Feeding tube placement for enteral nutrition (EN) support is widely used in both critically ill and stable chronically ill patients who are unable to meet their nutrition needs orally. Nasal or oral feeding tubes can be performed blindly at the bedside or with fluoroscopic or endoscopic guidance into the stomach or small bowel. Percutaneous feeding tubes are used when EN support is required for longer periods (>4–6 weeks) and are most commonly placed endoscopically or radiographically. Although generally safe and effective, there is a wide spectrum of known complications associated with feeding tube placement. Errors made at the time of feeding tube placement can result in a number of these procedural and postprocedural complications. In many cases, a single error at the time of placement can result in numerous complications. A thorough knowledge of these errors and avoiding them in practice will decrease iatrogenic complications in a vulnerable population. In addition, early recognition and management of complications will further minimize morbidity and even mortality in enteral feeding tube placement. This article reviews the common errors leading to complications of enteral feeding tube placement and their prevention and management.
KattelmannKHiseMRussellMCharneyP. Preliminary evidence for a medical nutrition therapy protocol: enteral feedings for critically ill patients. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:1226–1241.
2.
OwensCFangJ. Decisions to be made when initiating enteral nutrition. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2007;17:687–702.
3.
LewisSJEggerMSylversterPA. Early enteral feeding versus ‘nil by mouth’ after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ. 2001;323:1–5.
4.
FinucaineTEChristmasCTravisK. Tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia: a review of the evidence. JAMA. 1999;282:1365–1381.
5.
GillickMR. Rethinking the role of tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:206–210.
6.
CervoFBryanLFarberS. To PEG or not to PEG. Geriatrics. 2006; 62(6):30–35.
7.
SampsonECandyBJonesL. Enteral tube feeding for older patients with advanced dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(2):CD007279.
8.
SandersDSCarterMJD’SilvaJJamesGBoltonRPBardhanKD. Survival analysis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding: a worse outcome in patients with dementia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000:95(6):1472.
9.
TenoJMGozaloPMitchellSL. Feeding tubes and the prevention of healing or pressure ulcers. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:697–701.
10.
TruogRDCistAFBrackettSE. Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: the Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:2332–2348.
11.
BeauchampTLChildressJF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2001.
12.
RitchieCSWilcoxCMKvaleE. Ethical and medicolegal issues related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2007;17:805–815.
13.
LynchCFangJMcClaveS. Enteral access and enteral nutrition. In: DeLeggeM, ed. Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Disease. Totowa, NJ: Humana; 2008.
14.
ItkinMDeLeggeMHFangJC. Multidisciplinary practical guidelines for gastrointestinal access for enteral nutrition and decompression form the Society of Interventional Radiology and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute, with endorsement by Canadian International Radiological Association (CIRA) and Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). Gastroenterology. 2001;141:742–765.
15.
McClaveSA. Nutrition support in acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2007;36:65–74.
16.
Abou-AssiSCraigKO’KeefeSJ. Hypocaloric jejunal feeding is better than total parenteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis: results of a randomized comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2255–2262.
17.
EatockFCChongPMenezesN. A randomized study of early nasogastric vs. nasojejunal feeding in severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:432–439.
18.
MarikPE. What is the best way to feed patients with pancreatitis?Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15(2):131–138.
19.
McClaveSAMartindaleRGVanekVW. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33:277–316.
20.
MirtalloJMForbesAMcClaveSJensenGWaitzbergDDaviesA. International consensus guidelines for nutrition therapy in pancreatitis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012;36(3):284–291.
21.
SpanierBWMBrunoMJMathug-VliegenEMH. Enteral nutrition and acute pancreatitis: a review. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2011;2011:857949.
22.
PiciucchiMMerolaEMarignaniM. Nasogastric or nasointestinal feeding in acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(29):3692–3696.
23.
MarikPEZalogaGP. Gastric versus post-pyloric feeding: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2003;7:R46–R51.
24.
HeylandDKDroverJWMacDonaldSNovakFLamM. Effect of postpyloric feeding on gastroesophageal regurgitation and pulmonary microaspiration: results of a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1495–1501.
25.
HoKMDobbGJWebbSA. A comparison of early gastric and post-pyloric feeding in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:639–649.
26.
KynciJACodashHBTsangTK. PEG in a patient with ascites and varices. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:100–101.
27.
GassasAKenedyJGreenG. Risk of ventroculoperitoneal shunt infections due to gastrostomy feeding tube insertion in pediatric patients with brain tumors. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2006;42:95–99.
28.
SaneSSTowbinABergeyEA. Percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Pediatr Radiol. 1998;28:521–523.
29.
FangJC. Percutaneous access for enteral nutrition. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;9:176–182.
30.
ShaheenNJCrosbyMAGrimmISIsaacsK. The use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in pregnancy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;46:564–565.
31.
GodilAChenYK. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for nutrition support in pregnancy associated with hyperemesis gravidarum and anorexia nervosa. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1998;22:238–241.
32.
IrvingPMHowellRJShidrawiRG. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with a jejunal port for severe hyperemesis gravidarum. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16:937–939.
33.
SerranoPVellosoAGarcia-LunaPP. Enteral nutrition by percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy in severe hyperemesis gravidarum: a report of two cases. Clin Nutr. 1998;17:135–139.
34.
KarhadkarASNainiPDuttaSK. PEG-tube placement in a patient with extreme obesity: overcoming the technical challenges. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:731–733.
35.
BochicchioGVGuzzoJLScaleaTM. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the super-morbidly obese patient. JSLS. 2006;10:409–413.
36.
BrandtCMittendorfE. Endoscopic placement of naso-jejunal feeding tubes in ICU patients. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:1211–1214.
37.
SorokinRGottleibJE. Enhancing patient safety during feeding-tube insertion: a review of more than 2,000 insertions. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006;30(5):440–445.
38.
MardersteinELSimmonsRLOchoaJB. Patient safety: effect of institutional protocols on adverse events related to feeding tube placement in the critically ill. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199(1):39–50.
39.
MardersteinELSimmonsRLOchoaJB. Patient safety: effect of institutional protocols on adverse events related to feeding tube placement in the critically ill. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199(1):39–50.
40.
SorokinRGottliebJE. Enhancing patient safety during feeding-tube insertion: a review of more than 2,000 insertions. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006;30(5):1036–1039.
41.
De Aguilar-NascimentoJEKudskKA. Clinical costs of feeding tube placement. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007;31(4):269–273.
42.
American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). AACN Practice Alert–Verification of Feeding Tube Placement. Aliso Viejo, CA: AACN; 2005.
43.
RoubenoffRRavichWJ. Pneumothorax due to nasogastric feeding tubes: report of four cases, review of the literature, and recommendations for prevention. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(1):184–188.
44.
MardersteinELSimmonsRLOchoaJB. Patient safety: effect of institutional protocols on adverse events related to feeding tube placement in the critically ill. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199(1):39–50.
45.
RobertsSEcheverriaPGabrielSA. Devices and techniques for bedside enteral feeding tube placement. Nutr Clin Pract. 2007;22(4):412–420.
46.
Munera-SeeleyVOchoaJBBrownN. Use of a colorimetric carbon dioxide sensor for nasoenteric feeding tube placement in critical care patients compared with clinical methods and radiography. Nutr Clin Pract. 2008;23(3):318–321.
47.
GrayRTynanCReedL. Bedside electgromagnetic-guided feeding tube placement: an improvement over traditional placement technique?Nutr Clin Pract. 2007;22:436–444.
48.
KearnsPJDonnaC. A controlled comparison of traditional feeding tube verification methods to a bedside electromagnetic technique. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2001;25(4):210–215.
49.
LaaschHUWilbrahamLBullenK. Gastrostomy insertion: comparing the options—PEG, RIG or PIG?Clin Radiol. 2003;58:398–405.
50.
WollmanBD’AgostinoHB. Percutaneous radiologic and endoscopic gastrostomy: a 3-year institutional analysis of procedure performance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1551–1553.
51.
FroehlichFGoversJJVaderJPDuboisRWBurnandB. Appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy: risk of complications. Endoscopy. 1999;31:684–686.
52.
FangJC. Minimizing endoscopic complications in enteral access. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2007;17:179–196.
53.
SchragSPSharmaRJaikNP. Complications related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes: a comprehensive clinical review. Gastrointest Liver Dis. 2007;16(4):407–418.
54.
EisenGMBaronTHDominitzJA. Role of endoscopy in enteral feeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:794–797.
55.
LoserCWoltersSFolschUR. Enteral long-term nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 210 patients: a four-year prospective study. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43:2549–2557.
56.
DavisJBBowdenTARivesDA. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: do surgeons and gastroenterologists get the same results?Am Surg. 1990;56:47–51.
57.
KohliHBlochR. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a community hospital experience. Am Surg. 1995;61:191–194.
58.
SoJBAckroydFW. Experience of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy at Massachusetts General Hospital: indications and complications. Singapore Med J. 1998;39:560–563.
59.
FinucaneTEChristmasCTravisK. Tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia: a review of the evidence. JAMA. 1999;282:1365–1370.
60.
WollmanBD’AgostinoHBWalus-WigleJR. Radiologic, endoscopic and surgical gastrostomy: an institutional evaluation and metanalysis of the literature. Radiology. 1995;197:669–704.
61.
AbuksisGMorMSegalN. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: high morality rates in hospitalized patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:128–132.
62.
CaltonWCMartindaleRGGoodenSM. Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Mil Med. 1992;157:358–360.
63.
RabeneckLWrayNPetersenN. Long-term outcomes of patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:287–293.
64.
AmannWMischingerHJBergerA. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): 8 years of clinical experience in 232 patients. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:741–744.
65.
BaskinWN. Acute complications associated with bedside placement of feeding tubes. Nutr Clin Pract. 2006;21:40–55.
66.
GrantMDRudbergMABrodyJA. Gastrostomy placement and mortality among hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 1998;279(24):1973–1976.
67.
LockettMATempletonMLByrneTK. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy complications in a tertiary-care center. Am Surg. 2002;62:117–120.
68.
LynchCFangJ. Prevention and management of complications of PEG tubes. Pract Gastroenterol. November2004:66–76.
69.
FangJCBankheadRKinikiniM. Enteral access devices. In: GottschlichM, ed. The A.S.P.E.N. Nutrition Support Core Curriculum: A Case-Based Approach—The Adult Patient. Silver Spring, MD: A.S.P.E.N.; 2012.
70.
La NauzeRJCollinsKLyonS. Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus radiologically inserted gastrostomy tube insertion at a tertiary hospital. e-SPEN J. 2012;7(4):e144–e148.
71.
SafadiBMarksJPonskyJ. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 1998;8:551–568.
72.
LarsonDEBurtonDDSchroederKW. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, indications, success, complications and mortality in 314 consecutive patients. Gastroenterology. 1987;93:48–52.
73.
GrantJP. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: initial placement by single endoscopic technique and long-term follow up. Ann Surg. 1993;217:168–174.
EisenGMBaronTHDominitzJA. Guideline on the management of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:775–779.
76.
MalloyPCGrassiCJKunduS. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(7)(suppl):S240–S249.
77.
MamelJJ. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989;84:703–710.
RabeneckLWrayNPPetersonNJ. Long-term outcomes of patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:287–293.
80.
FoutchPGTalbertGAWaringJP. Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy: recognition, prevention, and treatment. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 1992;2:231–248.
81.
TowbinRBBallWSBissettGS. Percutaneous gastrostomy and percutaneous gastrojejunostomy in children: an integrated approach. Radiology. 1988;168:476–476.
82.
WojtowyczMArataJAMicklosTMillerJF. CT findings after uncomplicated percutaneous gastrostomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151:307–309.
83.
WiesenAJSideridisKFernandesA. True incidence and clinical significance of pneumoperitoneum after PEG placement: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:886–889.
84.
BlumCASelanderCRuddyJMLeonS. The incidence and clinical significance of pneumoperitoneum after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a review of 722 cases. Am Surg. 2009;75:39–43.
85.
DulabonGRAbramsJERutherfordEJ. The incidence and significance of free air after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Am Surg. 2002;68:590–593.
86.
SteinJSchulte-BockholtASabinMKeymlingM. A randomized prospective trial of immediate vs. next-day feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in intensive care patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1656–1660.
87.
BechtoldMLMattesonMLChoudharyA. Early versus delayed feeding after placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2919–2924.
88.
RimonE. The safety and feasibility of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement by a single physician. Endoscopy. 2001;33:241–244.
89.
SchapiroGDEdmundowiczSA. Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 1996;6:409–422.
90.
LumanWKwekKRLoiKLChiamMACheungWKNgHS. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications and outcome of our experience at the Singapore General Hospital. Singapore Med J. 2001;42:460–465.
HullMRawlingsJMurrayF. Audit of outcome of long-term enteral nutrition by percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy. Lancet. 1993;341:869–872.
93.
GossnerLKeymlingJHahnEEllC. Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): a prospective randomized clinical trial. Endoscopy. 1999;31:119–124.
94.
LeeJHKimJJKimYH. Increased risk of peristomal wound infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with diabetes mellitus. Dig Liver Dis. 2002;34:857–861.
LippALusardiG. A systematic review of prophylactic antimicrobials in PEG placement. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(7):938–948.
97.
CampoliPMOPeclat de PaulaAAAlvesLGTurchiMD. Effect of the introducer technique compared with the pull technique on peristomal infection rate in PEG: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75(5):988–996.
98.
MoonETamMDBSKikanoRNKaruppasamyK. Prophylactic antibiotic guidelines in modern interventional radiology practice. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2010;27(4):327–337.
99.
BanerjeeSShenBBaronT. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:791–798.
100.
JainNLarsonDSchroederK. Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:824–828.
101.
PreclickGGruneSLeserHG. Prospective, randomized, double blind trial of prophylaxis with single dose of co-amoxiclav before percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. BMJ. 1999;319:881–884.
102.
AhmadIMouncherAAbdoolahA. Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a prospective randomized double blind trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;18:209–215.
LinHIbrahimHKhengJFeeWTerrisD. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: strategies for prevention and management of complications. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:1847–1852.
108.
McClaveSAChangWK. Complications of enteral access. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:739–751.
109.
McClaveS. Managing complications of percutaneous and nasoenteric feeding tubes. Tech Gastrointerst Endosc. 2001;35:11.
110.
TsangTKEatonDFalconioMA. Percutaneous ostomy dilation: a technique for dilating the closed percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;41:335.
111.
WaltonGM. Complications of percutaneous gastrostomy in patients with head and neck cancer: an analysis of 42 consecutive patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999;81:272–276.
112.
VenuRPBrownRDPastikaBJ. The buried bumper syndrome: a simple management approach in two patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:582–584.
113.
DateRSDasNBatesonPG. Unusual complications of ballooned feeding tubes. Ir Med J. 2002;95:181–182.
114.
DwyerKMWattsDDThurberJS. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: the preferred method of elective feeding tube placement in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2002;52:26–32.
115.
SaltzbergDMAnandKJuvanPJoffeI. Colocutaneous fistula: an unusual complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987;11:86.
116.
LantzMLarssonHHArnjmornssonE. Literature review comparing laparoscopic and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies in a pediatric population. Int J Pediatr. 2010;2010:507616.
117.
BergerSAZarlingEJ. Colocutaneous fistula following migration of PEG tube. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:86–88.
118.
AdelsonRDucicY. Metastatic head and neck carcinoma to a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy site. Head Neck. 2005;27:339–343.
MincheffTV. Metastatic spread to a percutaneous gastrostomy site from head and neck cancer: case report and literature review. JSLS. 2005;9:466–471.
121.
KhuranaVSinghT. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy site metastasis in esophageal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:612.
122.
AlagaratnamTSmithB. Wound implantation: a surgical hazard. Br J Surg. 1993;64:872–875.
123.
CruzIMamelJJBradyPGCass-GarciaM. Incidence of abdominal wall metastasis complicating PEG tube placement in untreated head and neck cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:708–711.
124.
FosterJFilocamoPNavaH. The introducer technique is the optimal method for placing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in head and neck cancer patients. Surg Endosc. 2007;6:897–901.
125.
SilasAPearceLLestinaL. Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a comparison of indications, complications and outcomes in 370 patients. Eur J Radiol. 2005;56:84–90.
126.
DewaldCLHiettePOSewellLEFrendbergPGPalestrantAM. Percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy with gastropexy: experience in 701 procedures. Radiology. 1999;211(3):651–666.
127.
FanACBaronTHRumallaA. Comparison of direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy and PEG with jejunal extension. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:890–894.
128.
DiSarioJAFoutchPGSanowskiRA. Poor results with percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;36:257–260.
129.
DoedeTFaissSSchierF. Jejunal feeding tubes via gastrostomy in children. Endoscopy. 2002;34:539–542.
130.
DiSarioJ. Endoscopic approaches to enteral nutrition support. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20:605–630.
131.
UdorahMOFleischmanMWBalaV. Endoscopic clips prevent displacement of intestinal feeding tubes: a long-term follow-up study. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:371–374.
132.
MapleJPetersenBBaronTGostoutCWong Kee SongLMButtarN. Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy: outcomes in 307 consecutive attempts. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:2681–2688.
133.
ShikeMWallachCLikierH. Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomies. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;12(suppl):S38–S42.
SparrowPDavidEPugashR. Direct percutaneous jejunostomy: an underutilized interventional technique?Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008;31:336–341.
136.
CopeCDavisAGBaumRAHaskalZJSoulenMCShlansky-GolbergRD. Direct percutaneous jejunostomy: techniques and applications—ten years experience. Radiology. 1998;209:747–754.
137.
DeLeggeM. Small bowel endoscopic enteral access. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2007;17:663–686.
138.
ZielinskiMDCimaRR. Colojejunal fistula resulting from a DPEJ feeding tube. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2008;2:208–213.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
