The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of CogmedRM, a computerized, home-based working memory (WM) training program, in children with NF1.
Method:
A pre-post design was used to evaluate changes in performance-based measures of attention and WM, and parent-completed ratings of executive functioning. Children meeting eligibility criteria completed CogmedRM over 9 weeks. Primary outcomes included compliance statistics and change in attention and WM scores.
Results:
Thirty-one children (52% male; M age = 10.97 ± 2.51), aged 8-15, were screened for participation; 27 children (87%) evidenced WM difficulties and participated in CogmedRM training. On average, participants completed 19.7 out of 25 prescribed sessions, with an adherence rate of 69%. Participants demonstrated improvements in short-term memory, attention, and executive functioning (all Ps < .05).
Conclusion:
Results suggest that computerized, home-based WM training programs may be both feasible and efficacious for children with NF1 and cognitive deficits.
AcostaMTGioiaGASilvaAJ. Neurofibromatosis type 1: new insights into neurocognitive issues. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2006;6(2):136–143.
3.
HymanSLShoresANorthKN. The nature and frequency of cognitive deficits in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Neurology. 2005;65(7):1037–1044.
4.
PayneJMHymanSLShoresEANorthKN. Assessment of executive function and attention in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: relationships between cognitive measures and real-world behavior. Child Neuropsychol. 2011;17(4):313–329.
5.
LiWCuiYKushnerSA, et al.The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor lovastatin reverses the learning and attention deficits in a mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 1. Curr Biol. 2005;15(21):1961–1967.
6.
van der VaartTPlasschaertERietmanAB, et al.Simvastatin for cognitive deficits and behavioural problems in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1-SIMCODA): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(11):1076–1083. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70227-8.
7.
HardyKKWillardVWAllenTMBonnerMJ. Working memory training in survivors of pediatric cancer: a randomized pilot study. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(8):1856–1865.
8.
HardySJHardyKKSchatzJCThompsonALMeierER. Feasibility of home-based computerized working memory training with children and adolescents with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63(9):1578–1585.
9.
BaddeleyADHitchG.Working memory. In: Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol 8. Elsevier; 1974:47–89.
10.
CowanN. Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educ Psychol Rev. 2014;26(2):197–223.
11.
GathercoleSEPickeringSJ. Working memory deficits in children with low achievements in the national curriculum at 7 years of age. Br J Educ Psychol. 2000;70(2):177–194.
12.
GathercoleSELamontEAllowayTP. Working memory in the classroom. In: Working Memory and Education. Elsevier; 2006:219–240.
13.
BeaussartM-LBarbarotSMaugerCRoyA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of executive functions in preschool and school-age children with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018;24(9):977–994.
14.
KlingbergTFernellEOlesenPJ, et al.Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD-A randomized, controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005;44(2):177–186. doi:10.1097/00004583-200502000-00010
15.
KlingbergTForssbergHWesterbergH. Training of working memory in children with ADHD. J Clin Exper Neuropsychol. 2002;24(6):781–791. doi:10.1076/jcen.24.6.781.8395.
16.
CorteseSFerrinMBrandeisD, et al.Cognitive training for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: meta-analysis of clinical and neuropsychological outcomes from randomized controlled trials. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;54(3):164–174.
17.
RapportMDOrbanSAKoflerMJFriedmanLM. Do programs designed to train working memory, other executive functions, and attention benefit children with ADHD? A meta-analytic review of cognitive, academic, and behavioral outcomes. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33(8):1237–1252.
18.
Sonuga-BarkeEJBrandeisDCorteseS, et al.Nonpharmacological interventions for ADHD: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of dietary and psychological treatments. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170(3):275–289.
19.
ChackoABedardACMarksDJ, et al.A randomized clinical trial of Cogmed working memory training in school-age children with ADHD: A replication in a diverse sample using a control condition. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014;55(3):247–255.
20.
Melby-LervaagMHulmeC. Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Dev Psychol. 2013;49(2):270.
21.
Spencer-SmithMKlingbergT. Benefits of a working memory training program for inattention in daily life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0119522.
22.
MurisPRoodenrijsDKelgtermansL, et al.No medication for my child! A naturalistic study on the treatment preferences for and effects of Cogmed working memory training versus psychostimulant medication in clinically referred youth with ADHD. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev.2018;49(6):974–992.
23.
PrideNAPayneJMNorthKN. The impact of ADHD on the cognitive and academic functioning of children with NF1. Dev Neuropsychol. 2012;37(7):590–600.
24.
RosserTLPackerRJ. Neurocognitive dysfunction in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2003;3(2):129–136.
25.
PotvinDHardyKKWalshKS. The relation between ADHD and cognitive profiles of children with NF1. J Pediatr Neuropsychol. 2015;1(1):42–49. doi:10.1007/s40817-015-0007-3
26.
WechslerD. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). Psychological Corporation; 1999.
27.
WechslerD. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. SpringerReference; 2004. doi:10.1007/springerreference_184296.
28.
AchenbachTMRescorlaLA. Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles: An Integrated System of Multi-informant Assessment. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families; 2001.
MaruffPThomasECysiqueL, et al.Validity of the CogState brief battery: Relationship to standardized tests and sensitivity to cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, and AIDS dementia complex. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;24(2):165–178.
31.
YonchevaYNHardyKKLurieDJ, et al.Computerized cognitive training for children with neurofibromatosis type 1: A pilot resting-state fMRI study. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2017;266:53–58.
32.
CheluneGJFranklinRD. Assessing reliable neuropsychological change. In: Prediction in Forensic and Neuropsychology: Sound Statistical Practices. 2003:123–147.
33.
ConklinHMOggRJAshfordJM, et al.Computerized cognitive training for amelioration of cognitive late effects among childhood cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(33):3894–3902. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6672.
34.
BergerEMFehrEHermesHSchunkDWinkelK. The Impact of Working Memory Training on Children’s Cognitive and Noncognitive Skills. Social Science Research Network; 2020. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3622985.
35.
CoxLEAshfordJMClarkKN, et al.Feasibility and acceptability of a remotely administered computerized intervention to address cognitive late effects among childhood cancer survivors. Neuro-Oncol Pract. 2015;2(2):78–87. doi:10.1093/nop/npu036.
36.
PatelSKKatzERRichardsonRRimmerMKilianS. Cognitive and problem solving training in children with cancer: a pilot project. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2009;31(9):670–677.
37.
PayneJMBartonBUllrichNJ, et al.Randomized placebo-controlled study of lovastatin in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Neurology. 2016;87(24):2575–2584. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003435.
38.
BrownJAEmnettRJWhiteCR, et al.Reduced striatal dopamine underlies the attention system dysfunction in neurofibromatosis-1 mutant mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(22):4515–4528.
McNabFVarroneAFardeL, et al.Changes in cortical dopamine D1 receptor binding associated with cognitive training. Science. 2009;323(5915):800–802. doi:10.1126/science.1166102.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
