Improving Caregivers’ Perceptions Regarding Patient Goals of Care/End-of-Life Issues for the Multidisciplinary Critical Care Team

Abstract

Objective:

With population aging and growth, use of critical care medicine at the end of life continues to rise, while many critical care providers are not adequately trained regarding goals of care/end-of-life (GOC/EOL) issues. A multidisciplinary intensive care unit (ICU) team intervention regarding GOC/EOL communication will enhance the clinical abilities of all critical care providers when discussing GOC/EOL issues and increase ICU staff comfort level while improving transitions for patients to a comfort care approach.

Design:

This study was a preintervention/postintervention survey evaluation.

Setting:

This study was conducted at an academic tertiary surgical burn trauma ICU.

Population:

The intervention was provided to nursing, ancillary staff, house staff, and attending physicians.

Intervention:

An initial survey was circulated among the critical care staff for baseline expectations, satisfaction, and understanding of GOC/EOL care. A robust intervention was begun including the creation of a multidisciplinary GOC/EOL team, communication tools for providers, patient–family pamphlets, standardized EOL order sets, and formalized didactic sessions. Subsequently, the same survey was circulated and compared to baseline data.

Measurements:

Preintervention/postintervention survey data were reviewed and statistically analyzed.

Main Results:

Our survey response rate for preintervention/postintervention was 50.4% and 36.1%, respectively. The intervention generated heightened interest in improving family communication and provided focal direction to foster this growth. Based on the serial surveys regarding our intervention, statistically significant staff improvements were seen in “work stress” (P = .04), “EOL information” (P = .006), and “space allotment” (P = .001). Improved congruence of families and health care providers regarding decision over intensity of care was also noted.

Conclusion:

We created a novel unit-based multidisciplinary program for improved EOL/GOC approaches in the critical care setting. A similarly formatted program could be adapted by other ICUs. Benefits of such a program include improving caregivers’ perceptions regarding EOL/GOC issues and fostering critical care team growth.

Keywords

end-of-life care goals of care multidisciplinary communication education order sets

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angus

Barnato

Linde-Zwirble

. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(3):638–643.

Sudore

Fried

. Redefining the “planning” in advance care planning: preparing for end-of-life decision making. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(4):256–261.

Grudzen

Richardson

Hopper

Ortiz

Whang

Morrison

. Does palliative care have a future in the emergency department? Discussions with attending emergency physicians. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2012;43(1):1–9.

Education for Physicians on End of Life Care (EPEC project). The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. 2011.

Brownlee

. End of life care in California: you don’t always get what you want. California HealthCare Foundation. Web site. http://www.chcf.org/~/media/MEDIA%20LIBRARY%20Files/PDF/E/PDF%20EOLWhatYouWant.pdf. Accessed April 2014.

Morrison

Sie

. Survival in end-stage dementia following acute illness. JAMA. 2000;284(1):47–52.

Hogan

Losman

Carpenter

. Development of geriatric competencies for emergency medicine residents using an expert consensus process. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(3):316–324.

Mirarchi

Costello

Puller

Cooney

Kottkamp

. TRIAD III: nationwide assessment of living wills and do not resuscitate orders. J Emerg Med. 2012;42(5):511–520.

Volandes

Paasche-Orlow

Barry

. Video decision support tool for advance care planning in dementia: randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;338:b1964.

10.

Field

Cassel

. Approaching death: improving care at the end of life. Health Prog. 2011;92(1):25.

11.

Halpern

. Shaping end-of-life care: behavioral economics and advance directives. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;33(4):393–400.

12.

Teno

Clarridge

Casey

. Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. JAMA. 2004;291(1):88–93.

13.

California Healthcare Foundation. Final Chapter: Californians’ Attitudes and Experiences with Death and Dying. Web site. http://www.chcf.org/publications/2012/02/final-chapter-death-dying. Published February 2012. Accessed March 2015.

14.

The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice. Web site. http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/. Accessed March 2015. Updated January 2015.

15.

Curtis

Tonelli

. Shared decision-making in the ICU: value, challenges, and limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(7):840–841.

16.

Wright

Zhang

Ray

. Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA. 2008;300(14):1665–1673.

17.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium (ELNEC). Web site. http://www.aacn.nche.edu/elnec. Accessed October 2014. Updated January 2015.

18.

Hansen

Goodell

DeHaven

Smith

. Nurses’ perceptions of end-of-life care after multiple interventions for improvement. Am J Crit Care. 2009;18(3):263–271.

19.

Salkind

. Tests & Measurement for People who Think They Hate Tests & Measurement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2006.

20.

Dying in America. Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014.

21.

Justin

. Finding the right words at the right time—high-value advance care planning. NEJM. 2015;372(7):598–599.

22.

Nulty

Duncan D

. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2008;33(3):301–314.

23.

Campaign for the National Center for care at the End of Life. National Hospice Foundation. Web site. http://www.nationalhospicefoundation.org/files/public/Campaign/CAMPAIGN_case_statement.pdf. Accessed October 2014. Updated 2014.