Neonatal ethics has focused on 2 questions: is withholding potentially live-saving treatment from neonates ethically justified? and if so, who has the authority to decide? This article details how these questions developed and provides a description of the possible answers. In the first section, we review a selection of seminal articles by noted authors in the fields of ethics, medicine, and law. The second section provides a detailed account of the development of the Baby Doe Regulations and the impact they had on neonatal ethics, with particular attention to the emergence of the Best Interest Standard as a guideline for decision making. In the last section, we review the landmark position statements by the American Academy of Pediatric (AAP), and the focus on evidence-based decision making. We conclude that forgoing life-saving treatment is ethically justified. However, this requires a rigorous evidence-based process and is limited by the Best Interest Standard. The second question is more difficult to answer, but we feel that in light of legal limitations, physicians acting as both the infant advocate and a proxy for the state, decide what falls in the range of acceptable treatment options, with the parents free to choose within that range.
AntommariaAM.“Who should survive?: one of the choices on our conscience”: mental retardation and the history of contemporary bioethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006;16(3):205–224.
2.
SchumannW.Who Should Survive?: One of the Choices on Our Conscience[16 mm color film].
HartfordCT.JosephP. KennedyJrFoundation Film Service;1971
.
3.
GustafsonJ. Mongolismparental desires, and the right to life. Perspect Biol Med. 1973;16(4):529–557.
4.
LorberJ.Results of treatment of myelomeningocele. An analysis of 524 unselected cases, with special reference to possible selection for treatment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1971;13(3):279–303.
5.
LorberJ.Early results of selective treatment of spina bifida cystica. Br Med J. 1973;4(5886):201–204.
6.
LorberJ.Spina bifida cystica. Results of treatment of 270 consecutive cases with criteria for selection for the future. Arch Dis Child. 1972;47(256):854–873.
7.
LorberJ.Selective treatment of myelomeningocele: to treat or not to treat?Pediatrics. 1974;53(3):307–308.
8.
FletcherJ.Indicators of humanhood: a tentative profile of man. The Hastings Center Report. 1972;2(5):4.
9.
DuffRCampbellA.Moral and ethical dilemmas in the special-care nursery. N Engl J Med. 1973;289(17):890–894.
10.
DuffRCampbellA.On deciding the care of severely handicapped or dying persons: with particular reference to infants. Pediatrics. 1976;57(4):487–493.
11.
ShawA.Dilemmas of “informed consent” in children. N Engl J Med. 1973;289(17):885–890.
12.
IngelfingerF.Bedside ethics for the hopeless case. N Engl J Med. 1973;289(17):914–915.
13.
McCormickR.To save or let die. The dilemma of modern medicine. JAMA. 1974;229(2):172–176.
14.
BoyleRJ.Paradigm cases in decision making for neonates. NeoReviews. 2004;5(11):e477–e483.
15.
ShurtleffDHaydenPLoeserJKronmalR.Myelodysplasia: decision for death or disability. N Engl J Med. 1974;291(19):1005–1011.
16.
FletcherJ.Abortion, euthanasia, and care of defective newborns. N Engl J Med. 1975;292(2):75–78.
17.
FletcherJ.Ethics and euthanasia. Am J Nurs. 1973;73(4):670–675.
18.
RamseyPScreening: an ethicist’s view. In: HiltonBDanielCHarrisMCondliffePBerkleyB (Eds.), Ethical Issues in Human Genetics: Genetic Counseling and the Use of Genetic Knowledge. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1973:147–167.
19.
RamseyP.Ethics at the Edges of Life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1978
.
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics.
Treatment of critically ill newborns. Pediatrics. Oct 1983;72(4):565–566.
22.
CurranM.ACOG, AMA object to new ‘Baby Doe’ rule. Obstet Gynecol News. 1984;19(4):3, 42.
23.
McBeathWA. Testimony on the Confirmation of Surgeon General Nominee C. Everett Koop, M.D. Statement to Congress. October 1, 1981. Available at: http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/QQ/B/C/F/Z/_/qqbcfz.pdf. Accessibility verified December 1, 2009
.
24.
KoopC.The right to die (II). Hum Life Rev. 1976;2(2):33–58.
25.
KoopC.The right to live. Hum Life Rev. 1975;1(4):65–87.
26.
WeirRF.Selective Nontreatment of Handicapped Newborns: Moral Dilemmas in Neonatal Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1984.
27.
PlessJ.The story of Baby Doe. N Engl J Med. 1983;309(11):664.
28.
SherwoodC.HHS beats retreat on newborn rights. Washington Times: A:1.
29.
KoopCE. Testimony on the Baby Doe Rule. Committee on Education and Labor, Subcommittee on Select Education. Statement to Congress. September 16, 1982. Available at: http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/QQ/B/B/B/Y/_/qqbbby.pdf. Accessibility verified December 1, 2009
.
30.
United States. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment: a report on the ethical, medical, and legal issues in treatment decisions. Washington, DC: President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: For sale by the Supt. of Docs., US GPO; 1983.
.
31.
McMillanRCEngelhardtHTSpickerSF. Euthanasia and the Newborn: Conflicts Regarding Saving Lives. Dordrecht; Boston Norwell, MA: D. Reidel Pub. Co; Sold and distributed in the USA and Canada by Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1987
.
32.
Joint policy statement. Principles of treatment of disabled infants. Pediatrics. 1984;73(4):559–560.
33.
American Academy of Pediatrics Infant Bioethics Task Force and Consultants: Guidelines for infant bioethics committees. Pediatrics. 1984;74(2):306–310.
34.
Academy meets with Surgeon General, raises objections to Baby Doe regulations.
AAP News. Vol 1: American Academy of Pediatrics Journals Division; 1985:2.
35.
MoskopJCSaldanhaRL.The Baby Doe rule: still a threat. Hastings Cent Rep. 1986;16(2):8–14.
36.
StrongC.The tiniest newborns. Hastings Center Report. 1983;13(1):14–19.
37.
StrongC.The neonatologists duty to patient and parents. Hastings Center Report. 1984;14(4):10–16.
38.
RagatzSCEllisonPH.Decisions to withdraw life support in the neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1983;22(11):729–735.
39.
ArrasJD.Toward an ethic of ambiguity. Hastings Center Report. 1984;14(2):25–33.
40.
ReichWT.Caring for life in the first of it: moral paradigms for perinatal and neonatal ethics. Semin Perinatol. 1987;11(3):279–287.
41.
Imperiled newborns. Hastings Center Report. 1987;17(6):5–32.
42.
WaltersJW.Approaches to ethical decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Dis Child. 1988;142(8):825–830.
43.
KopelmanLMIronsTGKopelmanAE.Neonatologists judge the “Baby Doe” regulations. N Engl J Med. 1988;318(11):677–683.
44.
AnnasGJ.Asking the courts to set the standard of emergency care—the case of Baby K. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(21):1542–1545.
45.
re BabyKFed Report. 1994;16:590–599.
46.
FlanneryEJ.One advocate’s viewpoint: conflicts and tensions in the Baby K case. J Law Med Ethics. 1995;23(1):7–12.; discussion 13-14
.
47.
KrugEF.Law and ethics at the border of viability. J Perinatol. 2006;26(6):321–324.
48.
ParisJJSchreiberMDReardonF.The “emergent circumstances” exception to the need for consent: the Texas Supreme Court ruling in Miller v. HCA. J Perinatol. 2004;24(6):337–342.
49.
RobertsonJA.Extreme prematurity and parental rights after Baby Doe. Hastings Center Report. 2004;34(4):32–39.
50.
LightfootL.The ethical health lawyer. Incompetent decisionmakers and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: a case study. J Law Med Ethics. 2005;33(4):851–856.
51.
Texas Health and Safety Code § 166.046(a) (Vernon Supp 2002).
.
52.
ParisJJBillinngsJACummingsBMorelandMP.Howe v. MGH and Hudson v. Texas Children's Hospital: two approaches to resolving family-physician disputes in end-of-life care. J Perinatol. 2006;26(12):726–729.
53.
SayeedSA.Baby Doe Redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Pediatrics. 2005;116(4):E576–E585.
54.
Public Law 107–207, 116 STAT. 926; 2002
.
55.
BoyleDCarloWAGoldsmithJ.Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2001, Public Law No. 107-207. Pediatrics. 2003;111(3):680–681.
56.
HamiltonTE. Interaction of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) and the Born-Alive Infants Protection vAct of 2002. In: Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, eds. Baltimore, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2005
.
57.
HornWF. Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act requirements and the Born Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002. In: Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, ed. US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families; 2005
.
58.
BellEF.Noninitiation or withdrawal of intensive care for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics. 2007;119(2):401–403.
59.
The initiation or withdrawal of treatment for high-risk newborns. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Pediatrics. 1995;96(2 pt 1):362–363.
60.
Ethics and the care of critically ill infants and children. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Pediatrics. 1996;98(1):149–152.
61.
DiekemaDSBotkinJR.Clinical report—forgoing medically provided nutrition and hydration in children. Pediatrics. 2009;124(2):813–822.
62.
Guidelines on foregoing life-sustaining medical treatment.
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Pediatrics. Mar 1994;93(3):532–536
.
63.
The Pediatrician’s role in family support programs. Committee on Early Childhood and Adoption, and Dependent Care. Pediatrics. 2001;107(1):195–197.
64.
Palliative care for children.
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics and Committee on Hospital Care. Pediatrics. Aug 2000;106(2 Pt 1):351–357
.
65.
Perinatal care at the threshold of viability.
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice. Pediatrics. 1995;96(5 pt 1):974–976.
66.
MacDonaldH. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics. 2002;110(5):1024–1027.
67.
BattonDG. Clinical report—antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation at an extremely low gestational age. Pediatrics. 2009;124(1):422–427.
68.
NiermeyerSKattwinkelJVan ReemptsP. International Guidelines for Neonatal Resuscitation: an excerpt from the Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: International Consensus on Science. Contributors and Reviewers for the Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines. Pediatrics. 2000;106(3):E29.
69.
2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) of pediatric and neonatal patients: neonatal resuscitation guidelines. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5):e1029–e1038.
70.
Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Pediatrics. Feb 1995;>95(2):314-317.
71.
HackMHorbarJDMalloyMHTysonJEWrightEWrightL. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Network. Pediatrics. 1991;87(5):587–597.
72.
The Vermont-Oxford Trials Network: very low birth weight outcomes for 1990. Investigators of the Vermont-Oxford Trials Network Database Project. Pediatrics. 1993;91(3):540–545.
73.
WangCJMcGlynnEABrookRH. Quality-of-care indicators for the neurodevelopmental follow-up of very low birth weight children: results of an expert panel process. Pediatrics. 2006;117(6):2080–2092.
74.
BasslerDStollBJSchmidtB. Using a count of neonatal morbidities to predict poor outcome in extremely low birth weight infants: added role of neonatal infection. Pediatrics. 2009;123(1):313–318.
75.
MadanJCKendrickDHagadornJIFrantzIDIII. Patent ductus arteriosus therapy: impact on neonatal and 18-month outcome. Pediatrics. 2009;123(2):674–681.
76.
Peralta-CarcelenMMosesMAdams-ChapmanIGantzMVohrBR. Stability of neuromotor outcomes at 18 and 30 months of age after extremely low birth weight status. Pediatrics. 2009;123(5):e887–e895.
77.
LaptookARO'SheaTMShankaranSBhaskarB. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low birth weight infants with a normal head ultrasound: prevalence and antecedents. Pediatrics. 2005;115(3):673–680.
78.
StephensBEBannCMPooleWKVohrBR. Neurodevelopmental impairment: predictors of its impact on the families of extremely low birth weight infants at 18 months. Infant Ment Health J. 2008;29(6):570–587.
79.
BrehautJCKohenDERainaP. The health of primary caregivers of children with cerebral palsy: how does it compare with that of other Canadian caregivers?. Pediatrics. 2004;114(2):e182–e191.
80.
DrotarDHackMTaylorGSchluchterMAndreiasLKleinN. The impact of extremely low birth weight on the families of school-aged children. Pediatrics. 2006;117(6):2006–2013.
81.
MilesMSHolditch-DavisDSchwartzTAScherM. Depressive symptoms in mothers of prematurely born infants. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2007;28(1):36–44.
82.
RainaPO’DonnellMRosenbaumP. The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy. Pediatrics. 2005;115(6):e626–e636.
83.
TysonJEParikhNALangerJGreenCHigginsRD. Intensive care for extreme prematurity—moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(16):1672–1681.
84.
JanvierABarringtonKJAzizKLantosJ. Ethics ain’t easy: do we need simple rules for complicated ethical decisions?. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(4):402–406.
85.
MeadowWReimshiselTLantosJ. Birth weight-specific mortality for extremely low birth weight infants vanishes by four days of life: Epidemiology and ethics in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 1996;97(5):636–643.
86.
MeadowWFrainLRenYLeeGSonejiSLantosJ. Serial assessment of mortality in the neonatal intensive care unit by algorithm and intuition: certainty, uncertainty, and informed consent. Pediatrics. 2002;109(5):878–886.
87.
JanvierALeblancIBarringtonKJ. Nobody likes premies: the relative value of patients' lives. J Perinatol. 2008;28(12):821–826.
88.
ChervenakFAMcCulloughLBLeveneMI. An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive approach to peri-viability: gynaecological, obstetric, perinatal and neonatal dimensions. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27(1):3–7.
