Physiochemical characterization and biological effect of anorganic bovine bone matrix and organic-containing bovine bone matrix in comparison with Bio-Oss in rabbits

Abstract

Bovine origin matrix has been widely used in clinical applications and investigated by various research institutions. However, the potential factors that influence bone regeneration are still not thoroughly understood and need further investigations. In this study, bone regeneration properties of anorganic bovine bone matrix (ABBM), organic-containing bovine bone matrix (OBBM), and widely acknowledged anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) were compared. Besides, the correlations between physiochemical characterizations and bone regeneration properties of the three xenografts were also investigated. Physiochemical characterizations were measured by special instrumentations. In animal studies, the three xenografts were implanted into 8-mm-diameter cranial defects of 16 New Zealand white rabbits. The biological effects were evaluated by micro-computed tomography and histomorphometric analysis after 6 and 12 weeks of implantation. The physical characterizations showed that anorganic bovine bone matrix and Bio-Oss had more nanostructures, larger surface area, bigger pore volume, and bigger pore size than that of organic-containing bovine bone matrix. The chemical characterizations showed that anorganic bovine bone matrix and Bio-Oss had higher crystallinity than that of organic-containing bovine bone matrix, and organic-containing bovine bone matrix contained organic nitrogen (N) component. In vivo, anorganic bovine bone matrix and Bio-Oss possessed better bone regeneration properties than that of organic-containing bovine bone matrix. Taken together, nanostructures, larger surface area, bigger pore volume, and bigger pore size of xenografts played an active role in new bone formation. Besides, lower crystallinity and organic N element of xenografts produced a positive effect on graft degradation. The abovementioned findings could provide theoretical basis for better choice in clinical applications and better manufacturing hydroxyapatite-derived bone graft in the future.

Keywords

Xenograft bone graft biomaterial characterization bone regeneration rabbit

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Edgar

Chakravarthy

Barnes

et al . Autogenous regulation of a network of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) mediates the osteogenic differentiation in murine marrow stromal cells. Bone 2007; 40: 1389–1398.

Miron

Hedbom

Saulacic

et al . Osteogenic potential of autogenous bone grafts harvested with four different surgical techniques. J Dent Res 2011; 90: 1428–1433.

Miron

Gruber

Hedbom

et al . Impact of bone harvesting techniques on cell viability and the release of growth factors of autografts. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 15: 481–489.

Nkenke

Schultze-Mosgau

Radespiel-Tröger

et al . Morbidity of harvesting of chin grafts: a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 495–502.

Von Arx

Häfliger

Chappuis

Neurosensory disturbances following bone harvesting in the symphysis: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 432–439.

Borzabadi-Farahani

BLA.

Treatment of labial mucosal recession around maxillary anterior implants with tenting screws, particulate allograft and xenogenic membrane: a case report. J Oral Implantol 2016; 42: 427–431.

Barone

Toti

Quaranta

et al . Clinical and histological changes after ridge preservation with two xenografts: preliminary results from a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2017; 44: 204–214.

Kakar

Rao

BHS

Hegde

et al . Ridge preservation using an in situ hardening biphasic calcium phosphate (beta-TCP/HA) bone graft substitute-a clinical, radiological, and histological study. Int J Implant Dent 2017; 3: 25.

Denicolo

Guyton

Cuenin

et al . Histologic evaluation of osseous regeneration following combination therapy with platelet-rich plasma and Bio-Oss in a rat calvarial critical-size defect model. J Oral Implantol 2015; 41: 543–549.

10.

Bassil

Naaman

Lattouf

et al . Clinical, histological, and histomorphometrical analysis of maxillary sinus augmentation using inorganic bovine in humans: preliminary results. J Oral Implantol 2013; 39: 73–80.

11.

Muralithran

Ramesh

The effects of sintering temperature on the properties of hydroxyapatite. Ceram Int 2000; 26: 221–230.

12.

Rouahi

Gallet

Champion

et al . Influence of hydroxyapatite microstructure on human bone cell response. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 78A: 222–235.

13.

Eduardo Msdv

Calvo-Guirado

Gómez-Moreno

et al . Influence of hydroxyapatite granule size, porosity, and crystallinity on tissue reaction in vivo. Part B: a comparative study with biphasic synthetic biomaterials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 00: 1–8.

14.

MSDV

Calvo-Guirado

Gómez-Moreno

et al . Influence of hydroxyapatite granule size, porosity, and crystallinity on tissue reaction in vivo. Part A: synthesis, characterization of the materials, and SEM analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2016; 27: 1331–1338.

15.

Klüppel

Antonini

Olate

et al . Bone repair is influenced by different particle sizes of anorganic bovine bone matrix: a histologic and radiographic study in vivo. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24: 1074–1077.

16.

Nam

Kim

Han

SJ.

Cranial bone regeneration according to different particle sizes and densities of demineralized dentin matrix in the rabbit model. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 38: 27.

17.

Kon

Shiota

Ozeki

et al . The effect of graft bone particle size on bone augmentation in a rabbit cranial vertical augmentation model: a microcomputed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 402–406.

18.

Testori

Wallace

Trisi

et al . Effect of xenograft (ABBM) particle size on vital bone formation following maxillary sinus augmentation: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical histomorphometric trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013; 33: 466–475.

19.

Anjos

TLMRD

Molon

RSD

Paim

PRF

et al . Implant stability after sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles of different sizes: a prospective, randomized and controlled split-mouth clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 2016; 45: 1556–1563.

20.

Kuboki

Jin

Kikuchi

et al . Geometry of artificial ECM: sizes of pores controlling phenotype expression in BMP-induced osteogenesis and chondrogenesis. Connect Tissue Res 2002; 43: 529–534.

21.

Karageorgiou

Kaplan

Porosity of 3D biornaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 5474–5491.

22.

Lambert

Bacevic

Layrolle

et al . Impact of biomaterial microtopography on bone regeneration: comparison of three hydroxyapatites. Clin Oral Impl Res 2017; 28: e201–e207.

23.

Wenisch

Stahl

Horas

et al . In vivo mechanisms of hydroxyapatite ceramic degradation by osteoclasts: fine structural microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003; 67A: 713–718.

24.

Henriksen

Bollerslev

Everts

et al . Osteoclast activity and subtypes as a function of physiology and pathology-implications for future treatments of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 2011; 32: 31–63.

25.

Jensen

Gruber

Buser

et al . Osteoclast-like cells on deproteinized bovine bone mineral and biphasic calcium phosphate: light and transmission electron microscopical observations. Clin Oral Impl Res 2015; 26: 859–864.

26.

Dersot

Colombier

Lafont

et al . Multinucleated giant cells elicited around hydroxyapatite particles implanted in craniotomy defects are not osteoclasts. Anat Rec 1995; 242: 166–176.

27.

Van Houdt

CIA

Ulrich

DJO

Jansen

et al . The performance of CPC/PLGA and Bio‐Oss®; for bone regeneration in healthy and osteoporotic rats. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2016; 106: 131–142.

28.

Ramírez Fernández

Gehrke

Pérez

AMC

et al . SEM-EDX study of the degradation process of two xenograft materials used in sinus lift procedures. Materials 2017; 10: 542.

29.

Rfe

Teófilo

Brentegani

et al . Comparison of rat bone healing following intra-alveolar grafting with organic or inorganic bone particles. Braz J Oral Sci 2008; 7: 1512–1529.

30.

Liu

Wismeijer

et al . Deproteinized bovine bone functionalized with the slow delivery of BMP-2 for the repair of critical-sized bone defects in sheep. Bone 2013; 56: 110–118.

31.

Barradas

Yuan

van Blitterswijk

et al . Osteoinductive biomaterials: current knowledge of properties, experimental models and biological mechanisms. eCM 2011; 21: 407–429.

32.

Lewandrowski

Bondre

Wise

et al . Enhanced bioactivity of a poly(propylene fumarate) bone graft substitute by augmentation with nano-hydroxyapatite. Biomed Mater Eng 2003; 13: 115–124.

33.

Loiselle

Wei

Faryad

et al . Specific biomimetic hydroxyapatite nanotopographies enhance osteoblastic differentiation and bone graft osteointegration. Tissue Eng PT A 2013; 19: 1704–1712.

34.

Chang

Lee iCKfC-

Hong

et al . Osteoconduction at porous hydroxyapatite with various pore configurations. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1291–1298.

35.

Pogoda

Priemel

Rueger

et al . Bone remodeling: new aspects of a key process that controls skeletal maintenance and repair. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: S18–S24.

36.

Jensen

Broggini

Hjørting-Hansen

et al . Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and beta-tricalcium phosphate. A histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 237–243.

37.

Rammelt

Schulze

Witt

et al . Collagen type I increases bone remodelling around hydroxyapatite implants in the rat tibia. Cells Tissues Organs 2004; 178: 146–157.

38.

Accorsi-Mendonça

Conz

Barros

et al . Physicochemical characterization of two deproteinized bovine xenografts. Braz Oral Res 2008; 22: 5–10.

39.

Khoo

Nor

Ardhyananta

et al . Preparation of natural hydroxyapatite from bovine femur bones using calcination at various temperatures. Procedia Manuf 2015; 2: 196–201.

40.

Wang

Deng

et al . Repair of microdamage in osteonal cortical bone adjacent to bone screw. PLoS One 2014; 9: e89343.

41.

Yamada

Heymann

Bouler

et al . Osteoclastic resorption of calcium phosphate ceramics with different hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate ratios. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 1037–1041.

42.

Papanchev

Georgiev

Peev

et al . Comparison of the rates of bone regeneration in sinus lift grafting with a calcium-phosphate paste between the 6th and the 9th month – a clinical case. SSMD 2015; 1: 43–51.

43.

Behfarnia

Shahabooei

Mashhadiabbas

et al . Comparison of bone regeneration using three demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts: a histological and histomorphometric study in rabbit calvaria. Dent Res J 2012; 9: 554–560.

44.

Kusumbe

Ramasamy

Adams

RH.

Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by a specific vessel subtype in bone. Nature 2014; 507: 323–328.

45.

Wang

Duan

Markovic

et al . Phenotypic expression of bone-related genes in osteoblasts grown on calcium phosphate ceramics with different phase compositions. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 2507–2514.