Early enteral nutrition (EN) is consistently recommended as first-line nutrition therapy in critically ill patients since it favorably alters outcome, providing both nutrition and nonnutrition benefits. However, critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation are at risk for regurgitation, pulmonary aspiration, and eventually ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). EN may increase these risks when gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction is present. Gastric residual volume (GRV) is considered a surrogate parameter of GI dysfunction during the progression of enteral feeding in the early phase of critical illness and beyond. By monitoring GRV, clinicians may detect patients with delayed gastric emptying earlier and intervene with strategies that minimize or prevent VAP as one of the major risks of EN. The value of periodic GRV measurements with regard to risk reduction of VAP incidence has frequently been questioned in the past years. Increasing the GRV threshold before interrupting gastric feeding results in marginal increases in EN delivery. More recently, a large randomized clinical trial revealed that abandoning GRV monitoring did not negatively affect clinical outcomes (including VAP) in mechanically ventilated patients. The results have revived the discussion on the role of GRV monitoring in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients receiving early EN. This review summarizes the most recent clinical evidence on the use of GRV monitoring in critically ill patients. Based on the clinical evidence, it discusses the pros and cons and further addresses whether GRV is a dead marker or still alive for the nutrition management of critically ill patients.
DhaliwalRCahillNLemieuxMHeylandDK. The Canadian critical care nutrition guidelines in 2013: an update on current recommendations and implementation strategies. Nutr Clin Pract. 2014;29:29-43.
2.
McClaveSAMartindaleRGVanekVW. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33:277-316.
3.
SingerPBergerMMVan den BergheG. ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: intensive care. Clin Nutr. 2009;28:387-400.
4.
McClaveSAHeylandDK. The physiologic response and associated clinical benefits from provision of early enteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract. 2009;24:305-315.
5.
Reintam BlaserAMalbrainMLStarkopfJ. Gastrointestinal function in intensive care patients: terminology, definitions and management: recommendations of the ESICM Working Group on Abdominal Problems. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:384-394.
6.
DeaneAChapmanMJFraserRJBryantLKBurgstadCNguyenNQ. Mechanisms underlying feed intolerance in the critically ill: implications for treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:3909-3917.
7.
NguyenNQFraserRJBryantLKChapmanMHollowayRH. Diminished functional association between proximal and distal gastric motility in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1246-1255.
FruhwaldSHolzerPMetzlerH. Gastrointestinal motility in acute illness. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2008;120:6-17.
10.
FruhwaldSKainzJ. Effect of ICU interventions on gastrointestinal motility. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010;16:159-164.
11.
SchuijtTJvan der PollTde VosWMWiersingaWJ. The intestinal microbiota and host immune interactions in the critically ill. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21:221-229.
12.
DeitchEA. Role of the gut lymphatic system in multiple organ failure. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2001;7:92-98.
13.
LeaphartCLTepasJJ. The gut is a motor of organ system dysfunction. Surgery. 2007;141:563-569.
14.
OverhausMTogelSPezzoneMABauerAJ. Mechanisms of polymicrobial sepsis-induced ileus. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2004;287:G685-G694.
15.
CamilleriMPapathanasopoulosAOdunsiST. Actions and therapeutic pathways of ghrelin for gastrointestinal disorders. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:343-352.
16.
CronaDMacLarenR. Gastrointestinal hormone concentrations associated with gastric feeding in critically ill patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012;36:189-196.
17.
NguyenNQFraserRJBryantLK. The relationship between gastric emptying, plasma cholecystokinin, and peptide YY in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2007;11:R132.
18.
OhnoTMochikiEKuwanoH. The roles of motilin and ghrelin in gastrointestinal motility. Int J Pept. 2010;2010:820794.
19.
ChapmanMJFraserRJMatthewsG. Glucose absorption and gastric emptying in critical illness. Crit Care. 2009;13:R140.
20.
McClaveSADeMeoMTDeLeggeMH. North American Summit on Aspiration in the Critically Ill Patient: consensus statement. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26:S80-S85.
21.
BouinMSavoyeGHerveSHellotMFDenisPDucrotteP. Does the supplementation of the formula with fibre increase the risk of gastro-oesophageal reflux during enteral nutrition? A human study. Clin Nutr. 2001;20:307-312.
22.
BowlingTECliffBWrightJWBlackshawPEPerkinsACLoboDN. The effects of bolus and continuous nasogastric feeding on gastro-oesophageal reflux and gastric emptying in healthy volunteers: a randomised three-way crossover pilot study. Clin Nutr. 2008;27:608-613.
23.
EliaMEngferMBGreenCJSilkDB. Systematic review and meta-analysis: the clinical and physiological effects of fibre-containing enteral formulae. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27:120-145.
24.
MacLeodJBLeftonJHoughtonD. Prospective randomized control trial of intermittent versus continuous gastric feeds for critically ill trauma patients. J Trauma. 2007;63:57-61.
25.
SteevensECLipscombAFPooleGVSacksGS. Comparison of continuous vs intermittent nasogastric enteral feeding in trauma patients: perceptions and practice. Nutr Clin Pract. 2002;17:118-122.
26.
ChapmanMJNguyenNQDeaneAM. Gastrointestinal dysmotility: clinical consequences and management of the critically ill patient. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2011;40:725-739.
27.
BlaserARStarkopfJKirsimagiUDeaneAM. Definition, prevalence, and outcome of feeding intolerance in intensive care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58(8):914-922.
28.
GungabissoonUHacquoilKBainsC. Prevalence, risk factors, clinical consequences, and treatment of enteral feed intolerance during critical illness [published online March 17, 2014]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
29.
Lopez-HerceJ. Gastrointestinal complications in critically ill patients: what differs between adults and children?Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2009;12:180-185.
30.
NguyenNQNgMPChapmanMFraserRJHollowayRH. The impact of admission diagnosis on gastric emptying in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2007;11:R16.
31.
UklejaA. Altered GI motility in critically Ill patients: current understanding of pathophysiology, clinical impact, and diagnostic approach. Nutr Clin Pract. 2010;25:16-25.
32.
HsuCWSunSFLeeDL. Impact of disease severity on gastric residual volume in critical patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:2007-2012.
33.
GomesGFPisaniJCMacedoEDCamposAC. The nasogastric feeding tube as a risk factor for aspiration and aspiration pneumonia. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2003;6:327-333.
34.
NseirSZerimechFJailletteEArtruFBalduyckM. Microaspiration in intubated critically ill patients: diagnosis and prevention. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2011;11:413-423.
35.
DalhoffKAbele-HornMAndreasS. Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with nosocomial pneumonia: S-3 Guideline of the German Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, the German Society for Infectious Diseases, the German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology, the German Respiratory Society and the Paul-Ehrlich-Society for Chemotherapy [in German]. Pneumologie. 2012;66:707-765.
36.
CharlesMPEasowJMJosephNMRavishankarMKumarSUmadeviS. Incidence and risk factors of ventilator associated pneumonia in a tertiary care hospital. Australas Med J. 2013;6:178-182.
37.
MakrisDDesrousseauxBZakynthinosEDurocherANseirS. The impact of COPD on ICU mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Respir Med. 2011;105:1022-1029.
38.
IbrahimEHTracyLHillCFraserVJKollefMH. The occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a community hospital: risk factors and clinical outcomes. Chest. 2001;120:555-561.
39.
KohlenbergASchwabFBehnkeMGeffersCGastmeierP. Pneumonia associated with invasive and noninvasive ventilation: an analysis of the German nosocomial infection surveillance system database. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:971-978.
40.
MelsenWGRoversMMBontenMJ. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and mortality: a systematic review of observational studies. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2709-2718.
41.
MuscedereJGDayAHeylandDK. Mortality, attributable mortality, and clinical events as end points for clinical trials of ventilator-associated pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(suppl 1):S120-S125.
42.
SafdarNDezfulianCCollardHRSaintS. Clinical and economic consequences of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:2184-2193.
43.
BontenMJ. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and the gastropulmonary route of infection: a pendulum. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:991-993.
44.
BouadmaLWolffMLucetJC. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and its prevention. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25:395-404.
45.
MuscedereJDodekPKeenanSFowlerRCookDHeylandD. Comprehensive evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for ventilator-associated pneumonia: prevention. J Crit Care. 2008;23:126-137.
ChapmanMJBesankoLKBurgstadCM. Gastric emptying of a liquid nutrient meal in the critically ill: relationship between scintigraphic and carbon breath test measurement. Gut. 2011;60:1336-1343.
49.
HeylandDKDhaliwalRDroverJWGramlichLDodekP. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27:355-373.
50.
MethenyNAMillsACStewartBJ. Monitoring for intolerance to gastric tube feedings: a national survey. Am J Crit Care. 2012;21:e33-e40.
51.
McClaveSASniderHLLowenCC. Use of residual volume as a marker for enteral feeding intolerance: prospective blinded comparison with physical examination and radiographic findings. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1992;16:99-105.
52.
SoreideESoreideJAHolst-LarsenHSteenPA. Studies of gastric content: comparison of two methods. Br J Anaesth. 1993;70:360-362.
53.
MethenyNAStewartJNuetzelGOliverDClouseRE. Effect of feeding-tube properties on residual volume measurements in tube-fed patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2005;29:192-197.
54.
Bartlett EllisRJFuehneJ. Examination of accuracy in the assessment of gastric residual volume: a simulated, controlled study [published online February 21, 2014]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
55.
ParrishCRMcClaveSA. Checking gastric residual volumes: a practice in search of science?Pract Gastroenterol. 2008;10:33-47.
56.
MoreiraTVMcQuigganM. Methods for the assessment of gastric emptying in critically ill, enterally fed adults. Nutr Clin Pract. 2009;24:261-273.
57.
ChangWKMcClaveSAHsiehCBChaoYC. Gastric residual volume (GRV) and gastric contents measurement by refractometry. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007;31:63-68.
58.
SoulsbyCTKhelaMYazakiEEvansDFHennessyEPowell-TuckJ. Measurements of gastric emptying during continuous nasogastric infusion of liquid feed: electric impedance tomography versus gamma scintigraphy. Clin Nutr. 2006;25:671-680.
59.
PerlasAChanVWLupuCMMitsakakisNHanbidgeA. Ultrasound assessment of gastric content and volume. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:82-89.
60.
PerlasADavisLKhanMMitsakakisNChanVW. Gastric sonography in the fasted surgical patient: a prospective descriptive study. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:93-97.
61.
LandzinskiJKiserTHFishDNWischmeyerPEMacLarenR. Gastric motility function in critically ill patients tolerant vs intolerant to gastric nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2008;32:45-50.
62.
MentecHDupontHBocchettiMCaniPPoncheFBleichnerG. Upper digestive intolerance during enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: frequency, risk factors, and complications. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1955-1961.
63.
UmbrelloMEliaGDestrebecqALIapichinoG. Tolerance of enteral feeding: from quantity to quality of gastric residual volume?Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(9):1651-1652.
64.
MethenyNAClouseREChangYHStewartBJOliverDAKollefMH. Tracheobronchial aspiration of gastric contents in critically ill tube-fed patients: frequency, outcomes, and risk factors. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1007-1015.
65.
MethenyNASchallomLOliverDAClouseRE. Gastric residual volume and aspiration in critically ill patients receiving gastric feedings. Am J Crit Care. 2008;17:512-520.
66.
PoulardFDimetJMartin-LefevreL. Impact of not measuring residual gastric volume in mechanically ventilated patients receiving early enteral feeding: a prospective before-after study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010;34:125-130.
67.
DaviesAR. Gastric residual volume in the ICU: can we do without measuring it?JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010;34:160-162.
68.
PinillaJCSamphireJArnoldCLiuLThiessenB. Comparison of gastrointestinal tolerance to two enteral feeding protocols in critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2001;25:81-86.
69.
McClaveSALukanJKStefaterJA. Poor validity of residual volumes as a marker for risk of aspiration in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:324-330.
70.
MontejoJCMinambresEBordejeL. Gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition in ICU patients: the REGANE study. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:1386-1393.
71.
ReignierJMercierELe GougeA. Effect of not monitoring residual gastric volume on risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults receiving mechanical ventilation and early enteral feeding: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2013;309:249-256.
72.
WilliamsTALeslieGMillsL. Frequency of aspirating gastric tubes for patients receiving enteral nutrition in the ICU: a randomised controlled trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014;38:809-816.
73.
ElkeGHeylandD. Residual gastric volume and risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia. JAMA. 2013;309:2090.
74.
ReignierJLascarrouJB. Residual gastric volume and risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia—reply. JAMA. 2013;309:2090-2091.
75.
McClaveSASniderHL. Clinical use of gastric residual volumes as a monitor for patients on enteral tube feeding. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26:S43-S49.
76.
KuppingerDDRittlerPHartlWHRuttingerD. Use of gastric residual volume to guide enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a brief systematic review of clinical studies. Nutrition. 2013;29:1075-1079.
77.
HurtRTMcClaveSA. Gastric residual volumes in critical illness: what do they really mean?Crit Care Clin. 2010;26:481-490, viii.
78.
ZalogaGP. The myth of the gastric residual volume. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:449-450.
79.
RiceTW. Gastric residual volume: end of an era. JAMA. 2013;309:283-284.
80.
LorenteLBlotSRelloJ. New issues and controversies in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:870-876.
81.
O’MearaDMireles-CabodevilaEFrameF. Evaluation of delivery of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Am J Crit Care. 2008;17:53-61.
82.
HeylandDKMurchLCahillN. Enhanced protein-energy provision via the enteral route feeding protocol in critically ill patients: results of a cluster randomized trial. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:2743-2753.
83.
HenleyNParrishCR. The cost of checking gastric residuals: time to put the money where the evidence is?Nutr Clin Pract. 2008;23:210.
HartlWHParhoferKGKuppingerDRittlerP, and the German Society for Nutritional Medicine (DGEM) Steering Committee. S3-Guideline of the German Society for Nutritional Medicine (DGEM) in cooperation with the GESKES and the AKE monitoring of artificial nutrition: specific aspects. Aktuel Ernahrungsmed. 2013;38:e90-e100.
86.
HeylandDKCahillNEDhaliwalR. Enhanced protein-energy provision via the enteral route in critically ill patients: a single center feasibility trial of the PEP uP protocol. Crit Care. 2010;14:R78.
87.
HeylandDKDhaliwalRLemieuxMWangMDayAG. Implementing the PEP uP protocol in critical care units in Canada: results of a multicenter, quality improvement study [published online April18, 2014]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
88.
McClaveSASaadMAEsterleM. Volume-based feeding in the critically ill patient [published online June18, 2014]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
89.
DesachyAClavelMVuagnatANormandSGissotVFrancoisB. Initial efficacy and tolerability of early enteral nutrition with immediate or gradual introduction in intubated patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1054-1059.
90.
PichardC. When more is better. Crit Care. 2014;18:126.
91.
PichardCAttaixDBaracosVE. Too little or too much are inadequate. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2014;17:211-212.
92.
CasaerMP. The nutritional energy to clinical outcome relation revisited. Crit Care. 2014;18:140.
93.
DesaiSVMcClaveSARiceTW. Nutrition in the ICU: an evidence-based approach. Chest. 2014;145:1148-1157.
94.
CasaerMPVan den BergheG. Nutrition in the acute phase of critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2450-2451.
95.
ElkeGHeylandDK. Enteral nutrition in critically ill septic patients—less or more? [published online April 21, 2014]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
96.
ElkeGWangMWeilerNDayAGHeylandDK. Close to recommended caloric and protein intake by enteral nutrition is associated with better clinical outcome of critically ill septic patients: secondary analysis of a large international nutrition database. Crit Care. 2014;18:R29.
97.
RiceTWWheelerAPThompsonBT. Initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: the EDEN randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307:795-803.
98.
CasaerMPMesottenDHermansG. Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:506-517.
99.
HeideggerCPBergerMMGrafS. Optimisation of energy provision with supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet. 2013;381:385-393.
100.
HeylandDK. Critical care nutrition support research: lessons learned from recent trials. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2013;16:176-181.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
