This article presents an in-depth examination of recent advancements in medical and biotechnological sensing technologies, focusing on the forefront of innovation in hydrogel-based sensors within the domains of biomedical engineering and regenerative medicine. It delves into cutting-edge sensing technologies that facilitate non-invasive glucose monitoring, highlights progress in the development of intelligent solutions for wound care, and discusses the application of optical and fluorescence-based sensors for real-time diagnostics within the body. Further, it reviews the latest glucose monitoring devices, alongside wearable and implantable sensors designed for the continuous monitoring of health, including the measurement of physiological strain and stress. The exploration extends to the latest in non-invasive and minimally invasive technologies for ongoing health assessment, and to imaging and visualization techniques critical for medical diagnostics and therapeutic procedures. These advancements mark a pivotal move toward more efficient, precise, and patient-focused healthcare technologies, signaling new avenues for diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment in the healthcare sector.
OmidianHParkK.Hydrogels. Adv Del Sci Technol2012: 75–105.
2.
OmidianHChowdhurySD.Advancements and applications of injectable hydrogel composites in biomedical research and therapy. Gels2023; 9: 533.
3.
OmidianHMastropietroDKandalamU.Swelling, strength, and biocompatibility of acrylate-based superporous hydrogel hybrids. J Bioact Compat Pol2014; 29: 66–80.
4.
OmidianHParkK.Engineered high swelling hydrogels. In: Ottenbrite R, Park K and Okano T (eds) Biomedical applications of hydrogels handbook. New York, NY: Springer, 2010, pp. 351–374. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5919-5_19.
5.
OmidianHRoccaJGParkK.Elastic, superporous hydrogel hybrids of polyacrylamide and sodium alginate. Macromol Biosci2006; 6: 703–710.
6.
ShokrollahiPOmidiYCubedduLX, et al. Conductive polymers for cardiac tissue engineering and regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater2023; 111: 1979–1995.
7.
BuzzaccheraIVorobiiMKostinaNY, et al. Polymer brush-functionalized chitosan hydrogels as antifouling implant coatings. Biomacromolecules2017; 18: 1983–1992.
8.
NortonLWTegnellEToporekSS, et al. In vitro characterization of vascular endothelial growth factor and dexamethasone releasing hydrogels for implantable probe coatings. Biomaterials2005; 26: 3285–3297.
9.
FanLHeZPengX, et al. Injectable, intrinsically antibacterial conductive hydrogels with self-healing and ph stimulus responsiveness for epidermal sensors and wound healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2021; 13: 53541–53552.
10.
RavichandranRMartinezJGJagerEWH, et al. Type I collagen-derived injectable conductive hydrogel scaffolds as glucose sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2018; 10: 16244–16249.
11.
LiXHeLLiY, et al. Healable, degradable, and conductive MXene nanocomposite hydrogel for multifunctional epidermal sensors. ACS Nano2021; 15: 7765–7773.
12.
WangYVaddirajuSQiangL, et al. Effect of dexamethasone-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microsphere/poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel composite coatings on the basic characteristics of implantable glucose sensors. J Diabetes Sci Technol2012; 6: 1445–1453.
13.
TipnisNKastelloriziosMLegasseyA, et al. Sterilization of drug-loaded composite coatings for implantable glucose biosensors. J Diabetes Sci Technol2021; 15: 646–654.
14.
GamboaJPaulo-MirasolSEstranyF, et al. Recent progress in biomedical sensors based on conducting polymer hydrogels. ACS Appl Bio Mater2023; 6: 1720–1741.
15.
HuZLiJWeiX, et al. Enhancing strain-sensing properties of the conductive hydrogel by introducing PVDF-TrFE. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2022; 14: 45853–45868.
16.
WeiXLiJHuZ, et al. Carbon quantum dot/chitosan-derived hydrogels with photo-stress-pH multiresponsiveness for wearable sensors. Macromol Rapid Commun2023; 44: 2200928.
17.
MaoJZhaoCLiuL, et al. Adhesive, transparent, stretchable, and strain-sensitive hydrogel as flexible strain sensor. Compos Commun2021; 25: 100733.
18.
ZhaXJZhangSTPuJH, et al. Nanofibrillar poly(vinyl alcohol) ionic organohydrogels for smart contact lens and human-interactive sensing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2020; 12: 23514–23522.
19.
ChunSKimSKimJ.Human arm workout classification by arm sleeve device based on machine learning algorithms. Sensors2023; 23: 3106.
20.
ShaoLLiYMaZ, et al. Highly sensitive strain sensor based on a stretchable and conductive poly(vinyl alcohol)/phytic acid/NH(2)-POSS hydrogel with a 3D microporous structure. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2020; 12: 26496–26508.
21.
ZhangHRenPYangF, et al. Biomimetic epidermal sensors assembled from polydopamine-modified reduced graphene oxide/polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels for the real-time monitoring of human motions. J Mater Chem B2020; 8: 10549–10558.
22.
ZhangQYangGXueL, et al. Ultrasoft and biocompatible magnetic-hydrogel-based strain sensors for wireless passive biomechanical monitoring. ACS Nano2022; 16: 21555–21564.
23.
OhBLimYSKoKW, et al. Ultra-soft and highly stretchable tissue-adhesive hydrogel based multifunctional implantable sensor for monitoring of overactive bladder. Biosens Bioelectron2023; 225: 115060.
24.
LiangQXiaXSunX, et al. Highly stretchable hydrogels as wearable and implantable sensors for recording physiological and brain neural signals. Adv Sci2022; 9: e2201059.
25.
TharmattAMalhotraDSharmaH, et al. Pharmaceutical perspective in wearable drug delivery systems. Assay Drug Dev Technol2021; 19: 386–401.
26.
ZhangWQHuangLLWeinrebRN, et al. Wearable electronic devices for glaucoma monitoring and therapy. Mater Des2021; 212: 17.
27.
MengLTurnerAPFMakWC.Soft and flexible material-based affinity sensors. Biotechnol Adv2020; 39: 107398.
28.
GuoJJLuoYQYangCX, et al. In situ surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensing with soft and flexible polymer optical fiber probes. Opt Lett2018; 43: 5443–5446.
29.
WangYZhaoQDuX.Structurally coloured contact lens sensor for point-of-care ophthalmic health monitoring. J Mater Chem B2020; 8: 3519–3526.
30.
KimSKLeeGHJeonC, et al. Bimetallic nanocatalysts immobilized in nanoporous hydrogels for long-term robust continuous glucose monitoring of smart contact lens. Adv Mater2022; 34: e2110536.
31.
YangXPanXBlythJ, et al. Towards the real-time monitoring of glucose in tear fluid: holographic glucose sensors with reduced interference from lactate and pH. Biosens Bioelectron2008; 23: 899–905.
32.
GolsanamlouZMahmoudpourMSoleymaniJ, et al. Applications of advanced materials for non-enzymatic glucose monitoring: from invasive to the wearable device. Crit Rev Anal Chem2023; 53: 1116–1131.
33.
GuBPapadimitrakopoulosFBurgessDJ.PLGA microsphere/PVA hydrogel coatings suppress the foreign body reaction for 6 months. J Control Release2018; 289: 35–43.
34.
OmidianHChowdhurySD.High-performing conductive hydrogels for wearable applications. Gels2023; 9: 549.
35.
ForsterTStrohhoferCBockK, et al. Biosensor for calcium based on a hydrogel optical waveguide with integrated sensor proteins. In: TRANSDUCERS 2009–2009 international solid-state sensors, actuators and microsystems conference 2009/06// 2009, Denver, CO, pp. 1218–1221. IEEE.
36.
YangWXueHCarrLR, et al. Zwitterionic poly(carboxybetaine) hydrogels for glucose biosensors in complex media. Biosens Bioelectron2011; 26: 2454–2459.
37.
ZabowGDoddSJKoretskyAP.Shape-changing magnetic assemblies as high-sensitivity NMR-readable nanoprobes. Nature2015; 520: 73–77.
38.
HagenederSJungbluthVSoldoR, et al. Responsive hydrogel binding matrix for dual signal amplification in fluorescence affinity biosensors and peptide microarrays. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2021; 13: 27645–27655.
39.
NingYLuFLiuY, et al. Glow-type chemiluminescent hydrogels for point-of-care testing (POCT) of cholesterol. Analyst2021; 146: 4775–4780.
KimHJChoiWSan LeeJ, et al. Clinical application of serological Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis using a highly sensitive biosensor with hydrogel-enhanced dielectrophoretic force. Biosens Bioelectron2022; 195: 113668.
42.
LiJJiCLuB, et al. Dually crosslinked supramolecular hydrogel for cancer biomarker sensing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2020; 12: 36873–36881.
43.
PilotoAMLRibeiroDSMRodriguesSSM, et al. Cellulose-based hydrogel on quantum dots with molecularly imprinted polymers for the detection of CA19-9 protein cancer biomarker. Mikrochim Acta2022; 189: 134.
44.
TaubenbergerAVGirardoSTraberN, et al. 3D microenvironment stiffness regulates tumor spheroid growth and mechanics via p21 and ROCK. Adv Biosyst2019; 3: e1900128.
45.
HannahSDobreaALasserreP, et al. Development of a rapid, antimicrobial susceptibility test for E. coli based on low-cost, screen-printed electrodes. Biosensors2020; 10: 153.
46.
MurtazaGRizviASXueM, et al. Consensus receptor-binding domain-targeted aptamer selection and designing of a photonic crystal-decorated aptasensor for SARS-CoV-2. Anal Chem2022; 94: 7391–7399.
47.
ZhengFChenZLiJ, et al. A highly sensitive CRISPR-empowered surface plasmon resonance sensor for diagnosis of inherited diseases with femtomolar-level real-time quantification. Adv Sci2022; 9: e2105231.
48.
RaberHFKubiczekDHBodenbergerN, et al. FluCell-SELEX aptamers as specific binding molecules for diagnostics of the health relevant gut bacteriumAkkermansia muciniphila. Int J Mol Sci2021; 22: 10425.
49.
RizviASMurtazaGZhangW, et al. Aptamer-linked photonic crystal hydrogel sensor for rapid point-of-care detection of human immuno-deficiency virus-1 (HIV-1). J Pharm Biomed Anal2023; 227: 115104.
50.
HuBKangXXuS, et al. Multiplex chroma response wearable hydrogel patch: visual monitoring of urea in body fluids for health prognosis. Anal Chem2023; 95: 3587–3595.
51.
BarhoumASadakORamirezIA, et al. Stimuli-bioresponsive hydrogels as new generation materials for implantable, wearable, and disposable biosensors for medical diagnostics: principles, opportunities, and challenges. Adv Colloid Interface Sci2023; 317: 22.
52.
IversonNMBiskerGFariasE, et al. Quantitative tissue spectroscopy of near infrared fluorescent nanosensor implants. J Biomed Nanotechnol2016; 12: 1035–1047.
53.
RajamanthrilageACLevonEUzairU, et al. High spatial resolution chemical imaging of implant-associated infections with x-ray excited luminescence chemical imaging through tissue. J Vis Exp2022; 187: e64252.
54.
AlhudaithySHoshinoK.Biocompatible micro tweezers for 3D hydrogel organoid array mechanical characterization. PLoS One2022; 17: e0262950.
55.
LiuYWangCXueJ, et al. Body temperature enhanced adhesive, antibacterial, and recyclable ionic hydrogel for epidermal electrophysiological monitoring. Adv Healthc Mater2022; 11: e2200653.
56.
Mi KyungKHyojungKJungYS, et al. Implantable bladder volume sensor based on resistor ladder network composed of conductive hydrogel composite. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc2017; 2017: 1732–1735.
57.
WangXWangZWangX, et al. Preparation of silver nanoparticles by solid-state redox route from hydroxyethyl cellulose for antibacterial strain sensor hydrogel. Carbohydr Polym2021; 257: 117665.
58.
BlyakhmanFASokolovSYSafronovAP, et al. Ferrogels ultrasonography for biomedical applications. Sensors2019; 19: 3959.
59.
EskilsonOZattarinEBerglundL, et al. Nanocellulose composite wound dressings for real-time pH wound monitoring. Mater Today Bio2023; 19: 100574.
60.
WeiSYinRTangT, et al. Gas-permeable, irritation-free, transparent hydrogel contact lens devices with metal-coated nanofiber mesh for eye interfacing. ACS Nano2019; 13: 7920–7929.
61.
FarhoudiNLaurentiusLBMagdaJJ, et al. In vivo monitoring of glucose using ultrasound-induced resonance in implantable smart hydrogel microstructures. ACS Sens2021; 6: 3587–3595.
62.
BallerstadtRKholodnykhAEvansC, et al. Affinity-based turbidity sensor for glucose monitoring by optical coherence tomography: toward the development of an implantable sensor. Anal Chem2007; 79: 6965–6974.
63.
DomschkeAM.Continuous non-invasive ophthalmic glucose sensor for diabetics. Chimia2010; 64: 43–44.
64.
SawayamaJTakeuchiS.Long-term continuous glucose monitoring using a fluorescence-based biocompatible hydrogel glucose sensor. Adv Healthc Mater2021; 10: e2001286.
65.
SchifferDTeglGHeinzleA, et al. Enzyme-responsive polymers for microbial infection detection. Expert Rev Mol Diagn2015; 15: 1125–1131.
66.
ArifuzzamanMMillhousePWRavalY, et al. An implanted pH sensor read using radiography. Analyst2019; 144: 2984–2993.
67.
SunJWuXXiaoJ, et al. Hydrogel-integrated multimodal response as a wearable and implantable bidirectional interface for biosensor and therapeutic electrostimulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2023; 15: 5897–5909.
68.
WardaniNIKangkamanoTWannapobR, et al. Electrochemical sensor based on molecularly imprinted polymer cryogel and multiwalled carbon nanotubes for direct insulin detection. Talanta2023; 254: 124137.
69.
VezouviouELoweCR.A near infrared holographic glucose sensor. Biosens Bioelectron2015; 68: 371–381.
70.
LiLLWangYQPanLJ, et al. A nanostructured conductive hydrogels-based biosensor platform for human metabolite detection. Nano Lett2015; 15: 1146–1151.
71.
XiangCLiRAdhikariB, et al. Sensitive electrochemical detection of Salmonella with chitosan-gold nanoparticles composite film. Talanta2015; 140: 122–127.
72.
MingotJBenejamNVilloraG, et al. Multimodal biomedical implant with plasmonic and simulated body temperature responses. Macromol Biosci2023; 23: e2300118.
73.
GalliRSitoci-FiciciKHUckermannO, et al. Label-free multiphoton microscopy reveals relevant tissue changes induced by alginate hydrogel implantation in rat spinal cord injury. Sci Rep2018; 8: 10841.
74.
OmlorGWFischerJKleinschmittK, et al. Short-term follow-up of disc cell therapy in a porcine nucleotomy model with an albumin-hyaluronan hydrogel: in vivo and in vitro results of metabolic disc cell activity and implant distribution. Eur Spine J2014; 23: 1837–1847.
75.
ZhengXCookJPWatkinsonM, et al. Generic protease detection technology for monitoring periodontal disease. Faraday Discuss2011; 149: 37-47; Discussion 63–77.
76.
FanDFangQ.Siderophores for medical applications: imaging, sensors, and therapeutics. Int J Pharm2021; 597: 120306.
77.
NahhasAFWebsterTJ.The promising use of nano-molecular imprinted templates for improved SARS-CoV-2 detection, drug delivery and research. J Nanobiotechnology2021; 19: 305.
78.
SchneiderKPGewesslerUFlockT, et al. Signal enhancement in polysaccharide based sensors for infections by incorporation of chemically modified laccase. N Biotechnol2012; 29: 502–509.
79.
WangYLiWLinB, et al. NIR-II imaging-guided photothermal cancer therapy combined with enhanced immunogenic death. Biomater Sci2023; 11: 5177–5185.
80.
LeightJLTokudaEYJonesCE, et al. Multifunctional bioscaffolds for 3D culture of melanoma cells reveal increased MMP activity and migration with BRAF kinase inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2015; 112: 5366–5371.
81.
FarhoudiNLeuHYLaurentiusLB, et al. Smart hydrogel micromechanical resonators with ultrasound readout for biomedical sensing. ACS Sens2020; 5: 1882–1889.
82.
ZhuHYangHZhanL, et al. Hydrogel-based smart contact lens for highly sensitive wireless intraocular pressure monitoring. ACS Sens2022; 7: 3014–3022.
83.
XuXChenRLiY, et al. A surface-confined gradient conductive network strategy for transparent strain sensors toward full-range monitoring. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2021; 13: 43806–43819.
84.
MarinPBorgesJGueyePB, et al. Wireless stress sensor based on magnetoelastic microwires for biomedical applications: detection of collagen concentration. In: IEEE MTT-S international microwave biomedical conference (IMBioC) Electr Network, Toulouse, France, 14–17December2020, pp. 1–4. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/IMBIoC47321.2020.9384907.
HellerAFeldmanB.Electrochemistry in diabetes management. Acc Chem Res2010; 43: 963–973.
87.
LeeIProbstDKlonoffD, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring systems—current status and future perspectives of the flagship technologies in biosensor research. Biosens Bioelectron2021; 181: 113054.
88.
LiuJFangXZhangZ, et al. Long-term in vivo glucose monitoring by polymer-dot transducer in an injectable hydrogel implant. Anal Chem2022; 94: 2195–2203.
89.
ZhangJZhengYLeeJ, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring enabled by fluorescent nanodiamond boronic hydrogel. Adv Sci2023; 10: e2203943.
90.
SiYXuLWangN, et al. Target microRNA-responsive dna hydrogel-based surface-enhanced raman scattering sensor arrays for microRNA-marked cancer screening. Anal Chem2020; 92: 2649–2655.
91.
ZhouXHuangSZhangD, et al. Gold nanocluster-based fluorescent microneedle platform toward visual detection of ATP. Anal Chem2023; 95: 12104–12112.
92.
WeaverEUddinSColeDK, et al. The present and future role of microfluidics for protein and peptide-based therapeutics and diagnostics. Appl Sci-Basel2021; 11: 16.
93.
LimJKangBSonHY, et al. Microfluidic device for one-step detection of breast cancer-derived exosomal mRNA in blood using signal-amplifiable 3D nanostructure. Biosens Bioelectron2022; 197: 113753.
94.
LimJKimSOhSJ, et al. miRNA sensing hydrogels capable of self-signal amplification for early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Biosens Bioelectron2022; 209: 114279.
95.
XueTLiangWLiY, et al. Ultrasensitive detection of miRNA with an antimonene-based surface plasmon resonance sensor. Nat Commun2019; 10: 28.
96.
ChenZLiJLiT, et al. A CRISPR/Cas12a-empowered surface plasmon resonance platform for rapid and specific diagnosis of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. Natl Sci Rev2022; 9: nwac104.
97.
ChenZWuCYuanY, et al. CRISPR-Cas13a-powered electrochemical biosensor for the detection of the L452R mutation in clinical samples of SARS-CoV-2 variants. J Nanobiotechnology2023; 21: 141.
98.
WuCChenZLiC, et al. CRISPR-Cas12a-empowered electrochemical biosensor for rapid and ultrasensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 delta variant. Nanomicro Lett2022; 14: 159.
99.
KimHWKimTYParkHK, et al. Hygroscopic auxetic on-skin sensors for easy-to-handle repeated daily use. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2018; 10: 40141–40148.
100.
NisslerRBaderODohmenM, et al. Remote near infrared identification of pathogens with multiplexed nanosensors. Nat Commun2020; 11: 5995.
101.
KluehUQiaoYCzajkowskiC, et al. Basement membrane-based glucose sensor coatings enhance continuous glucose monitoring in vivo. J Diabetes Sci Technol2015; 9: 957–965.
102.
GuoJYangCDaiQ, et al. Soft and stretchable polymeric optical waveguide-based sensors for wearable and biomedical applications. Sensors2019; 19: 3771.
103.
HuangJWangLXiongC, et al. Elastic hydrogel as a sensor for detection of mechanical stress generated by single cells grown in three-dimensional environment. Biomaterials2016; 98: 103–112.
104.
LeeWKalashnikovNMokS, et al. Dispersible hydrogel force sensors reveal patterns of solid mechanical stress in multicellular spheroid cultures. Nat Commun2019; 10: 144.
105.
ZhaoYCaoLLiL, et al. Conducting polymers and their applications in diabetes management. Sensors2016; 16: 1787.
106.
ZeponKMMartinsMMMarquesMS, et al. Smart wound dressing based on kappa-carrageenan/locust bean gum/cranberry extract for monitoring bacterial infections. Carbohydr Polym2019; 206: 362–370.
107.
Kleffner-CanucciKLuuPNalewayJ, et al. A novel hydrogel electrolyte extender for rapid application of EEG sensors and extended recordings. J Neurosci Methods2012; 206: 83–87.
108.
DauttaMAlshetaiwiMEscobarJ, et al. Passive and wireless, implantable glucose sensing with phenylboronic acid hydrogel-interlayer RF resonators. Biosens Bioelectron2020; 151: 112004.
109.
HeoYJShibataHOkitsuT, et al. Long-term in vivo glucose monitoring using fluorescent hydrogel fibers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2011; 108: 13399–13403.
110.
XieXZhangWAbbaspourradA, et al. Microfluidic fabrication of colloidal nanomaterials-encapsulated microcapsules for biomolecular sensing. Nano Lett2017; 17: 2015–2020.
111.
DasRBejSMurmuNC, et al. Selective recognition of ammonia and aliphatic amines by C-N fused phenazine derivative: a hydrogel based smartphone assisted ‘opto-electronic nose’ for food spoilage evaluation with potent anti-counterfeiting activity and a potential prostate cancer biomarker sensor. Anal Chim Acta2022; 1202: 339597.
112.
NguyenKTKimHYParkJO, et al. Tripolar electrode electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for endoscopic devices toward early colorectal tumor detection. ACS Sens2022; 7: 632–640.
113.
UzairUJohnsonCBeladi-BehbahaniS, et al. Conformal coating of orthopedic plates with x-ray scintillators and pH indicators for x-ray excited luminescence chemical imaging through tissue. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2020; 12: 52343–52353.
114.
MiloSThetNTLiuD, et al. An in-situ infection detection sensor coating for urinary catheters. Biosens Bioelectron2016; 81: 166–172.
115.
KenneyRMBoyceMWWhitmanNA, et al. A pH-sensing optode for mapping spatiotemporal gradients in 3D paper-based cell cultures. Anal Chem2018; 90: 2376–2383.
116.
ChuangHTaylorEDavisonTW.Clinical evaluation of a continuous minimally invasive glucose flux sensor placed over ultrasonically permeated skin. Diabetes Technol Ther2004; 6: 21–30.
117.
OmidianHParkK.Introduction to hydrogels. In: Ottenbrite R, Park K and Okano T (eds) Biomedical applications of hydrogels handbook. New York, NY: Springer, 2010, pp. 1–16. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5919-5_1.
118.
HoremanTBuiterECPouranB, et al. In-vitro detection of small isolated cartilage defects: intravascular ultrasound vs. optical coherence tomography. Ann Biomed Eng2018; 46: 1745–1755.
119.
WeitschiesWMullerLGrimmM, et al. Ingestible devices for studying the gastrointestinal physiology and their application in oral biopharmaceutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2021; 176: 113853.
