Physician Insurers Association of America : Data SharingSystem. Pennington, NJ, 1994.
2.
Palinkos v Bennett, 620 NE2d 775 (Mass 1993).
3.
Weintraub MI : Medical-Legal Issues Facing Neurologists. American Academy of Neurology Annual Course No. 421, May 1, 1993.
4.
Weintraub MI : Medical-Legal Issues Facing Neurologists. American Academy of Neurology Annual Course No. 142, May 1, 1994.
5.
Committee on Medical Liability: Guidelines for expert witness testimony. Pediatrics1989;83:312-313.
6.
Harvard Medical Malpractice Study. Patients, Doctors and Lawyers: Medical Injury, Malpractice Litigation and Patient Compensation in New York: The Report of the Harvard Medical Practice Study to the State of New York. Cambridge, MA, Harvard Medical Practice Study, 1990.
7.
Danzon PM: Medical Malpractice: Theory, Evidence and Public Policy. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1985.
8.
Dolan v Galluzo, 396 NE2d 13 (III 1979).
9.
Graham υ Wyeth Laboratories, 906 F2d 1399 (10th Cir 1990).
10.
Safran A., Skydell B., Ropper S.: Expert witness testimony in neurology: Massachusetts 1980-1990. Neurol Chron1992;2:1-6.
11.
Qualifications and Guidelines for the Physician Expert Witness. American Academy of Neurology, Minneapolis, MN, 1989.
12.
Federal Rules of Evidence §§ 702-705, Pub L No. 93-595, 88 Stat 1926, 1975.
13.
Testimony and ProfessionalLiability Cases. American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Park Ridge, IL, May 1987.
14.
Medical Testimony. Chicago, American Medical Association, 1989.
15.
McCarthy MC: "Helpful" or "reasonably reliable"? Analyzing the expert witness methodology under Federal Rules of Evidence 702 and 703. Cornell Law Rev1992;77:350-392.
16.
Weinstein JB : Improving expert testimony. Univ Richmond Law Rev1986;20:473-494.
17.
Black B.: A unified theory of scientific evidence. Fordham Law Rev1988;56:595-630.
18.
Rose JR: A state moves against doctors who alter records. Med Econ1994; 71:9.
19.
Shields WD: Peer review of expert medical-legal testimony: A proposal for child neurology . J Child Neurol1992;7:237-239.
20.
Short GF: The Paladin problem. J Child Neurol1994;9:213-215.
21.
McAbee GN: Peer review of medical expert witnesses. J Child Neurol1994;9:216-217.
22.
Beresford HR : Containing partisan medical experts. J Child Neurol1995;10:170-173.
23.
Appalachian Regional Health Care v Johnson, 862 SW2d 868 (Ky Super Ct 276, 1993).
24.
Benson v IHC Hospitals, Inc, 866 P2d 537 (Utah Super Ct, December 30, 1993).
25.
Expert witness sued for giving his opinions during peer review . Am Med News May 1, 1992, p 3.
26.
Holoweiko M. : What competition can do to peer review. Med Econ1985;62:122-139.
27.
Dolan LC: Antitrust law v peer review. N Engl J Med1985;313: 1156-1157.
28.
Curran WJ: Medical peer review of physicians' competence and performance: Legal immunity and the antitrust laws. N Engl J Med1987;316:597-598.
29.
US House of Representatives: Congressional Record. October 17, 1986, H11590.
30.
Weinstein JB : The effect of Daubert on the work of federal trial judges. Shepard's Expert Sci Evidence1994;2:1-9.
31.
Rovit RL, Hauber C.: The expert witness: Some observations and a response from neurosurgeons . Am Coll Surg Bull1989;74:10-16.
32.
Lavin JH: Everyone believed the plaintiff except his doctor. Med Econ1991; 68:34-41.
33.
The dancing invalid. Prime Time Live WABC , December, 1991.
34.
Villalobas υ Our Lady of Resurrection Medical Center et al, Cook County, III 89L-9149.
35.
Taragon MI, Willett LR, Wilczek AP, et al: The influence of standard of care and severity of injury on the resolution of medical malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med1992;117:780-784.