Bacterial cellulose (BC), which can be produced by microorganisms, is an ideal biomaterial especially for tissue engineering and drug delivery systems thanks to its properties of high purity, biocompatibility, high mechanical strength, high crystallinity, 3 D nanofiber structure, porosity and high-water holding capacity. Therefore, wide ranges of researches have been done on the BC production process and its structural and physical modifications to make it more suitable for certain targeted biomedical applications thoroughly. BC’s properties such as mechanical strength, pore diameter and porosity can be tuned in situ or ex situ processes by using various polymer and compounds. Besides, different organic or inorganic compounds that support cell attachment, proliferation and differentiation or provide functions such as antimicrobial effectiveness can be gained to its structure for targeted application. These processes not only increase the usage options of BC but also provide success for mimicking the natural tissue microenvironment, especially in tissue engineering applications. In this review article, the studies on optimisation of BC production in the last decade and the BC modification and functionalisation studies conducted for the three main perspectives as tissue engineering, drug delivery and wound dressing with diverse approaches are summarized.
FernandesSCMSadoccoPAlonso-VaronaA, et al. Bioinspired antimicrobial and biocompatible bacterial cellulose membranes obtained by surface functionalization with aminoalkyl groups. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2013; 5: 3290–3297.
2.
RouabhiaMAsselinJTaziN, et al. Production of biocompatible and antimicrobial bacterial cellulose polymers functionalized by RGDC grafting groups and gentamicin. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2014; 6: 1439–1446.
3.
BrownRM.Cellulose structure and biosynthesis: what is in store for the 21th century?J Poly Sci Part A Polym Chem2004; 42: 10877.
4.
FinkenstadtVL.Natural polysaccharides as electroactive polymers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol2005; 67: 735–745.
5.
SilvaNHCSRodriguesAFAlmeidaIF, et al. Bacterial cellulose membranes as transdermal delivery systems for diclofenac: in vitro dissolution and permeation studies. Carbohydr Polym2014; 106: 264–269.
6.
ZhaoYLiJ.Excellent chemical and material cellulose from tunicates: diversity in cellulose production yield and chemical and morphological structures from different tunicate species. Cellulose2014; 21: 3427–3441.
7.
ZmejkoskiDSpasojevićDOrlovskaI, et al. Bacterial cellulose-lignin composite hydrogel as a promising agent in chronic wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol2018; 118: 494–503.
8.
de Lima FontesMMeneguinABTercjakA, et al. Effect of in situ modification of bacterial cellulose with carboxymethylcellulose on its nano/microstructure and methotrexate release properties. Carbohydr Polym2018; 179: 126–134.
9.
LazariniSCde AquinoRAmaralAC, et al. Characterization of bilayer bacterial cellulose membranes with different fiber densities: a promising system for controlled release of the antibiotic ceftriaxone. Cellulose2016; 23: 737–748.
10.
CaiZKimJ.Bacterial cellulose/poly(ethylene glycol) composite: characterization and first evaluation of biocompatibility. Cellulose2010; 17: 83–91.
11.
AlvarezOMPatelMBookerJ, et al. Effectiveness of a biocellulose wound dressing for the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers: results of a single center randomized study involving 24 patients. Wounds2004; 16: 224–233.
12.
CzajaWKrystynowiczABieleckiS, et al. Microbial cellulose – the natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials2006; 27: 145–151.
13.
CzajaWKYoungDJKaweckiM, et al. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules2007; 8: 1–12.
14.
ZhangXFangYChenW.Preparation of silver/bacterial cellulose composite membrane and study on its antimicrobial activity. Synth React Inorgan Met Nano Metal Chem2013; 43: 907–913.
15.
de Santa MariaLCSantosALCOliveiraPC, et al. Synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles impregnated into bacterial cellulose. Mater Lett2009; 63: 797–799.
16.
EsaFTasirinSMRahmanNA.Overview of bacterial cellulose production and application. Agric Agric Sci Proc2014; 2: 113–119.
17.
Ul-IslamMKhanTParkJK.Water holding and release properties of bacterial cellulose obtained by in situ and ex situ modification. Carbohydr Polym2012; 88: 596–603.
18.
ShahNUl-IslamMKhattakWA, et al. Overview of bacterial cellulose composites: a multipurpose advanced material. Carbohydr Polym2013; 98: 1585–1598.
19.
LucchesiCFerreiraBMPDuekEAR, et al. Increased response of vero cells to PHBV matrices treated by plasma. J Mater Sci Mater Med2008; 19: 635–643.
20.
QiaoHGuoTZhengY, et al. A novel microporous oxidized bacterial cellulose/arginine composite and its effect on behavior of fibroblast/endothelial cell. Carbohydr Polym2018; 184: 323–332.
21.
PetersenNGatenholmP.Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol2011; 91: 1277–1286.
22.
FuLZhouPZhangS, et al. Evaluation of bacterial nanocellulose-based uniform wound dressing for large area skin transplantation. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2013; 33: 2995–3000.
23.
LiZWangLChenS, et al. Facilely green synthesis of silver nanoparticles into bacterial cellulose. Cellulose2015; 22: 373–383.
24.
FrankelVHSeraficaGCDamienCJ.Development and testing of a novel biosynthesized XCell for treating chronic wounds. Surg Technol Int2004; 12: 27–33.
25.
NumataYMazzarinoLBorsaliR.A slow-release system of bacterial cellulose gel and nanoparticles for hydrophobic active ingredients. Int J Pharm2015; 486: 217–225.
26.
NumataYSakataTFurukawaH, et al. Bacterial cellulose gels with high mechanical strength. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2015; 47: 57–62.
27.
UllahHBadshahMMäkiläE, et al. Fabrication, characterization and evaluation of bacterial cellulose-based capsule shells for oral drug delivery. Cellulose2017; 24: 1445–1454.
28.
JonasRFarahLF.Production and application of microbial cellulose. Polym Degrad Stab1998; 59: 101–106.
29.
IguchiMYamanakaSBudhionoA.Bacterial cellulose. A masterpiece of nature’s arts. J Mater Sci2000; 35: 261–270.
30.
KlemmDSchumannDUdhardtU, et al. Bacterial synthesized cellulose – artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog Polym Sci2001; 26: 1561–1603.
31.
FuLZhangJYangG.Present status and applications of bacterial cellulose-based materials for skin tissue repair. Carbohydr Polym2013; 92: 1432–1442.
32.
WeiBYangGHongF.Preparation and evaluation of a kind of bacterial cellulose dry films with antibacterial properties. Carbohydr Polym2011; 84: 533–538.
33.
VittaSThiruvengadamV.Multifunctional bacterial cellulose and nanoparticle-embedded composites. Curr Sci2012; 102: 1398–1405.
34.
YoshinagaFTonouchiNWatanabeK.Research progress in production of bacterial cellulose by aeration and agitation culture and its application as a new industrial material. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem1997; 61: 219–224.
35.
TabuchiM.Nanobiotech versus synthetic nanotech?Nat Biotechnol2007; 25: 389–390.
36.
YamanakaSWatanabeKKitamuraN, et al. The structure and mechanical properties of sheets prepared from bacterial cellulose. J Mater Sci1989; 24: 3141–3145.
37.
GorgievaSTrčekJ.Bacterial cellulose: production, modification and perspectives in biomedical applications. Nanomaterials2019; 9: 1–20.
38.
BarshanSRezazadeh-BariMAlmasiH, et al. Optimization and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Komagatacibacter xylinus PTCC 1734 using vinasse as a cheap cultivation medium. Int J Biol Macromol2019; 136: 1188–1195.
39.
DahmanY.Nanostructured biomaterials and biocomposites from bacterial cellulose nanofibers. J Nanosci Nanotechnol2009; 9: 5105–5122.
40.
MeftahiAKhajaviRRashidiA, et al. The effects of cotton gauze coating with microbial cellulose. Cellulose2010; 17: 199–204.
41.
PortelaRLealCRAlmeidaPL, et al. Bacterial cellulose: a versatile biopolymer for wound dressing applications. Microb Biotechnol2019; 12: 586–610.
42.
JeongSIl LeeSEYangH, et al. Toxicologic evaluation of bacterial synthesized cellulose in endothelial cells and animals. Mol Cell Toxicol2010; 6: 373–380.
43.
BodinABäckdahlHFinkH, et al. Influence of cultivation conditions on mechanical and morphological properties of bacterial cellulose tubes. Biotechnol Bioeng2007; 97: 425–434.
44.
ShiXZhengYWangG, et al. PH- and electro-response characteristics of bacterial cellulose nanofiber/sodium alginate hybrid hydrogels for dual controlled drug delivery. RSC Adv2014; 4: 47056–47065.
45.
MohammadkazemiFFariaMCordeiroN.In situ biosynthesis of bacterial nanocellulose-CaCO3 hybrid bionanocomposite: one-step process. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2016; 65: 393–399.
46.
PircherNVeigelSAignerN, et al. Reinforcement of bacterial cellulose aerogels with biocompatible polymers. Carbohydr Polym2014; 111: 505–513.
47.
BieleckiSKrystynowiczATurkiewiczM. Bacterial cellulose. In: Steinbüchel A and Rhee SK (eds) Biopolymers online. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2005, pp.31–84.
48.
EmbuscadoMEMarksJSBemillerJN.Bacterial cellulose. I. Factors affecting the production of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. Food Hydrocoll1994; 8: 407–418.
49.
AbeerMMMohd AminMCIMartinC.A review of bacterial cellulose‐based drug delivery systems: their biochemistry, current approaches and future prospects. J Pharm Pharmacol2014; 66: 1047–1061.
50.
HestrinSSchrammM. Factors affecting production of cellulose at the air/liquid interface of a culture of Acetobacter xylinum. Journal of General Microbiology 1954; 11: 123–129.
51.
ÇakarFKatiAÖzerI, et al. Newly developed medium and strategy for bacterial cellulose production. Biochem Eng J2014; 92: 35–40.
52.
SonHHeoMKimY, et al. Optimization of fermentation conditions for the production of bacterial cellulose by a newly isolated acetobacter. Biotechnol Appl Biochem2001; 33: 1–5.
53.
MeftahiAKhajaviRRashidiA, et al. Effect of purification on nano microbial cellulose pellicle properties. Proc Mater Sci2015; 11: 206–211.
54.
RukaDRSimonGPDeanKM.Altering the growth conditions of Gluconacetobacter xylinus to maximize the yield of bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym2012; 89: 613–622.
55.
WuJ-MLiuR-H.Thin stillage supplementation greatly enhances bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Carbohydr Polym2012; 90: 116–121.
56.
GomesFPSilvaNHCSTrovattiE, et al. Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter sacchari using dry olive mill residue. Biomass Bioenergy2013; 55: 205–211.
57.
ÇakarFÖzerIAytekinAÖ, et al. Improvement production of bacterial cellulose by semi-continuous process in molasses medium. Carbohydr Polym2014; 106: 7–13.
58.
BilgiEBayirESendemir-UrkmezA, et al. Optimization of bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus using carob and haricot bean. Int J Biol Macromol2016; 90: 2–10.
59.
HsiehJTWangMJLaiJT, et al. A novel static cultivation of bacterial cellulose production by intermittent feeding strategy. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng2016; 63: 46–51.
60.
PachecoGNogueiraCRMeneguinAB, et al. Development and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by cashew tree residues as alternative carbon source. Ind Crops Prod2017; 107: 13–19.
61.
TianDShenFHuJ, et al. Enhancing bacterial cellulose production via adding mesoporous halloysite nanotubes in the culture medium. Carbohydr Polym2018; 198: 191–196.
62.
Molina-RamírezCEncisoCTorres-TabordaM, et al. Effects of alternative energy sources on bacterial cellulose characteristics produced by Komagataeibacter medellinensis. Int J Biol Macromol2018; 117: 735–741.
63.
LotfimanSAwang BiakDRTiTB, et al. Influence of date syrup as a carbon source on bacterial cellulose production by acetobacter xylinum 0416. Adv Polym Technol2018; 37: 1085–1091.
64.
VolovaTGPrudnikovaSVSukovatyiAG, et al. Production and properties of bacterial cellulose by the strain Komagataeibacter xylinus B-12068. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol2018; 102: 7417–7428.
65.
BekatorouAPlioniISparouK, et al. Bacterial cellulose production using the corinthian currant finishing side-stream and cheese whey: process optimization and textural characterization. Foods2019; 8: 193.
66.
YeJZhengSZhangZ, et al. Bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum ATCC 23767 using tobacco waste extract as culture medium. Bioresour Technol2019; 274: 518–524.
67.
AbdelraofMHasaninMSEl-SaiedH.Ecofriendly green conversion of potato peel wastes to high productivity bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym2019; 211: 75–83.
68.
Molina-RamírezCCañas-GutiérrezACastroC, et al. Effect of production process scale-up on the characteristics and properties of bacterial nanocellulose obtained from overripe banana culture medium. Carbohydr Polym2020; 240: 116341.
69.
LuTGaoHLiaoB, et al. Characterization and optimization of production of bacterial cellulose from strain CGMCC 17276 based on whole-genome analysis. Carbohydr Polym2020; 232: 115788.
70.
PichethGFPirichCLSierakowskiMR, et al. Bacterial cellulose in biomedical applications: a review. Int J Biol Macromol2017; 104: 97–106.
71.
ChenPChoSYJinHJ.Modification and applications of bacterial celluloses in polymer science. Macromol Res2010; 18: 309–320.
72.
ShezadOKhanSKhanT, et al. Physicochemical and mechanical characterization of bacterial cellulose produced with an excellent productivity in static conditions using a simple fed-batch cultivation strategy. Carbohydr Polym2010; 82: 173–180.
73.
ChengKCCatchmarkJMDemirciA.Effects of CMC addition on bacterial cellulose production in a biofilm reactor and its paper sheets analysis. Biomacromolecules2011; 12: 730–736.
74.
YinNStilwellMDSantosTMA, et al. Agarose particle-templated porous bacterial cellulose and its application in cartilage growth in vitro. Acta Biomater2015; 12: 129–138.
75.
KirdponpattaraSKhamkeawASanchavanakitN, et al. Structural modification and characterization of bacterial cellulose-alginate composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym2015; 132: 146–155.
76.
ChengKCCatchmarkJMDemirciA.Effect of different additives on bacterial cellulose production by acetobacter xylinum and analysis of material property. Cellulose2009; 16: 1033–1045.
77.
HeleniusGBäckdahlHBodinA, et al. In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res A2006; 76: 431–438.
78.
SciontiG.Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose implants. MSc Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden 2010: Report n.366.
79.
MeftahiANasrolahiDBabaeipourV, et al. Investigation of nano bacterial cellulose coated by sesamum oil for wound dressing application. Proc Mater Sci2015; 11: 212–216.
80.
StumpfTRYangXZhangJ, et al. In situ and ex situ modifications of bacterial cellulose for applications in tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2018; 82: 372–383.
81.
AmorimJDPCostaAFSGaldinoCJS, et al. Bacterial cellulose production using fruit residues as substract to industrial application. Chem Eng Trans2019; 74: 1165–1170.
82.
QiuYQiuLCuiJ, et al. Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose-vaccarin membranes for wound healing. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2016; 59: 303–309.
83.
BusuiocCStroescuMStoica-GuzunA, et al. Fabrication of 3D calcium phosphates based scaffolds using bacterial cellulose as template. Ceram Int2016; 42: 15449–15458.
84.
KhanMUAHaiderSHaiderA, et al. Development of porous, antibacterial and biocompatible GO/n-HAp/bacterial cellulose/β-Glucan biocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Arab J Chem2021; 14: 102924.
85.
GrandeCJTorresFGGomezCM, et al. Nanocomposites of bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater2009; 5: 1605–1615.
86.
GutierrezJTercjakAAlgarI, et al. Conductive properties of TiO2/bacterial cellulose hybrid fibres. J Colloid Interface Sci2012; 377: 88–93.
87.
RukaDRSimonGPDeanKM.In situ modifications to bacterial cellulose with the water insoluble polymer poly-3-hydroxybutyrate. Carbohydr Polym2013; 92: 1717–1723.
88.
HouYWangXYangJ, et al. Development and biocompatibility evaluation of biodegradable bacterial cellulose as a novel peripheral nerve scaffold. J Biomed Mater Res A2018; 106: 1288–1298.
89.
WeyellPBeekmannUKüpperC, et al. Tailor-made material characteristics of bacterial cellulose for drug delivery applications in dentistry. Carbohydr Polym2019; 207: 1–10.
90.
HayashiT.Biodegradable polymers for biomedical uses. Prog Polym Sci1994; 19: 663–702.
91.
DeviKSSinhaTJMVasudevanP.Biosoluble surgical material from 2,3-diadehyde cellulose. Biomaterials1986; 7: 193–196.
92.
SinghMRayARVasudevanP.Biodegradation studies on periodate oxidized cellulose. Biomaterials1982; 3: 16–20.
93.
YangMZhenWChenH, et al. Biomimetic design of oxidized bacterial cellulose-gelatin-hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. J Bionic Eng2016; 13: 631–640.
94.
LiJWanYLiL, et al. Preparation and characterization of 2, 3-dialdehyde bacterial cellulose for potential biodegradable tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C2009; 29: 1635–1642.
95.
OksmanKAitomäkiYMathewAP, et al. Review of the recent developments in cellulose nanocomposite processing. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2016; 83: 2–18.
96.
LuoHXiongGHuD, et al. Characterization of TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Mater Chem Phys2013; 143: 373–379.
97.
YuJHuangTRLimZH, et al. Production of hollow bacterial cellulose microspheres using microfluidics to form an injectable porous scaffold for wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater2016; 5: 2983–2992.
98.
Zeaiean FirouzabadiPGhanbariHMahmoudiN, et al. Synthesis of nanobentonite–poly (vinyl alcohol)–bacterial cellulose nanocomposite by electrospinning for wound healing applications. Phys Status Solidi A2020; 217: 1900536.
99.
IvanovaLAUstinovichKBKhamovaTV, et al. Crystal and supramolecular structure of bacterial cellulose hydrolyzed by cellobiohydrolase from scytalidium candidum 3C: a basis for development of biodegradable wound dressings. Materials2020; 13: 2087.
100.
RashidbenamZJasmanMHHafezP, et al. Overview of urethral reconstruction by tissue engineering: current strategies, clinical status and future direction. Tissue Eng Regen Med2019; 16: 365–384.
101.
Abu GhaliaMDahmanY.Fabrication and enhanced mechanical properties of porous PLA/PEG copolymer reinforced with bacterial cellulose nanofibers for soft tissue engineering applications. Polym Test2017; 61: 114–131.
StevensMM.Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Mater Today2008; 11: 18–25.
104.
ZhangHWangJWangK, et al. A bilayered PLGA/multiwall carbon nanotubes/bacterial cellulose composite membrane for tissue regeneration of maxillary canine periodontal bone defects. Mater Lett2018; 212: 118–121.
105.
ZhouHLeeJ.Nanoscale hydroxyapatite particles for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater2011; 7: 2769–2781.
106.
SinghGSinghRPJollySS.Customized hydroxyapatites for bone-tissue engineering and drug delivery applications: a review. J Sol Gel Sci Technol2020; 94: 505–530.
107.
HutchensSABensonRSEvansBR, et al. Biomimetic synthesis of calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite in a natural hydrogel. Biomaterials2006; 27: 4661–4670.
108.
YinNChenSYOuyangY, et al. Biomimetic mineralization synthesis of hydroxyapatite bacterial cellulose nanocomposites. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int2011; 21: 472–477.
109.
WanYZuoGYuF, et al. Preparation and mineralization of three-dimensional carbon nanofibers from bacterial cellulose as potential scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Surf Coatings Technol2011; 205: 2938–2946.
110.
FangBWanYZTangTT, et al. Proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells on hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A2009; 15: 1091–1098.
111.
ChengZYeZNatanA, et al. Bone-inspired mineralization with highly aligned cellulose nanofibers as template. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2019; 11: 42486–42495.
112.
LuzEPCGChavesPHSVieira L deAP, et al. In vitro degradability and bioactivity of oxidized bacterial cellulose-hydroxyapatite composites. Carbohydr Polym2020; 237: 116174.
113.
JingWChunxiYYizaoW, et al. Laser patterning of bacterial cellulose hydrogel and its modification with gelatin and hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. Soft Mater2013; 11: 173–180.
114.
RanJJiangPLiuS, et al. Constructing multi-component organic/inorganic composite bacterial cellulose-gelatin/hydroxyapatite double-network scaffold platform for stem cell-mediated bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2017; 78: 130–140.
115.
AtilaDKarataşAEvcinA, et al. Bacterial cellulose-reinforced boron-doped hydroxyapatite/gelatin scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Cellulose2019; 26: 9765–9785.
116.
ParkMLeeDShinS, et al. Effect of negatively charged cellulose nanofibers on the dispersion of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces2015; 130: 222–228.
117.
HuangYWangJYangF, et al. Modification and evaluation of micro-nano structured porous bacterial cellulose scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2017; 75: 1034–1041.
118.
CakmakAMUnalSSahinA, et al. 3D printed polycaprolactone/gelatin/bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Polymers (Basel) 2020; 12(9): 1962.
119.
SaskaSTeixeiraLNde Castro RaucciLMS, et al. Nanocellulose-collagen-apatite composite associated with osteogenic growth peptide bone regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol2017; 103: 467–476.
120.
JiangPRanJYanP, et al. Rational design of a high-strength bone scaffold platform based on in situ hybridization of bacterial cellulose/nano-hydroxyapatite framework and silk fibroin reinforcing phase. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed2018; 29: 107–124.
SaskaSTeixeiraLNTambasco de OliveiraP, et al. Bacterial cellulose-collagen nanocomposite for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Chem2012; 22: 22102.
123.
ZhangWWangXChuan LiX, et al. A 3D porous microsphere with multistage structure and component based on bacterial cellulose and collagen for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym2020; 236: 116043.
124.
SaskaSScarel-CaminagaRMTeixeiraLN, et al. Characterization and in vitro evaluation of bacterial cellulose membranes functionalized with osteogenic growth peptide for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med2012; 23: 2253–2266.
125.
CoelhoFCavicchioliMSpecianSS, et al. Bacterial cellulose membrane functionalized with hydroxiapatite and anti-bone morphogenetic protein 2: a promising material for bone regeneration. PLoS One2019; 14: e0221286–23.
126.
ZaborowskaMBodinABäckdahlH, et al. Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater2010; 6: 2540–2547.
127.
LuoHLiWAoH, et al. Preparation, structural characterization, and in vitro cell studies of three-dimensional SiO2–CaO binary glass scaffolds built ofultra-small nanofibers. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2017; 76: 94–101.
128.
WanYChangPYangZ, et al. Constructing a novel three-dimensional scaffold with mesoporous TiO 2 nanotubes for potential bone tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B2015; 3: 5595–5602.
129.
KheiryEVParivarKBahararaJ, et al. The osteogenesis of bacterial cellulose scaffold loaded with fisetin. Iran J Basic Med Sci2018; 21: 965–971.
130.
ZhuHJiaSWanT, et al. Biosynthesis of spherical Fe3O4/bacterial cellulose nanocomposites as adsorbents for heavy metal ions. Carbohydr Polym2011; 86: 1558–1564.
131.
AkiDUlagSUnalS, et al. 3D printing of PVA/hexagonal boron nitride/bacterial cellulose composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Des2020; 196: 109094.
132.
CodreanuABaltaCHermanH, et al. Bacterial cellulose-modified polyhydroxyalkanoates scaffolds promotes bone formation in critical size calvarial defects in mice. Materials2020; 13: 1433.
133.
KlinthoopthamrongNChaikiawkeawDPhoolcharoenW, et al. Bacterial cellulose membrane conjugated with plant-derived osteopontin: preparation and its potential for bone tissue regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol2020; 149: 51–59.
134.
YuKAubin-TamME.Bacterially grown cellulose/graphene oxide composites infused with γ-Poly (glutamic acid) as biodegradable structural materials with enhanced toughness. ACS Appl Nano Mater2020; 3: 12.
135.
TorgboSSukyaiP.Fabrication of microporous bacterial cellulose embedded with magnetite and hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Mater Chem Phys2019; 237: 121868.
136.
HananiNur ZA. Gelatin. In Benjamin C, Paul MF, and Fidel T (eds.) Encyclopedia of Food and Health, Academic Press, 2016, Pages 191–195, ISBN 9780123849533. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384947-2.00347-0
137.
BusuiocCGhitulicaCDStoicaA, et al. Calcium phosphates grown on bacterial cellulose template. Ceram Int2018; 44: 9433–9441.
138.
LuoHZhouZLiG, et al. Morphology and cell responses of three-dimensional porous silica nanofibrous scaffold prepared by sacrificial template method. J Non Cryst Solids2017; 457: 145–151.
139.
LuoHZhangYWangZ, et al. Constructing three-dimensional nanofibrous bioglass/gelatin nanocomposite scaffold for enhanced mechanical and biological performance. Chem Eng J2017; 326: 210–221.
140.
WenCHongYWuJ, et al. The facile synthesis and bioactivity of a 3D nanofibrous bioglass scaffold using an amino-modified bacterial cellulose template. RSC Adv2018; 8: 14561–14569.
141.
XiaoJWanYYangZ, et al. Simvastatin-loaded nanotubular mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Microporous Mesoporous Mater2019; 288: 109570.
Dehghan-BanianiDChenYWangD, et al. Injectable in situ forming kartogenin-loaded chitosan hydrogel with tunable rheological properties for cartilage tissue engineering. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces2020; 192: 111059.
144.
TavakoliEMehdikhani-NahrkhalajiMHashemi-BeniB, et al. Preparation, characterization and mechanical assessment of poly (lactide-co-glycolide)/hyaluronic acid/fibrin/bioactive glass nano-composite scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Proc Mater Sci2015; 11: 124–130.
145.
YangXLuZWuH, et al. Collagen-alginate as bioink for three-dimensional (3D) cell printing based cartilage tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2018; 83: 195–201.
146.
CieleckaISzustakMGendaszewska-DarmachE, et al. Novel bionanocellulose/κ-Carrageenan composites for tissue engineering. Appl Sci2018; 8: 1352.
147.
LiGNandgaonkarAGHabibiY, et al. An environmentally benign approach to achieving vectorial alignment and high microporosity in bacterial cellulose/chitosan scaffolds.RSC Adv2017; 7: 13678–13688.
148.
YangCGaoCWanY, et al. Preparation and characterization of three-dimensional nanostructured macroporous bacterial cellulose/agarose scaffold for tissue engineering. J Porous Mater2011; 18: 545–552.
149.
Martínez ÁvilaHSchwarzSFeldmannE-M, et al. Biocompatibility evaluation of densified bacterial nanocellulose hydrogel as an implant material for auricular cartilage regeneration. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol2014; 98: 7423–7435.
150.
Martínez ÁvilaHFeldmannEMPleumeekersMM, et al. Novel bilayer bacterial nanocellulose scaffold supports neocartilage formation in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials2015; 44: 122–133.
151.
WangKMaQZhangYM, et al. Preparation of bacterial cellulose/silk fibroin double-network hydrogel with high mechanical strength and biocompatibility for artificial cartilage. Cellulose2020; 27: 1845–1852.
152.
WuJYinNChenS, et al. Simultaneous 3D cell distribution and bioactivity enhancement of bacterial cellulose (BC) scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Cellulose2019; 26: 2513–2528.
153.
KumbharJVJadhavSHBodasDS, et al. In vitro and in vivo studies of a novel bacterial cellulose-based acellular bilayer nanocomposite scaffold for the repair of osteochondral defects. Int J Nanomed2017; 12: 6437–6459.
154.
ZhuXChenTFengB, et al. Biomimetic bacterial cellulose-enhanced double-network hydrogel with excellent mechanical properties applied for the osteochondral defect repair. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2018; 4: 3534–3544.
155.
KeshkSM.Bacterial cellulose production and its industrial applications. J Bioprocess Biotech2014; 4: 2.
156.
QiuKNetravaliAN.A review of fabrication and applications of bacterial cellulose based nanocomposites. Polym Rev2014; 54: 598–626.
157.
VigKChaudhariATripathiS, et al. Advances in skin regeneration using tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci2017; 18: 789.
158.
KeskinZSendemir UrkmezAHamesEE.Novel keratin modified bacterial cellulose nanocomposite production and characterization for skin tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2017; 75: 1144–1153.
159.
ChiaoprakobkijNSeetabhawangSSanchavanakitN, et al. Fabrication and characterization of novel bacterial cellulose/alginate/gelatin biocomposite film. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed2019; 30: 961–982.
160.
AzarniyaATamjidEEslahiN, et al. Modification of bacterial cellulose/keratin nanofibrous mats by a tragacanth gum-conjugated hydrogel for wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol2019; 134: 280–289.
161.
AzarniyaAEslahiNMahmoudiN, et al. Effect of graphene oxide nanosheets on the physico-mechanical properties of chitosan/bacterial cellulose nanofibrous composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2016; 85: 113–122.
162.
LinQZhengYRenL, et al. Preparation and characteristic of a sodium alginate/carboxymethylated bacterial cellulose composite with a crosslinking semi-interpenetrating network. J Appl Polym Sci2014; 131: 1–9.
163.
KirdponpattaraSPhisalaphongMKongruangS.Gelatin-bacterial cellulose composite sponges thermally cross-linked with glucose for tissue engineering applications. Carbohydr Polym2017; 177: 361–368.
164.
AbdEYousefSAPastoreMN, et al. Skin models for the testing of transdermal drugs. Clin Pharmacol Adv Pharmacol2016; 8: 163–176.
165.
SchernerMReutterSKlemmD, et al. In vivo application of tissue-engineered blood vessels of bacterial cellulose as small arterial substitutes: proof of concept?J Surg Res2014; 189: 340–347.
166.
HuangYZhuCYangJ, et al. Recent advances in bacterial.Cellulose2014; 21: 1–30.
167.
SteinthorssonGSumpioB.Clinical and biological relevance of vein cuff anastomosis. Acta Chir Belg1999; 99: 282–288.
168.
JeongSILeeSEYangH, et al. Effect of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes on endothelial cell growth in bacterial cellulose for vascular tissue engineering. Mol Cell Toxicol2012; 8: 119–126.
169.
BodinAAhrenstedtLFinkH, et al. Modification of nanocellulose with a xyloglucan – RGD conjugate enhances adhesion and proliferation of endothelial cells: implications for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules2007; 8: 3697–3704.
170.
AndradeFKCostaRDominguesL, et al. Improving bacterial cellulose for blood vessel replacement: functionalization with a chimeric protein containing a cellulose-binding module and an adhesion peptide. Acta Biomater2010; 6: 4034–4041.
171.
WangBLvXChenS, et al. Use of heparinized bacterial cellulose based scaffold for improving angiogenesis in tissue regeneration. Carbohydr Polym2018; 181: 948–956.
172.
LiXTangJBaoL, et al. Performance improvements of the BNC tubes from unique double-silicone-tube bioreactors by introducing chitosan and heparin for application as small-diameter artificial blood vessels. Carbohydr Polym2017; 178: 394–405.
173.
PanaitescuDMLupescuIFroneAN, et al. Medium Chain-Length polyhydroxyalkanoate copolymer modified by bacterial cellulose for medical devices. Biomacromolecules2017; 18: 3222–3232.
174.
RahmanMMNetravaliAN.High-performance green nanocomposites using aligned bacterial cellulose and soy protein. Compos Sci Technol2017; 146: 183–190.
175.
BäckdahlHRisbergBGatenholmP.Observations on bacterial cellulose tube formation for application as vascular graft. Mater Sci Eng C2011; 31: 14–21.
176.
PértileRMoreiraSAndradeF, et al. Bacterial cellulose modified using recombinant proteins to improve neuronal and mesenchymal cell adhesion. Biotechnol Prog2012; 28: 526–532.
177.
AltunEAydogduMOTogaySO, et al. Bioinspired scaffold induced regeneration of neural tissue. Eur Polym J2019; 114: 98–108.
178.
Gonçalves-PimentelCMorenoGMMTrindadeBS, et al. Cellulose exopolysaccharide from sugarcane molasses as a suitable substrate for 2D and 3D neuron and astrocyte primary cultures. J Mater Sci Mater Med2018; 29: 1–12.
179.
ZhuCLiFZhouX, et al. Kombucha-synthesized bacterial cellulose: preparation, characterization, and biocompatibility evaluation. J Biomed Mater Res A2014; 102: 1548–1557.
180.
YangJDuMWangL, et al. Bacterial cellulose as a supersoft neural interfacing substrate. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2018; 10: 33049–33059.
181.
RebeloALiuYLiuC, et al. Carbon nanotubes-reinforced poly(4-vinylaniline)/polyaniline bi-layer grafted bacterial cellulose for bioelectronic applications. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2015; 5: 2160–2172.
182.
OrabiHBouhoutSMorissetteA, et al. Tissue engineering of urinary bladder and urethra: advances from bench to patients. Sci World J2013; 2013: 1–13.
183.
LvXGFengCLiuYD, et al. A smart bilayered scaffold supporting keratinocytes and muscle cells in micro/nano-scale for urethral reconstruction. Theranostics2018; 8: 3153–3163.
184.
HuangJWLvXGLiZ, et al. Urethral reconstruction with a 3D porous bacterial cellulose scaffold seeded with lingual keratinocytes in a rabbit model. Biomed Mater2015; 10: 055005.
185.
BodinABharadwajSWuS, et al. Tissue-engineered conduit using urine-derived stem cells seeded bacterial cellulose polymer in urinary reconstruction and diversion. Biomaterials2010; 31: 8889–8901.
186.
WangBLvXLiZ, et al. Urethra-inspired biomimetic scaffold: a therapeutic strategy to promote angiogenesis for urethral regeneration in a rabbit model. Acta Biomater2020; 102: 247–258.
187.
LinNDufresneA.Nanocellulose in biomedicine: current status and future prospect. Eur Polym J2014; 59: 302–325.
188.
de Oliveira BarudHGda SilvaRRda Silva BarudH, et al. A multipurpose natural and renewable polymer in medical applications: bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym2016; 153: 406–420.
189.
BodhibukkanaCSrichanaTKaewnopparatS, et al. Composite membrane of bacterially-derived cellulose and molecularly imprinted polymer for use as a transdermal enantioselective controlled-release system of racemic propranolol. J Control Release2006; 113: 43–56.
190.
Stoica-GuzunAStroescuMTacheF, et al. Effect of electron beam irradiation on bacterial cellulose membranes used as transdermal drug delivery systems. Nucl Instruments Methods Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact with Mater Atoms2007; 265: 434–438.
191.
CarreiraPMendesJASTrovattiE, et al. Bioresource technology utilization of residues from agro-Forest industries in the production of high value bacterial cellulose. Bioresour Technol2011; 102: 7354–7360.
192.
WangXUllahNSunX, et al. Development and characterization of bacterial cellulose reinforced biocomposite films based on protein from buckwheat distiller’s dried grains. Int J Biol Macromol2017; 96: 353–360.
193.
ShaoWLiuHWangS, et al. Controlled release and antibacterial activity of tetracycline hydrochloride-loaded bacterial cellulose composite membranes. Carbohydr Polym2016; 145: 114–120.
194.
JuncuGStoica-GuzunAStroescuM, et al. Drug release kinetics from carboxymethylcellulose-bacterial cellulose composite films. Int J Pharm2016; 510: 485–492.
195.
PavaloiuRDStoica-GuzunAStroescuM, et al. Composite films of poly(vinyl alcohol)-chitosan-bacterial cellulose for drug controlled release. Int J Biol Macromol2014; 68: 117–124.
196.
HuangLChenXNguyenTX, et al. Nano-cellulose 3D-networks as controlled-release drug carriers. J Mater Chem B2013; 1: 2976–2984.
197.
AminMCIMAhmadNHalibN, et al. Synthesis and characterization of thermo-and pH-responsive bacterial cellulose/acrylic acid hydrogels for drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym2012; 88: 465–473.
198.
AminMCIMAbadiAGAhmadN, et al. Bacterial cellulose film coating as drug delivery system: physicochemical, thermal and drug release properties. Sains Malays2012; 41: 561–568.
199.
MüllerDMandelliJSMarinsJA, et al. Electrically conducting nanocomposites: preparation and properties of polyaniline (PAni)-coated bacterial cellulose nanofibers (BC). Cellulose2012; 19: 1645–1654.
200.
TrovattiEFreireCSRPintoPC, et al. Bacterial cellulose membranes applied in topical and transdermal delivery of lidocaine hydrochloride and ibuprofen: in vitro diffusion studies. Int J Pharm2012; 435: 83–87.
201.
PandeyMMohd AminMCIAhmadN, et al. Rapid synthesis of superabsorbent smart-swelling bacterial cellulose/acrylamide-based hydrogels for drug delivery. Int J Polym Sci2013; 2013: 1–10.
202.
AhmadNAminMCIMMahaliSM, et al. Biocompatible and mucoadhesive bacterial cellulose-g-poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels for oral protein delivery. Mol Pharm2014; 11: 4130–4142.
203.
AlmeidaIFPereiraTSilvaNHCS, et al. Bacterial cellulose membranes as drug delivery systems: an in vivo skin compatibility study. Eur J Pharm Biopharm2014; 86: 332–336.
204.
Mohd AminMCIAhmadNPandeyM, et al. Stimuli-responsive bacterial cellulose-g-poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamide) hydrogels for oral controlled release drug delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm2014; 40: 1340–1349.
205.
SilvaNHCSDrumondIAlmeidaIF, et al. Topical caffeine delivery using biocellulose membranes: a potential innovative system for cellulite treatment. Cellulose2014; 21: 665–674.
206.
CacicedoMLCescaKBosioVE, et al. Self-assembly of carrageenin-CaCO3hybrid microparticles on bacterial cellulose films for doxorubicin sustained delivery. J Appl Biomed2015; 13: 239–248.
207.
LuoHAoHLiG, et al. Bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide nanocomposite as a novel drug delivery system. Curr Appl Phys2017; 17: 249–254.
208.
CacicedoMLIslanGALeónIE, et al. Bacterial cellulose hydrogel loaded with lipid nanoparticles for localized cancer treatment. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces2018; 170: 596–608.
209.
SiangsanohCUmmartyotinSSathirakulK, et al. Fabrication and characterization of triple-responsive composite hydrogel for targeted and controlled drug delivery system. J Mol Liq2018; 256: 90–99.
210.
UllahHWahidFSantosHA, et al. Advances in biomedical and pharmaceutical applications of functional bacterial cellulose-based nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym2016; 150: 330–352.
211.
ZhaoXWuHGuoB, et al. Antibacterial anti-oxidant electroactive injectable hydrogel as self-healing wound dressing with hemostasis and adhesiveness for cutaneous wound healing. Biomaterials2017; 122: 34–47.
212.
XuRLuoGXiaH, et al. Novel bilayer wound dressing composed of silicone rubber with particular micropores enhanced wound re-epithelialization and contraction. Biomaterials2015; 40: 1–11.
213.
LionelliGTLawrenceWT.Wound dressings. Surg Clin North Am2003; 83: 617–638.
214.
EaglsteinWH.Moist wound healing with occlusive dressings: a clinical focus. Dermatologic Surg2001; 27: 175–182.
215.
JunkerJPEKamelRACatersonEJ, et al. Clinical impact upon wound healing and inflammation in moist, wet, and dry environments. Adv Wound Care2013; 2: 348–356.
216.
BergstromNHornSDSmoutRJ, et al. The national pressure ulcer long‐term care study: outcomes of pressure ulcer treatments in long‐term care. J Am Geriatr Soc2005; 53: 1721–1729.
217.
LeeJCKandulaSSherberNS.Beyond wet-to-dry: a rational approach to treating chronic wounds. Eplasty2009; 9: e14.
218.
ChawlaPRBajajIBSurvaseSA, et al. Microbial cellulose : fermentative production and applications. Food Technol Biotechnol2009; 47: 107–124.
219.
SulaevaIHennigesURosenauT, et al. Bacterial cellulose as a material for wound treatment: properties and modifications: a review. Biotechnol Adv2015; 33: 1547–1571.
JayakumarRPrabaharanMKumarPTS, et al. Biomaterials based on chitin and chitosan in wound dressing applications. Biotechnol Adv2011; 29: 322–337.
222.
FonderMALazarusGSCowanDA, et al. Treating the chronic wound: a practical approach to the care of nonhealing wounds and wound care dressings. J Am Acad Dermatol2008; 58: 185–206.
223.
JonesAMSan MiguelL.Are modern wound dressings a clinical and cost-effective alternative to the use of gauze?J Wound Care2006; 15: 65–69.
224.
TsaoCTChangCHLinYY, et al. Evaluation of chitosan/γ-poly (glutamic acid) polyelectrolyte complex for wound dressing materials. Carbohydr Polym2011; 84: 812–819.
225.
KaewnopparatSSansernlukKFaroongsarngD.Behavior of freezable bound water in the bacterial cellulose produced by Acetobacter xylinum: an approach using thermoporosimetry. AAPS PharmSciTech2008; 9: 701–707.
226.
GayathryGGopalaswamyG.Production and characterisation of microbial cellulosic fibre from acetobacter xylinum. Indian J Fibre Text Res2014; 39: 93–96.
227.
MuangmanPOpasanonSSuwanchotS, et al. Efficiency of microbial cellulose dressing in partial-thickness burn wounds. J Am Col Certif Wound Spec2011; 3: 16–19.
228.
LinWCLienCCYehHJ, et al. Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose-chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr Polym2013; 94: 603–611.
229.
PortalOClarkWALevinsonDJ.Microbial cellulose wound dressing in the treatment of nonhealing lower extremity ulcers. Wounds2009; 21: 1–3.
230.
KwakMHKimJEGoJ, et al. Bacterial cellulose membrane produced by acetobacter sp. A10 for burn wound dressing applications. Carbohydr Polym2015; 122: 387–398.
231.
MengEChenCLLiuCC, et al. Bioapplications of bacterial cellulose polymers conjugated with resveratrol for epithelial defect regeneration. Polymers2019; 11: 1048.
232.
PouraliPYahyaeiB.The healing property of a bioactive wound dressing prepared by the combination of bacterial cellulose (BC) and zingiber officinale root aqueous extract in rats. 3 Biotech2019; 9: 1–9.
233.
MoraisESSilvaNHCSSintraTE, et al. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant nanostructured cellulose membranes loaded with phenolic-based ionic liquids for cutaneous application. Carbohydr Polym2019; 206: 187–197.
234.
VolovaTGShumilovaAANikolaevaED, et al. Biotechnological wound dressings based on bacterial cellulose and degradable copolymer P(3HB/4HB). Int J Biol Macromol2019; 131: 230–240.
235.
SajjadWKhanTUl-IslamM, et al. Development of modified montmorillonite-bacterial cellulose nanocomposites as a novel substitute for burn skin and tissue regeneration. Carbohydr Polym2019; 206: 548–556.
236.
MoraesP. R F d SSaskaSBarudH, et al. Bacterial cellulose/collagen hydrogel for wound healing. Mat Res2016; 19: 106–116.
237.
WannaDAlamCToivolaDM, et al. Bacterial cellulose–kaolin nanocomposites for application as biomedical wound healing materials. Adv Nat Sci2013; 4: 045002.
238.
AydogduMOAltunECrabbe ‐MannM, et al. Cellular interactions with bacterial cellulose: polycaprolactone nanofibrous scaffolds produced by a portable electrohydrodynamic gun for point‐of‐need wound dressing. Int Wound J2018; 15: 789–797.
239.
JinMChenWLiZ, et al. Patterned bacterial cellulose wound dressing for hypertrophic scar inhibition behavior. Cellulose2018; 25: 6705–6717.
240.
KimJKimSWParkS, et al. Bacterial cellulose nanofibrillar patch as a wound healing platform of tympanic membrane perforation. Adv Healthc Mater2013; 2: 1525–1531.
241.
LamboniLLiYLiuJ, et al. Silk Sericin-Functionalized bacterial cellulose as a potential Wound-Healing biomaterial. Biomacromolecules2016; 17: 3076–3084.
242.
LinS-BChenC-CChenL-C, et al. The bioactive composite film prepared from bacterial cellulose and modified by hydrolyzed gelatin peptide. J Biomater Appl2015; 29: 1428–1438.
LiYJiangHZhengW, et al. Bacterial cellulose–hyaluronan nanocomposite biomaterials as wound dressings for severe skin injury repair. J Mater Chem B2015; 3: 3498–3507.
245.
LohEYXMohamadNFauziMB, et al. Development of a bacterial cellulose-based hydrogel cell carrier containing keratinocytes and fibroblasts for full-thickness wound healing. Sci Rep2018; 8: 1–12.
246.
MahdaviMMahmoudiNRezaie AnaranF, et al. Electrospinning of nanodiamond-modified polysaccharide nanofibers with physico-mechanical properties close to natural skins. Mar Drugs2016; 14: 128.
247.
MohamadNAminMCIMPandeyM, et al. Bacterial cellulose/acrylic acid hydrogel synthesized via electron beam irradiation: accelerated burn wound healing in an animal model. Carbohydr Polym2014; 114: 312–320.
248.
OsorioMVelásquez-CockJRestrepoLM, et al. Bioactive 3D-shaped wound dressings synthesized from bacterial cellulose: effect on cell adhesion of polyvinyl alcohol integrated in situ. Int J Polym Sci2017; 2017: 1–10.
249.
OstadhosseinFMahmoudiNMorales-CidG, et al. Development of chitosan/bacterial cellulose composite films containing nanodiamonds as a potential flexible platform for wound dressing. Materials2015; 8: 6401–6418.
250.
PandeyMMohamadNLowW-L, et al. Microwaved bacterial cellulose-based hydrogel microparticles for the healing of partial thickness burn wounds. Drug Deliv Transl Res2017; 7: 89–99.
251.
PichethGFSierakowskiMRWoehlMA, et al. Lysozyme-triggered epidermal growth factor release from bacterial cellulose membranes controlled by smart nanostructured films. J Pharm Sci2014; 103: 3958–3965.
252.
SanchavanakitNSangrungraungrojWKaomongkolgitR, et al. Growth of human keratinocytes and fibroblasts on bacterial cellulose film. Biotechnol Prog2006; 22: 1194–1199.
253.
LinYKChenKHOuKL, et al. Effects of different extracellular matrices and growth factor immobilization on biodegradability and biocompatibility of macroporous bacterial cellulose. J Bioact Compat Polym2011; 26: 508–518.
254.
BottanSRobottiFJayathissaP, et al. Surface-structured bacterial cellulose with guided assembly-based biolithography (GAB). ACS Nano2015; 9: 206–219.
255.
VasconcelosNFCunhaAPRicardoNMPS, et al. Papain immobilization on heterofunctional membrane bacterial cellulose as a potential strategy for the debridement of skin wounds. Int J Biol Macromol2020; 165: 3065–3077.
256.
PasaribuKMGeaSIlyasS, et al. Characterization of bacterial cellulose-based wound dressing in different order impregnation of chitosan and collagen. Biomolecules2020; 10: 1511–1515.
257.
WanYYangSWangJ, et al. Scalable synthesis of robust and stretchable composite wound dressings by dispersing silver nanowires in continuous bacterial cellulose. Compos Part B Eng2020; 199: 108259.
258.
SzymańskaMKarakulskaJSobolewskiP, et al. Glycoside hydrolase (PelAh) immobilization prevents Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation on cellulose-based wound dressing. Carbohydr Polym2020; 246: 116625.
259.
SulaevaIHetteggerHBergenA, et al. Fabrication of bacterial cellulose-based wound dressings with improved performance by impregnation with alginate. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2020; 110: 110619.
260.
BarudHSde Araújo JúniorAMSantosDB, et al. Thermal behavior of cellulose acetate produced from homogeneous acetylation of bacterial cellulose. Thermochim Acta2008; 471: 61–69.
ManeerungTTokuraSRujiravanitR.Impregnation of silver nanoparticles into bacterial cellulose for antimicrobial wound dressing. Carbohydr Polym2008; 72: 43–51.
263.
PalNDubeyPGopinathP, et al. Combined effect of cellulose nanocrystal and reduced graphene oxide into poly-lactic acid matrix nanocomposite as a scaffold and its anti-bacterial activity. Int J Biol Macromol2017; 95: 94–105.
264.
MariaLCSSantosALCOliveiraPC, et al. Preparation and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles impregnated in bacterial cellulose. Polímeros2010; 20: 72–77.
265.
DiZShiZUllahMW, et al. A transparent wound dressing based on bacterial cellulose whisker and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). Int J Biol Macromol2017; 105: 638–644.
266.
WuJZhengYWenX, et al. Silver nanoparticle/bacterial cellulose gel membranes for antibacterial wound dressing: investigation in vitro and in vivo. Biomed Mater2014; 9: 35005.
267.
WuJZhengYSongW, et al. In situ synthesis of silver-nanoparticles/bacterial cellulose composites for slow-released antimicrobial wound dressing. Carbohydr Polym2014; 102: 762–771.
268.
LiuCYangDWangY, et al. Fabrication of antimicrobial bacterial cellulose–Ag/AgCl nanocomposite using bacteria as versatile biofactory. J Nanoparticle Res2012; 14: 1084.
269.
SureshkumarMSiswantoDYLeeC-K.Magnetic antimicrobial nanocomposite based on bacterial cellulose and silver nanoparticles. J Mater Chem2010; 20: 6948–6955.
270.
LuanJWuJZhengY, et al. Impregnation of silver sulfadiazine into bacterial cellulose for antimicrobial and biocompatible wound dressing. Biomed Mater2012; 7: 65006.
271.
MohiteBVPatilSV.In situ development of nanosilver-impregnated bacterial cellulose for sustainable released antimicrobial wound dressing. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater2016; 14: 53–58.
272.
YanNZhouYZhengY, et al. Antibacterial properties and cytocompatibility of bio-based nanostructured carbon aerogels derived from silver nanoparticles deposited onto bacterial cellulose. RSC Adv2015; 5: 97467–97476.
273.
BayónBCacicedoMLÁlvarezVA, et al. Self-assembly stereo-specific synthesis of silver phosphate microparticles on bacterial cellulose membrane surface for antimicrobial applications. Colloid Interface Sci Commun2018; 26: 7–13.
274.
KhalidAKhanRUl-IslamM, et al. Bacterial cellulose-zinc oxide nanocomposites as a novel dressing system for burn wounds. Carbohydr Polym2017; 164: 214–221.
275.
KhanSUl-IslamMKhattakWA, et al. Bacterial cellulose-titanium dioxide nanocomposites: nanostructural characteristics, antibacterial mechanism, and biocompatibility. Cellulose2015; 22: 565–579.
276.
ShaoWWangSWuJ, et al. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of copper nanoparticle loaded regenerated bacterial cellulose membranes. RSC Adv2016; 6: 65879–65884.
277.
ChuMGaoHLiuS, et al. Functionalization of composite bacterial cellulose with C 60 nanoparticles for wound dressing and cancer therapy. RSC Adv2018; 8: 18197–18203.
278.
LiYTianYZhengW, et al. Composites of bacterial cellulose and small molecule‐decorated gold nanoparticles for treating gram‐negative bacteria‐infected wounds. Small2017; 13: 1700130.
279.
Barud H daSde Araújo JúniorAMSaskaS, et al. Antimicrobial brazilian propolis (EPP-AF) containing biocellulose membranes as promising biomaterial for skin wound healing. Evid Based Compl Altern Med2013; 2013: 1–10.
280.
JijiSUdhayakumarSRoseC, et al. Thymol enriched bacterial cellulose hydrogel as effective material for third degree burn wound repair. Int J Biol Macromol2019; 122: 452–460.
281.
FürsatzMSkogMSivlérP, et al. Functionalization of bacterial cellulose wound dressings with the antimicrobial peptide ε-poly-L-Lysine. Biomed Mater2018; 13: 25014.
