Major barriers to the development of a desirable small-diameter vascular scaffold are the compliance mismatch between natural and artificial vessels and low long-term patency. In the present study, the electrospinning technique was performed to fabricate three different structures, i.e. non-corrugated, radial corrugated, and axial corrugated, for small-diameter vascular graft. The compliance measurement shows that the value of dynamic compliance for the crimping structures is lower than that of the simple structure and decreases in the order: non-corrugated structure > radial corrugated structure > axial corrugated structure. The crimping in the axial direction decreases the more than requirement compliance of Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) scaffolds. The scaffolds should maintain its tubular shape during the grafting to avoid any collapsing, hence, the setup for measuring the resistance of scaffold against radial compression was designed and the result was reported as the dimensionless collapse coefficient. For non-corrugated, radial corrugated, and axial corrugated structures at constant intraluminal pressure, the required external pressure corresponding to the collapse coefficients equal to 0.5 were 140.92 ± 3.43, 136.51 ± 2.53, and 152.26 ± 3.08 mmHg, respectively. The reinforcing role of the axial crimping shifts the collapsing threshold to higher external pressure. Besides, the fabricated scaffolds provided the burst strength very close to those of the native blood vessels.
YenK-CChenC-YHuangJ-Y, et al.
Fabrication of keratin/fibroin membranes by electrospinning for vascular tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B2016;
4: 237–244.
2.
SolettiLHongYGuanJ, et al.
A bilayered elastomeric scaffold for tissue engineering of small diameter vascular grafts. Acta Biomater2010;
6: 110–122.
3.
GoldmanSZadinaKMoritzT, et al.
Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. J Am Coll Cardiol2004;
44: 2149–2156.
4.
GuoH-FDaiWWQianDH, et al.
A simply prepared small-diameter artificial blood vessel that promotes in situ endothelialization. Acta Biomater2017;
54: 107–116.
5.
ConteMS.Critical appraisal of surgical revascularization for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg2013;
57: 8S–13S.
6.
KannanRYSalacinskiHJButlerPE, et al.
Current status of prosthetic bypass grafts: a review. J Biomed Mater Res2005;
74: 570–581.
TiwariAChengKSSalacinskiH, et al.
Improving the patency of vascular bypass grafts: the role of suture materials and surgical techniques on reducing anastomotic compliance mismatch. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2003;
25: 287–295.
10.
UttayaratPToworfeGKDietrichF, et al.
Topographic guidance of endothelial cells on silicone surfaces with micro- to nanogrooves: orientation of actin filaments and focal adhesions. J Biomed Mater Res2005;
75: 668–680.
11.
MorenoMAjjiAMohebbi-KalhoriD, et al.
Development of a compliant and cytocompatible micro-fibrous polyethylene terephthalate vascular scaffold. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater2011;
97B: 201–214.
12.
McClureMJSellSASimpsonDG, et al.
A three-layered electrospun matrix to mimic native arterial architecture using polycaprolactone, elastin, and collagen: a preliminary study. Acta Biomater2010;
6: 2422–2433.
13.
XueLGreislerHP.Biomaterials in the development and future of vascular grafts. J Vasc Surg2003;
37: 472–480.
14.
WiseSGByromMJWaterhouseA, et al.
A multilayered synthetic human elastin/polycaprolactone hybrid vascular graft with tailored mechanical properties. Acta Biomater2011;
7: 295–303.
15.
Salacinski, GoldnerSGiudiceandreaA, et al.
The mechanical behavior of vascular grafts: a review. J Biomater Appl2001;
15: 241–278.
16.
GreenRMAbbottWMMatsumotoT, et al.
Prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: five-year results of a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg2000;
31: 417–425.
17.
Khodadoust, Mohebbi-KalhoriDJiroftiN.Fabrication and characterization of electrospun Bi-hybrid PU/PET scaffolds for small-diameter vascular grafts applications. Cardiovasc Eng Technol2018;
9: 73–83.
18.
HasanADeebGAtwiK, et al. Electrospun PET-PU scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering. In: 2015 international conference on advances in biomedical engineering (ICABME), 2015. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
19.
PezzoliDCauliEChevallierP, et al.
Biomimetic coating of cross-linked gelatin to improve mechanical and biological properties of electrospun PET: a promising approach for small caliber vascular graft applications. J Biomed Mater Res A2017;
105: 2405–2415.
20.
ChantawongPTanakaTUemuraA, et al.
Silk fibroin-Pellethane® cardiovascular patches: effect of silk fibroin concentration on vascular remodeling in rat model. J Mater Sci Mater Med2017;
28: 191.
21.
MarcolinCDraghiLTanziM, et al.
Electrospun silk fibroin–gelatin composite tubular matrices as scaffolds for small diameter blood vessel regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med2017;
28: 80.
22.
CattoVFarèSCattaneoI, et al.
Small diameter electrospun silk fibroin vascular grafts: mechanical properties, in vitro biodegradability, and in vivo biocompatibility. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2015;
54: 101–111.
23.
YuEMiHYZhangJ, et al.
Development of biomimetic thermoplastic polyurethane/fibroin small-diameter vascular grafts via a novel electrospinning approach. J Biomed Mater Res A2018;
106: 985–996.
24.
FaturechiRHashemiAAbolfathiN, et al.
Fabrications of small diameter compliance bypass conduit using electrospinning of clinical grade polyurethane. Vascular2019;
27: 636–647.
25.
MiH-YJingXYuE, et al.
Manipulating the structure and mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane/polycaprolactone hybrid small diameter vascular scaffolds fabricated via electrospinning using an assembled rotating collector. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2018;
78: 433–441.
26.
ShimadaRKonishiHOzawaH, et al.
Development of a new surgical sheet containing both silk fibroin and thermoplastic polyurethane for cardiovascular surgery. Surg Today2018;
48: 486–494.
27.
Abdal-HayABartnikowskiMHamletS, et al.
Electrospun biphasic tubular scaffold with enhanced mechanical properties for vascular tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2018;
82: 10–18.
28.
JiroftiNMohebbi-KalhoriDSamimiA, et al.
Small-diameter vascular graft using co-electrospun composite PCL/PU nanofibers. Biomed Mater2018;
13: 055014.
29.
InoguchiHKwonIKInoueE, et al.
Mechanical responses of a compliant electrospun poly(l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) small-diameter vascular graft. Biomaterials2006;
27: 1470–1478.
30.
McClureMSellSAAyresCE, et al.
Electrospinning-aligned and random polydioxanone–polycaprolactone–silk fibroin-blended scaffolds: geometry for a vascular matrix. Biomed Mater2009;
4: 055010.
31.
WilliamsonMRBlackRKieltyC.PCL–PU composite vascular scaffold production for vascular tissue engineering: attachment, proliferation and bioactivity of human vascular endothelial cells. Biomaterials2006;
27: 3608–3616.
32.
KangYKParkCHChangH, et al.
Development of thermoplastic polyurethane vascular prostheses. J Appl Polym Sci2008;
110: 3267–3274.
33.
LannuttiJRenekerDMaT, et al.
Electrospinning for tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C2007;
27: 504–509.
34.
SoldaniGMurziMFaitaF, et al.
In vivo evaluation of an elastomeric small-diameter vascular graft reinforced with a highly flexible Nitinol mesh. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater2019;
107: 951–964.
35.
MatsudaTIharaMInoguchiH, et al.
Mechano-active scaffold design of small-diameter artificial graft made of electrospun segmented polyurethane fabrics. J Biomed Mater Res A2005;
73A: 125–131.
36.
KhoffiFDievalabFChakféN, et al.
A development of a technique for measuring the compliance of the textile vascular prostheses. Physics Procedia2011;
21: 234–239.
37.
LiZWangC. Effects of working parameters on electrospinning In: One-dimensional nanostructures: electrospinning technique and unique nanofibers. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2013, pp.15–28.
38.
CramariucBCramariucRScarletR, et al.
Fiber diameter in electrospinning process. J Electrostat2013;
71: 189–198.
39.
CuiWLiXZhouS, et al.
Investigation on process parameters of electrospinning system through orthogonal experimental design. J Appl Polym Sci2007;
103: 3105–3112.
40.
NdreuANikkolaLYlikauppilaH, et al.
Electrospun biodegradable nanofibrous mats for tissue engineeringNanomedicine2008;
3: 45–60.
41.
StuppSILeBonheurVVWalkerK, et al.
Supramolecular materials: self-organized nanostructures. Science1997;
276: 384–389.
42.
ZeltingerJSherwoodJKGrahamDA, et al.
Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation, and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng2001;
7: 557–572.
43.
BergmeisterHSeyidovaNSchreiberC, et al.
Biodegradable, thermoplastic polyurethane grafts for small diameter vascular replacements. Acta Biomater2015;
11: 104–113.
44.
PhamQPSharmaUMikosAG.Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for tissue engineering applications: a review. Tissue Eng2006;
12: 1197–1211.
45.
WhiteRA.The effect of porosity and biomaterial on the healing and long-term mechanical properties of vascular prostheses. ASAIO Trans1988;
34: 95–100.
46.
PostADiaz-RodriguezPBalouchB, et al.
Elucidating the role of graft compliance mismatch on intimal hyperplasia using an ex vivo organ culture model. Acta Biomater2019;
89: 84–94.
47.
MatsuzakiYJohnKShojiT, et al.
The evolution of tissue engineered vascular graft technologies: from preclinical trials to advancing patient care. Appl Sci2019;
9: 1274.
BallykPDWalshCButanyJ, et al.
Compliance mismatch may promote graft–artery intimal hyperplasia by altering suture-line stresses. J Biomech1997;
31: 229–237.
50.
LaogunAGoslingR.In vivo arterial compliance in man. Clin Phys Physiol Meas1982;
3: 201.
51.
RossetEBrunetCRieuR, et al.
Viscoelastic properties of human arteries methodology and preliminary results. Surg Radiol Anat1996;
18: 89–96.
52.
MarelliBAlessandrinoAFarèS, et al.
Compliant electrospun silk fibroin tubes for small vessel bypass grafting. Acta Biomater2010;
6: 4019–4026.
53.
RoederRWolfeJLianakisN, et al.
Compliance, elastic modulus, and burst pressure of small-intestine submucosa (SIS), small-diameter vascular grafts. J Biomed Mater Res1999;
47: 65–70.
54.
LaterreurVRuelJAugerFA, et al.
Comparison of the direct burst pressure and the ring tensile test methods for mechanical characterization of tissue-engineered vascular substitutes. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2014;
34: 253–263.
55.
MatsumuraGIsayamaNMatsudaS, et al.
Long-term results of cell-free biodegradable scaffolds for in situ tissue engineering of pulmonary artery in a canine model. Biomaterials2013;
34: 6422–6428.
56.
FuYGuidoinRDe PaulisR, et al.
The Gelweave Valsalva graft to better reconstruct the anatomy of the aortic root. J Long Term Eff Med Implants2016;
26: 97–121.
57.
LiCWangFChenP, et al.
Preventing collapsing of vascular scaffolds: the mechanical behavior of PLA/PCL composite structure prostheses during in vitro degradation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2017;
75: 455–462.
