Academic Merit,Promotion,and Journal Peer Reviewing: The Role of Academic Institutions In Providing Proper Recognition

Rennie D. , Flanagin A. , Godlee F. , Smith J. Sixth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, September 2009. Call for Research. JAMA. 2007 ;298:2420-2421.

Rennie D. Guarding the guardians: a conference on editorial peer review. JAMA. 1986;256:2391-2392.

Rennie D. , Knoll E. , Flanagin A. The international congress on peer review in biomedical publication . JAMA. 1989;261:749.

Guarding the guardians: research on editorial peer review: selected proceedings from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. JAMA. 1990;263:1317-1441.

Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: papers from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication (sponsored by the American Medical Association). Chicago, Illinois: Council of Biology Editors; 1991.

Rennie D. , Flanagin A. The Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication . JAMA. 1994;272:91.

Rennie D. , Flanagin A. Peer review in Prague. The International Congress on Biomedical Peer Review and Global Communications, 1997. JAMA. 1995 ;274:986-987.

Third International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication . JAMA. 1998;280:203-306.

Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. JAMA. 2002;287:2759-2871.

Rennie D. Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication . JAMA. 2002;287:2759-2760.

Rennie D. , Flanagin A. , Smith R. , Smith J. Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication: call for research. JAMA. 2003;289:1438.

The PLoS Medicine Editors. Peer review in PLOS Medicine. PLos Med. 2007 ;4:e58.

Burnham JC The evolution of editorial peer review. JAMA. 1990; 263:1323-1329.

Spier R. The history of the peer-review process. Trends Biotechnol . 2002;20:357-358.

Lock S. A. Difficult Balance. Philadelphia: ISI Press ; 1986.

Stamps AE III, ed. Advances in peer review research. Sci Eng Ethics. 1997 ;3:3-98.

Wessely S. What do we know about peer review? Psychol Med. 1996;26:883-886.

Brumback RA Success at publishing in biomedical journals: hints from a journal editor. J Child Neurol. 2009;24:370-378.

Rip A. Commentary: peer review is alive and well in the United States. Sci Technol Human Values. 1985;10:82-86.

Gregory AT Peer review: where science meets the arts of war, politics and ancient history . Med J Aust. 2007;187:684.

Hoppin FG Jr. How I review an original scientific article. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:1019-1023.

Peters D. , Ceci S. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: the fate of published articles submitted again. Behav Brain Sci. 1982;5:187-255.

Mahawar KK , Kejariwal D. , Malviya A. , Birla R. , Viswanath YKS. Peer review practices in biomedical literature: a time for change ? Asian J Surg. 2009;32:240-246.

Hawkey M. Joys, frustrations and concerns of a journal peer reviewer. J Nurs Manag. 2001;9:65-66.

Isaacs D. Who teaches the referee? J Paediatr Child Health. 2004; 40:397-398.

McCrory P. To review or not to review, that is the question. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36:80-81.

Jefferson T. , Rudin M. , Brodney Folse S. , Davidoff F. Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2: MR000016.

Dickstein K. The plight of the peer reviewer. Eur Heart J. 2002; 23:172.

Editorial. Why review? Nat Med. 2007;13:887.

Clausen T. , Nielsen OB Reviewing should be shown in publication list. Nature . 2003;421:689.

Dominiczak MH Funding should recognize the value of peer review. Nature. 2003;421:111.

vanLoon AJ Peer review: recognition via year-end statements. Nature. 2003;423:116.

Connerade JP Scandals stem from the low priority of peer review. Nature. 2004;427:196.

Adam D. , Knight J. Publish, and be damned Nature. 2002 ; 419:772-776.

No Authors Listed. The pitfalls and rewards of peer review . Lancet. 2008;371:447.