Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) utilizes veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in cardiac arrest patients to reduce the risk of mortality and multiorgan dysfunction from systemic hypoperfusion. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of patients receiving ECPR versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) for refractory cardiac arrest.
Data Sources
This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. A librarian searched the main databases, Ovid MEDLINE (including epub ahead of print, in-process & other non-indexed citations), Ovid EMBASE and Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception through July 2024.
Study Selection
We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared the outcomes of ECPR to CCPR in cardiac arrest patients. Primary outcomes were neurological sequelae and survival.
Data Extraction
We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data on selected articles and performed risk of bias assessments using ROBINS-I for non-randomized controlled trials and the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials with disagreements settled by a third independent reviewer.
Data Synthesis
Out of 3458 studies identified and screened, 28 studies including 304,360 cardiac arrest patients met eligibility criteria and were included. Survival at hospital discharge was 20% for ECPR versus 3.3% for CCPR (OR 0.48 [CI 0.27, 0.84]). Favorable neurological outcome at hospital discharge was 11.8% for ECPR versus 1.9% for CCPR (OR 0.41 [CI 0.17, 1.01]). Complications from bleeding were ten times higher in the ECPR group (35.3% vs 3.7%; OR 0.08 [0.03, 0.24]).
Conclusions
ECPR appeared to be superior to CCPR for improved neurological outcome and survival in cardiac arrest patients, although bleeding was increased. There was large heterogeneity in the included studies and outcomes reported. Future prospective studies may improve the identification of subgroups of patients that will benefit most from ECPR.
Systematic review and meta-analysis registration: PROSPERO - CRD42023394128.
PanchalARBartosJACabanasJG, et al. Part 3: Adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_2):S366‐S468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916
2.
ViraniSSAlonsoAAparicioHJ, et al.Heart disease and stroke statistics-2021 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143(8):e254‐e743. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950.
3.
RabahHRabahA. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): What we need to know. Cureus. 2022;14(7):e26735. doi:https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26735.
4.
RichardsonACTonnaJENanjayyaV, et al.Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults. Interim guideline consensus statement from the extracorporeal life support organization. ASAIO J. 2021;67(3):221‐228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/Mat.0000000000001344.
5.
Alm-KruseKSorensenGOsbakkSA, et al.Outcome in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before and after implementation of an ECPR protocol. Resuscitation. 2021;162:35‐42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.038.
6.
BelohlavekJSmalcovaJRobD, et al.Effect of intra-arrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and immediate invasive assessment and treatment on functional neurologic outcome in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2022;327(8):737‐747. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.1025.
7.
BlumensteinJLeickJLiebetrauC, et al.Extracorporeal life support in cardiovascular patients with observed refractory in-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with favourable short and long-term outcomes: A propensity-matched analysis. Europ Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016;5(7):13‐22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872615612454.
8.
LinJWWangMJYuHY, et al.Comparing the survival between extracorporeal rescue and conventional resuscitation in adult in-hospital cardiac arrests: Propensity analysis of three-year data. Resuscitation. 2010;81(7):796‐803. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.03.002.
9.
PatricioDPelusoLBrasseurA, et al.Comparison of extracorporeal and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A retrospective propensity score matched study. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2320-1.
10.
SuvereinMMDelnoijTSRLorussoR, et al.Early extracorporeal CPR for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(4):299‐309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2204511.
11.
ChenCYTsaiJHsuTY, et al.ECMO Used in a refractory ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation patient: A national case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(13):e3204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003204.
12.
ChenYSLinJWYuHY, et al.Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life-support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational study and propensity analysis. Lancet. 2008;372(9638):554‐561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60958-7.
13.
SiaoFYChiuCCChiuCW, et al.Managing cardiac arrest with refractory ventricular fibrillation in the emergency department: Conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015;92:70‐76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.016.
14.
OhbeHIsogaiSJoTMatsuiHFushimiKYasunagaH. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation improves outcomes of accidental hypothermia without vital signs: a nationwide observational study. Resuscitation. 2019;09. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.08.041.
15.
OhbeHOguraTMatsuiHYasunagaH. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for acute aortic dissection during cardiac arrest: A nationwide retrospective observational study. Resuscitation. 2020;12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.08.001.
16.
YannopoulosDBartosJARaveendranG, et al.Coronary artery disease in patients with out-of-hospital refractory ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(9):1109‐1117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.059.
17.
YoshidaTFujitaniSWakatakeH, et al.Exploratory observational study of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for nonshockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurring after an emergency medical services arrival: SOS-KANTO 2012 study report. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2020;58(3):375‐384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.12.004.
18.
YannopoulosDBartosJRaveendranG, et al.Advanced reperfusion strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation (ARREST): A phase 2, single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10265):1807‐1816. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32338-2.
19.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J. 2021;372:n71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
20.
NolanJPBergRAAndersenLW, et al.Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: Update of the utstein resuscitation registry template for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A consensus report from a task force of the international liaison committee on resuscitation (American Heart Association, European resuscitation council, Australian and New Zealand council on resuscitation, heart and stroke foundation of Canada, InterAmerican heart foundation, resuscitation council of Southern Africa, resuscitation council of Asia). Circulation. 2019;140(18):e746‐e757. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000710.
21.
JacobsINadkarniVBahrJ, et al.Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: Update and simplification of the utstein templates for resuscitation registries: A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the international liaison committee on resuscitation (American Heart Association, European resuscitation council, Australian resuscitation council, New Zealand resuscitation council, heart and stroke foundation of Canada, InterAmerican heart foundation, resuscitation councils of Southern Africa). Circulation. 2004;110(21):3385‐3397. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000147236.85306.15.
22.
SterneJAHernanMAReevesBC, et al.ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. Br Med J. 2016;355:i4919. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919.
23.
SterneJACSavovicJPageMJ, et al.Rob 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J. 2019;366:l4898. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898.
24.
BougouinWDumasFLamhautL, et al.Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a registry study. Eur Heart J. 2019;31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz753.
25.
CesanaFAvalliLGarattiL, et al.Effects of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation on neurological and cardiac outcome after ischaemic refractory cardiac arrest. Europ Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018;7(5):432‐441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872617737041.
26.
ChoiDHKimYJRyooSM, et al.Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Clin. 2016;3(3):132‐138.
27.
ChoiDSKimTRoYS, et al.Extracorporeal life support and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a nationwide registry: A propensity score-matched analysis. Resuscitation. 2016;99:26‐32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.11.013.
28.
ChouTHFangCCYenZS, et al.An observational study of extracorporeal CPR for in-hospital cardiac arrest secondary to myocardial infarction. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(6):441‐447. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2012-202173.
29.
JeongDLeeGTParkJE, et al.Extracorporeal life-support for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide multicenter study. Shock (Augusta, Ga). 2022;57(5):680‐686. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001924.
30.
KitadaMKanekoTYamadaSHaradaMTakahashiT. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation without target temperature management for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients prolongs the therapeutic time window: A retrospective analysis of a nationwide multicentre observational study in Japan. J Intensive Care. 2020;8(1), (no pagination). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00478-9.
31.
MaekawaKTannoKHaseMMoriKAsaiY. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin: A propensity-matched study and predictor analysis. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(5):1186‐1196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827ca4c8.
32.
MandigersLScholtenERietdijkWJR, et al.Survival and neurological outcome with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest caused by massive pulmonary embolism: A two center observational study. Resuscitation. 2019;136:8‐13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.12.008.
33.
NakajimaMKaszynskiRHGotoH, et al. Current trends and outcomes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan: A nationwide observational study. Resusc Plus. 2020;4:100048. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100048.
34.
SakamotoTMorimuraNNagaoK, et al.Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective observational study. Resuscitation. 2014;85(6):762‐768. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.01.031.
35.
ShinTGChoiJHJoIJ, et al.Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with inhospital cardiac arrest: A comparison with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(1):1‐7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feb339.
36.
SunPLiuWLiM, et al.Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective propensity matching analysis. Perfusion. 2023:2676591231222365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591231222365.
37.
TakaujiSHayakawaMYamadaD, et al.Outcome of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in severe accidental hypothermia with cardiac arrest and circulatory instability: A multicentre, prospective, observational study in Japan (ICE-CRASH study). Resuscitation. 2022;182:109663. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.12.001.
38.
YamadaSKanekoTKitadaMHaradaMTakahashiT. Shorter interval from witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to reaching the target temperature could improve neurological outcomes after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation with target temperature management: A retrospective analysis of a Japa. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2021;11(3):185‐191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/ther.2020.0045.
39.
BovillEGTerrinMLStumpDC, et al.Hemorrhagic events during therapy with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, heparin, and aspirin for acute myocardial infarction. Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI), phase II trial. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(4):256‐265. doi:https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-115-4-256.
40.
KennedyJH. The role of assisted circulation in cardiac resuscitation. JAMA. 1966;197(8):615‐618.
41.
NagaoKHayashiNKanmatsuseK, et al.Cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation using emergency cardiopulmonary bypass, coronary reperfusion therapy and mild hypothermia in patients with cardiac arrest outside the hospital. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(3):776‐783. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00779-8.
42.
ChenYSChaoAYuHY, et al.Analysis and results of prolonged resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients rescued by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(2):197‐203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02716-x.
43.
Le GuenMNicolas-RobinACarreiraS, et al.Extracorporeal life support following out-of-hospital refractory cardiac arrest. Crit Care. 2011;15(1), (no pagination). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9976.
44.
ParkSBYangJHParkTK, et al.Developing a risk prediction model for survival to discharge in cardiac arrest patients who undergo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Int J Cardiol. 2014;177(3):1031‐1035. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.124.
45.
NakajimaMOkadaYSonooTGotoT. Development and validation of a novel method for converting the Japan coma scale to Glasgow coma scale. J Epidemiol. 2023;33(10):531‐535. doi:https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20220147.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
