Orthodontic treatment is strongly dependent on the loads developed by metal wires, and the choice of an orthodontic archwire should be based on its mechanical performance. The desire of both orthodontists and engineers would be to predict the mechanical behavior of archwires. To this aim, Gum Metal (Toyota Central R&L Labs., Inc.), TMA (ORMCO), 35°C Copper NiTi (SDS ORMCO), Thermalloy Plus (Rocky Mountain), Nitinol SE (3M Unitek), and NiTi (SDS ORMCO) were tested according to dynamic mechanical analysis and differential scanning calorimetry. A model was also developed to predict the elastic modulus of superelastic wires. Results from experimental tests have highlighted that superelastic wires are very sensitive to temperature variations occurring in the oral environment, while the proposed model seems to be reliable to predict the Young’s modulus allowing to correlate calorimetric and mechanical data. Furthermore, Gum Metal wire behaves as an elastic material with a very low Young’s modulus, and it can be particularly useful for the initial stage of orthodontic treatments.
AndreasenG.F.HillemanT.B. An Evaluation of 55 Cobalt Substituted Nitinol Wire for Use in Orthodontics, J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 1971: 82: 1373–1375.
2.
AndreasenG.F. A Clinical Trial of Alignment of Teeth Using a 0.019 Inch Thermal Nitinol Wire With a Transition Temperature Range Between 31°C and 45°C, Am. J. Orthod., 1980: 78: 528–537.
3.
GoldbergA.J.BurstoneC.J. An Evaluation of Beta Titanium Alloys for Use in Orthodontic Appliances, J. Dent. Res., 1979: 58: 593–600.
4.
KusyR.P.GreenbergA.R. Comparison of the Elastic Properties of Nickel-Titanium and Beta-Titanium Arch Wires, Am. J. Orthod., 1982: 82: 199–205.
5.
WenX.ZhangN.LiX.CaoZ. Electrochemical and Histomorphometric Evaluation of the Ni-Ti-Cu Shape MemoryAlloy, Biomed. Mater. Eng., 1997: 7: 1–11.
6.
ArciniegasM.ManeroJ.M.PeñaJ.GilF.J.PlanellJ.A. Study of New Multifunctional Shape Memory and Low Elastic Modulus Ni-Free Ti Alloys, Metall. Mater. Trans. A., 2008; 39: 742–751.
7.
RogenN.E.HillR.J. (1969). Temperature Sensing, Patent Number: US3483748.
8.
AndreasenG.F. (1977). Method and System for Orthodontic Moving of Teeth, Patent Number: US 4037324.
9.
Ingram JrS.B.GipeD.B.SmithR.J. Comparative Range of Orthodontic Wires, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 1986: 90: 296–307.
10.
YoneyamaT.DoiH.HamanakaH.OkamotoY.MogiM. and Miura F. Superelasticity and Thermal Behavior of Ni-Ti Alloy Orthodontic Arch Wires, Dent. Mater. J., 1992: 11: 1–10.
11.
WeilandF. Constant Versus Dissipating Forces in Orthodontics: The Effect on Initial Tooth Movement and Root Resorption, Eur. J. Orthod., 2003: 25: 335–342.
12.
DuerigT.W.PeltonA.R.StokelD.WaymanC.M. The Utility of Superelasticity in Medicine, Biomed. Mater. Eng., 1996: 6: 255–266.
13.
ThompsonS.A. An Overview of Nickel-Titanium Alloys Used in Dentistry, Int. Endod. J., 2000: 33: 297–310.
14.
KusyR.P. Orthodontic Biomaterials: From the Past to the Present, Angle Orthod., 2002: 72: 501–512.
15.
IngramS.B.GipeD.B.SmithR.J. Comparative Range of Orthodontic Wires, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 1986: 90: 296–307.
16.
BurstoneC.J.QinB.MortonJ.Y.ChineseNiTiWire: A New Orthodontic Alloy, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 1985: 87: 445–452.
17.
MiuraF.MogiM.OhuraY.HamanakaH. The Super-Elastic Property of the Japanese NiTi Alloy Wire for Use in Orthodontics, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 1986: 90: 1–10.
18.
TonnerR.I.WatersN.E. The Characteristics of Superelastic Ni-Ti Wires in Three-Point Bending. Part I: The Effect of Temperature, Eur. J. Orthod., 1994: 16: 409–419.
19.
BradleyT.G.BrantleyW.A.CulbertsonB.M. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) Analyses of Superelastic and Nonsuperelastic Nickel-Titanium Orthodontic Wires, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 1996: 109: 589–597.
20.
MelingT.R.ØdegaardJ. The Effect of Temperature on the Elastic Responses to Longitudinal Torsion of Rectangular Nickel Titanium Archwires, Angle Orthod., 1998: 68: 357–363.
21.
SakimaM.T.DalstraM.MelsenB. How Does Temperature Influence the Properties of Rectangular Nickel-Titanium Wires?, Eur. J. Orthod., 2006: 28: 282–291.
22.
WilkinsonP.D.DysartP.S.HoodJ.A.HerbisonG.P. Load-Deflection Characteristics of Superelastic Nickel-Titanium Orthodontic Wires, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 2002; 121: 483–495.
KusyR.P.WhitleyJ.Q. Thermal and Mechanical Characteristics of Stainless Steel, Titanium-Molybdenum, and Nickel-Titanium Archwires, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 2007: 131: 229–237.
25.
De SantisR.DolciF.LainoA.MartinaR.AmbrosioL.NicolaisL. The Eulerian Buckling Test for Orthodontic Wires, Eur. J. Orthod., 2008; 30: 190–198.
26.
NikolaiR.J.ChungA.Y. Controlled Localized Buckling Responses of Orthodontic Arch Wires, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 1999: 116: 308–316.
27.
GilF.J.PlanellJ.A. Effect of Copper Addition on the Superelastic Behavior of Ni-Ti Shape Memory Alloys for Orthodontic Applications, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1999: 48: 682–688.
28.
HurstC.L.DuncansonM.G.NandaR.S.AngolkarP.V. An Evaluation of the Shape Memory Phenomenon of Nickel-Titanium Orthodontic Wires, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 1990; 98: 72–76.
29.
MooreR.J.WattsJ.T.HoodJ.A.BurrittD.J. Intra-oral Temperature Variation Over 24 Hours, Eur. J. Orthod., 1999: 21: 249–261.
30.
ChangS.H.WuS.K. Effect of Cooling Rate on Transformation Temperature Measurements of Ti50Ni50 Alloy by Differential Scanning Calorimetry and Dynamic Mechanical Analysis, Mater. Charact., 2008: 59: 987–990.
31.
TurnerC.H.PavalkoF.M. Mechanotransduction and Functional Response of the Skeleton to Physical Stress: The Mechanisms and Mechanics of Bone Adaptation, J. Orthop. Sci., 1998: 3: 346–355.
32.
BrantleyW.A.IijimaM.GrentzerT.H. Temperature-Modulated DSC Provides New Insight About Nickel-Titanium Wire Transformations, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 2003: 124: 387–394.
