KASEA16(+) and KASEA16(−) peptides, the net charges of which are positive and negative, respectively, under a neutral condition could undergo self-assembly into nanofibers and form transparent hydrogels without peptide aggregation upon rapid pH neutralization. The numbers of NIH3T3 cells attached to the KASEA16(+) hydrogel and KASEA16(−) hydrogel were similar, and cells proliferated with time on both hydrogels. Cells on the KASEA16(+) hydrogel had spindle-like morphology, while cells on the KASEA16(−) hydrogel formed clusters without extending cytoplasmic processes. Comparison of differently charged peptides under a neutral condition suggested that the charges of the scaffolds should be taken into consideration for the best design and selection of scaffolds for cell culture. Since the KASEA16(+) peptide could form a stable hydrogel under a neutral condition and the hydrogel served as a scaffold for cell proliferation, the KASEA16(+) hydrogel will be a useful scaffold for cell culture.
FuS.GuoG.GongC.. Injectable Biodegradable Thermosensitive Hydrogel Composite for Orthopedic Tissue Engineering. 1. Preparation and Characterization of Nanohydroxyapatite/Poly(ethylene glycol)-Poly(epsilon-caprolactone)-Poly(ethylene glycol) Hydrogel Nanocomposites, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2009: 113: 16518–16525.
4.
OzekiM.KurodaS.KonK.KasugaiS. Differentiation of Bone Marrow Stromal Cells into Osteoblasts in a Self-assembling Peptide Hydrogel: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies, J. Biomater. Appl., 2010, (Epub ahead of print).
5.
RamachandranS.TsengY.YuY.B. Repeated Rapid Shear-Responsiveness of Peptide Hydrogels with Tunable Shear Modulus, Biomacromolecules, 2005: 6: 1316–1321.
6.
TakeiJ. Self-assembling 3-Dimensional Scaffold Peptide Hydrogel for Bone Regeneration, J. Jpn. Assoc. Regenerative Dent., 2005: 3: 1–11.
7.
ZhangS.GelainF.ZhaoX. Designer Self-assembling Peptide Nanofiber Scaffolds for 3D Tissue Cell Cultures, Semin. Cancer. Biol., 2005: 15: 413–420.
8.
IchiokaS.OhuraN.SekiyaN.ShibataM.NakatsukaT. Regenerative Surgery for Sacral Pressure Ulcers Using Collagen Matrix Substitute Dermis (Artificial Dermis), Ann. Plast. Surg., 2003: 51: 383–389.
9.
YamadaN.UchinumaE.KuroyanagiY. Clinical Evaluation of an Allogeneic Cultured Dermal Substitute Composed of Fibroblasts Within a Spongy Collagen Matrix, Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Hand Surg., 1999: 33: 147–154.
KojimaK.AmanoT. Injectable Collagen for Soft Tissue Contour Defects, J. Transportation Med., 1985: 39: 6–13.
12.
OnoI.ZhouL.J.TateshitaT. Effects of a Collagen Matrix Containing Prostaglandin E(1) on Wound Contraction, J. Dermatol. Sci., 2001: 25: 106–115.
13.
OnoI.TateshitaT.InoueM. Effects of a Collagen Matrix Containing Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor on Wound Contraction, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1999: 48: 621–630.
14.
CharriereG.BejotM.SchnitzlerL.VilleG.HartmannD.J. Reactions to a Bovine Collagen Implant. Clinical and Immunologic Study in 705 Patients, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 1989: 21: 1203–1208.
15.
KatsubeK.OchiM.UchioY.. Repair of Articular Cartilage Defects with Cultured Chondrocytes in Atelocollagen Gel. Comparison with Cultured Chondrocytes in Suspension, Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 2000: 120: 121–127.
16.
UchioY.OchiM.MatsusakiM.KuriokaH.KatsubeK. Human Chondrocyte Proliferation and Matrix Synthesis Cultured in Atelocollagen Gel, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2000: 50: 138–143.
17.
ItoY.OchiM.AdachiN.. Repair of Osteochondral Defect with Tissue-engineered Chondral Plug in a Rabbit Model, Arthroscopy, 2005: 21: 1155–1163.
18.
NagayasuA.HosakaY.YamasakiA.. A Preliminary Study of Direct Application of Atelocollagen into a Wound Lesion in the Dog Cornea, Curr. Eye Res., 2008: 33: 727–735.
19.
ZhangS.HolmesT.LockshinC.RichA. Spontaneous Assembly of a Self-complementary Oligopeptide to Form a Stable Macroscopic Membrane, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1993: 90: 3334–3338.
20.
ZhangS.LockshinC.CookR.RichA. Unusually Stable Beta-sheet Formation in an Ionic Self-complementary Oligopeptide, Biopolymers, 1994: 34: 663–672.
21.
ZhaoY.YokoiH.TanakaM.KinoshitaT.TanT. Self-assembled pH-responsive Hydrogels Composed of the RATEA16 Peptide, Biomacromolecules, 2008: 9: 1511–1518.
HolmesT.C.de LacalleS.SuX.LiuG.RichA.ZhangS. Extensive Neurite Outgrowth and Active Synapse Formation on Self-assembling Peptide Scaffolds, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2000: 97: 6728–6733.
27.
CaplanM.R.MooreP.N.ZhangS.KammR.D.LauffenburgerD.A. Self-assembly of a Beta-sheet Protein Governed by Relief of Electrostatic Repulsion Relative to van der Waals Attraction, Biomacromolecules, 2000: 1: 627–631.
28.
KisidayJ.JinM.KurzB.. Self-assembling Peptide Hydrogel Fosters Chondrocyte Extracellular Matrix Production and Cell Division: Implications for Cartilage Tissue Repair, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2002: 99: 9996–10001.
29.
JunS.HongY.ImamuraH.HaB.Y.BechhoeferJ.ChenP. Self-assembly of the Ionic Peptide EAK16: The effect of Charge Distributions on Self-assembly, Biophys. J., 2004: 87: 1249–1259.
30.
SeminoC.E.MerokJ.R.CraneG.G.PanagiotakosG.ZhangS. Functional Differentiation of Hepatocyte-like Spheroid Structures from Putative Liver Progenitor Cells in Three-dimensional Peptide Scaffolds, Differentiation, 2003: 71: 262–270.
31.
DeganoI.R.QuintanaL.VilaltaM.. The Effect of Self-assembling Peptide Nanofiber Scaffolds on Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast Implantation and Proliferation, Biomaterials, 2009: 30: 1156–1165.
YokoiH.KinoshitaT. (2008). Design of Self-assembling Peptides to Form Transparent Gels at Neutral pH, In: AimotoS.OnoS. (eds), Peptide Science2007, Osaka, The Japanese Peptide Society, pp. 109–110.
34.
YeZ.ZhangH.LuoH.. Temperature and pH Effects on Biophysical and Morphological Properties of Self-assembling Peptide RADA16-I, J. Pept. Sci., 2008: 14: 152–162.
35.
GenoveE.ShenC.ZhangS.SeminoC.E. The Effect of Functionalized Self-assembling Peptide Scaffolds on Human Aortic Endothelial Cell Function, Biomaterials, 2005: 26: 3341–3351.
36.
GuoJ.SuH.ZengY.. Reknitting the Injured Spinal Cord by Self-assembling Peptide Nanofiber Scaffold, Nanomedicine, 2007: 3: 311–321.
InoueT.OsatakeH. A New Drying Method of Biological Specimens for Scanning Electron Microscopy: The t-Butyl Alcohol Freeze-drying Method, Arch. Histol. Cytol., 1988: 51: 53–59.
GelainF.LomanderA.VescoviA.L.ZhangS. Systematic Studies of a Self-assembling Peptide Nanofiber Scaffold with Other Scaffolds, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2007: 7: 424–434.
41.
BacakovaL.FilovaE.RypacekF.SvorcikV.StaryV. Cell Adhesion on Artificial Materials for Tissue Engineering, Physiol. Res., 2004: 53: S35–45.
42.
GenesN.G.RowleyJ.A.MooneyD.J.BonassarL.J. Effect of Substrate Mechanics on Chondrocyte Adhesion to Modified Alginate Surfaces, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 2004: 422: 161–167.
43.
YeungT.GeorgesP.C.FlanaganL.A.. Effects of Substrate Stiffness on Cell Morphology, Cytoskeletal Structure, and Adhesion, Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton, 2005: 60: 24–34.
44.
FlanaganL.A.JuY.E.MargB.OsterfieldM.JanmeyP.A. Neurite Branching on Deformable Substrates, Neuroreport, 2002: 13: 2411–2415.
45.
LoC.M.WangH.B.DemboM.WangY.L. Cell Movement is Guided by the Rigidity of the Substrate, Biophys. J., 2000: 79: 144–152.
46.
WangH.B.DemboM.WangY.L. Substrate Flexibility Regulates Growth and Apoptosis of Normal But Not Transformed Cells, Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol., 2000: 279: C1345–1350.
