The quality and quantity of bone are crucial to the success of dental implant treatment. Recently, bone grafting materials have reached some limitations. This study aimed to evaluate the biocompatibility of novel drug delivery material, injectable methacrylated hyaluronic acid hydrogel incorporated with different ratios of mannitol and BSA (Man/BSA MeHA), to human alveolar bone cells. The three-dimensionally encapsulated cell culture was evaluated with the resazurin cell viability test, alkaline phosphatase activity assay, immunohistochemistry test for collagen type-I synthesis, and cell morphology. The results showed that the encapsulated cells were viable in all four ratios of Man/BSA MeHA hydrogel and the average metabolic rate was not less than the control group. The morphology test showed round shape cells at the upper portion of the hydrogel and fibroblast-like or polygonal shape at the lower portion of hydrogel next to the culture plate. All four groups could express enzyme alkaline phosphatase and collagen type-I. In conclusion, four ratios of Man/BSA MeHA hydrogel were biocompatible with primary human alveolar bone cells.
GaviriaLSalcidoJPGudaT, et al.
Current trends in dental implants. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg2014;
40: 50–60.
2.
WhiteGS.Treatment of the edentulous patient. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am2015;
27: 265–272.
3.
ChaH-SKimJ-WHwangJ-H, et al.
Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg2016;
38: 19.
4.
VenkataramanNBansalSBansalP, et al.
Dynamics of bone graft healing around implants. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ2015;
7: 40–47.
5.
RaikarSTalukdarPKumariS, et al.
Factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants: a retrospective study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent2017;
7: 351–355.
6.
SaimaSJanSShahA, et al.
Bone grafts and bone substitutes in dentistry. J Oral Res Rev2016;
8: 36–38.
7.
Abou NeelEAChrzanowskiWSalihVM, et al.
Tissue engineering in dentistry. J Dent2014;
42: 915–928.
LoKWUleryBDAsheKM, et al.
Studies of bone morphogenetic protein-based surgical repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2012;
64: 1277–1291.
10.
VoTNKasperFKMikosAG.Strategies for controlled delivery of growth factors and cells for bone regeneration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2012;
64: 1292–1309.
11.
KharkarPMRehmannMSSkeensKM, et al.
Thiolene click hydrogels for therapeutic delivery. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2016;
2: 165–179.
12.
CalóEKhutoryanskiyVV.Biomedical applications of hydrogels: a review of patents and commercial products. Eur Polym J2015;
65: 252–267.
13.
Martinez-SanzEOssipovDAHilbornJ, et al.
Bone reservoir: injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogel for minimal invasive bone augmentation. J Control Release2011;
152: 232–240.
14.
FakhariABerklandC.Applications and emerging trends of hyaluronic acid in tissue engineering, as a dermal filler and in osteoarthritis treatment. Acta Biomater2013;
9: 7081–7092.
15.
MaturavongsaditPBiXMetavarayuthK, et al.
Influence of cross-linkers on the in vitro chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells in hyaluronic acid hydrogels. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2017;
9: 3318–3329.
16.
MaturavongsaditPLuckanagulJAMetavarayuthK, et al.
Promotion of in vitro chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells using in situ hyaluronic hydrogel functionalized with Rod-Like viral nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules2016;
17: 1930–1938.
17.
TrakiattikulNDhanesuanNLuckanagulJA, et al.
The development of mannitol/BSA methacrylated hyaluronic acid hydrogels as an injectable drug delivery platform. Swu Dent J2561;
11: 41–54.
18.
OhremHLSchornickEKalivodaA, et al.
Why is mannitol becoming more and more popular as a pharmaceutical excipient in solid dosage forms. Pharm Dev Technol2014;
19: 257–262.
19.
LuckanagulJLeeLANguyenQL, et al.
Porous alginate hydrogel functionalized with virus as three-dimensional scaffolds for bone differentiation. Biomacromolecules2012;
13: 3949–3958.
20.
AreevijitKDhanesuanNLuckanagulJA, et al.
Biocompatibility of methacrylated hyaluronic acid hydrogel to alveolar bone cells. Swu Dent J2019;
12: 22–37.
21.
HighleyCBPrestwichGDBurdickJA.Recent advances in hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol2016;
40: 35–40.
22.
PritchardCDO'SheaTSiegwartD, et al.
An injectable thiol-acrylate poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel for sustained release of methylprednisolone sodium succinate. Biomaterials2011;
32: 587–597.
23.
FerreraDPoggiSBiassoniC, et al.
Three-dimensional cultures of normal human osteoblasts: proliferation and differentiation potential in vitro and upon ectopic implantation in nude mice. Bone2002;
30: 718–725.
24.
RestleLCosta-SilvaDLourençoES, et al.
A 3D osteoblast in vitro model for the evaluation of biomedical materials. Adv Mater Sci Eng2015;
2015: 1–8.
25.
Castillo DiazLASaianiAGoughJE, et al.
Human osteoblasts within soft peptide hydrogels promote mineralisation in vitro. J Tissue Eng2014;
5: 2041731414539344.
26.
EdmondsonRBroglieJJAdcockAF, et al.
Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors. Assay Drug Dev Technol2014;
12: 207–218.
27.
TeradaMInabaMYanoY, et al.
Growth-inhibitory effect of a high glucose concentration on osteoblast-like cells. Bone1998;
22: 17–23.
28.
VandrovcovaMBacakovaL.Adhesion, growth and differentiation of osteoblasts on surface-modified materials developed for bone implants. Physiol Res2011;
60: 403–417.
29.
ZhangTLinSShaoX, et al.
Effect of matrix stiffness on osteoblast functionalization. Cell Prolif2017;
50: e12338.
30.
SunMChiGLiP, et al.
Effects of matrix stiffness on the morphology, adhesion, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Med Sci2018;
15: 257–268.
31.
LuckanagulJALeeLYouS, et al.
Plant virus incorporated hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering possess low immunogenicity in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A2015;
103: 887–895.
32.
NaselloGAlamán-DíezPSchiaviJ, et al.
Primary human osteoblasts cultured in a 3D microenvironment create a unique representative model of their differentiation into osteocytes. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2020;
8: 336.
33.
TavsanliBOkayO.Mechanically strong hyaluronic acid hydrogels with an interpenetrating network structure. Eur Polym J2017;
94: 185–195.
34.
PoldervaartMTGoversenBde RuijterM, et al.
3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity. Plos ONE2017;
12: e0177628.
35.
CaliariSRBurdickJA.A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture. Nat Methods2016;
13: 405–414.
36.
KiniUNandeeshBN.Physiology of bone formation, remodeling, and metabolism. In: FogelmanIGnanasegaranGvan der WallH (eds).Radionuclide and hybrid bone imaging.
Berlin, Heidelberg:
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, pp.29–57.
37.
CunhaJSFerreiraVMaquigussaE, et al.
Effects of high glucose and high insulin concentrations on osteoblast function in vitro. Cell Tissue Res2014;
358: 249–256.
38.
ZayzafoonMBotolinSMcCabeLR.P38 and activating transcription factor-2 involvement in osteoblast osmotic response to elevated extracellular glucose. J Biol Chem2002;
277: 37212–37218.
