In this study, a novel class of polyesters of glycerol, aconitic acid, and cinnamic acid were synthesized along with their hydroxyapatite (HA) composites, and studied for their potential application in bone defect repair. An osteogenic study was conducted with human adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (hASCs) to determine the osteoinductive ability of aconitic acid–glycerol (AG) polyesters, AG:HA (80:20), aconitic acid–glycerol–cinnamic acid (AGC) polyesters, and AGC:HA (80:20) to serve as bone scaffolds. The results indicate that AGC scaffolds have the highest mechanical strength in comparison to AG, AG:HA (80:20), and AGC:HA (80:20) scaffolds due to its low porosity. It was determined by cytotoxicity and osteogenesis experiments that hASCs cultured for 21 days on AG:HA (80:20) scaffolds in stromal medium exhibited a greater number of live cells than control PCL:HA composites. Moreover, hASCs cultured on foamed AG:HA (80:20) scaffolds resulted in the highest levels of mineralization, increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression, and the greatest osteocalcin (OCN) expression after 21 days. Overall, AG:HA (100:0 and 80:20) scaffolds had higher mechanical strength and cytocompatibility than the PCL:HA control. In vitro osteogenic study demonstrated that AG:HA (100:0 and 80:20) synthesized using sugarcane industry by-products hold potential as scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications.
CardonaCAQuinteroJAPazIC. Production of bioethanol from sugarcane bagasse: status and perspectives. Bioresour Technol2010; 101: 4754–4766.
2.
CazettaMLCelligoiMABuzatoJB. Fermentation of molasses by Zymomonas mobilis: effects of temperature and sugar concentration on ethanol production. Bioresour Technol2007; 98: 2824–2828.
3.
KimMDayDF. Composition of sugar cane, energy cane, and sweet sorghum suitable for ethanol production at Louisiana sugar mills. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol2011; 38: 803–807.
4.
XuFSunR-CSunJ-X. Determination of cell wall ferulic and p-coumaric acids in sugarcane bagasse. Anal Chim Acta2005; 552: 207–217.
5.
McMurraySHGriffinGJ. Extraction of aconitic acid from mixtures of organic acids and cane molasses solutions using supported liquid membranes. J Chem Technol Biotechnol2002; 77: 1262–1268.
6.
NavarroARdel C SepulvedaMRubioMC. Bio-concentration of vinasse from the alcoholic fermentation of sugar cane molasses. Waste Manage2000; 20: 581–585.
7.
FitzPatrickMChampagnePCunninghamMF. A biorefinery processing perspective: treatment of lignocellulosic materials for the production of value-added products. Bioresour Technol2010; 101: 8915–8922.
8.
Zhang L and Spector M. Tissue engineering of muscoskeletal tissue. In: Pallua N and Suschek CV (eds) Tissue engineering: from lab to clinic. Springer: New York, 2011.
9.
BohnerM. Resorbable biomaterials as bone graft substitutes. Mater Today2010; 13: 24–30.
10.
NelsonCMaggeABernardTST. Nanostructured composites for bone repair. J Biomater Tissue Eng2013; 3: 426–439.
11.
SchiekerMSeitzHDrosseI. Biomaterials as scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Eur J Trauma2006; 32: 114–124.
12.
NijstCLEBruggemanJPKarpJM. Synthesis and characterization of photocurable elastomers from poly(glycerol-co-sebacate). Biomacromolecules2007; 8: 3067–3073.
13.
BarrettDGYousafMN. Design and applications of biodegradable polyester tissue scaffolds based on endogenous monomers found in human metabolism. Molecules2009; 14: 4022–4050.
KarageorgiouVKaplanD. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials2005; 26: 5474–5491.
16.
LeongKFCheahCMChuaCK. Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs. Biomaterials2003; 24: 2363–2378.
17.
ZeltingerJSherwoodJKGrahamDA. Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation, and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng2001; 7: 557–572.
18.
LiaoC-JChenC-FChenJ-H. Fabrication of porous biodegradable polymer scaffolds using a solvent merging/particulate leaching method. J Biomed Mater Res2002; 59: 676–681.
19.
TaboasJMMaddoxRDKrebsbachPH. Indirect solid free form fabrication of local and global porous, biomimetic and composite 3D polymer-ceramic scaffolds. Biomaterials2003; 24: 181–194.
20.
GarberLChenCKilchristKV. Thiol-acrylate nanocomposite foams for critical size bone defect repair: a novel biomaterial. J Biomed Mater Res2013; 101: 3531–3541.
21.
OtsuN. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. Automatica1975; 11: 23–27.
22.
Zanetti AS, McCandless GT, Chan JY, et al. In vitro human adipose-derived stromal/stem cells osteogenesis in akermanite: poly-ɛ-caprolactone scaffolds. J Biomater Appl 2013: 998–1007.
23.
LiuQCenLYinS. A comparative study of proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells on akermanite and beta-TCP ceramics. Biomaterials2008; 29: 4792–4799.
24.
LivakKJSchmittgenTD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods2001; 25: 402–408.
RezwanKChenQZBlakerJJ. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials2006; 27: 3413–3431.
27.
WangYDAmeerGASheppardBJ. A tough biodegradable elastomer. Nat Biotechnol2002; 20: 602–606.
28.
ChenQ-ZIshiiHThouasGA. An elastomeric patch derived from poly(glycerol sebacate) for delivery of embryonic stem cells to the heart. Biomaterials2010; 31: 3885–3893.
29.
LamKHNieuwenhuisPMolenaarI. Biodegradation of porous versus non-porous poly(L-lactic acid) films. J Mater Sci Mater Med1994; 5: 181–189.
30.
SabirMXuXLiL. A review on biodegradable polymeric materials for bone tissue engineering applications. J Mater Sci2009; 44: 5713–5724.
31.
LeongDTNahWKGuptaA. The osteogenic differentiation of adipose tissue-derived precursor cells in a 3D scaffold/matrix environment. Curr Drug Discov Technol2008; 5: 319–327.
32.
CaoHZhengYZhouJ. A novel hyperbranched polyester made from aconitic acid (B3) and di(ethylene glycol) (A2). Polym Int2011; 60: 630–634.
33.
ThomasLVNairPD. (Citric acid-co-polycaprolactone triol) polyester: a biodegradable elastomer for soft tissue engineering. Biomatter2011; 1: 81–90.
34.
Arsad MS, Lee PM and Hung LK. Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and β-TCP particles. In: 2nd international conference on biotechnology and food science, Singapore, 2011, pp.184–188.
35.
JoseMVThomasVJohnsonKT. Aligned PLGA/HA nanofibrous nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater2009; 5: 305–315.
36.
MoradiADalilottojariAPingguan-MurphyB. Fabrication and characterization of elastomeric scaffolds comprised of a citric acid-based polyester/hydroxyapatite microcomposite. Mater Des2013; 50: 446–450.
37.
Hollinger JO, Brekke J, Gruskin E, et al. Role of bone substitutes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 324: 55–65.
38.
AttawiaMAHerbertKMLaurencinCT. Osteoblast-like cell adherance and migration through 3-dimensional porous polymer matrices. Biochem Biophys Res Commun1995; 213: 639–644.
39.
JayabalanMShalumonKTMithaMK. Effect of hydroxyapatite on the biodegradation and biomechanical stability of polyester nanocomposites for orthopaedic applications. Acta Biomater2010; 6: 763–775.
40.
SerbetciKKorkusuzFHasirciN. Thermal and mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite impregnated acrylic bone cements. Polym Test2004; 23: 145–155.
41.
ZebarjadSMSajjadiSASdrabadiTE. A study on mechanical properties of PMMA/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite. Engineering2011; 3: 795–801.
42.
HoSTHutmacherDW. A comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in the characterization of scaffolds. Biomaterials2006; 27: 1362–1376.
43.
GarberLChenCKilchristKV. Thiol-acrylate nanocomposite foams for critical size bone defect repair: a novel biomaterial. J Biomed Mater Res A2013; 101: 3531–3541.
44.
QureshiATMonroeWTDasaV. miR-148b-nanoparticle conjugates for light mediated osteogenesis of human adipose stromal/stem cells. Biomaterials2013; 34: 7799–7810.
45.
KurashinaKKuritaHWuQ. Ectopic osteogenesis with biphasic ceramics of hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate in rabbits. Biomaterials2002; 23: 407–412.
46.
RahimiFMaurerBTEnzweilerMG. Coralline hydroxyapatite: a bone graft alternative in foot and ankle surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg1997; 36: 192–203.
47.
Bauer TW and Muschler GF. Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 371: 10–27.
