Making Sense of Cruzan: Implications of the Supreme Court's Right-to-Die Decision

Cruzan by Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health, 110 S.Ct. 2841 (1990)

Cruzan by Cruzan v Harmon, 760 S.W.2d 408 (MO 1988)

Addington v Texas, 441 U.S. 418 (1979)

Santosky v Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 at 755 (1982)

760 S.W.2d at 419.

110 S.Ct. at 2854.

Ohio v Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 110 S.Ct. 2972 (1990)

Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, AMA Ethical Opinion 2.20. Withholding or withdrawing life-prolonging medical treatment. Current Opinions 13 (1989)

110 S.Ct. at 2855.

Medawar PB The threat and the glory: reflections on science and scientists. Quoted in Perutz MF. High on Science. New York Review of Books, Vol XXXVII, #13, Aug 16, 1990, p. 12

Mishkin DB You don't need a judge to terminate treatment. Intensive Care Med 1990;5:201-204