This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a triage-based blunt trauma assessment (best practice advisory) on Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN)-guided recommendations and actual head computed tomography (CT) use in children <18 years old presenting with head injury. We examined agreement between best practice advisory recommendations, PECARN risk categories, and head CT use, as well as risk factors associated with deviation from PECARN guidance. Group comparisons were analyzed by Mann-Whitney rank-sum test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Fisher exact test, or χ2 test, as indicated. Best practice advisory and PECARN agreement was 47%. The best practice advisory aligned with CT use in 39% of cases, whereas PECARN aligned 73%. In children <2 years, 42% received a head CT despite a PECARN recommendation against it (P < .001). In children ≥2 years, 38% received a head CT against PECARN recommendations (P < .001). Overall agreement among best practice advisory, PECARN, and head CT use was 35%. Symptoms such as speech changes, lethargy, altered mood, and gait abnormalities were associated with deviations from PECARN. Findings suggest that although PECARN guides imaging decisions, numerous clinical factors and best practice advisory recommendations influence provider behavior, highlighting opportunities to improve decision support and reduce unnecessary CT scans.
LiIGYangYHLiYTTsaiYH. Paediatric computed tomography and subsequent risk of leukaemia, intracranial malignancy and lymphoma: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):7759. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64805-8
2.
HennellyKEMannixRNigrovicLE, et al.Pediatric traumatic brain injury and radiation risks: a clinical decision analysis. J Pediatr. 2013;162(2):392–397. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.07.018
3.
KuppermannNHolmesJFDayanPS, et al.Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2009;374(9696):1160–1170. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61558-0
4.
HommeJ(Jim) L. Pediatric minor head injury 2.0. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2018;36(2):287–304. doi:10.1016/j.emc.2017.12.015
5.
DayanPSBallardDWThamE, et al.Use of traumatic brain injury prediction rules with clinical decision support. Pediatrics. 2017;139(4):e20162709. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2709
6.
HolmesJFBorgialliDANadelFM, et al.Do children with blunt head trauma and normal cranial computed tomography scan results require hospitalization for neurologic observation?Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58(4):315–322. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.060
7.
DayanPSHolmesJFSchutzmanS, et al.Risk of traumatic brain injuries in children younger than 24 months with isolated scalp hematomas. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(2):153–162. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.02.003
8.
PennellCWilsonTBruceM, et al.Adherence to PECARN criteria in children transferred to a pediatric trauma center: an opportunity for improvement?Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(7):1546.e1–1546.e4. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.042
9.
MannixRMeehanWPMonuteauxMCBachurRG. Computed tomography for minor head injury: variation and trends in major United States pediatric emergency departments. J Pediatr. 2012;160(1):136–139.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.06.024
10.
KuppermannNHolmesJFDayanPS. Head injury decision rules in children. Lancet. 2017;390(10101):1487–1488. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32153-0
11.
BablFEBorlandMLPhillipsN, et al.Accuracy of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE head injury decision rules in children: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2017;389(10087):2393–2402. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30555-X
12.
BozanÖAkselGKahramanHAGiritliÖEroğluSE. Comparison of PECARN and CATCH clinical decision rules in children with minor blunt head trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019;45(5):849–855. doi:10.1007/s00068-017-0865-8
13.
EasterJSBakesKDhaliwalJMillerMCarusoEHaukoosJS. Comparison of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE rules for children with minor head injury: a prospective cohort study. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(2):145–152.e5. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.030
14.
McGrawMWayT. Comparison of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE clinical decision rules for pediatric head injury in the emergency department. CJEM. 2019;21(1):120–124. doi:10.1017/cem.2018.444
15.
Meral AtişGAltayTAtişŞE. Comparison of CATCH, PECARN, and CHALICE clinical decision rules in pediatric patients with mild head trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(4):3123–3130. doi:10.1007/s00068-021-01859-x
16.
SchonfeldDBressanSDa DaltLHenienMNWinnettJANigrovicLE. Republished: pediatric emergency care applied research network head injury clinical prediction rules are reliable in practice. Postgrad Med J. 2015;91(1081):634–638. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-305004rep
17.
Duarte-DoradoDMMadero-OrosteguiDSRodriguez-MartinezCENinoG. Validation of a scale to assess the severity of bronchiolitis in a population of hospitalized infants. J Asthma. 2013;50(10):1056–1061. doi:10.3109/02770903.2013.834504
18.
SheehanBNigrovicLEDayanPS, et al.Informing the design of clinical decision support services for evaluation of children with minor blunt head trauma in the emergency department: a sociotechnical analysis. J Biomed Inform. 2013;46(5):905–913. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2013.07.005
19.
KuoDZHoutrowAJ; Council on Children With Disabilities. Recognition and management of medical complexity. Pediatrics. 2016;138(6):e20163021. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-3021
20.
Rivera-SepulvedaAMaulTDongK, et al.Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the pediatric emergency department flow. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2023;17:e83. doi:10.1017/dmp.2021.355
21.
Lumba-BrownAYeatesKOSarmientoK, et al.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline on the diagnosis and management of mild traumatic brain injury among children. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(11):e182853. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2853
22.
BairdAKibbeBLesandriniJ. Stakeholder bias in best practice advisories: an ethical perspective. JAMIA Open. 2020;3(2):142–145. doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa018
23.
BlackwellCDGorelickMHolmesJFBandyopadhyaySKuppermannN. Pediatric head trauma: changes in use of computed tomography in emergency departments in the United States over time. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(3):320–324. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.09.025
24.
MenochMJAHirshDAKhanNSSimonHKSturmJJ. Trends in computed tomography utilization in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 2012;129(3):e690–e697. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2548
25.
NigrovicLEStackAMMannixRC, et al.Quality improvement effort to reduce cranial CTs for children with minor blunt head trauma. Pediatrics. 2015;136(1):e227–e233. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-3588
26.
JenningsRMBurtnerJJPellicerJF, et al.Reducing head CT use for children with head injuries in a community emergency department. Pediatrics. 2017;139(4):e20161349. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1349
27.
EngineerRSPodolskySRFertelBS, et al.A pilot study to reduce computed tomography utilization for pediatric mild head injury in the emergency department using a clinical decision support tool and a structured parent discussion tool. Pediatr Emer Care. 2021;37(12):e1670–e1674. doi:10.1097/PEC.0000000000001501
28.
AtabakiSMJacobsBRBrownKM, et al.Quality improvement in pediatric head trauma with PECARN rules implementation as computerized decision support. Pediatric Quality & Safety. 2017;2(3):e019. doi:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000019
29.
BallardDWKuppermannNVinsonDR, et al.Implementation of a clinical decision support system for children with minor blunt head trauma who are at nonnegligible risk for traumatic brain injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;73(5):440–451. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.11.011
30.
SavioliGCeresaIFPiccioniA, et al.Pediatric head trauma algorithm for head CT decision-making in the emergency department. J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2025;5(1):19. doi:10.1186/s44158-025-00238-x
31.
AbreuPForteDCorreiaMMatosMSagarribayA. Mild head trauma in a pediatric hospital: analysis of the PECARN rule, traumatic lesions on head CT and functional sequelae. Pediatr Neurosurg. Published online July 21, 2025:1–14. doi:10.1159/000547384
32.
Arredondo MonteroJPérez RiverosBPMartín-CalvoN. Diagnostic performance of total platelet count, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio for overall and complicated pediatric acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). Published online April 14, 2023:sur.2023.013. doi:10.1089/sur.2023.013
33.
LesykNKirklandSWVilla-RoelC, et al.Interventions to reduce imaging in children with minor traumatic head injury: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2024;154(6):e2024066955. doi:10.1542/peds.2024-066955
34.
NigrovicLESchunkJEFoersterA, et al.The effect of observation on cranial computed tomography utilization for children after blunt head trauma. Pediatrics. 2011;127(6):1067–1073. doi:10.1542/peds.2010-3373
35.
HamiltonMMrazikMJohnsonDW. Incidence of delayed intracranial hemorrhage in children after uncomplicated minor head injuries. Pediatrics. 2010;126(1):e33–e39. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0692
36.
MigliorettiDLJohnsonEWilliamsA, et al.The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(8):700. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.311
37.
BursteinBUptonJEMTerraHFNeumanMI. Use of CT for head trauma: 2007-2015. Pediatrics. 2018;142(4):e20180814. doi:10.1542/peds.2018-0814
38.
PuffenbargerMSAhmadFAArgentM, et al.Reduction of computed tomography use for pediatric closed head injury evaluation at a nonpediatric community emergency department. Alpern E, ed. Acad Emerg Med. 2019;26(7):784–795. doi:10.1111/acem.13666
39.
WindhamAKWhittedMBrimhallB, et al.Adherence to choosing wisely campaign guidelines at three health systems. Am J Clin Pathol. 2021;156(Supplement_1):S119–S119. doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqab191.254
40.
DeoNJohnsonEKancharlaKO’HoroJCKashyapR. Instant gratification as a method to promote physician practice guideline adherence: a systematic review. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e9381. doi:10.7759/cureus.9381
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
