Objectives: To investigate the relationship between sublingual microcirculation and the prognosis of sepsis. Data sources: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched to identify studies published from January 2003 to November 2023. Study selection: Clinical studies examining sublingual microcirculation and the prognosis of sepsis were included. Data extraction: Sublingual microcirculation indices included the microvascular blood index (MFI), total vascular density (TVD), perfusion vascular density (PVD), perfusion vascular vessel (PPV), and heterogeneity index (HI). Prognostic outcomes included mortality and severity. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used to detect publication bias. The ability of the small vessel PPV (PPVs) to predict sepsis-related mortality was analyzed based on the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, pooled sensitivity, and pooled specificity. Data synthesis: Twenty-five studies involving 1750 subjects were included. The TVD (95% CI 0.11-0.39), PVD (95% CI 0.42-0.88), PPV (95% CI 6.63-13.83), and MFI (95% CI 0.13-0.6) of the survival group were greater than those of the nonsurvival group. The HI in the survival group was lower than that in the nonsurvival group (95% CI −0.49 to −0.03). The TVD (95% CI 0.41-0.83), PVD (95% CI 0.83-1.17), PPV (95% CI 14.49-24.9), and MFI (95% CI 0.25-0.66) of the nonsevere group were greater than those of the severe group. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in TVD between the survival group and the nonsurvival group in the small vessel subgroup. The area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.88. Conclusions: Sublingual microcirculation was worse among patients who died and patients with severe sepsis than among patients who survived and patients with nonsevere sepsis. PPV has a good predictive value for the mortality of sepsis patients. This study was recorded in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023486349).
SingerMDeutschmanCSSeymourCW, et al.The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810.
2.
InceC. The microcirculation is the motor of sepsis. Crit Care. 2005;9(Suppl 4):S13-S19.
3.
De BackerDDonadelloKSakrY, et al.Microcirculatory alterations in patients with severe sepsis: impact of time of assessment and relationship with outcome. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(3):791-799.
4.
TopAPInceCde MeijN, et al.Persistent low microcirculatory vessel density in nonsurvivors of sepsis in pediatric intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(1):8-13.
5.
NaculFEGuiaILLessaMA, et al.The effects of vasoactive drugs on intestinal functional capillary density in endotoxemic rats: intravital video-microscopy analysis. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(2):547-554.
6.
InceCBoermaECCecconiM, et al.Second consensus on the assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: results from a task force of the European society of intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(3):281-299.
BrunoRRWollbornJFenglerK, et al.Direct assessment of microcirculation in shock: a randomized-controlled multicenter study. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49(6):645-655.
9.
VellingaNABoermaECKoopmansM, et al.International study on microcirculatory shock occurrence in acutely ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(1):48-56.
10.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J.2021;372(8284):n71.
11.
StangA. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603-605.
12.
BoneRCBalkRACerraFB, et al.Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM consensus conference committee. American college of chest physicians/society of critical care medicine. Chest. 1992;101(6):1644-1655. doi:https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.101.6.1644
LuoDWanXLiuJTongT. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res.2018;27(6):1785-1805.
15.
WanXWangWLiuJ, et al.Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol.2014;14:135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
16.
FuHWangLZhangW, et al.Diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for sarcopenia diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023;14(1):57-70.
17.
WuSMLiZXuXH. Analysis of the value of monitoring sublingual microcirculation and percutaneous oxygen metabolism in diagnosing disease severity and short-term prognosis of sepsis patients. J Clin Exp Med. 2023;22(16):1721-1724.
18.
PandaARevadiGSharmaJP, et al.On admission, microcirculation abnormality is an independent predictor of sepsis and sepsis-related mortality: a hospital-based study. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022;26(3):294-301. doi:https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24110
19.
ChenXYChenXLWangYP, et al.Significance of sublingual microcirculation monitoring in the early prediction evaluation for acute renal injury in patients with septic shock. Chin J Crit Care Intensive Care Med. 2022;8(2):147-152.
20.
GuoLChenHLiuJM, et al.Analysis of the relationship between the changes of sublingual microcirculation and the severity and prognosis of sepsis. J Pract Shock. 2022;6(4):204-207.
21.
DomiziRDamianiEScorcellaC, et al.Mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) and microcirculation in monitoring organ dysfunction of critical care patients with infection: a prospective observational pilot study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:680244. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.680244
22.
MinHDHuYJ. The levels and significance of serum prostaglandin-2 and hypoxia-inducible factor-1a in patients with sepsis complicated by heart failure. Hebei Med J. 2021;43(6):864-867.
23.
XiaZC. Relationship between changes of sublingual microcirculation and prognosis in patients with sepsis. Contemp Med. 2020;26(26):99-101.
24.
GaoWZhuQYNiHB, et al.Prognostic value of combining tongue color with sublingual microcirculation in patients with septic shock. CJITWM. 2019;39(02):189-193.
25.
MasseyMJHouPCFilbinM, et al.Microcirculatory perfusion disturbances in septic shock: results from the ProCESS trial. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):308.
26.
ShihCCLiuCMChaoA, et al.Matched comparison of microcirculation between healthy volunteers and patients with sepsis. Asian J Anesthesiol. 2018;56(1):14-22.
27.
FontanaVSpadaroSBondO, et al.No relationship between red blood cell distribution width and microcirculatory alterations in septic patients. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2017;66(2):131-141. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-160154
28.
YingZ. The changes of heart function and microcirculation in elderly septic patients with acute heart failure. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine on Cardio/Cerebrovascular Disease. 2017;15(10):1226-1228.
29.
ZengXYLiaoXLKangY, et al.The value of early diastolic transmitral velocity to early mitral Anulus diastolic velocity ratio for pulmonary edema in severe sepsis patients. J Sichuan Univ Med Sci Ed. 2016;47(04):574-579.
30.
ZhangHLiLMinD, et al.Effects of early goal directed therapy on microcirculation in patients with sepsis shock Z. J Surg Concepts Pract. 2015;20(02):146-150.
31.
EdulVSKInceCNavarroN, et al.Dissociation between sublingual and gut microcirculation in the response to a fluid challenge in postoperative patients with abdominal sepsis. Ann Intensive Care. 2014;4:39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-014-0039-3
32.
LiuJFZhaoMYWangHM, et al.Clinical study on sublingual microcirculation of patient with sepsis-associated encephalopathy. J Med Res. 2014;43(10):49-52.
33.
HernandezGBoermaECDubinA, et al.Severe abnormalities in microvascular perfused vessel density are associated to organ dysfunctions and mortality and can be predicted by hyperlactatemia and norepinephrine requirements in septic shock patients. J Crit Care. 2013;28(4):538.e9-14.
34.
YanMLYanJChenJ, et al.Microcirculation characters in the elderly septic patients. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013;93(25):1965-1969.
35.
EdulVSEnricoCLaviolleB, et al.Quantitative assessment of the microcirculation in healthy volunteers and in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(5):1443-1448.
36.
ZhaoMYLiAZhuangHZ, et al.The clinical significance of determining the severity and prognosis by monitoring the changes in sublingual microcirculation in patients with severe sepsis. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2012;24(3):158-161.
37.
HernandezGRegueiraTBruhnA, et al.Relationship of systemic, hepatosplanchnic, and microcirculatory perfusion parameters with 6-h lactate clearance in hyperdynamic septic shock patients: an acute, clinical-physiological, pilot study. Ann Intensive Care. 2012;2(1):44.
38.
SpanosAJhanjiSVivian-SmithA, et al.Early microvascular changes in sepsis and severe sepsis. Shock. 2010;33(4):387-391.
39.
TrzeciakSDellingerRPParrilloJE, et al.Early microcirculatory perfusion derangements in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: relationship to hemodynamics, oxygen transport, and survival. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(1):88-98.e2. 98.e1-2.
40.
SakrYDuboisMJDe BackerD, et al.Persistent microcirculatory alterations are associated with organ failure and death in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(9):1825-1831.
41.
TangALShenMJZhangGQ. Intestinal microcirculation dysfunction in sepsis: pathophysiology, clinical monitoring, and therapeutic interventions. World J Emerg Med. 2022;13(5):343-348.
42.
QIANJYangZFCahoonJ, et al.Changes in sublingual microcirculation reflect changes in mesenteric microcirculation. Crit Care Med.2013;41(12):A118.
43.
VerdantCLDe BackerDBruhnA, et al.Evaluation of sublingual and gut mucosal microcirculation in sepsis: a quantitative analysis. Crit Care Med.2009;37(11):2875-2881.
44.
ChalkiasALaouEMermiriM, et al.Microcirculation-guided treatment improves tissue perfusion and hemodynamic coherence in surgical patients with septic shock. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(6):4699-4711.
45.
BrunoRRHernandezGThieleH, et al.A microcirculation-guided trial: never trying is worse than failing. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49(12):1555-1556.
46.
HiltyMPDuranteauJMontomoliJ, et al.A microcirculation-guided trial doomed to fail. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49(12):1557-1558.
47.
De BackerDHollenbergSBoermaC, et al.How to evaluate the microcirculation: report of a round table conference. Crit Care. 2007;11(5):R101.
48.
ElbersPWInceC. Mechanisms of critical illness–classifying microcirculatory flow abnormalities in distributive shock. Crit Care. 2006;10(4):221.
49.
BoermaECMathuraKRvan der VoortPH, et al.Quantifying bedside-derived imaging of microcirculatory abnormalities in septic patients: a prospective validation study. Crit Care. 2005;9(6):R601-R606.
50.
De BackerDCreteurJDuboisMJ, et al.Microvascular alterations in patients with acute severe heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J. 2004;147(1):91-99.
51.
De BackerDOspina-TasconGSalgadoD, et al.Monitoring the microcirculation in the critically ill patient: current methods and future approaches. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(11):1813-1825. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-010-2005-3
52.
MorelliADonatiAErtmerC, et al.Effects of vasopressinergic receptor agonists on sublingual microcirculation in norepinephrine-dependent septic shock. Crit Care. 2011;15(5):217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10453
53.
Fiorese CoimbraKTde FreitasFGRBafiAT, et al.Effect of increasing blood pressure with noradrenaline on the microcirculation of patients with septic shock and previous arterial hypertension. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(8):1033-1040. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003795
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
