A comparison between the thermodilution method and the Fick method of cardiac output measurement in 30 critically ill patients was performed. Although there was good correlation between both methods, there was poor agreement. The Bland and Altman method of assessing agreement between 2 measurements is the preferred method of agreement assessment. The variables possibly responsible for this disagreement are noted.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1: 307-310.
2.
Linton R, Band D, O’Brien T, et al.Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement: a comparison with thermodilution. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:1796-1800.
3.
Axler O, Tousignant C, Thompson CR, et al.Comparison of transesophageal echocardiographic, Fick, and thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients. J Clin Care. 1996;11:109-116.
4.
Eagle KAet al:ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1966 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:542-553.
5.
Sageman WS, Amundson DE. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output in postaortocoronary bypass patients. Crit Care Med. 1993;21:1139-1142.
6.
Ryan T, Page R, Bouchier-Hayes D, et al.Transesophageal pulsed wave Doppler measurement of cardiac output during major vascular surgery: comparison with thermodilution technique. Br J Anaesth. 1992;69:101-104.
7.
Estagnasie P, Djedaini K, Mier L, et al.Measurement of cardiac output by transesophageal echocardiography in mechanically ventilated patients: comparison with thermodilution. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23:753-759.
8.
Dhingra VK, Fenwick JC, Walley KR, et al.Lack of agreement between thermodilution and Fick cardiac output in critically ill patients. Chest. 2002; 122:990-997.
9.
Lefrant J-Y, Bruelle P, Ripart J, et al.Cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients: comparison of continuous and conventional thermodilution techniques. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42:972-976.
10.
Nishikawa T, Dohi S.Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution. Can J Anaesth. 1993;40:142-153.
11.
Stetz CW, Miller RG, Kelly GE, et al.Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982;126:1001-1004
12.
Cheatham ML, Nelson LD, Chang MC, Safcsak K.Right ventricular end -diastolic volume index as a predictor of preload status in patients on positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med. 1988;26:1801-1806.
13.
Diebel LN, Wilson RF, Tagett MG, Kline RA. End-diastolic volume: a better indicator of preload in the critically ill. Arch Surg. 1992;127:817-822.
14.
Latson TW, Whitten CW, O’Flaherty D.Ventilation, thermal noise, and errors in cardiac output measurement after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:1233-1243.
15.
Jansen JR, Vesprille A.Improvement of cardiac output estimation by the thermodilution method during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 1986;12:71-79.
