Futility disputes in the intensive care unit setting have received significant attention in the literature over the past several years. Although the idea of improving communication in an attempt to resolve these challenging situations has been regularly discussed, the concept and role of trust building as the means by which communication improves and disputes are best navigated is largely absent. We take this opportunity to review the current literature on futility disputes and argue the important role of broken trust in these encounters, highlighting current evidence establishing the necessity and utility of trust in both medical decision-making and effective communication. Finally, we propose a futility dispute navigation model built upon improved communication through trust building.
AzoulayETimsitJFSprungCL. Prevalence and factors of intensive care unit conflicts: The Conflicus Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(9):853–860.
2.
AngoodPB. The end of a life: why intensivists should care (more). Crit Care Med. 2003;31(9):2399–2400.
3.
FinsJJSolomonMZ. Communication in intensive care settings: the challenge of futility disputes. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(2 suppl):N10–N15.
4.
CaplanAL. Odds and ends: trust and the debate over medical futility. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125(8):688–689.
5.
HoodKBHartAJrBelgraveFZTademyRHJonesRA. The role of trust in health decision making among African American men recruited from urban barbershops. J Natl Med Assoc. 2012;104(7-8):351–359.
6.
JanvierABarringtonKFarlowB. Communication with parents concerning withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining interventions in neonatology. Semin Perinatol. 2014;38(1):38–46.
7.
KraetschmerNSharpeNUrowitzSDeberRB. How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making?Health Expect. 2004;7(4):317–326.
8.
RoigCG. Art of communication. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2003;4(2):259–260.
9.
TodresID. Communication between physician, patient, and family in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1993;21(9 suppl):S383–S386.
10.
CoveySR.The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, Powerful Lessons in Personal Change. 1989, 2004:198.
11.
DelmarC. The excesses of care: a matter of understanding the asymmetry of power. Nurs Philos. 2012;13(4):236–243.
12.
MurrayBMcCroneS. An integrative review of promoting trust in the patient-primary care provider relationship. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(1):3–23.
DictionariesO. “Trust”. Oxford Dictionaries. Oxford University Press.
15.
LongACCurtisJR. The epidemic of physician-family conflict in the ICU and what we should do about it. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(2):461–462.
16.
StuddertDMBurnsJPMelloMMPuopoloALTruogRDBrennanTA. Nature of conflict in the care of pediatric intensive care patients with prolonged stay. Pediatrics. 2003;112(3 pt 1):553–558.
17.
BowmanKW. Communication, negotiation, and mediation: dealing with conflict in end-of-life decisions. J Palliat Care. 2000;16suppl:S17–S23.
18.
HalevyABrodyBA. A multi-institution collaborative policy on medical futility. JAMA. 1996;276(7):571–574.
19.
CurtisJR. Communicating about end-of-life care with patients and families in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin. 2004;20(3):363–380, viii.
20.
LongdenJV. Parental perceptions of end-of-life care on paediatric intensive care units: a literature review. Nurs Crit Care. 2011;16(3):131–139.
21.
ZurcaADCorriveauCO. Family communication in the PICU: less than ideal no matter how you say it. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(6):1569–1570.
22.
ChoongKCupidoCNelsonE. A framework for resolving disagreement during end of life care in the critical care unit. Clin Invest Med. 2010;33(4):E240–E253.
23.
Van CleaveACRoosen-RungeMUMillerABMilnerLCKarkazisKAMagnusDC. Quality of communication in interpreted versus noninterpreted PICU family meetings. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(6):1507–1517.
24.
WhiteDBCurtisJR. Establishing an evidence base for physician-family communication and shared decision making in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(9):2500–2501.
25.
LittleJBolickBN. Preparing prelicensure and graduate nursing students to systematically communicate bad news to patients and families. J Nurs Educ. 2014;53(1):52–55.
26.
KellyWFEliassonAHStockerDJHnatiukOW. Do specialists differ on do-not-resuscitate decisions?Chest. 2002;121(3):957–963.
27.
BenkertRHollieBNordstromCKWicksonBBins-EmerickL. Trust, mistrust, racial identity and patient satisfaction in urban African American primary care patients of nurse practitioners. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2009;41(2):211–219.
28.
BohnertASZivinKWelshDEKilbourneAM. Ratings of patient-provider communication among veterans: serious mental illnesses, substance use disorders, and the moderating role of trust. Health Commun. 2011;26(3):267–274.
29.
BellLDuffyA. A concept analysis of nurse-patient trust. Br J Nurs. 2009;18(1):46–51.
30.
CarterMA. Trust, power, and vulnerability: a discourse on helping in nursing. Nurs Clin North Am. 2009;44(4):393–405.
31.
HupceyJEPenrodJMorseJMMitchamC. An exploration and advancement of the concept of trust. J Adv Nurs. 2001;36(2):282–293.
32.
FloresFSolomonR. Creating trust. Business Ethics Quarterly. 1998;8(2):205–232.
33.
BaierA. Trust and antitrust. Ethics. 1986;96(2):231–260.
34.
CegalaDJGadeCBrozSLMcClureL. Physicians’ and patients’ perceptions of patients’ communication competence in a primary care medical interview. Health Commun. 2004;16(3):289–304.
35.
OngLMde HaesJCHoosAMLammesFB. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 40(7):903–918.
36.
KrepsGL. Relational communication in health care. South Speech Comm J. 1988;53(4):344–359.
37.
ChaitinEStillerRJacobsSHershlJGrogenTWeinbergJ. Physician-patient relationship in the intensive care unit: erosion of the sacred trust?Crit Care Med. 2003;31(5 suppl):S367–S372.
38.
WocialLD. Life support decisions involving imperiled infants. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2000;14(2):73–86.
39.
KramerRTylerT. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. SAGE Publications Inc: California; 1996.
40.
BousquetGOrriMWintermanSBrugiereCVerneuilLRevah-LevyA. Breaking bad news in oncology: a metasynthesis. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(22):2437–2443.
