Screening and analysis of key genes in the biological behavior of bone mesenchymal stem cells seeded on gradient nanostructured titanium compared with native pure Ti
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2023
Screening and analysis of key genes in the biological behavior of bone mesenchymal stem cells seeded on gradient nanostructured titanium compared with native pure Ti
Titanium (Ti) and Ti-based alloy materials are ideal brackets that restore bone defect, and the mechanism of related genes inducing bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) to osteogenic differentiation is currently a hot research topic. In order to screen key genes of BMSCs during the osteogenic expression process, we acquired data sets (GSE37237 and GSE84500) which were in the database Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Investigations on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and their enrichment of functions were conducted. We constructed relative protein-protein interaction (PPI) network by using Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) and visualized the expression of DEGs with Cytoscape. A total of 279 DEGs were discerned, which could be divided into 177 down regulated genes and 102 up regulated genes. In addition, the DEGs' enrichment and pathways included regulation of actin cytoskeleton, inflammatory mediator regulation of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) pathway, cell cycle, Rheumatoid arthritis, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) signaling pathway and Ras signaling pathway ect. It showed that 10 notable up regulated genes were mainly in AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway. Then we used a technology named surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT) to prepare gradient nanostructured (GNS) surface Ti and seeded well-growing BMSCs on the surface of SMAT Ti and native pure Ti. Cell Counting Kits-8 (CCK-8), apoptosis experiment, immunofluorescence technology and staining experiments for alka-line phosphatase (ALP) and alizarin red staining (ARS) were used to research the proliferation, adhesion and differentiation ability of BMSCs seeded on SMAT Ti compared with native pure Ti. We used quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) technology so as to verify the expression of the most significant 5 genes. In summary, these results indicated novel point of views into candidate genes and potential mechanism for the further study of BMSCs' behaviors seeded on SMAT Ti.
HosseinpourSNandaAWalshLJ, et al.Microbial decontamination and antibacterial activity of nanostructured titanium dental implants: a narrative review. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021; 11: 2021. DOI: 10.3390/nano11092336.
2.
ZhouYTangCDengJ, et al.Micro/nano topography of selective laser melting titanium inhibits osteoclastogenesis via mediation of macrophage polarization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun2021; 581: 53–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.
3.
LiLYangSXuL, et al.Nanotopography on titanium promotes osteogenesis via autophagy-mediated signaling between YAP and β-catenin. Acta Biomaterialia2019; 96: 674–685. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.007.
4.
AbunaRPFOliveiraFSLopesHB, et al.The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is regulated by titanium with nanotopography to induce osteoblast differentiation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces2019; 184: 110513. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.
5.
LopesHBFreitasGPFantaciniDMC, et al.Titanium with nanotopography induces osteoblast differentiation through regulation of integrin αV. J Cellular Biochemistry2019; 120: 16723–16732. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.28930.
6.
YueGSongWXuS, et al.Role of ILK/p38 pathway in mediating the enhanced osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on amorphous carbon coating. Biomater Science2019; 7: 975–984. DOI: 10.1039/c8bm01151f.
7.
GaoXXueYZhuZ, et al.Nanoscale zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 activator of canonical MAPK signaling for bone repair. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2021; 13: 97–111. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c15945.
8.
WangWLiuQZhangY, et al.Involvement of ILK/ERK1/2 and ILK/p38 pathways in mediating the enhanced osteoblast differentiation by micro/nanotopography. Acta Biomaterialia2014; 10: 3705–3715. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.04.019.2014/04/29
9.
ZhuZXieQHuangY, et al.Aucubin suppresses Titanium particles-mediated apoptosis of MC3T3-E1 cells and facilitates osteogenesis by affecting the BMP2/Smads/RunX2 signaling pathway. Mol Medicine Reports2018; 18: 2561–2570. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9286.
10.
LiuXHouWHeL, et al.AMOT130/YAP pathway in topography-induced BMSC osteoblastic differentiation. Colloids Surf B, Biointerfaces2019; 182: 110332. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.06.061.
11.
ZhaoCHanPJiW, et al.Enhanced mechanical properties and in vitro cell response of surface mechanical attrition treated pure titanium. J Biomater App2012; 27: 113–118. DOI: 10.1177/0885328210393047.
12.
WangWWangZFuY, et al.Improved osteogenic differentiation of human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells on gradient nanostructured Ti surface. J Biomed Mater Res A2020; 108: 1824–1833. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36948.
13.
LiuWJinXZhangB, et al.A coupled EBSD/TEM analysis of the microstructure evolution of a gradient nanostructured ferritic/martensitic steel subjected to surface mechanical attrition treatment. Materials (Basel); 12: 140, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/ma12010140.
14.
LuoXLiangCLiN, et al.Effect of gradient nanostructured Ti on behaviours of MG63 cells in vitro. J Nanomater2020; 2020: 1–11. DOI: 10.1155/2020/9480537.
15.
CloughEBarrettT. The gene expression omnibus database. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ)2016; 1418: 93–110. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3578-9_5.
16.
HeYChenDYangL, et al.The therapeutic potential of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in premature ovarian failure. Stem Cell Research Therapy2018; 9: 263. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-018-1008-9.
17.
WangJLiuSLiJ, et al.Roles for miRNAs in osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther2019; 10: 197. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-019-1309-7.
18.
DongCLLiuXHWuL. [Research and development of osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells]. Zhongguo Gu Shang2019; 32: 288–292. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.03.018.
19.
CiciarelloMZiniRRossiL, et al.Extracellular purines promote the differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells to the osteogenic and adipogenic lineages. Stem Cells Development2013; 22: 1097–1111. DOI: 10.1089/scd.2012.0432.
20.
van ZoelenEJDuarteIHendriksJM, et al.TGFβ-induced switch from adipogenic to osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells: identification of drug targets for prevention of fat cell differentiation. Stem Cell Res Ther2016; 7: 123. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-016-0375-3.
21.
UniProt Consortium. UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Research2019; 47: D506–d515. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1049.
22.
KanehisaMFurumichiMTanabeM, et al.KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res2017; 45: D353–d361. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1092.
WuJMHayakawaSTsuruK, et al.Soft solution approach to prepare crystalline titania films. Scripta Materialia2002; 46: 705–709. DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(02)00056-8.
25.
TakamoriERCruzRGonçalvezF, et al.Effect of roughness of zirconia and titanium on fibroblast adhesion. Artif Organs2008; 32: 305–309. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2008.00547.x.
26.
LinWGaoLJiangW, et al.The role of osteomodulin on osteo/odontogenic differentiation in human dental pulp stem cells. BMC Oral Health2019; 19: 22. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-018-0680-6.
27.
MarofiFVahediGSolaliS, et al.Gene expression of TWIST1 and ZBTB16 is regulated by methylation modifications during the osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Cellular Physiology2019; 234: 6230–6243. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27352.
28.
YanLXLiuYHXiangJW, et al.PIK3R1 targeting by miR-21 suppresses tumor cell migration and invasion by reducing PI3K/AKT signaling and reversing EMT, and predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Int Journal Oncology2016; 48: 471–484. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2015.3287.
29.
Le MoualHDionNRoquesBP, et al.Asp650 is crucial for catalytic activity of neutral endopeptidase 24-11. Eur J Biochem1994; 221: 475–480. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18760.x.
30.
MiledNYanYHonWC, et al.Mechanism of two classes of cancer mutations in the phosphoinositide 3-kinase catalytic subunit. Science2007; 317: 239–242. DOI: 10.1126/science.1135394.
31.
MandelkerDGabelliSBSchmidt-KittlerO, et al.A frequent kinase domain mutation that changes the interaction between PI3Kalpha and the membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2009; 106: 16996–17001. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0908444106.
32.
VainikkaSJoukovVWennströmS, et al.Signal transduction by fibroblast growth factor receptor-4 (FGFR-4). Comparison with FGFR-1. The J Biol Chem1994; 269: 18320–18326.
33.
BossisGMalnouCEFarrasR, et al.Down-regulation of c-Fos/c-Jun AP-1 dimer activity by sumoylation. Mol Cellular Biology2005; 25: 6964–6979. DOI: 10.1128/mcb.25.16.6964-6979.2005.
34.
PortalMMFerreroGOCaputtoBL. N-Terminal c-Fos tyrosine phosphorylation regulates c-Fos/ER association and c-Fos-dependent phospholipid synthesis activation. Oncogene2007; 26: 3551–3558. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210137.
35.
FerreroGOVelazquezFNCaputtoBL. The kinase c-Src and the phosphatase TC45 coordinately regulate c-Fos tyrosine phosphorylation and c-Fos phospholipid synthesis activation capacity. Oncogene2012; 31: 3381–3391. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2011.510.
36.
LinDYHuangCCHsiehYT, et al.Analysis of the interaction between Zinc finger protein 179 (Znf179) and promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (Plzf). J Biomed Sci2013; 20: 98–2013. DOI: 10.1186/1423-0127-20-98.
37.
FurukawaMHeYJBorchersC, et al.Targeting of protein ubiquitination by BTB-Cullin 3-Roc1 ubiquitin ligases. Nat Cell Biology2003; 5: 1001–1007. DOI: 10.1038/ncb1056.
38.
GuoSRenaGCichyS, et al.Phosphorylation of serine 256 by protein kinase B disrupts transactivation by FKHR and mediates effects of insulin on insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 promoter activity through a conserved insulin response sequence. The J Biol Chem1999; 274: 17184–17192. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.24.17184.
39.
YuanZBeckerEBMerloP, et al.Activation of FOXO1 by Cdk1 in cycling cells and postmitotic neurons. Science2008; 319: 1665–1668. DOI: 10.1126/science.1152337.
40.
YuanZLehtinenMKMerloP, et al.Regulation of neuronal cell death by MST1-FOXO1 signaling. The J Biol Chem2009; 284: 11285–11292. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M900461200.
41.
KrittanawongCKitaiT. Pharmacogenomics of angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor and its long-term side effects. Cardiovasc Therapeutics2017; 35: 2017–2105. DOI: 10.1111/1755-5922.12272.
42.
KuçiSKuçiZSchäferR, et al.Molecular signature of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell subsets. Sci Rep2019; 9: 1774. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-38517-7.
43.
LiuLLingJWeiX, et al.Stem cell regulatory gene expression in human adult dental pulp and periodontal ligament cells undergoing odontogenic/osteogenic differentiation. J Endodontics2009; 35: 1368–1376. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.005.
44.
TashimaTNagatoishiSSagaraH, et al.Osteomodulin regulates diameter and alters shape of collagen fibrils. Biochem Biophys Res Commun2015; 463: 292–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.05.053.
45.
LiLQiQLuoJ, et al.FOXO1-suppressed miR-424 regulates the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of MSCs by targeting FGF2 under oxidative stress. Sci Rep2017; 7: 42331–52017. DOI: 10.1038/srep42331.
46.
ZhouJWangFMaY, et al.Vitamin D3 contributes to enhanced osteogenic differentiation of MSCs under oxidative stress condition via activating the endogenous antioxidant system. Osteoporos Int2018; 29: 1917–1926. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4547-0.
47.
BoregowdaSVKrishnappaVStrivelliJ, et al.Basal p53 expression is indispensable for mesenchymal stem cell integrity. Cell Death Differentiation2018; 25: 679–692. DOI: 10.1038/s41418-017-0004-4.
48.
HuangJLiRYangJ, et al.Bioadaptation of implants to In vitro and In vivo oxidative stress pathological conditions via nanotopography-induced FoxO1 signaling pathways to enhance Osteoimmunal regeneration. Bioact Mater2021; 6: 3164–3176. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.023.
49.
Veldhuis-VlugAGRosenCJ. Mechanisms of marrow adiposity and its implications for skeletal health. Metab Clin Experiment2017; 67: 106–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2016.11.013.
50.
JiatingLBuyunJYinchangZ. Role of metformin on osteoblast differentiation in type 2 diabetes. Biomed Res Inter2019; 2019: 1–6. DOI: 10.1155/2019/9203934.
51.
HotchkissKMReddyGBHyzySL, et al.Titanium surface characteristics, including topography and wettability, alter macrophage activation. Acta Biomaterialia2016; 31: 425–434. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.12.003.
52.
AndrukhovOHuberRShiB, et al.Proliferation, behavior, and differentiation of osteoblasts on surfaces of different microroughness. Dent Mater2016; 32: 1374–1384. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.217.
53.
AttarilarSSalehiMTAl-FadhalahKJ, et al.Functionally graded titanium implants: Characteristic enhancement induced by combined severe plastic deformation. PloS One2019; 14: e0221491. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221491.
54.
ParisiLGhezziBBianchiMG, et al.Titanium dental implants hydrophilicity promotes preferential serum fibronectin over albumin competitive adsorption modulating early cell response. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2020; 117: 111307. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111307.
55.
LüthenFLangeRBeckerP, et al.The influence of surface roughness of titanium on beta1- and beta3-integrin adhesion and the organization of fibronectin in human osteoblastic cells. Biomaterials2005; 26: 2423–2440. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.054.
56.
HuPGaoQZhengH, et al.The role and activation mechanism of TAZ in hierarchical microgroove/nanopore topography-mediated regulation of stem cell differentiation. Int J Nanomed2021; 16: 1021–1036. DOI: 10.2147/ijn.S283406.
57.
FanTQuRYuQ, et al.Bioinformatics analysis of the biological changes involved in the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Cellular Molecul Med2020; 24: 7968–7978. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.15429.
