Prevalence,Risk Factors,and Clinical Consequences of Recurrent Activation of a Rapid Response Team: A Multicenter Observational Study

Abstract

Introduction:

Rapid response teams (RRTs) are groups of health-care providers, implemented by hospitals to respond to distressed hospitalized patients on the hospital wards. Patients assessed by the RRT for deterioration may be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) or may be triaged to remain on the wards, putting them at risk of recurrent deterioration and repeat RRT activation. Previous studies evaluating outcomes of patients with recurrent deterioration and multiple RRT activations have produced conflicting results.

Methods:

We used a prospectively collected multicenter registry from 2 hospitals within a single tertiary-level hospital system between 2012 and 2016. Comparisons were made between patients with a single RRT activation and those with multiple RRT activations over the course of their admission. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, which was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.

Results:

A total of 5995 patients who had any RRT activation were analyzed. Of that, 1183 (19.7%) patients had recurrent deterioration and multiple RRT activations during their admission. Risk factors for recurrent deterioration included admission from a home setting (as opposed to a long-term care facility), RRT activation during nighttime hours, and delay (>1 hour) to RRT activation. Recurrent deterioration was associated with increased odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.44 [1.28-1.64], P = <.001). Increasing number of RRT activations were associated with increasing risk of mortality. Patients with recurrent deterioration had prolonged median hospital length of stay (21.0 days vs 12.0 days, P < .001), while patients with only a single activation were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (adjusted OR: 2.30 [1.96-2.70], P < .001).

Conclusions:

Recurrent deteriorations leading to RRT activations among hospitalized patients are associated with increased odds of mortality and prolonged hospital length of stay. This work identifies a group of patients who warrant closer attention to help reduce adverse outcomes.

Keywords

rapid response team recurrent deterioration quality improvement intensive care unit critical care resuscitation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kause

Smith

Prytherch

, et al. A comparison of antecedents to cardiac arrests, deaths and emergency intensive care admissions in Australia and New Zealand, and the United Kingdom – the ACADEMIA study. Resuscitation. 2004;62(3):275–282.

Sax

Charlson

. Medical patients at high risk for catastrophic deterioration. Crit Care Med. 1987;15(5):510–515.

Devita

Bellomo

Hillman

, et al. Findings of the first consensus conference on medical emergency teams. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(9):2463–2478.

Jones

DeVita

Bellomo

. Rapid-response teams. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(2):139–146.

Jones

Lippert

DeVita

, et al.

What’s new with rapid response systems?

Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(2):315–317.

Amaral

McDonald

Coburn

, et al. Expanding the scope of critical care rapid response teams: a feasible approach to identify adverse events. A prospective observational cohort. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(12):764–768.

Chan

Jain

Nallmothu

, et al. Rapid response teams: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):18–26.

Winters

Weaver

Pfoh

, et al. Rapid-response systems as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 pt 2):417–425.

Maharaj

Raffaele

Wendon

. Rapid response systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2015;19:254.

10.

De Jong

Jung

Daurat

, et al. Effect of rapid response systems on hospital mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(4):615–617.

11.

Niven

Bastos

Stelfox

. Critical care transition programs and the risk of readmission or death after discharge from an ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(11):179–187.

12.

Harrison

Gao

Welch

, et al. The effects of critical care outreach services before and after critical care: a matched-cohort analysis. J Crit Care. 2010;25(2):196–204.

13.

Jones

Moran

Winters

, et al. The rapid response system and end-of-life care. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013;19(6):616–623.

14.

McQuillan

Pilkington

Allan

, et al. Confidential inquiry into quality of care before admission to intensive care. BMJ. 1998;316(7148):1853–1858.

15.

Calzavacca

Licari

Tee

, et al. Features and outcome of patients receiving multiple medical emergency team reviews. Resuscitation. 2010;81(11):1509–1515.

16.

Stelfox

Bagshaw

Gao

. Characteristics and outcomes for hospitalized patients with recurrent clinical deterioration and repeat medical emergency team activation*. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(7):1601–1609.

17.

Schneider

Warrillow

Robbins

, et al. An assessment of the triage performance of the efferent arm of the rapid response system. Resuscitation. 2013;84(4):477–482.

18.

Ronksley

McKay

Kobewka

, et al. Patterns of health care use in a high-cost inpatient population in Ottawa, Ontario: a retrospective observational study. CMAJ Open. 2015;3(1):E111–E118.

19.

Kobewka

van Walraven

Turnbull

, et al. Quality gaps identified through mortality review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(2):141–149.

20.

McIsaac

Abdulla

Yang

, et al. Association of delay of urgent or emergency surgery with mortality and use of health care resources: a propensity score-matched observational cohort study. CMAJ. 2017;189(27): E905–E912.

21.

Baxter

Cardinal

Hooper

, et al. Medical emergency teams at The Ottawa Hospital: the first two years. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55(4):223–231.

22.

Konrad

Jaderling

Bell

, et al. Reducing in-hospital cardiac arrests and hospital mortality by introducing a medical emergency team. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(1):100–106.

23.

Sarani

. Identifying the ICU recidivist in the hospital*. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(7):1725–1726.

24.

Sundararajan

Flabouris

Thompson

. Diurnal variation in the performance of rapid response systems: the role of critical care services – a review article. J Intensive Care. 2016;4:15.

25.

Barwise

Thongprayoon

Gajic

, et al. Delayed rapid response team activation is associated with increased hospital mortality, morbidity, and length of stay in a tertiary care institution. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(1):54–63.

26.

Chen

. Saving patients’ lives through activating a rapid response system: willing is not enough, we must do. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(1):239–240.

27.

Churpek

Edelson

Lee

, et al. Association between survival and time of day for rapid response team calls in a national registry. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(10):1677–1682.

28.

Sorensen

Petersen

. Performance of the efferent limb of a rapid response system: an observational study of medical emergency team calls. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015;23:69.

29.

Stelfox

Hemmelgarn

Bagshaw

, et al. Intensive care unit bed availability and outcomes for hospitalized patients with sudden clinical deterioration. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(6):467–474.

30.

Amirian

Andersen

Rosenberg

, et al. Working night shifts affects surgeons’ biological rhythm. Am J Surg. 2015;210(2):389–395.

31.

Sharpe

Koval

Ronco

, et al. The impact of prolonged continuous wakefulness on resident clinical performance in the intensive care unit: a patient simulator study. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(3):766–770.

32.

Olson

Drage

Auger

. Sleep deprivation, physician performance, and patient safety. Chest. 2009;136(5):1389–1396.

33.

Atkins

Best

Briss

, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1490.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB