The first two authors contributed equally to this study.
Bioactivity and cell adhesion properties are major factors for fabricating medical devices such as coronary stents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the advantages of atmospheric-pressure plasma jet in enhancing the biocompatibility and endothelial cell-favorites. The experimental objects were divided into before and after atmospheric-pressure plasma jet treatment with the ratio of nitrogen:argon = 3:1, which is similar to air. The treated surfaces were basically characterized by means of a contact angle analyzer for the activation property on their surfaces. The effect of atmospheric-pressure plasma jet on cellular response was examined by endothelial cell adhesion and XTT analysis. It was difficult to detect any changeable morphology after atmospheric-pressure plasma jet treatment on the surface. The roughness was increased after atmospheric-pressure plasma jet treatment compared to nonatmospheric-pressure plasma jet treatment (86.781 and 7.964 nm, respectively). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results showed that the surface concentration of the C–O groups increased slightly from 6% to 8% after plasma activation. The contact angle dramatically decreased in the atmospheric-pressure plasma jet treated group (22.6 ± 15.26°) compared to the nonatmospheric-pressure plasma jet treated group (72.4 ± 15.26°) (n = 10, p < 0.05). The effect of the increment in hydrophilicity due to the atmospheric-pressure plasma jet on endothelial cell migration and proliferation was 85.2% ± 12.01% and 34.2% ± 2.68%, respectively, at 7 days, compared to the nonatmospheric-pressure plasma jet treated group (58.2% ± 11.44% in migration, n = 10, p < 0.05). Taken together, the stent surface could easily obtain a hydrophilic property by the atmospheric-pressure plasma jet method. Moreover, the atmospheric-pressure plasma jet might affect re-endothelialization after stenting.
JonerMFinnAVFarbAet al.Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol2006; 48: 193–202.
2.
WeiYJiYXiaoLLet al.Surface engineering of cardiovascular stent with endothelial cell selectivity for in vivo re-endothelialisation. Biomaterials2013; 34: 2588–2599.
3.
ChenMCChangYLiuCTet al.The characteristics and in vivo suppression of neointimal formation with sirolimus-eluting polymeric stents. Biomaterials2009; 30: 79–88.
4.
FinnAVNakazawaGJonerMet al.Vascular responses to drug eluting stents: importance of delayed healing. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol2007; 27: 1500–1510.
5.
HristovMWeberC. Endothelial progenitor cells in vascular repair and remodeling. Pharmacol Res2008; 58: 148–151.
6.
LiMChengYZhengYFet al.Surface characteristics and corrosion behaviour of WE43 magnesium alloy coated by SiC film. Appl Surf Sci2012; 258: 3074–3081.
7.
ScottNACandalFJRobinsonKAet al.Seeding of intracoronary stents with immortalized human microvascular endothelial cells. Am Heart J1995; 129: 860–866.
8.
OngATSerruysPW. Technology insight: an overview of research in drug-eluting stents. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med2005; 2: 647–658.
9.
BuszmanPTrznadelSZurakowskiAet al.Prospective registry evaluating safety and efficacy of cobalt-chromium stent implantation in patients with de novo coronary lesions. Kardiol Pol2007; 65: 1041–1046. discussion 1047–1048.
10.
GrayDSTienJChenCS. Repositioning of cells by mechanotaxis on surfaces with micropatterned Young’s modulus. J Biomed Mater Res A2003; 66A: 605–614.
11.
YangZTuQZhuYet al.Mussel-inspired coating of polydopamine directs endothelial and smooth muscle cell fate for re-endothelialization of vascular devices. Adv Healthc Mater2012; 1: 548–559.
12.
WangKBruceAMezanRet al.Nanotopographical modification of cell function through nuclear deformation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2016; 8: 5082–5092.
13.
LuTQiaoYLiuX. Surface modification of biomaterials using plasma immersion ion implantation and deposition. Interface Focus2012; 2: 325–336.
14.
Avci-AdaliMZiemerGWendelHP. Induction of EPC homing on biofunctionalized vascular grafts for rapid in vivo self-endothelialization-a review of current strategies. Biotechnol Adv2010; 28: 119–129.
XieDWanGJMaitzMFet al.Deformation and corrosion behaviors of Ti–O film deposited 316L stainless steel by plasma immersion ion implantation and deposition. Surf Coat Technol2013; 214: 117–123.
17.
LengYXSunHYangPet al.Biomedical properties of tantalum nitride films synthesized by reactive magnetron sputtering. Thin Solid Fims2001; 398: 471–475.
18.
ZhuJZXiongXWDuRet al.Hemocompatibility of drug-eluting coronary stents coated with sulfonated poly (styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene). Biomaterials2012; 33: 8204–8212.
19.
LiHChenCZhangSet al.The use of layer by layer self-assembled coatings of hyaluronic acid and cationized gelatin to improve the biocompatibility of poly(ethylene terephthalate) artificial ligaments for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Acta Biomater2012; 8: 4007–4019.
20.
HoshiRAVan LithRJenMCet al.The blood and vascular cell compatibility of heparin-modified ePTFE vascular grafts. Biomaterials2013; 34: 30–41.
21.
FrickeKKobanITrespHet al.Atmospheric pressure plasma: a high-performance tool for the efficient removal of biofilms. PLoS One2012; 7: e42539–e42539.
22.
LeeOJJuHWKhangGet al.An experimental burn wound-healing study of non-thermal atmospheric pressure microplasma jet arrays. J Tissue Eng Regen Med2016; 10: 348–357.
23.
AkhlaghiMRajayiHMashayekhASet al.On the design and characterization of a new cold atmospheric pressure plasma jet and its applications on cancer cells treatment. Biointerphases2015; 10: 029510–029510.
24.
WolterMBornholdtSHackelMet al.Atmospheric pressure plasma jet for treatment of polymers. J Achieve Mater Manuf Eng2009; 37: 730–734.
25.
MitchellESmithLE. Cell responses to plasma polymers – implications for wound care. Wound Pract Res2012; 20: 74–79.
26.
BaeIHLimKSParkJKet al.Mechanical behavior and in vivo properties of newly designed bare metal stent for enhanced flexibility. J Ind Eng Chem2015; 21: 1295–1300.
27.
OwensDKWendtRC. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci1969; 13: 1741–1747.
28.
LiangCCParkAYGuanJL. In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat Protoc2007; 2: 329–333.
29.
SaraniANikiforovALeysC. Atmospheric pressure plasma jet in Ar and Ar/H2O mixtures: optical emission spectroscopy and temperature measurements. Phys Plasma2010; 17: 063504–063504.
30.
GonzalezEHicksRF. Surface analysis of polymers treated by remote atmospheric pressure plasma. Langmuir2010; 26: 3710–3719.
31.
ChenMZamoraPOSomPet al.Cell attachment and biocompatibility of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) treated with glow-discharge plasma of mixed ammonia and oxygen. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed2003; 14: 917–935.
32.
MooradianDLTresconyPKeeneyKet al.Effect of glow discharge surface modification of plasma TFE vascular graft material on fibronectin and laminin retention and endothelial cell adhesion. J Surg Res1992; 53: 74–81.
33.
AnselmeK. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials2000; 21: 667–681.
34.
XuCYangFWangSet al.In vitro study of human vascular endothelial cell function on materials with various surface roughness. J Biomed Mater Res A2004; 71: 154–161.
35.
WanYWangYLiuZet al.Adhesion and proliferation of OCT-1 osteoblast-like cells on micro- and nano-scale topography structured poly(l-lactide). Biomaterials2005; 26: 4453–4459.
36.
HuangHHHoCTLeeTHet al.Effect of surface roughness of ground titanium on initial cell adhesion. Biomol Eng2004; 21: 93–97.
