Damer TEAttacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-free Arguments. 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadworth Cengage Learning; 2009.
3.
Rossner M., Van Epps H., Hill E.Show me the data. J Cell Biol. 2007;179:1091-1092.
4.
Rossner M., Van Epps H., Hill E.Irreproducible results: a response to Thomson Scientific. J Cell Biol. 2008;180:254-255.
5.
The PLoS Medicine Editors.The impact factor game: it is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS Med.2006;3:e291.
6.
Hernán MAEpidemiologists (of all people) should question journal impact factors. Epidemiology. 2008;19:366-368.
7.
Porta M., Álvarez-Dardet C.How come scientists uncritically adopt and embody Thomson's bibliographic impact factor?Epidemiology. 2008;19:370-371.
8.
Adam D.The counting house. Nature. 2002;415:726-729.
9.
Agrawal AACorruption of journal impact factors. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20:157.
10.
Amin M., Mabe MAImpact factors: use and abuse. Perpectives in Publishing. 2000;1:1-6.
11.
Brown H.How impact factors changed medical publishing- and science. BMJ. 2007;334:561-564. [Web site responses available at: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/334/7593/561 .]
12.
Campanario JM, González L.Journal self-citations that contribute to the impact factor: documents labeled "editorial material" in journals covered by the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics. 2006;69:365-386.
13.
Citation data: the wrong impact?Nat Neurosci . 1998;1: 641-642.
14.
Colquhoun D.Challenging the tyranny of impact factors. Nature. 2003;423:479.
15.
DeMaria ANA report card for journals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:952-953.
Falagas ME, Zouglakis GM, Papastamataki PATrends in the impact factor of scientific journals. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:1401-1402.
18.
Frank M.Impact factors: arbiter of excellence? J Med Libr Assoc. 2003;91:4-6.
19.
Golubic R., Rudes M., Kovacic N., Marusic M., Marusic A.Calculating impact factor: how bibliographical classification of journal items affects the impact factor of large and small journals. Sci Eng Ethics. 2008;14:41-49.
20.
Greenwood DCReliability of journal impact factor rankings . BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:48-53.
21.
Ha TC, Tan SB, Soo KCThe journal impact factor: too much of an impact? Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2006;35: 911-916.
22.
Hecht F., Hecht BK, Sandberg AAThe journal "impact factor": a misnamed, misleading, misused measure. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1998;104:77-81.
23.
Holden G., Rosenberg G., Barker K., Onghena P.An assessment of the predictive validity of impact factor scores: implications for academic employment decisions in social work. Res Soc Work Pract. 2006;16:613-624.
24.
Lawrence PAThe mismeasurement of science. Curr Biol. 2007;17:R583-R585.
25.
Liu SVHwang's retracted publication still contributes to Science's impact factor . Scientific Ethics2007;2:44-45.
26.
Mart T.Counting papers. Symmetry. 2006;3:8-9.
27.
Moed HF, van Leeuwen TNImpact factors can mislead. Nature. 1996;381:186.
28.
Not-so-deep impact. Nature. 2005;435:1003-1004.
29.
Ogden TL, Bartley DLThe ups and downs of journal impact factors. Ann Occup Hyg . 2008;52:72-82.
30.
Pfeiger MP, Snodgrass GLThe continued use of retracted, invalid scientific literature. JAMA. 1990;263:1420-1423.
31.
Roussakis AG, Stamatelopoulos A., Balaka C.What does impact factor depend upon? J BUON. 2007;12:415-418.
32.
Seglen POWhy the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research . BMJ. 1997;314:498-502.
33.
Smith R.Beware the tyranny of impact factors. J Bone Joint Surg Br . 2008;90:125-126.
34.
Smoller BRImpact factor: certainly a factor, but just whom does it impact? Important lessons from another discipline. J Cutan Pathol. 2006;33:458-461.
35.
Walter G., Bloch S., Hunt G., Fisher K.Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality. Med J Aust. 2003;178:280-281.
36.
Wilson AEJournal impact factors are inflated. BioScience. 2007;57:550-551.
37.
Monastersky R.The number that's devouring science. Chron High Educ. 2005(Oct 14);52:A12-A17.
38.
Szklo M.Impact factor good reasons for concern. Epidemiology. 2008;19:369.
39.
Begley S.Science journals artfully try to boost their rankings. Wall St J (East Ed). 2006(June 5); B1.
40.
Jiménez-Contreras E., López-Cózar ED, Ruiz-Pérez R., Fernández VMImpact-factor rewards affect Spanish research . Nature. 2002;417:898.
Russell-Edu W.The impact factor: your job may depend on it-but do you know what it is?CancerFutures2003;2: 171-175.
43.
Maunder RGUsing publication statistics for evaluation in academic psychiatry. Can J Psychiatry. 2007;52:790-797.
44.
Wilcox AJRise and fall of the Thomson impact factor. Epidemiology. 2008;19:373-374.
45.
Kaltenborn KF, Kuhn K.The journal impact factor as a parameter for the evaluation of researchers and research. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2004;96:460-476.
46.
Weigel RJ, Dracon G., Radhakrishnan R., Rho Y., Sevgen F., Dafoe DCIncentive systems for academic productivity in a department of surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:300-307.
47.
Briggs J.Editorial. Geogr J. 2008;174:3-4.
48.
Rovner SLThe import of impact. Chem Eng News. 2008 (May 19);86:39-42.
49.
Johnston R.On structuring subjective judgements: originality, significance and rigour in RAE2008. High Educ Quarterly. 2008; 62:120-147.
50.
Happell B.`Ding dong the witch is dead!' the demise of the research quality framework . Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2008;17:83-84.