Development of biological meniscus scaffold: Decellularization method and recellularization with meniscal cell population derived from mesenchymal stem cells
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2021
Development of biological meniscus scaffold: Decellularization method and recellularization with meniscal cell population derived from mesenchymal stem cells
Tissue engineering approaches which include a combination of cells and scaffold materials provide an alternative treatment for meniscus regeneration. Decellularization and recellularization techniques are potential treatment options for transplantation. Maintenance of the ultrastructure composition of the extracellular matrix and repopulation with cells are important factors in constructing a biological scaffold and eliminating immunological reactions.
The aim of the study is to develop a method to obtain biological functional meniscus scaffolds for meniscus regeneration. For this purpose, meniscus tissue was decellularized by our modified method, a combination of physical, chemical, and enzymatic methods and then recellularized with a meniscal cell population composed of fibroblasts, chondrocytes and fibrochondrocytes that obtained from mesenchymal stem cells. Decellularized and recellularized meniscus scaffolds were analysed biochemically, biomechanically and histologically. Our results revealed that cellular components of the meniscus were successfully removed by preserving collagen and GAG structures without any significant loss in biomechanical properties. Recellularization results showed that the meniscal cells were localized in the empty lacuna on the decellularized meniscus, and also well distributed and proliferated consistently during the cell culture period (p < 0.05). Furthermore, a high amount of DNA, collagen, and GAG contents (p < 0.05) were obtained with the meniscal cell population in recellularized meniscus tissue.
The study demonstrates that our decellularization and recellularization methods were effective to develop a biological functional meniscus scaffold and can mimic the meniscus tissue with structural and biochemical features. We predict that the obtained biological meniscus scaffolds may provide avoidance of adverse immune reactions and an appropriate microenvironment for allogeneic or xenogeneic recipients in the transplantation process. Therefore, as a promising candidate, the obtained biological meniscus scaffolds might be verified with a transplantation experiment.
McDermottIDAmisAA.The consequences of meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br2006; 88-B:12: 1549–1556.
2.
MarkesARHodaxJDMaCB.Meniscus form and function. Clin Sports Med2020;
39: 1–12.
3.
RaoAJEricksonBJCvetanovichGL, et al.
The meniscus-deficient knee. Orthop J Sport Med2015; 3: n. pag.
4.
RodkeyWGSteadmanJRLiST.A clinical study of collagen meniscus implants to restore the injured meniscus. In: Clinical orthopaedics and related research1999; 367 Suppl: 281–292.
5.
HouckDAKraeutlerMJBelkJW, et al.
Similar clinical outcomes following collagen or polyurethane meniscal scaffold implantation: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc2018;
26: 2259–2269.
6.
Torres SJ, Hsu JE, Mauck RL. Meniscal Anatomy. In: Kelly JD (eds) Meniscal Injuries. 4th ed. New York: Springer 2014, pp.1–7.
7.
Verdonk P. Histology-Ultrastructure-Biology. In: Beaufils P, Verdonk R (eds) The Meniscus. 2nd ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010, pp. 19–27.
8.
NiuWGuoWHanS, et al.
Cell-based strategies for meniscus tissue engineering. Stem Cells Int2016;
2016: 4717184.
9.
BumaPRamrattanNNVan TienenTG, et al.
Tissue engineering of the meniscus. Biomaterials2004;
25: 1523–1532.
10.
KohnDVerdonkRAagaardH, et al.
Meniscal substitutes – animal experience. Scand J Med Sci Sports2007; 9: 141–145.
11.
VårbakkenKLoråsHNilssonKG, et al.
Relative difference among 27 functional measures in patients with knee osteoarthritis: an exploratory cross-sectional case-control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2019;
20: 462.
12.
LohmanderLSEnglundPMDahlLL, et al.
The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med2007; 35(10): 1756–1769.
13.
KaplanDJGlaitSARyanWE, et al.
Meniscal allograft transplantation made simple: bridge and slot technique. Arthrosc Tech2017; 6(6): 2129–2135.
14.
De BruyckerMVerdonkPCMVerdonkRC.Meniscal allograft transplantation: a meta-analysis. Sicot J2017;
3: 33.
15.
DoralMNBilgeOHuriGTurhanEVerdonkR.Modern treatment of meniscal tears. EFORT Open Rev. 2018; 3(5): 260–268.
16.
BadylakSFGilbertTW.Extra cellular matrix as a biological scaffold material structure and function. Acta Biomater2009; 5(1): 1–13.
17.
CrapoPMGilbertTWBadylakSF.An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials2011;
32: 3233–3243.
18.
Hoshiba T and Yamaoka T. Extracellular matrix scafolds for tissue engineering and biological reseaerch. In: Decellularized Extracellular Matrix: Characterization, Fabrication and Applications. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019, pp. 1–14.
19.
Faulk DM, Badylak SF, Natural Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine Applications, In: Orlando G, Lerut J, Soker S, Stratta RJ (eds) Regenerative Medicine Applications in Organ Transplantation, Academic Press, 2014, pp. 101–112.
20.
Gupta SK, Mishra NC, Dhasmana A. Decellularization Methods for Scaffold Fabrication. In: Turksen K. (ed) Decellularized Scaffolds and Organogenesis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1577. Humana Press, New York, NY, 2017, pp. 1-10.
21.
StapletonTWIngramJKattaJ, et al.
Development and characterization of an acellular porcine medial meniscus for use in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng – Part A2008; 14(4): 505–518.
22.
Kara A. Development of meniscus tissue bio-compatibility using allograft native scaffold. PhD Thesis, Dokuz Eylul University, TR, 2017.
23.
Athanasiou KA, Sanchez-Adams J. Engineering the knee meniscus. In: Athanasiou KA, Kent Leach JK, editors. Synthesis lectures on tissue engineering. Williston (VT): Morgan and Claypool Publishers; 2009. p. 1–97.
24.
VerdonkPCMForsythRGWangJ, et al.
Characterisation of human knee meniscus cell phenotype. Osteoarthr Cartil2005; 13(7): 548–560.
25.
HayesWCKeerLMHerrmannG, et al.
A mathematical analysis for indentation tests of articular cartilage. J Biomech1972; 5(5): 541–551.
26.
DominiciMLe BlancKMuellerI, et al.
Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The international society for cellular therapy position statement. Cytotherapy2006;
8: 315–317.
27.
MakrisEAHadidiPAthanasiouKA.The knee meniscus: structure-function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration. Biomaterials2011;
32: 7411–7431.
28.
YagiHSoto-GutierrezAKitagawaY.Whole-organ re-engineering: a regenerative medicine approach in digestive surgery for organ replacement. Surg Today2013;
43: 587–594.
29.
Verdonk P. Histology-Ultrastructure-Biology. In: Beaufils P., Verdonk R. (eds) The Meniscus. Springer, Berlin, 2010, pp.19–27.
30.
LeroyABeaufilsPFaivreB, et al.
Actifit® polyurethane meniscal scaffold: MRI and functional outcomes after a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2017; 103(4): 609–614.
31.
SunJVijayavenkataramanSLiuH.An overview of scaffold design and fabrication technology for engineered knee meniscus. Materials2017;
10: 29.
32.
BaekJChenXSovaniS, et al.
Meniscus tissue engineering using a novel combination of electrospun scaffolds and human meniscus cells embedded within an extracellular matrix hydrogel. J Orthop Res2015; 33(4): 572–583.
33.
MandalBBParkSHGilES, et al.
Multilayered silk scaffolds for meniscus tissue engineering. Biomaterials2011;
32: 639–651.
LinkeRDUlmerMImhoffAB.Replacement of the meniscus with a collagen implant (CMI). Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg2007;
33: 435–440.
36.
VerdonkRVerdonkPHuysseW, et al.
Tissue ingrowth after implantation of a novel, biodegradable polyurethane scaffold for treatment of partial meniscal lesions. Am J Sports Med2011;
39: 774–782.
37.
SchüttlerKFPöttgenSGetgoodA, et al.
Improvement in outcomes after implantation of a novel polyurethane meniscal scaffold for the treatment of medial meniscus deficiency. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc2015; 23(7): 1929–1935.
38.
YanRChenYGuY, et al.
A collagen-coated sponge silk scaffold for functional meniscus regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med2019;
13: 156–173.
39.
GruchenbergKIgnatiusAFriemertB, et al.
In vivo performance of a novel silk fibroin scaffold for partial meniscal replacement in a sheep model. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc2015; 23(8): 2218–2229.
40.
BakerBMShahRPSilversteinAM, et al.
Sacrificial nanofibrous composites provide instruction without impediment and enable functional tissue formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2012; 109(35): 14176–14181.
41.
EspositoARModaMCattaniSMDM, et al.
PLDLA/PCL-T scaffold for meniscus tissue engineering. Biores Open Access2013; 2(2): 138–147.
42.
GaoSChenMWangP, et al.
An electrospun fiber reinforced scaffold promotes total meniscus regeneration in rabbit meniscectomy model. Acta Biomater2018; 73: 127–140.
43.
WoodDJMinnsRJStroverA.Replacement of the rabbit medial meniscus with a polyester-carbon fibre bioprosthesis. Biomaterials1990;
11: 13–16.
44.
NaalFDSchauweckerJSteinhauserE, et al.
Biomechanical and immunohistochemical properties of meniscal cartilage after high hydrostatic pressure treatment. J Biomed Mater Res – Part B Appl Biomater2008; 87(1): 19–25.
45.
MartinekVUsasAPelinkovicD, et al.
Genetic engineering of meniscal allografts. Tissue Eng2002; 8(1): 107–17.
46.
SandmannGHEichhornSVogtS, et al.
Generation and characterization of a human acellular meniscus scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res – Part A2009; 14: 324.
47.
MaierDBraeunKSteinhauserE, et al.
In vitro analysis of an allogenic scaffold for tissue-engineered meniscus replacement. J Orthop Res2007; 25: 1598–1608.
48.
ChenYChenJZhangZ, et al.
Current advances in the development of natural meniscus scaffolds: innovative approaches to decellularization and recellularization. Cell Tissue Res2017;
370: 41–52.
49.
SandmannGHAdamczykCGarciaEG, et al.
Biomechanical comparison of menisci from different species and artificial constructs. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2013;
14–324.
50.
PorzionatoAStoccoEBarbonS, et al.
Tissue-engineered grafts from human decellularized extracellular matrices: a systematic review and future perspectives. Ijms2018;
19: 4117.
51.
VediVWilliamsATennantSJ, et al.
Meniscal movement. An in-vivo study using dynamic MRI. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B1999; 81(1): 37–41.
52.
KawamuraSLotitoKRodeoSA.Biomechanics and healing response of the meniscus. Oper Tech Sports Med2003; 11(2): 68–76.
53.
KalekaCCDebieuxPDa Costa AsturD, et al.
Updates in biological therapies for knee injuries: Menisci. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med2014;
7: 247–255.
54.
DiehlPSteinhauserEGollwitzerH, et al.
Biomechanical and immunohistochemical analysis of high hydrostatic pressure-treated achilles tendons. J Orthop Sci2006; 11(4): 380–5.
55.
LichtenbergATudoracheICebotariS, et al.
Preclinical testing of tissue-engineered heart valves re-endothelialized under simulated physiological conditions. Circulation2006;
114: I-559–I-565.
56.
LovatiABBottagisioMMorettiM.Decellularized and engineered tendons as biological substitutes: a critical review. Stem Cells Int2016;
2016: 7276150.
57.
CaddeoSBoffitoMSartoriS.Tissue engineering approaches in the design of healthy and pathological in vitro tissue models. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2017;
5: 40.
58.
HillebrandtKHEverwienHHaepN, et al.
Strategies based on organ decellularization and recellularization. Transpl Int2019; 32(6): 571–585.
59.
FuRHWangYCLiuSP, et al.
Decellularization and recellularization technologies in tissue engineering. Cell Transplant2014;
23: 621–630.
60.
KunaVKXuB and
Sumitran-Holgersson S. Decellularization and recellularization methodology for human saphenous veins. J Vis Exp2018; (137): 57803.
61.
YamasakiTDeieMShinomiyaR, et al.
Transplantation of meniscus regenerated by tissue engineering with a scaffold derived from a rat meniscus and mesenchymal stromal cells derived from rat bone marrow. Artif Organs2008; 32(7): 519–24.
62.
WilsonCGNishimutaJFLevenstonME.Chondrocytes and meniscal fibrochondrocytes differentially process aggrecan during de novo extracellular matrix assembly. Tissue Eng – Part A2009; 15(7): 1513–1522.
63.
Brown BN, Buckenmeyer MJ, Prest TA. Preparation of Decellularized Biological Scaffolds for 3D Cell Culture. In: Koledova Z. (eds) 3D Cell Culture. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1612. Humana Press, New York, 2017, pp. 15–27.
64.
BarberoAGroganSSchäferD, et al.
Age related changes in human articular chondrocyte yield, proliferation and post-expansion chondrogenic capacity. Osteoarthr Cartil2004; 12(6): 476–484.
65.
DonnellyHSalmeron-SanchezMDalbyMJ.Designing stem cell niches for differentiation and self-renewal. J R Soc Interface2018;
15: 20180388.
66.
DingZHuangH.Mesenchymal stem cells in rabbit meniscus and bone marrow exhibit a similar feature but a heterogeneous multi-differentiation potential: Superiority of meniscus as a cell source for meniscus repair evolutionary developmental biology and morphology. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2015;
16: 65–79.
67.
Diaz-RodriguezPChenHErndt-MarinoJD, et al.
Impact of select sophorolipid derivatives on macrophage polarization and viability. ACS Appl Bio Mater2019; 2(1): 601–612.
Fontenot AP, Simonian P. Adaptive Immunity, In: Broaddus VD, Mason RJ, Ernst JD, et al. (eds) Murray and Nadel's Textbook of Respiratory Medicine 6th ed. W.B. Saunders, 2016, pp. 206–224.
70.
NikbakhtMPakbinBNikbakht BrujeniG.Evaluation of a new lymphocyte proliferation assay based on cyclic voltammetry; an alternative method. Sci Rep2019;
9: 1–8.
71.
GreeneNAleoMDLouise-MayS, et al.
Using an in vitro cytotoxicity assay to aid in compound selection for in vivo safety studies. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett2010; 20(17): 5308–5312.
72.
ChewEPrakashRKhanW.Mesenchymal stem cells in human meniscal regeneration: a systematic review. Ann Med Surg (Lond)2017;
24: 3–7.
73.
HuangZGodkinOSchulze-TanzilG.The challenge in using mesenchymal stromal cells for recellularization of decellularized cartilage. Stem Cell Rev Rep2017;
13: 50–67.
74.
ChenJLDuanLZhuW, et al.
Extracellular matrix production in vitro in cartilage tissue engineering. J Transl Med2014;
12: 88.
