Histological Behavior of HDPE Scaffolds Fabricated by the “Press-and-Baking” Method

Abstract

High density polyethylene (HDPE) scaffolds were fabricated by a new “Press-and-Baking” method without using solvents. This method involved mixing HDPE and salt particles, then pressing and baking to produce porous scaffolds after the salt was leached out. The HDPE scaffolds from 80wt% salt had strength and flexibility comparable to commercial Medpor HDPE implants. The HDPE scaffolds provided larger and more pores than Medpor. The HDPE scaffolds were oxidized by ozone to investigate the effect of increased hydrophilicity on tissue healing.

The HDPE scaffolds fabricated were implanted subcutaneously into rats for 28 days to evaluate the biocompatibility compared with Medpor. The HDPE scaffolds exhibited suitable tolerance with surrounding tissue. Although the tissue ingrowth in the HDPE scaffolds infiltrated the pores slower, denser tissue formation was organized in the scaffolds, while Medpor allowed tissue to infiltrate more readily into the interconnective pores. These results indicate that the difference in porous structural morphology affects tissue ingrowth. In contrast, the increased hydrophilicity by ozone oxidation had little effect on tissue ingrowth.

Keywords

High-density polyethylene porous scaffold “Press-and-Baking” method ebiocompatibility biocompatibility fibrovascularization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ASTM F 1027 . (1994). Standard Practice for Assessment of Tissue and Cell Compatibility of Orofacial Prosthetic Materials and Devices, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 13:1, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA .

ASTM F 981 . (1994). Standard Practice for Assessment of Biocompatibility of Biomaterials for Surgical Implants with Respect to Effect of Materials on Muscle and Bone, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 13:1, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA .

Bikhazi, H.B. and van Antwerp, R. (1990). The Use of Medpor in Cosmetic and Reconstructive Surgery: Experimental and Clinical Evidence, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Head and Neck, Stucker, F. (ed.), p. 271, Mosby, St. Louis, USA .

Wellisz, T. (1998). Reconstruction of the Burned External Ear Using a Medpor Porous Polyethylene Pivoting Helix Framework , Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 91: 811 .

Wellisz, T. , Dougherty, W. and Gross, J. (1992). Craniofacial Applications for the Medpor Porous Polyethylene Flexblock Implant , J. Craniofac. Surg., 3: 101 .

Karesh, J.W. and Dresner, S.C. (1994). High-Density Porous Polyethylene (Medpor) as a Successful Anophthalmic Socket Implant , Ophthalmology, 101: 1688 .

Berghaus, A. (1985). Porous Polyethylene in Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery , Arch. Otolaryngol., 111: 154 .

Spector, M. , Flemming, W.R. and Sauer, B.W. (1975). Early Tissue Infiltrate in Porous Polyethylene Implants in Bone: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study , J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 9: 537 .

Spector, M. , Flemming, W.R. and Kreutner, A. (1976). Bone Growth into Porous High-Density Polyethylene , J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 7: 595 .

10.

Shanbhag, A. , Friedman, H.I. , Augustine, J. and von Recum, A.F. (1990). Evaluation of Porous Polyethylene for External Ear Reconstruction , Ann. Plast. Surg., 24: 32 .

11.

Lee, S.H. , Kim, B.S. , Kim, S.H. , Kang, S.W. and Kim, Y.H. (2004). Thermally Produced Biodegradable Scaffolds for Cartilage Tissue Engineering , Macromol. Biosci., 4: 802 .

12.

Goldman, M. , Gronsky, R. and Pruitt, L. (1998). The Influence of Sterilization Technique and Aging on the Structure and Morphology of Medical-Grade Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene , J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. in Med., 9: 207 .

13.

Ko, Y.G. , Kim, Y.H. , Park, K.D. , Lee, H.J. , Lee, W.K. , Park, H.D. , Kim, S.H. , Lee, G.S. and Ahn, D.J. (2001). Immobilization of PEG onto Polymer Surfaces by Ozone Oxidation , Biomaterials, 22: 2115 .

14.

Rubin, P.A.D. , Popham, J.K. and Bilyk, J.R. (1994). Comparison of Fibrovascular Ingrowth into Hydroxyapatite and Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implants , Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 10: 96 .

15.

Bigham, W.J. , Stanley, P. and Cahill, J.M. (1999). Fibrovascular Ingrowth in Porous Ocular Implants: The Effect of Material Composition, Porosity, Growth Factors, and Coatings , Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 15: 317 .

16.

Choi, J.C. , Fleming, J.C. and Aitken, P.A. (1999). Porous Polyethylene Channel Implants: A Modified Porous Polyethylene Sheet Designed for Repairs of Large and Complex Orbital Wall Fractures , Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 15: 56 .

17.

Hsu, W.C. , Green, J.P. and Spilker, M.H. (2000). Primary Placement of a Titanium Motility Post in a Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implant , Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 16, 370 .

18.

Jordan, D.R. , Brownstein, S. , Dorey, M. , Ho Yuen, V. and Gilberg, S. (2004). Fibrovascularization of Porous Polyethylene (Medpor) Orbital Implant in a Rabbit Model , Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 20: 136 .

19.

Khang, G. , Jeon, J.H. , Lee, J.W. , Cho, S.C. and Lee, H.B. (1997). Cell and Platelet Adhesions on Plasma Glow Discharge-Treated Poly(Lactide-Co-Glycolide) , Biomed. Mater. Eng., 7: 357 .