HayJMoonsawmyCBarberB. Reducing the cost of enteral feeding. Gastroenterol Nurs1996;19:29–30.
2.
KeymlingM. Technical aspects of enteral nutrition. Gut1994;35(Suppll):S77–80.
3.
RipamontiCGemloBBozzettiB. Role of enteral nutrition in advanced cancer patients: Indications and contraindications of the different techniques employed. Tumori1996;82:302–8.
4.
RabeneckLWrayNPetersenN. Long-term outcomes of patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. J Gen Intern Med1996;11:287–93.
5.
KruppK. Latex foley catheters vs silicone gastrostomy tubes: A review of the literature. Columbus, OH: Ross Products Division, Abbott Laboratories, 1996.
6.
WalshT. Cost savings realized by using self-flushing enteral feeding pump. Columbus, OH: Ross Products Division, Abbott Laboratories, 1996.
7.
ThomasL. Profile of an evaluation for ready-to-hang enteral feedings. Support Line Newsletter1991;13:12–13.
8.
SilvermanDWCampbellSMRenkC. Comparison of two handling techniques on microbiological quality of prefilled enteral feedings [Abstr]. J Am Diet Assoc1990;90:A131.