The internal reliability and validity of the Aggregate Neurobehavioral Student Health and Educational Review parent’s questionnaire (ANSER-PQ) were evaluated. Three diagnostic groups participated: (1) attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; N = 100), (2) learning disability (N = 80), and (3) a combined group (N-100). The Conners’ parent and teacher rating scales were completed. Seven clusters were derived as follows: conduct, anxiety, social, attention and activity, strengths, obsessive—compulsive, and distress and disruption. Internal reliability was found above 0.7 for 6 of the clusters. Concurrent validity was found highly significant for the clusters of conduct and attention and activity. Discriminant validity of these clusters was found acceptable for the attention and learning disability groups. The clusters of conduct, attention and activity, and distress and disruption were found to significantly correlate with the Conners’ teacher scale. The ANSER-PQ may be employed for the assessment of children with attention or learning disabilities.
American Psychiatric Association .The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatric Disorders (DSM-IV). 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
2.
Greenhill LL , Pliszka S., Dulcan MK, et al. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.Practice parameter for the use of stimulant medications in children, adolescents, and adults. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41(2 suppl): 4s-25s.
3.
American Academy of Pediatrics.Committee on Quality Improvement and Subcommittee on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics. 2000;105(5):1158-1170.
Snyder SM, Hall JR, Cornwell SLReview of clinical validation of ADHD behavior rating scales. Psychol Rep. 2006;99(2): 363-378.
6.
Bloom B., Cohen RASummary health statistics for U.S. children: National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Vital Health Stat-10. 2007;234:1-79.
7.
Rodriguez A. , Jaervelin MR, Obel C., et al. Do inattention and hyperactivity symptoms equal scholastic impairment? Evidence from threeEuropean cohorts. BMC Public Health. 2007 ;7(147):327-340.
8.
Crawford SG, Kaplan BT, Dewey D.Effects of coexisting disorders on cognition and behavior in children with ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2006;10(2):192-199.
9.
Edwards MC, Schulz EG, Chelonis J., Gardner E., Philyaw A., Young J.Estimates of the validity and utility of unsctructured clinical observations of children in the assessment of ADHD. Clin Pediatr. 2005;44(1):49-56.
10.
Biederman J. , Faraone SV, Monuteaux MC, Grossbard JRHow informative are parent reports of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms for assessing outcome in clinical trials of long-acting treatments? A pooled analysis of parents’ and teachers’ reports . Pediatrics . 2004;113(6):1667-1671.
11.
Levine MDThe ANSER System (Aggregate Neurobehavioral Student Health and Educational Review). Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service;1984.
12.
Schmidt SL, Snyder TJ, Rouget AC, Gray E.Empirical analysis of the selective attention and associated behavior checklists of the Aggregate Neurobehavioral Student Health and Educational Review. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2000;21(3):165-171.
13.
Biederman JM , Mick E., Faraone SV, et al. Influence of gender on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children referred to a psychiatric clinic. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 ;159(1):36-42.
Goyette CH, Conners CK, Ulrich RFNormal data on revised Conners Parent and Teachers Rating Scales. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1978;6(2):221-236.
16.
Gianarris WJ , Golden CJ, Greene L.The Conners’ parent rating scales: a critical review of the literature. Clinic Pschol Rev. 2001;21(7):1061-1093.
17.
Tirosh E., Berger J., Cohen-Ophir M., Davidovitch M., Cohen A.Learning Disabilities with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: parents’ and teachers’ perspectives. J Child Neurol . 1998;13(6):270-276.
18.
Shalem Z., Lachman D.Diagnostic Battery for Reading Process in the Hebrew Language. Tel Aviv, Israel: Nitzan; 1998.
Steele RG, Aylward BSThe use of cluster analytic techniques in developmental and behavioral pediatric research. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2007 ;28(4):327-329.
21.
Lahey BB, Pelham WE, Loney J., Lee SS, Willcutt E. Instability of the DSM IV subtypes of ADHD from preschool through elementary school. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 ;62(8):695-702.
22.
Decker SL, McIntosh DE, Kelly AM, Nicholls SK, Dean RSComorbidity among individuals classified with attention disorders . Int J Neurosci. 2001;110(1-2):43-54.
23.
Lewis RJAn introduction to classification and regression tree (CART) analysis . Proceedings of The Annual Meeting of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. San Francisco, CA; 2000.
24.
Therneau T., Atkinson E.An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning Using the RPART Routine . Technical Report 61, Mayo Clinic, Section of Statistics ; 1997.
25.
SAS/STATUser’s Guide, Version 9.2, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.2007 .
26.
Frazier TW, Youngstrom EAEvidence-based assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Using multiple sources of information. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry . 2006; 45(5):614-620.
27.
Achenbach TM , Ruffle TMThe Child Behavior Checklist and related forms of assessing behavioral/emotional problems and competencies . Pediatr Rev. 2000;21(8):265-271.
28.
Morgan GA, Gliner J., Harmon RJMeasurement validity. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry.2001;40(6):729-731.
29.
Martinussen R., Tannock R.Working memory impairments in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder with and without comorbid learning disorders. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006;28(7):1073-1094.
