1499.
29.
HuTWuYZhaoX, et al.Micropatterned, electroactive, and biodegradable poly(glycerol sebacate)-aniline trimer elastomer for cardiac tissue engineering. Chem Eng J2019; 366: 208–222.
30.
QuJZhaoXLiangY, et al.Degradable conductive injectable hydrogels as novel antibacterial, anti-oxidant wound dressings for wound healing. Chem Eng J2019; 362: 548–560.
GuoBSunYFinne-WistrandA, et al.Electroactive porous tubular scaffolds with degradability and non-cytotoxicity for neural tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater2012; 8(1): 144–153.
33.
BaheiraeiNYeganehHAiJ, et al.Synthesis, characterization and antioxidant activity of a novel electroactive and biodegradable polyurethane for cardiac tissue engineering application. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2014; 44: 24–37.
34.
GuoBFinne-WistrandAAlbertssonA-C. Universal two-step approach to degradable and electroactive block copolymers and networks from combined ring-opening polymerization and post-functionalization via oxidative coupling reactions. Macromolecules2011; 44(13): 5227–5236.
35.
HuangH-YHuangT-CYehT-C, et al.Advanced anticorrosive materials prepared from amine-capped aniline trimer-based electroactive polyimide-clay nanocomposite materials with synergistic effects of redox catalytic capability and gas barrier properties. Polymer2011; 52(11): 2391–2400.
36.
GuoYLiMMylonakisA, et al.Electroactive oligoaniline-containing self-assembled monolayers for tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules2007; 8(10): 3025–3034.
37.
HuangLHuJLangL, et al.Synthesis and characterization of electroactive and biodegradable ABA block copolymer of polylactide and aniline pentamer. Biomaterials2007; 28(10): 1741–1751.
38.
WeiYYangCDingT. A one-step method to synthesize N,N′-bis(4′-aminophenyl)-1,4-quinonenediimine and its derivatives. Tetrahedron Lett1996; 37(6): 731–734.
39.
ZhangQKhajoASaiT, et al.Intramolecular transport of charge carriers in trimeric aniline upon a three-step acid doping process. J Phys Chem A2012; 116(29): 7629–7635.
TamadaYIkadaY. Fibroblast growth on polymer surfaces and biosynthesis of collagen. J Biomed Mater Res1994; 28(7): 783–789.
42.
RiversTJHudsonTWSchmidtCE. Synthesis of a novel, biodegradable electrically conducting polymer for biomedical applications. Adv Funct Mater2002; 12(1): 33–37.
43.
AguiarAEde O SilvaMRodasACD, et al.Mineralized layered films of xanthan and chitosan stabilized by polysaccharide interactions: a promising material for bone tissue repair. Carbohydr Polym2019; 207: 480–491.
44.
JinSSHeDQLuoD, et al.A biomimetic hierarchical nanointerface orchestrates macrophage polarization and mesenchymal stem cell recruitment to promote endogenous bone regeneration. ACS Nano2019; 13(6): 6581–6595.
45.
ZhangXQiHWangS, et al.Cellular responses of aniline oligomers: a preliminary study. Toxicol Res2012; 1(3): 201.
46.
YaoQCosmeJGXuT, et al.Three dimensional electrospun PCL/PLA blend nanofibrous scaffolds with significantly improved stem cells osteogenic differentiation and cranial bone formation. Biomaterials2017; 115: 115–127.
47.
KaurGValarmathiMTPottsJD, et al.Regulation of osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow stromal cells on 2D nanorod substrates. Biomaterials2010; 31(7): 1732–1741.
48.
PusztaszeriMPSeelentagWBosmanFT. Immunohistochemical expression of endothelial markers CD31, CD34, von Willebrand factor, and Fli-1 in normal human tissues. J Histochem Cytochem2006; 54(4): 385–395.
49.
KohnSNagyJDvorakH, et al.Pathways of macromolecular tracer transport across venules and small veins: structural basis for the hyperpermeability of tumor blood vessels. Lab Invest1992; 67: 596–607.
50.
IwasakaCTanakaKAbeM, et al.Ets1 regulates angiogenesis by inducing the expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and matrix metalloproteinase-1 and the migration of vascular endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol1996; 169: 522–531.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
