Patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) have been reported to have increased sedation requirements. Tracheostomies are performed in intensive care to facilitate longer term mechanical ventilation, reduce sedation, improve patient comfort, secretion clearance, and ability to speak and swallow. We aimed to investigate the safety of tracheostomy (TT) placement on ECMO, its impact on fluid intake, and the use of sedative, analgesic, and vasoactive drugs.
Methods:
Prospective data were collated for all ECMO patients over a 5.5-year period. Data included the cumulative dose of sedatives and analgesics, fluid balance, inotrope and vasopressor requirements, and number of packed red cell (PRC) units transfused. Data were analyzed to determine the differences in the aforementioned between 5 days pre-TT and post-TT insertion.
Results:
Thirty-one (22.1%) of 140 patients underwent TT while on ECMO in the study period. Inotrope and vasopressor use was significantly less in the post-TT period compared to pre-TT dose (P value = .01). This was in the setting of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores the day before TT placement being significantly greater than those on days 2, 3, and 4. There was a trend toward reduction in analgesic usage in the post-TT period. No major complications of TT were reported. There was no significant difference (P value = .46) in the amount of PRC used post-TT.
Conclusions:
These data indicate that TT may result in a reduction in vasopressor and inotropic requirement. Data do not suggest increased major bleeding with placement of TT in patients on ECMO. The potential risk and benefits of inserting a TT in ECMO patients need further validation in prospective clinical studies.
ShekarKMullanyDVThomsonBZiegenfussMPlattsDGFraserJF. Extracorporeal life support devices and strategies for management of acute cardiorespiratory failure in adult patients: a comprehensive review. Crit Care. 2014;18(3):219.
ShekarKBrodieDFraserJMacLarenG. Appraising extracorporeal life support—current and future roles in adult intensive care. Crit Care Resusc. 2017;19(suppl 1):5–7.
4.
Australia and New Zealand Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ANZ ECMO) Influenza Investigators, DaviesAJonesDBaileyM, et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A (H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA. 2009;302(17):1888–1895.
5.
PeekGJMugfordMTiruvoipatiR, et al.Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9698):1351–1363.
6.
SmithMVukomanovicABrodieDThiagarajanRRycusPBuscherH. Duration of veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA ECMO) and outcome: an analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):45.
7.
CombesAHajageDCapellierG, et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(21):1965–1975.
8.
GoligherECTomlinsonGHajageD, et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and posterior probability of mortality benefit in a post hoc Bayesian analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(21):2251–2259.
9.
CamporotaLNicolettiEMalafronteM, et al.International survey on the management of mechanical ventilation during ECMO in adults with severe respiratory failure. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81(11):1170–1183.
10.
MohitePNSabashnikovAReedA, et al.Extracorporeal life support in “awake” patients as a bridge to lung transplant. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63(8):699–705.
11.
ShekarKRobertsJAGhassabianS, et al.Sedation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation—why more is less. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40(6):1067–1069.
12.
AndrioloBNAndrioloRBSaconatoHAtallahÁNValenteO. Early versus late tracheostomy for critically ill patients. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015;1:Cd007271.
13.
YoungDHarrisonDACuthbertsonBHRowanKTracManC. Effect of early vs late tracheostomy placement on survival in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: the TracMan randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;309(20):2121–2129.
14.
GrovesDSDurbinCGJr. Tracheostomy in the critically ill: indications, timing and techniques. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007;13(1):90–97.
15.
DurbinCGJr. Tracheostomy: why, when, and how?Respir Care. 2010;55(8):1056–1068.
16.
KlugeSBaumannHJMaierC, et al.Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a nationwide survey. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(5):1639–1643.
17.
VargasMSutherasanYAntonelliM, et al.Tracheostomy procedures in the intensive care unit: an international survey. Crit Care. 2015;19:291.
18.
NieszkowskaACombesALuytCE, et al.Impact of tracheotomy on sedative administration, sedation level, and comfort of mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(11):2527–2533.
19.
ArabiYHaddadSShirawiNAl ShimemeriA. Early tracheostomy in intensive care trauma patients improves resource utilization: a cohort study and literature review. Crit Care. 2004;8(5):R347–R352.
20.
SuttALCornwellPMullanyDKinneallyTFraserJF. The use of tracheostomy speaking valves in mechanically ventilated patients results in improved communication and does not prolong ventilation time in cardiothoracic intensive care unit patients. J Crit Care. 2015;30(3):491–494.
21.
SuttALFraserJF. Patients want to be heard—loud and clear!Crit Care. 2017;21(1):6.
22.
HeilmannCGeisenUBeyersdorfF, et al.Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(1):62–68.
23.
JonesMBRamakrishnanKAlfaresFA, et al.Acquired von Willebrand syndrome: an under-recognized cause of major bleeding in the cardiac intensive care unit. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2016;7(6):711–716.
24.
ShekarKRobertsJAMullanyDV, et al.Increased sedation requirements in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory and cardiorespiratory failure. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40(4):648–655.
NigoghossianCDDzierbaALEtheridgeJ, et al.Effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use on sedative requirements in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pharmacotherapy. 2016;36(6):607–616.
27.
Barrientos-VegaRSanchez-SoriaMMMorales-GarciaCRobas-GomezACuena-BoyRAyensa-RinconA. Prolonged sedation of critically ill patients with midazolam or propofol: impact on weaning and costs. Crit Care Med. 1997;25(1):33–40.
28.
BoydJHForbesJNakadaTAWalleyKRRussellJA. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(2):259–265.
29.
GirardTDKressJPFuchsBD, et al.Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9607):126–134.
30.
JacksonDLProudfootCWCannKFWalshT. A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R59.
31.
KrajcovaAWaldaufPAndelMDuskaF. Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports. Crit Care. 2015;19:398.
32.
SchmidtMBaileyMKellyJ, et al.Impact of fluid balance on outcome of adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(9):1256–1266.
33.
ShehabiYBellomoRReadeMC, et al.Early intensive care sedation predicts long-term mortality in ventilated critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(8):724–731.
34.
DevlinJWRobertsRJ. Pharmacology of commonly used analgesics and sedatives in the ICU: benzodiazepines, propofol, and opioids. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011;29(4):567–585.
35.
WoodhouseAHobbesAFMatherLEGibsonM. A comparison of morphine, pethidine and fentanyl in the postsurgical patient-controlled analgesia environment. Pain. 1996;64(1):115–121.
36.
GaiesMGGurneyJGYenAH, et al.Vasoactive-inotropic score as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in infants after cardiopulmonary bypass. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11(2):234–238.
37.
AbramsDJavidfarJFarrandE, et al.Early mobilization of patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2014;18(1):R38.
38.
KoYChoYHParkYH, et al.Feasibility and safety of early physical therapy and active mobilization for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J. 2015;61(5):564–568.
39.
BrauneSKienastSHademJ, et al.Safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in patients on extracorporeal lung support. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(10):1792–1799.
