Polymeric stent is a temporary cardiovascular scaffold, made of biodegradable poly (l-lactic) acid, to treat coronary artery stenosis, with expected resorption by the human body over two to three years. In this paper, the mechanical properties of a polymeric stent over two-year in vitro degradation were studied and characterised using atomic force microscopy and nanoindentation techniques, complemented with analyses of weight loss, gel permeation chromatography and differential scanning calorimetry. Atomic force microscopy assessed stent degradation at the surface, whilst nanoindentation was able to investigate the property at a greater depth into the material. No significant changes to the Young’s modulus were observed with the atomic force microscopy due to bulk degradation nature of the polymer. Chemical analyses demonstrated a reduction of molecular weight and an increase of crystallinity, indicating degradation of the stents. Berkovich nanoindentation showed a trend of reduction in modulus over in vitro degradation, which was, however, not continuous due to the variations of measurements associated with the pyramidal indenter tip and the semi-crystalline structure of the polymer.
UleryBDNairLSLaurencinCT.Biomedical applications of biodegradable polymers. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys2011;
49: 832–864.
2.
BlairRWDunneNJLennonABet al.
Processing-property relationships of biaxially stretched poly(L-lactic acid) sheet for application in coronary stents. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2018;
86: 113–121.
3.
WangQFangGZhaoYet al.
Computational and experimental investigation into mechanical performances of poly-L-lactide acid (PLLA) coronary stents. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2017;
65: 415–427.
4.
QuynhTMMitomoHNagasawaNet al.
Properties of crosslinked polylactides (PLLA & PDLA) by radiation and its biodegradability. Eur Polym J2007;
43: 1779–1785.
GöpferichA.Mechanisms of polymer degradation and erosion. Polym Scaffolding Hard Tissue Eng1996;
17: 103–114.
7.
VieiraACVieiraJCFerraJMet al.
Mechanical study of PLA–PCL fibers during in vitro degradation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2011;
4: 451–460.
8.
GongYZhouQGaoCet al.
In vitro and in vivo degradability and cytocompatibility of poly(l-lactic acid) scaffold fabricated by a gelatin particle leaching method. Acta Biomater2007;
3: 531–540.
9.
YuanXMakAFTYaoK.In vitro degradation of poly(L-lactic acid) fibers in phosphate buffered saline. J Appl Polym Sci2002;
85: 936–943.
10.
NuutinenJPValimaaTClercCet al.
Mechanical properties and in vitro degradation of bioresorbable knitted stents. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed2002;
13: 1313–1323.
11.
ZilbermanMNelsonKDEberhartRC.Mechanical properties and in vitro degradation of bioresorbable fibers and expandable fiber-based stents. J Biomed Mater Res2005;
74B: 792–799.
12.
Bartkowiak-JowsaMBędzińskiRKozłowskaAet al.
Mechanical, rheological, fatigue, and degradation behavior of PLLA, PGLA and PDGLA as materials for vascular implants. Meccanica2012;
48: 721–731.
13.
LuoQLiuXLiZet al.
Degradation model of bioabsorbable cardiovascular stents. PLoS One2014;
9: e110278.
14.
CifuentesSCFrutosEBenaventeRet al.
Strain rate effect on semi-crystalline PLLA mechanical properties measured by instrumented indentation tests. Eur Polym J2014;
59: 239–246.
15.
GhoshSVianaJCReisRLet al.
Effect of processing conditions on morphology and mechanical properties of injection-molded poly(l-lactic acid). Polym Eng Sci2007;
47: 1141–1147.
16.
TangBNganAHPethicaJB.A method to quantitatively measure the elastic modulus of materials in nanometer scale using atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology2008;
19: 495713.
17.
OliverWCPharrGM.An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res1992;
7: 1564–1583.
18.
OzciviciEFerreriSQinYXet al. Determination of bone's mechanical matrix properties by nanoindentation. In: Westendorf JJ (ed.) Osteoporosis. Methods in molecular biology™. Vol. 455. New York: Humana Press, 2008, pp. 323–334.
19.
FreireE. Differential scanning calorimetry. In: Shirley BA (ed.) Protein stability and folding: methods in molecular biology™. Vol. 40. New York: Humana Press, 1995, pp. 191–218.
20.
TesfamariamB.Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: biodegradation, drug delivery and vascular remodelling. Pharmacol Res2016;
107: 163–171.
21.
GaonaLAGómez RibellesJLPerillaJEet al.
Hydrolytic degradation of PLLA/PCL microporous membranes prepared by freeze extraction. Polym Degrad Stab2012;
97: 1621–1632.
22.
LyuSUnterekerD.Degradability of polymers for implantable biomedical devices. Int J Mol Sci2009;
10: 4033–4065.
23.
DreherMLNagarajaSBatchelorB.Effects of fatigue on the chemical and mechanical degradation of model stent sub-units. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2016;
59: 139–145.
24.
LiaoLPengCLiSet al.
Evaluation of bioresorbable polymers as potential stent material – in vivo degradation behavior and histocompatibility. J Appl Polym Sci2017;
134: 44355.
25.
RaneSS.Polydispersity index: how accurately does it measure the breadth of the molecular weight distribution?Chem Mater2005;
17: 926926.
26.
IqbalTBriscoeBJYasinSet al.
Nanoindentation response of poly(ether ether ketone) surfaces – a semicrystalline bimodal behavior. J Appl Polym Sci2013;
130: 4401–4409.
27.
KimbleLDBhattacharyyaD.In vitro degradation effects on strength, stiffness, and creep of PLLA=PBS: a potential stent.Mater Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater2015;
64: 299–310.
28.
HuTYangCLinSet al.
Biodegradable stents for coronary artery disease treatment: recent advances and future perspectives. Mater Sci Eng C2018;
91: 163–178.
29.
SchiavoneAAbunassarCSHossainySet al.
Computational analysis of mechanical stress-strain interaction of a bioresorbable scaffold with blood vessel. J Biomech2016;
49: 2677–2683.
