Although nanotechnology advances have been exploited for a myriad of purposes, including cancer diagnostics and treatment, still there is little discussion about the mechanisms of remote control. Our main aim here is to explain the possibility of a magnetic field control over magnetic nanocomplexes to improve their delivery, controlled release and antitumor activity. In doing so we considered the nonlinear dynamics of magnetomechanical and magnetochemical effects based on free radical mechanisms in cancer development for future pre-clinical studies.
BaydaSAdeelMTuccinardiT, et al. The history of nanoscience and nanotechnology: from chemical–physical applications to nanomedicine. Molecules2019; 25: 112.
2.
BruschiMLde ToledoLdAS.Pharmaceutical applications of iron-oxide magnetic nanoparticles. Magnetochemistry2019; 5: 50.
3.
SoetaertFKorangathPSerantesD, et al. Cancer therapy with iron oxide nanoparticles: agents of thermal and immune therapies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2020; 163-164: 65–83.
4.
PankhurstQAConnollyJJonesSK, et al. Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J Phys D: Appl Phys2003; 36: R167–R181.
SalvioniLRizzutoMABertoliniJA, et al. Thirty years of cancer nanomedicine: success, frustration, and hope. Cancers (Basel)2019; 11: 1855.
7.
NaudCThébaultCCarrièreM, et al. Cancer treatment by magneto-mechanical effect of particles, a review. Nanoscale Adv2020; 2: 3632–3655.
8.
GunesT.Magneto-mechanical effect on the magnetic properties and microstructures in nanocrystalline Fe-Cu-Nb-Si-B alloys. Metall Mater Trans A2019; 50: 4480–4491.
9.
GolovinYIGribanovskySLGolovinDY, et al. Towards nanomedicines of the future: remote magneto-mechanical actuation of nanomedicines by alternating magnetic fields. J Control Release2015; 219: 43–60.
OrelVEKorovinSIMolnárJ, et al. Non-linear dynamics theory and malignant melanoma. Exp Oncol2019; 41: 291–299.
19.
OrelVRomanovA.Cancer magnetic nanotherapy. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2014, p.158.
20.
OrelVETselepiMMitreliasT, et al. Nonlinear magnetochemical effects in nanotherapy of walker-256 carcinosarcoma. ACS Appl Bio Mater2019; 2: 3954–3963.
21.
KembroJMCortassaSLloydD, et al. Mitochondrial chaotic dynamics: Redox-energetic behavior at the edge of stability. Sci Rep2018; 8: 15422.
22.
SteinacherABatesDGAkmanOE, et al. Nonlinear dynamics in gene regulation promote robustness and evolvability of gene expression levels. PLoS One2016; 11: e0153295.
23.
LaurentMDeschatretteJWolfromCM.Unmasking chaotic attributes in time series of living cell populations. PLoS One2010; 5: e9346.
24.
HorsmanMRVaupelP.Pathophysiological basis for the formation of the tumor microenvironment. Front Oncol2016; 6: 66.
25.
EmanuelN.Kinetics of experimental tumor processes. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982, p.348.
26.
LowengrubJSFrieboesHBJinF, et al. Nonlinear modelling of cancer: Bridging the gap between cells and tumours. Nonlinearity2010; 23: R1–R9.
27.
SigstonEAWWilliamsBRG.An emergence framework of carcinogenesis. Front Oncol2017; 7: 198.
28.
KilincDDennisCLLeeGU.Bio-nano-magnetic materials for localized mechanochemical stimulation of cell growth and death. Adv Mater2016; 28: 5672–5680.
29.
JohannsenMThiesenBWustP, et al. Magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia for prostate cancer. Int J Hyperthermia2010; 26: 790–795.
30.
OrelVShevchenkoARomanovA, et al. Magnetic properties and antitumor effect of nanocomplexes of iron oxide and doxorubicin. Nanomedicine2015; 11: 47–55.
31.
CohenAE.Nanomagnetic control of intersystem crossing. J Phys Chem A2009; 113: 11084–11092.
32.
Vasiliu-OpreaCDanF.Macromolecular mechanochemistry. Cambridge: Cambridge International Science Publishing, 2007, p.453.
33.
MontagnerMDupontS.Mechanical forces as determinants of disseminated metastatic cell fate. Cells2020; 9: 250.
34.
ChengDLiXZhangG, et al. Morphological effect of oscillating magnetic nanoparticles in killing tumor cells. Nanoscale Res Lett2014; 9: 195.
35.
HanahanDWeinbergRA.Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell2011; 144: 646–674.
36.
BalmertSCLittleSR.Biomimetic delivery with micro- and nanoparticles. Adv Mater2012; 24: 3757–3778.
37.
JostCStüberJCHoneggerA, et al. Rigidity of the extracellular part of HER2: evidence from engineering subdomain interfaces and shared-helix DARPin-DARPin fusions. Protein Sci2017; 26: 1796–1806.
38.
JainRKMartinJDStylianopoulosT.The role of mechanical forces in tumor growth and therapy. Annu Rev Biomed Eng2014; 16: 321–346.
39.
TakaoSTayaMChiewC.Mechanical stress-induced cell death in breast cancer cells. Biol Open2019; 8: bio043133. DOI: 10.1242/bio.043133
40.
KirkhamGRElliotKJKeramaneA, et al. Hyperpolarization of human mesenchymal stem cells in response to magnetic force. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience2010; 9: 71–74.
41.
MannixRJKumarSCassiolaF, et al. Nanomagnetic actuation of receptor-mediated signal transduction. Nat Nanotechnol2008; 3: 36–40.
42.
KilincDLesniakARashdanSA, et al. Mechanochemical stimulation of MCF7 cells with rod-shaped Fe-Au Janus particles induces cell death through paradoxical hyperactivation of ERK. Adv Healthc Mater2015; 4: 395–404.
43.
HirataHGuptaMVedulaSR, et al. Actomyosin bundles serve as a tension sensor and a platform for ERK activation. EMBO Rep2015; 16: 250–257.
44.
PaszekMJZahirNJohnsonKR, et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell2005; 8: 241–254.
45.
LiuDWangLWangZ, et al. Magnetoporation and magnetolysis of cancer cells via carbon nanotubes induced by rotating magnetic fields. Nano Lett2012; 12: 5117–5121.
46.
MuradHYYuHLuoD, et al. Mechanochemical disruption suppresses metastatic phenotype and pushes prostate cancer cells toward apoptosis. Mol Cancer Res2019; 17: 1087–1101.
47.
CaoYZhaoJZhangY, et al. pH/redox dual-sensitive nanoparticles based on the PCL/PEG triblock copolymer for enhanced intracellular doxorubicin release. RSC Adv2015; 5: 28060–28069.
48.
ShenBBGaoXCYuSY, et al. Fabrication and potential application of a di-functional magnetic system: magnetic hyperthermia therapy and drug delivery. CrystEngComm2016; 18: 1133–1138.
49.
WangAGaoHSunY, et al. Temperature- and pH-responsive nanoparticles of biocompatible polyurethanes for doxorubicin delivery. Int J Pharm2013; 441: 30–39.
50.
ZhengYWangLLuL, et al. pH and thermal dual-responsive nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery with high loading content. ACS Omega2017; 2: 3399–3405.
51.
LiWLiuYQianZ, et al. Evaluation of tumor treatment of magnetic nanoparticles driven by extremely low frequency magnetic field. Sci Rep2017; 7: 46287.
52.
RegoGNANucciMPMamaniJB, et al. Therapeutic efficiency of multiple applications of magnetic hyperthermia technique in glioblastoma using aminosilane coated iron oxide nanoparticles: in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Mol Sci2020; 21: 958.
53.
OrelVBZabolotnyMAOrelVE.Heterogeneity of hypoxia in solid tumours and mechanochemical reactions with oxygen nanobubbles. Med Hypotheses2017; 102: 82–86.
54.
DriverBRBarriosRGeY, et al. Folate receptor α expression level correlates with histologic grade in lung adenocarcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med2016; 140: 682–685.
55.
LeeESGaoZBaeYH.Recent progress in tumor pH targeting nanotechnology. J Control Release2008; 132: 164–170.
56.
SwietachP.What is pH regulation, and why do cancer cells need it?Cancer Metastasis Rev2019; 38: 5–15.
57.
ZhangBWangKSiJ, et al. Charge‐reversal polymers for biodelivery. In: GuZ (ed.) Bioinspired and biomimetic polymer systems for drug and gene delivery. 1st ed.Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2015, pp.223–242.
58.
MunnierECohen-JonathanSLinassierC, et al. Novel method of doxorubicin-SPION reversible association for magnetic drug targeting. Int J Pharm2008; 363: 170–176.
59.
BlumenfeldCMSchulzMDAboianMS, et al. Drug capture materials based on genomic DNA-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles. Nat Commun2018; 9: 2870.
60.
NogueiraJSoaresSFAmorimCO, et al. Magnetic driven nanocarriers for pH-responsive doxorubicin release in cancer therapy. Molecules2020; 25: 333.
61.
HuangYTangZZhangX, et al. pH-Triggered charge-reversal polypeptide nanoparticles for cisplatin delivery: preparation and in vitro evaluation. Biomacromolecules2013; 14: 2023–2032.
62.
HuYZhouYZhaoN, et al. Multifunctional pDNA-conjugated polycationic Au nanorod-coated Fe3O4 hierarchical nanocomposites for trimodal imaging and combined photothermal/gene therapy. Small2016; 12: 2459–2468.
63.
ZhangHXueYHuangJ, et al. Tailor-made magnetic nanocarriers with pH-induced charge reversal and pH-responsiveness to guide subcellular release of doxorubicin. J Mater Sci2015; 50: 2429–2442.
64.
SahaIChaffeeKEDuanmuC, et al. pH-Sensitive MR responses induced by dendron-functionalized SPIONs. J Phys Chem C2013; 117: 1893–1903.
65.
YarYKhodadustRAkkocY, et al. Development of tailored SPION-PNIPAM nanoparticles by ATRP for dually responsive doxorubicin delivery and MR imaging. J Mater Chem B2018; 6: 289–300.
66.
ZhangZQSongSC.Multiple hyperthermia-mediated release of TRAIL/SPION nanocomplex from thermosensitive polymeric hydrogels for combination cancer therapy. Biomaterials2017; 132: 16–27.
67.
GentricGMieuletVMechta-GrigoriouF.Heterogeneity in cancer metabolism: new concepts in an old field. Antioxid Redox Signal2017; 26: 462–485.
68.
TakeshitaKKawaguchiKFujii-AikawaK, et al. Heterogeneity of regional redox status and relation of the redox status to oxygenation in a tumor model, evaluated using electron paramagnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Res2010; 70: 4133–4140.
69.
BalendiranGKDaburRFraserD.The role of glutathione in cancer. Cell Biochem Funct2004; 22: 343–352.
70.
AyyanaarSBalachandranCBhaskarRC, et al. ROS-responsive chitosan coated magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as potential vehicles for targeted drug delivery in cancer therapy. Int J Nanomedicine2020; 15: 3333–3346.
71.
StephenZRKievitFMVeisehO, et al. Redox-responsive magnetic nanoparticle for targeted convection-enhanced delivery of O6-benzylguanine to brain tumors. ACS Nano2014; 8: 10383–10395.
72.
SangMMLiuFLWangY, et al. A novel redox/pH dual-responsive and hyaluronic acid-decorated multifunctional magnetic complex micelle for targeted gambogic acid delivery for the treatment of triple negative breast cancer. Drug Deliv2018; 25: 1846–1857.
73.
VinczeGSzaszOSzaszA.Generalization of the thermal dose of hyperthermia in oncology. Open J Biophys2015; 05: 97–114.
74.
WustPKortümBStraussU, et al. Non-thermal effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Sci Rep2020; 10: 13488.
75.
BarnesFGreenebaumB.Role of radical pairs and feedback in weak radio frequency field effects on biological systems. Environ Res2018; 163: 165–170.
76.
BozicMLipusCKokolV.Magnetic field effects on redox potential of reduction and oxidation agents. Croat Chem Acta2008; 81: 413–421.
77.
HorePJMouritsenH.The radical-pair mechanism of magnetoreception. Annu Rev Biophys2016; 45: 299–344.
78.
UsselmanRJChavarriagaCCastelloPR, et al. The quantum biology of reactive oxygen species partitioning impacts cellular bioenergetics. Sci Rep2016; 6: 38543.
OrelVETselepiMMitreliasT, et al. The comparison between superparamagnetic and ferromagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for cancer nanotherapy in the magnetic resonance system. Nanotechnology2019; 30: 415701.
81.
AgudeloDBourassaPBérubéG, et al. Review on the binding of anticancer drug doxorubicin with DNA and tRNA: structural models and antitumor activity. J Photochem Photobiol B2016; 158: 274–279.
82.
OrelVShevchenkoARykhalskyiO, et al. Influence of radio frequency electromagnetic irradiation on magnetic properties of magneto-mechano-chemically synthesized antitumor nanocomplex. In: NANO 2016: nanophysics, nanomaterials, interface studies, and applications. Lviv: Springer, 2017, pp.813–825.
83.
OrelVETselepiMMitreliasT, et al. Nanomagnetic modulation of tumor redox state. Nanomedicine2018; 14: 1249–1256.
84.
EmersonJBallentineLE.Characteristics of quantum-classical correspondence for two interacting spins. Phys Rev A2001; 63: 052103.
85.
TrailCMMadhokVDeutschIH.Entanglement and the generation of random states in the quantum chaotic dynamics of kicked coupled tops. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys2008; 78: 046211.
86.
WangXGhoseSSandersBC, et al. Entanglement as a signature of quantum chaos. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys2004; 70: 016217.
87.
NikolovSWolkenhauerOVeraJ.Tumors as chaotic attractors. Mol Biosyst2014; 10: 172–179.
88.
UngefrorenHSebensSSeidlD, et al. Interaction of tumor cells with the microenvironment. Cell Commun Signal2011; 9: 18.
89.
SotoAMSonnenscheinC.Is systems biology a promising approach to resolve controversies in cancer research?Cancer Cell Int2012; 12: 12.
90.
MaherBAO'SullivanVFeeneyJ, et al. Indoor particulate air pollution from open fires and the cognitive function of older people. Environ Res2021; 192: 110298.
91.
GonetTMaherBAKukutschováJ.Source apportionment of magnetite particles in roadside airborne particulate matter. Sci Total Environ2021; 752: 141828.
92.
HofmanJMaherBAMuxworthyAR, et al. Biomagnetic monitoring of atmospheric pollution: a review of magnetic signatures from biological sensors. Environ Sci Technol2017; 51: 6648–6664.
93.
SeatonATranLAitkenR, et al. Nanoparticles, human health hazard and regulation. J R Soc Interface2010; 7: S119–S129.
